Site Notices
10/24/2014 2:42:22 PM
Page:  / 5
Next Page  
Author
Message
Vonbongo
Hey watch this!
Offline
Posts: 496
Feedback: 100% (42)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 2:24:50 PM
Originally Posted By Blaculo:
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/clip/4254274



proof that is is about tax revenue not lives or the constitution.
John 3:16
rara1141
Member
Offline
Posts: 1893
Feedback: 100% (10)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 2:26:26 PM
Originally Posted By ka-tetof1:
look at how big the Tobacco companies were and how they couldn't do anything to stop what has happened.

.


Tobacco is not in the constitution. Guns are.
POLYTHENEPAM
Offline
Posts: 13228
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 2:27:53 PM
Originally Posted By StretchMaK:
Originally Posted By BuckeyeDoc:
She is one person, against how many million gun owners?

Tell me again how this country is supposed to work?




Have you forgotten about Obama Care already? You know, the bill that 70% of the US population or "We The People" did not want. They do not care about what "we" think.


Have you forgotten about the results of the 2010 election?
You can be sure that the politicians haven't. They may not give a damn about what people think, but how they vote is of very great concern to them.
VA-gunnut
Because I said so, that's why!
Instructor
Offline
Posts: 44749
Feedback: 100% (7)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 2:29:29 PM
I keep saying, let them go full retard with their wish lists.

The higher they reach, the greater chance of falling.
"Site Staff remembers when you could buy a keg of musket balls for $1.75"

I'm never wrong. I thought I was once, but I was mistaken.
SirSqueeboo
2012 Cockpocalypse Survivor
NRA
Offline
Posts: 13879
Feedback: 100% (57)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 2:41:18 PM
Well I guess my xmas wish didn't come true...she doesn't have Ebola.
It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on personal freedom is what it is ok. Keep that in mind at all times.

-Bill Hicks
moose-hunter
Rule #2: Double Tap!!
Offline
Posts: 1923
Feedback: 100% (69)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 2:42:43 PM
Originally Posted By felrom:
Make a letter for D's and a letter for R's, and start sending them.


I have my "R" letter(s) done and in route as we speak. Alas, I fear the "D" letter will fall on deaf ears and closed minds.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
SpankD
Offline
Posts: 1980
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 2:52:23 PM
The real question is, if they came for your guns, via NFA or str8 confiscation. Would you fight for your right by whatever means necessary? I imagine the answers most here would give would make you lose hope as I think most would tuck tail and register / give up their property.
JAGERBOMBER
Member
Offline
Posts: 1249
Feedback: 100% (47)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 2:57:01 PM
Originally Posted By RDak:
Originally Posted By pivoproseem:
Stupid bitch can't even get the act straight. "Federal Firearms Act"...bwahahahaahaha. dumbass.


She also said "there is this little thing you can buy for real cheap to make all those AR's full auto".

For the younger members............this is how she acted during the first AWB.

Total anti-gun, hypocritical, lying DOUCHE BAG!!


DIAS.
Romney or Commie... whys that so hard to figure out?
NoloContendere
Of Counsel
NRA
Offline
Posts: 12937
Feedback: 100% (10)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 3:07:38 PM
Originally Posted By JAGERBOMBER:
Originally Posted By RDak:
Originally Posted By pivoproseem:
Stupid bitch can't even get the act straight. "Federal Firearms Act"...bwahahahaahaha. dumbass.


She also said "there is this little thing you can buy for real cheap to make all those AR's full auto".

For the younger members............this is how she acted during the first AWB.

Total anti-gun, hypocritical, lying DOUCHE BAG!!


DIAS.


Shoestring
The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would steal them away.
Ronald Reagan
VA-gunnut
Because I said so, that's why!
Instructor
Offline
Posts: 44759
Feedback: 100% (7)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 3:14:52 PM

Originally Posted By SpankD:
The real question is, if they came for your guns, via NFA or str8 confiscation. Would you fight for your right by whatever means necessary? I imagine the answers most here would give would make you lose hope as I think most would tuck tail and register / give up their property.

While I would not support adding semi-auto rifles to the NFA, quite a few of us here already have NFA items.
"Site Staff remembers when you could buy a keg of musket balls for $1.75"

I'm never wrong. I thought I was once, but I was mistaken.
Dukota
Offline
Posts: 4398
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 3:27:17 PM
Fuck her with chuckle shumers old shriveled up dick.
bigstick61
Extreme Conservative Arch-Liberal
Offline
Posts: 12950
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 3:27:52 PM
Originally Posted By WhirlyGirl45:
Originally Posted By RDak:
Originally Posted By WhirlyGirl45:

............

And there it is! its okay for her...and the 'right' people to be armed...not for the rabble.


Yup.


Man that pisses me off...talk about an aristocracy right here in the US...the founding fathers must be spinning in their graves at 90,000 RPM's.


I also find her actions to be upsetting, but the Founders were pretty much all aristocrats/elitists, which was a good thing. The folks who have wanted to disarm the people the most have been the egalitarians.
The finest opportunity ever given to the world was thrown away because the passion for equality made vain the hope for freedom.

-Lord Acton
cobra-ak
Fan of the Krinkov
Offline
Posts: 18120
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 3:34:50 PM
[Last Edit: 12/25/2012 3:36:19 PM by cobra-ak]
Originally Posted By rara1141:
Originally Posted By ka-tetof1:
look at how big the Tobacco companies were and how they couldn't do anything to stop what has happened.

.


Tobacco is not in the constitution. Guns are.
There are no laws saying you cannot smoke, just restrcitions on areas where you can smoke, and by the way the tobacco companies own the Feds more than the NRA could ever imagine to lobby

The Eastern diamond rattlesnake was the symbol of the American Revolution. The Gadsden flag is a historic American flag with it's yellow field depicting a rattlesnake coiled and ready to strike and with the words underneath "DON'T TREAD ON ME".
POLYTHENEPAM
Offline
Posts: 13231
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 3:37:34 PM
Originally Posted By NoloContendere:
Shoestring


I sold all my shoestrings on the gray market.
bigstick61
Extreme Conservative Arch-Liberal
Offline
Posts: 12951
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 3:45:05 PM
Originally Posted By rara1141:
Originally Posted By ka-tetof1:
look at how big the Tobacco companies were and how they couldn't do anything to stop what has happened.

.


Tobacco is not in the constitution. Guns are.


I really hate this sort of statement, but it is a popular one used to justify all sorts of government intrusions and regulations.

Most of our rights are not listed in the constitution, and the constitution says that that lack of complete enumeration (which wouldn't be possible or needed in a constitution) does not mean that those rights are not retained by the people.

Even if that wasn't true, the Constitution does not grant Congress the power to pass laws regarding tobacco aside from taxes and laws ensuring that interstate commerce is not obstructed/remains uniform (as opposed to a State banning importation from another State) and governing international commerce. With guns, even without the second amendment there is no power to restrict what kinds of guns people can own granted to Congress.
The finest opportunity ever given to the world was thrown away because the passion for equality made vain the hope for freedom.

-Lord Acton
zband
Offline
Posts: 416
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 3:50:29 PM
I see this move in a different way.

To me, to include AR15 in the NFA, signals that there isn't the interest in the Senate or House to pass her ban (banning the grandfathering, transfer of AR's).

Unfortunately, I can see more congressional support for NFA registration (IMO =easy confiscation or future ban).

Amazing how these democrat buckets of sewage have turned the "conversation " from guns to increasing the scope of the feds(registration) and taxes (tax stamp).

Spectre210
Offline
Posts: 678
Feedback: 100% (5)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 4:04:55 PM
I am already considering a lawsuit against BATFE. . .

I wonder what would happen if even 1/3 of the gun owners in the U.S. simultaneously sued the BATFE, for a wide variety of claims so they couldn't be consolidated. The fucks are already using our money against us, if they could be made to waste it defending themselves instead of wasting it to fuck with gun owners I would consider that a victory.

On a related note, that's the only feasible way I can think of to stop all the crooked fucking politicians too; get a coalition together to build a financial base and start sueing them (individually) out of existance one at a time. The same tactic the fucking gov't uses on us. If done properly they wouldn't have governmental immunity to fall back on and they would have to use personal funds to defend themselves. You don't have to win...just destroy the fuckers lives as a warning to the rest. You know, the way they do their "subjects."
jal777
Offline
Posts: 1038
Feedback: 100% (12)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 4:57:15 PM
[Last Edit: 12/25/2012 4:59:03 PM by jal777]
Ladies and gentlemen. If they can get away with this they will find the way to put handguns and shotguns on the NFA registry. For all your wet dreamers, they are NOT going to let you register anything full auto. They will come up with a new category named "assault weapon" or simply thrown them in with destructive devices. Then they will include handguns and shotguns when the time is right, eventually leading to their ultimate goal which is confiscation. We can't allow this shit to happen!
Kubota3430
Member
Online
Posts: 1528
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 4:59:50 PM
That worthless stupid bitch!!!

I did not read through 5 pages of bitchin' about the bitch.

If she somehow gets EBR's as an NFA item, and we are not charged the $200, through some sort of grandfather clause think about this. Not being grandfathered it would not pass, IMHO. Also IMHO grandfather laws suck, they do that shit so people won't fight against a bill so much.

You need a trust, money out of your pocket
the fed's would know where and what you have, makes for easier pick up later on
it won't solve any gun crime, the asshole's steal the guns anyway
getchevyn
Member
Offline
Posts: 1376
Feedback: 100% (18)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 5:23:51 PM
Originally Posted By Freezeland:
Originally Posted By Blaculo:
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/clip/4254274



I do not agree that they should be put under the NFA, but if they did it then it wouldn't be an AWB. Can you imagine the backlog at NFA Branch this would cause though, fuck me to death....



Wow. That sucks for the new people. But I got 2 already and my 3rd coming in 2 weeks.
damcv62
Member
Offline
Posts: 48832
Feedback: 100% (73)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 5:27:43 PM
That would blow. Guess I'd be set though, currently I've only got NFA AR's.
tlcman
Offline
Posts: 91
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 5:29:12 PM
Evey time that bagel munching Communist opens her mouth I want to puke all over the TV screen.

She has most definitely overplayed her hand with her lies and clever personal motives.
intercooler
Offline
Posts: 181
Feedback: 100% (6)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 5:30:08 PM
Originally Posted By spartacus2002:
A week ago I predicted this is what tehy would do...

from The Official AWB Speculation thread, 19 Dec:

My predictions:

1. Ban on production/sale of new rifle or pistol mags over 10rd capacity to non-LEO/.gov.

2. Possible ban on possession of any rifle or pistol mag over 10rd capacity for non-LEO/.gov. i.e., NO GRANDFATHERING.

3. Addition of "semi-automatic centerfire rifles with a magazine capacity over 10 rds or capable of accepting a detachable magazine" to the NFA registry. Passes constitutional muster under Heller. Current ownership can be registered online within 30 days and the $200 fee waived because the regime will WANT that list of current owners. There will be massive noncompliance. Expect a minimum prison sentence of 5 years and a bounty on turning in someone in possession of an unregistered "assault rifle". Future purchase/transfer will take 24 months for the limited number of NFA Branch clerks to process the paperwork, killing the market.


in Nj this would ban any ar or ak outright because the state bans all NFA items. so there would be a challenge here as the AR15 is in comon use...they would have to make some clause here in NJ due to this and then it would make 30rd mags legal for me as any registered assault weapon owner can buy and posses ...
tlcman
Offline
Posts: 92
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 5:30:53 PM
Originally Posted By 98_1LE:
The "gun show loophole" is ignorant liberal for forcing all private sales through an FFL.

What we need is a federally mandated program for concealed carry that is a copy of the drivers license model that already has proven to work. State issued licenses, federally mandated to be recognized in all 50.



And what that logic amounts to is streamlining the registry....no way.....the 2nd amendment is over regulated to the max as it is.
hyperjoe
Offline
Posts: 124
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 5:33:13 PM
hate to say it, but this is feminism which we are battling now. It is an accumulative dose of women reaching "equality" or a perceived shift in power and now they need to "take away the toys from the children".
mongolikebeans
Offline
Posts: 111
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 5:42:53 PM
Look, WHATEVER THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT IS NOT WHAT THEY ARE PLANNING TO DO!
Fighter before thefight" I plan on taking it to the ground as fast as possible and submitting my opponent"
That means he is going to try to knock him the f*** out.
If they are talking about registration and NFA, that means they are probably planning a mental health firearms card as defined by a obamacare specialist.

"Tell me about the time your dog ran away and how it made you feel"
Sleepy1988
Offline
Posts: 8862
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 5:44:20 PM
Oh, gee, wasn't there a rumor floating around that the Obama admin wanted to do this before Newtown? We're being played.
hyperjoe
Offline
Posts: 125
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 5:49:15 PM
[Last Edit: 12/25/2012 5:50:32 PM by hyperjoe]

Originally Posted By dayphotog:
will she ban barrel shrouds?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rGpykAX1fo


"It's a shoulder thing that goes up"

polymer4me
A sinner saved by Grace
Offline
Posts: 1446
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 6:20:16 PM
Originally Posted By Spectre210:
I am already considering a lawsuit against BATFE. . .

I wonder what would happen if even 1/3 of the gun owners in the U.S. simultaneously sued the BATFE, for a wide variety of claims so they couldn't be consolidated. The fucks are already using our money against us, if they could be made to waste it defending themselves instead of wasting it to fuck with gun owners I would consider that a victory.

On a related note, that's the only feasible way I can think of to stop all the crooked fucking politicians too; get a coalition together to build a financial base and start sueing them (individually) out of existance one at a time. The same tactic the fucking gov't uses on us. If done properly they wouldn't have governmental immunity to fall back on and they would have to use personal funds to defend themselves. You don't have to win...just destroy the fuckers lives as a warning to the rest. You know, the way they do their "subjects."


Sounds good in theory, but in reality it will never happen. Our side is never that well organized, and they already have way too much power as it is.

Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me" - John 14:6
rxdawg
Friendly neighborhood drug dealer
Offline
Posts: 9301
Feedback: 100% (5)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 6:23:21 PM
Originally Posted By NoVaGator:
Hmmmmm maybe we can allow the manufacture of new full auto for civilians if we're going that route.


Poison pill amendment comes to mind.
Women and children can afford to be careless, but not men.
disco_jon75
Member
Military
Offline
Posts: 4523
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 6:24:48 PM
Originally Posted By POLYTHENEPAM:
Originally Posted By NoloContendere:
Shoestring


I sold all my shoestrings on the gray market.


I sold a Heavy Plasma Rifle, an Alien Grenade and a Sectoid corpse on the Gray market.
felrom
Fighting Naturalist
NRA
Offline
Posts: 2889
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 7:53:31 PM

Originally Posted By moose-hunter:
Originally Posted By felrom:
Make a letter for D's and a letter for R's, and start sending them.


I have my "R" letter(s) done and in route as we speak. Alas, I fear the "D" letter will fall on deaf ears and closed minds.

My "D" letter:

Dear Senator/Representative XXXX,

Please don't lose the senate over gun control!

The last time we passed an Assault Weapons Ban, we lost the House in the mid-terms as a direct result.

It's not worth it to let the republicans take control.

Sincerely,

xxxx

Use your imagination and come up with something similar.

Join the NRA, and donate to the NRAILA: https://www.nraila.org/get-involved-locally/secure/donate.aspx

Are you working to make a difference, or just posting on the internet? Get involved!
mongolikebeans
Offline
Posts: 115
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 8:42:41 PM
NICE!!!


My "D" letter:

Dear Senator/Representative XXXX,

Please don't lose the senate over gun control!

The last time we passed an Assault Weapons Ban, we lost the House in the mid-terms as a direct result.

It's not worth it to let the republicans take control.

Sincerely,

xxxx
Curdmugeon45
Person of Interest.
Offline
Posts: 1582
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 8:54:00 PM
Originally Posted By Ponyboy:
Honestly, congress can't even agree on how to stop the biggest tax increase in history. Do y'all really think they'll agree on something to do with guns?



Yes.

Because it's visceral and it's for the children.

Don't forget: complacency kills.
FlyingGorilla
Member
Offline
Posts: 382
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2012 9:19:20 PM
Originally Posted By Ponyboy:
If George Washington was here today he'd already be killing people.


He'd be standing in line waiting his turn behind Jefferson and Madison. They'd be going after folks like Pelosi like Viking berzerkers on an English monastery.
Arfcom: I came for the tech, I stayed for GD

Proud member Team Ranstad
Chris_C
*Voted #1 in blind taste tests.
Military
Offline
Posts: 33694
Feedback: 100% (26)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/27/2012 11:23:23 AM
Here is a good write up of what she wants...if it says it is forbidden, give it a moment..Monderno's site is getting hit on more then a deployment widow on pay day.

No amount of legislation can ever disarm evil.
http://www.marinebattleherk.com
(_@___]]~~ It is better to smoke here, than here after. Grab a cigar.
PriapusMaximus
Offline
Posts: 178
Feedback: 100% (23)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/27/2012 6:29:32 PM
Originally Posted By Tannim:
Bright side is once a gun is NFA, it's NFA.....


If this happens I'm full autoing EVERYTHING.


No you won't.

IF they make them NFA, which is a big "if", they will just create a new category of NFA.

What you are saying is no different than saying "Gee, I'm just going to make my SBR into a machinegun, because they are both NFA."

So the point is, don't give them an inch in the first place.
AcidGambit
Offline
Posts: 12390
Feedback: 100% (9)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/27/2012 6:41:41 PM
I'm not even sure BATF could deal with the logistics of that.
53gunner
Member
Military
Offline
Posts: 657
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/27/2012 7:02:02 PM
I dont think (hope) this has a chance in hell of passing but lets say it does.
They would make a new class in the NFA registry say AW or some such silly shit. They would have about a hundred million year backlog. At a certain point someone will get pissed who up till now didnt have NFA weapons. They will file all manner of legal briefs and stall the whole process more. At some point they will want a full counting of items on the NFA registries, MG's included. The feds DO NOT want to open the MG registry! If they do they would have to explain how post 86 MG's made it to the registry (Oh I dont know like how there is only supposed to be one PKM in the registry yet there are 2 transferable). There are other iffy things as well.
Long story short though, I dont think people have the will to stand up to this sort of thing once passed but I hope Im wrong
SirSqueeboo
2012 Cockpocalypse Survivor
NRA
Offline
Posts: 13887
Feedback: 100% (57)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/28/2012 9:51:33 PM
Originally Posted By AcidGambit:
I'm not even sure BATF could deal with the logistics of that.


They'll find a way.
It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on personal freedom is what it is ok. Keep that in mind at all times.

-Bill Hicks
ffsparky26
ruthlessness is a virtue
Offline
Posts: 9765
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/28/2012 9:54:03 PM
Originally Posted By rxdawg:
Originally Posted By NoVaGator:
Hmmmmm maybe we can allow the manufacture of new full auto for civilians if we're going that route.


Poison pill amendment comes to mind.


This right here. We can make all semis NFA, but they all get converted to full auto with no limit on new registrations.
Hit the gym, hit the range, hit the bag, and embrace the hate.
saigamanTX
Member
Offline
Posts: 13941
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/28/2012 9:54:53 PM
This does not have a chance in hell of passing as the bill is written. This cunt is fucking nuts.

I will say it loud and clear. I will not register my weapons and if she wants to kick a hornets nest she's kicking the biggest one she's ever seen.
I survived Acockcalypse 2012 and all I got was this lousy signature.
saigamanTX
Member
Offline
Posts: 13942
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/28/2012 10:04:33 PM
I survived Acockcalypse 2012 and all I got was this lousy signature.
mpweed
Offline
Posts: 80
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/31/2012 2:28:35 PM
[Last Edit: 12/31/2012 4:01:52 PM by mpweed]
Folks,

Please don't think that this can't pass the Congress or Supreme Court scrutiny on constitutional grounds. Most of the laws on the books right now are unconstitutional. We need to do everything we can now to convince our lawmakers to oppose this.

Consider for a moment:

1. The NFA: It is structurally no different than a Poll Tax -- a tax that must be paid in order to exercise a right. Yet the former was ruled constitutional while the latter was not. Imagine for a moment if the same rationale were applied to the First Amendment. What would people say/do if they had to file paperwork, get fingerprinted, receive permission from the government, and pay a tax before they could publish a news article or editorial? The hypocrisy is breathtaking.

2. The Health Care Affordability Act (a.k.a., Obamacare): This is a more recent but no less egregious example of how despotic the Supreme Court has become. In the ruling upholding the statute, it was remarked by the majority that it must be "construed" as a tax even though it was not characterized as such by Congress. Yet -- as most constitutional scholars will tell you -- in order for it to be a valid tax-raising law it must originate in the House of Representatives (it originated in the Senate). So even if the majority is correct in their interpretation, the law should still be null and void because it violates the Constitution's explicit procedures on raising revenue.

Clearly, the Supreme Court cannot be trusted to uphold the Constitution or the God-given rights it is supposed to recognize and bolster. Freedom diminishing acts such as this must be stopped before they become law because it is nearly impossible to stop them afterwards.

Beyond urging our lawmakers to resist this, you also need to decide how you will respond if the proposed AWB does come to pass. Will you comply or not?

I will not.

I had hoped to die in bed at an old age. I am now beginning to believe that I will be murdered by my government for defending my freedom.
Page:  / 5
Next Page