Site Notices
8/19/2014 4:57:02 PM
Page:  / 30
Author
Message
Aimless
The Hero of Cockpocalypse
Offline
Posts: 122979
Feedback: 100% (46)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 10:06:08 PM
Is it a felony? Can you make a citizen's arrest in DC? I bet I can catch him....
Don't be a victim of the Quote Tree crack down.Turn in your buddies for cash and prizes.
Hedonist
Keep shooting, my friends...
Offline
Posts: 23309
Feedback: 100% (4)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 10:10:39 PM
Arfcom should prepare for the wrath of NBC, and be on alert.

Remember, as liberals, they will not just get angry or talk - they will act in ways to punish. I just don't know if they understand who they're messing with. "Back-firing" is a very small and inadequate description of how this will blow up in their faces.

I use the Fight Club analogy "We cook your meals, we haul your trash, we connect your calls, we drive your ambulances. We guard you while you sleep. Do not... fuck with us."


SWODaddy
Offline
Posts: 132
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 10:11:56 PM
Dear NRA:

Please take all that money I sent you last week and put it towards "Wanted" ads for David Gregory - preferably running during MTP. This is a golden opportunity to drive home the enforcement issue.
pavlovwolf
Member
Offline
Posts: 10030
Feedback: 100% (7)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 10:14:34 PM
[Last Edit: 12/23/2012 10:16:04 PM by pavlovwolf]
Originally Posted By Aimless:
Is it a felony? Can you make a citizen's arrest in DC? I bet I can catch him....


If you perform a citizen's arrest , I will send a donation in your name to the Adopt a Penguin Fund through the World Wildlife Foundation.

ETA

You think I'm shitting you don't you.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CEcQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgifts.worldwildlife.org%2Fgift-center%2Fgifts%2FSpecies-Adoptions%2FEmperor-Penguin.aspx&ei=W8jXUP-XKofk8gTZsYGoDA&usg=AFQjCNHjQbs5rPGoxIPjkNwRgF7HLIhECA&bvm=bv.1355534169,d.eWU&cad=rja
Don't go ninj'in nobody that don't need ninj'in
SWODaddy
Offline
Posts: 133
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 10:15:59 PM
Originally Posted By Aimless:
Is it a felony? Can you make a citizen's arrest in DC? I bet I can catch him....


Just sit outside Sidwell Friends and notify one of the 11 armed guards when he pulls up to drop off the kiddies.
us-kiwi
Member
Offline
Posts: 4387
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 10:17:37 PM

Originally Posted By nightstalker:
Here is an excerpt from CA law. Not a violation.

(31) The loan of a large-capacity magazine for use solely as a prop for a motion picture, television, or video production.
(32) The purchase of a large-capacity magazine by the holder of a special weapons permit issued pursuant to Section 12095, 12230, 12250, 12286, or 12305, for any of the following purposes:
(A) For use solely as a prop for a motion picture, television, or video production.
(B) For export pursuant to federal regulations.
(C) For resale to law enforcement agencies, government agencies, or the military, pursuant to applicable federal regulations.
-- SeanNewton - 29 Oct 2007
CA =/= DC


Motor Racing, Mountain Climbing and Bullfighting are the only true sports. The others are simply children's games played by adults. - Ernest Hemingway
MoS #666
I don't like lube. I do like pain though, so YMMV. - BeS
superbowtie
Offline
Posts: 613
Feedback: 100% (9)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 10:19:24 PM
Kihn
Offline
Posts: 14549
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 10:21:19 PM
Originally Posted By A_Sibley:
Originally Posted By bookertbab:
Why do these assholes think reloading is such a big deal anyway. This kook reloaded many times. So what if he has to do it a few more. It only takes a few seconds. Getting rid of 30 round mags will do nothing.


Come on.

If it's not a big deal, then why are we fighting tooth and nail to avoid having neutered magazines?


Incrementalism. Start small and whittle it down. If you can get someone to accept the logic, then its just a matter of degree.

Seberius
Offline
Posts: 1435
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 10:21:21 PM
Originally Posted By us-kiwi:

Originally Posted By nightstalker:
Here is an excerpt from CA law. Not a violation.

(31) The loan of a large-capacity magazine for use solely as a prop for a motion picture, television, or video production.
(32) The purchase of a large-capacity magazine by the holder of a special weapons permit issued pursuant to Section 12095, 12230, 12250, 12286, or 12305, for any of the following purposes:
(A) For use solely as a prop for a motion picture, television, or video production.
(B) For export pursuant to federal regulations.
(C) For resale to law enforcement agencies, government agencies, or the military, pursuant to applicable federal regulations.
-- SeanNewton - 29 Oct 2007
CA =/= DC




No, see, DC is Federal, so they can enforce any state law that they want!
whiskerz
Does not need caffeine or sugar
Offline
Posts: 10546
Feedback: 100% (17)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 10:26:28 PM
Was he in dc ? Be could do a interview from any studio.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
The liberals ride the backs of dead children promoting gun control.

NRA life member .Notary public. taxpayer

Tennessee Squire,

Vote for me in 2016 ,
Seberius
Offline
Posts: 1436
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 10:35:02 PM
Originally Posted By A_Sibley:
Originally Posted By bookertbab:
Why do these assholes think reloading is such a big deal anyway. This kook reloaded many times. So what if he has to do it a few more. It only takes a few seconds. Getting rid of 30 round mags will do nothing.


Come on.

If it's not a big deal, then why are we fighting tooth and nail to avoid having neutered magazines?


It IS a big deal when you are fighting an armed assailant, or frankly anyone that intends to do you harm. If you have 2 armed people in break into your house, you are going to be very happy that you have that many rounds available without having to commit a magazine change.

Do you know when it DOESN'T matter? When you are murdering 7- 8 year old children. The shooter at VTech performed 17 mag changes during his rampage. And he was able to do so unimpeded because he was murdering unarmed college students and staff. Does anyone honestly think that if the shooter was restricted to 5 round magazines the outcome in Sandy Hook would have been much different?
FREEFALLE7
Grumpy Ranger
Military
Offline
Posts: 12731
Feedback: 100% (164)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 10:53:42 PM
Just emailed the DC police this

Gentleman,
This morning Mr Gregory was in possesion of a AR-15 magazine on national TV, which is in violation of D.C. Official Code 7-2506.01

This is a felony offense as per DC laws, see below:

"DC High Capacity Ammunition Magazines - D.C. Official Code 7-2506.01

(b) No person in the District shall possess, sell, or transfer any large capacity ammunition feeding device regardless of whether the device is attached to a firearm. For the purposes of this subsection, the term �large capacity ammunition feeding device� means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The term �large capacity ammunition feeding device� shall not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.�."

Several citizens have been prosecuted under your unconstitutional gun laws and just because he is a reporter he should not get a pass.

I do not like your laws, but if you pulled me over and I had a AR-15 mag I would go to jail and have to spend countless dollars to get my sentence reduced/stay out of jail.

Would a "I didnt know"save me???

Or can I too get permission to posses 30rd mags while in DC??

Heck no, you would throw me in jail and say..tell it to the Judge.

I ask you do one of two things:

Prosecute him
or get rid of the law

Its your duty to do the right thing, I would rather you just drop the law, but if not he needs to be held accountable.

Thanks for your time
Joe
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms
Thomas Jefferson

If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so.
- Thomas Jefferson
Sirveaux
I'M HUGE!
Offline
Posts: 2431
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 11:09:37 PM
Originally Posted By whiskerz:
Was he in dc ? Be could do a interview from any studio.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile


Meet the Press is filmed in the DC studios of WRC TV:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WRC-TV#Programs
commandowink
Offline
Posts: 735
Feedback: 100% (5)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 11:16:24 PM
Originally Posted By Iowaredneck:
Originally Posted By commandowink:
Its awesome this made it on drudge and elsewhere, hopefully something comes of it. I just wish LaPierre had pointed that out on national TV. It would have been a legendary moment on TV.


Ted would have

I signed the petition and sent it to everyone I know

HIT IT


i just signed it
bstonemega
Atoadaso!
Online
Posts: 3872
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 11:16:37 PM
Originally Posted By FREEFALLE7:
Just emailed the DC police this

Gentleman,
This morning Mr Gregory was in possesion of a AR-15 magazine on national TV, which is in violation of D.C. Official Code 7-2506.01

This is a felony offense as per DC laws, see below:

"DC High Capacity Ammunition Magazines - D.C. Official Code 7-2506.01

(b) No person in the District shall possess, sell, or transfer any large capacity ammunition feeding device regardless of whether the device is attached to a firearm. For the purposes of this subsection, the term �large capacity ammunition feeding device� means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The term �large capacity ammunition feeding device� shall not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.�."

Several citizens have been prosecuted under your unconstitutional gun laws and just because he is a reporter he should not get a pass.

I do not like your laws, but if you pulled me over and I had a AR-15 mag I would go to jail and have to spend countless dollars to get my sentence reduced/stay out of jail.

Would a "I didnt know"save me???

Or can I too get permission to posses 30rd mags while in DC??

Heck no, you would throw me in jail and say..tell it to the Judge.

I ask you do one of two things:

Prosecute him
or get rid of the law

Its your duty to do the right thing, I would rather you just drop the law, but if not he needs to be held accountable.

Thanks for your time
Joe


Very nice!

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Smart people talk about ideas, average people talk about events, stupid people talk about people.
Loremsk
I could have sworn there was an ocean here...
Military
Offline
Posts: 564
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 11:20:25 PM
Has anyone tried phoning in the report to the DC police yet?
74AKZ
Offline
Posts: 3742
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 11:21:27 PM
Originally Posted By scottedward58:
Originally Posted By johnnypantz:
Originally Posted By scottedward58:
Originally Posted By Sirveaux:
Originally Posted By Circle10:
There is a thread around here discussing cnn's Don Lemon perjuring himself on the 4473 when he purchased an ar15 in Colorado. It is something about residency. Don't know if he did, but we should check into both of this maybe.


Where's Don Lemon a resident of at all? If he's from NY now, he's probably in violation of several of their state laws, too.

Edit: Disregard. He's from Georgia, apparently. Legal for long guns. Nevermind.


It's only legal to buy long guns in neighboring states. Any other states and it has to go through a dealer in your state of residence.


Huh?


If you are a say Florida resident it is illegal to buy a gun while you are in Nevada. The only legal way to do it is like buying over the internet, you pay for it at the dealer in NV and he ships it to your local dealer in FL where you fill out the 4473 and do the background check.


That is not true and has been cleared up here before.

There is nothing in federal law about restricting long gun sales to neighboring states. A few states require it to be a neighboring state, but most don't.

Sirveaux
I'M HUGE!
Offline
Posts: 2432
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 11:24:54 PM
OODA, things may look a bit different when you log out and log back in.
DamascusKnifemaker
Ебать BHO
NRAMilitary
Offline
Posts: 7469
Feedback: 100% (8)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 11:25:25 PM
Originally Posted By Loremsk:
Has anyone tried phoning in the report to the DC police yet?


Someone in this thread posted they had phoned it into the DC gun snitch line.
This is Nevada, we don't care how you did it in California.
I'm Republican because not everyone can be on welfare.
bc5000
Member
Online
Posts: 1397
Feedback: 100% (17)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 11:26:16 PM
I doubt if the police do anything about it other then have a good chuckle, especially if his kids go to school with Obama's.
Der_Hans
Offline
Posts: 4625
Feedback: 100% (8)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 11:27:58 PM
Originally Posted By DamascusKnifemaker:
Originally Posted By Loremsk:
Has anyone tried phoning in the report to the DC police yet?


Someone in this thread posted they had phoned it into the DC gun snitch line.


And someone just blabbed about it on the Bill Cunningham show, so lets hope it gets some momentum.
tc2129
Offline
Posts: 805
Feedback: 100% (42)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 11:31:15 PM
Has anyone contacted LE or NBC about this? I say get this out to as many outlets as possible, If a law abiding person did something similar, the media would have already convicted them. Hell, Zimmerman was pretty much guilty by the media before he was taken to the police station.
I've never seen gun control issues like this before and us as gun owners and supporters of the 2nd amendment must do what he can to preserve our rights. So if that includes nailing the anti's with violation of laws, even better. We must not let up, we must show discredit to their reporting. Yes people in general wont care or the media will sweep it under a rug, but if we continue to hammer them the tide may turn
DK-Prof
PsychoPolitical Master & King of the PureSkins(TM)
NRAMilitary
Offline
Posts: 75225
Feedback: 100% (8)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 11:32:44 PM
Originally Posted By Skip237:
Originally Posted By DK-Prof:
Originally Posted By Skip237:
Originally Posted By DK-Prof:
...

My point is merely that IF (and obviously it's a big 'if") the news organization went to the police, and the police loaned them a mag for the duration of the story, and then they returned it, then the "outrage" at their flaunting of the law seems a little manufactured to me. All this "outrage" just seems petty and silly to me, as a way of nailing someone for a technicality, mostly because we don't LIKE the guy. (I'm not saying that's what you are saying, but that's the feeling that I get from a lot of posters in this thread).



No, it seems we don't all know what possession means. But many of our "conversations" get dragged down into the trivial and petty nuances so your response is no surprise...

It is kind of strange to see someone manufacture a defense for the antis and then defend them so vigorously (in this environment).

He broke the law. PERIOD. How many gun owners have lost years of their lives for petty violations and victimless crimes they weren't even aware they committed?





You've exposed me! I'm secretly Diane Feinstein's account!!!




You got caught trying to excuse the hypocrisy of the elite antis. Only for me, not for thee


Your grasping at straws is getting funnier by the moment.

I did not in any way say what you claim. I did not try to "excuse" any criminal behavior by "the elite" - nor did I at any point say or imply that my hypothetical should be any DIFFERENT if Joe Blow had borrowed a magazine from a D.C. cop (say for a magazine photo shoot, or an art project or anything like that).

In fact, I have previously given examples of a D.C. cop letting a kid shoot his duty weapon. So BY MY OWN WORDS, clearly I am not talking about something that should be okay for "the elite" but not for the average person, because the very example I gave to make my point involved a kid being allowed to shoot a gun.

So, either so are unable to read and comprehend simple English, or your argument is now so weak, that you are forced to LIE about what I have been saying.

This entire time, I have merely pointed out that IF they temporarily borrowed a magazine from law enforcement, then it does not seem to be any kind of serious crime, even though as a technicality, of course the argument could be made. Furthermore, my point has also been that no prosecutor or judge would ever take this seriously, no more than a prosecutor or judge would take someone seriously that claimed a kid should be charged with a felony, if a cop let the kid shoot his gun. My ENTIRE POINT is based on a purely hypothetical case (that may not even be true). As I have repeatedly stated - and you apparently have trouble comprehending - if it turns out that he got the magazine somewhere other than on loan from law enforcement, of course he should be charged with a crime.

I have been saying the same thing consistently, and you have been getting more and more bizarre in your desperate attempt to try to make some ludicrous point about my HYPOTHETICAL situation.

I GET the fact that you want to be as petty and silly as the antis, in some attempt to try to win the battle or propaganda and perception. But, wars of principle are NOT won by being petty and silly. Gun rights have been moving in the RIGHT direction for the past 15 years or so, and all along, WE have been principled, and THEY have been getting more and more shrill and hysterical.

If you want to adopt those tactics, knock yourself out. But please don't tell lies about what I am saying. My words in this thread are clear for anyone to read, and NOWHERE did I make the argument that (in my hypothetical case) the "temporary borrowing" should only be okay for "the elite" - in fact, I was very specific in my example of the child, that I meant the logic to apply to anyone.


Feel free to apologize for the bullshit you posted, but given your posts in this thread, I won't be holding my breath.
This isn't a democracy, it's a cheerocracy !
ohiobob
A Tired Man they see no longer cares! & it's TRUE
Offline
Posts: 13159
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 11:42:59 PM

Originally Posted By 101_proof:
9:47


I know I am late but I like how these "newscasters" or show hosts have an earpiece in and 20 guys behind a curtain telling them what questions to ask or what points to bring up
Whoever wishes to foresee the future must consult the Past
www-glock19-com
Partially destructive
Online
Posts: 39346
Feedback: 100% (55)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 11:45:11 PM

Originally Posted By DamascusKnifemaker:
Originally Posted By www-glock19-com:

Originally Posted By DK-Prof:

We're not talking about someone saying a cop GAVE it to him, and basically owning it or having it long-term I'm talking about a reporter TEMPORARILY BORROWING one for the brief time to shoot a news story and then returning it. In that hypothetical case, it's not clear that it would rise to the standard of "possesssing" that would be enough for a prosecutor or judge to gie a shit about. My point is that it wouldn't really be any different from a cop at the range letting some kid shoot his AR or something like that. Obviously that kid is not in illegal possession of an AR for the few minutes e is holding it.

The argument would become so technical that it would be pointless. If a cop had let David Gregory touch a magazine, is that a crime? What about if he left him hold it for 5 minutes? What about loaning it for 2 hours? What if a cop was AT the studio, just off-camera? I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you that TECHNICALLY a law might have been broken, but it would be in such an ambiguous way that no judge or prosecutor would care ... IF in fact we are talking about borrowing it temporarily from law enforcement.
There are people in prison for felon in possession for merely having finger prints found on a weapon they never owned, used , or even fired



How did their prints get on the weapon?

they picked it up just like Mr Gregory did with this magazine

I was just stating that in the past merely holding a item has constituted possession if the powers that be would like to pursue it
and in this case there is video to go along with it
Originally Posted By broken_reticle:

To me $300 is pretty damn cheap for sodomy insurance.
jah141
Member
Offline
Posts: 183
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 11:47:20 PM
Signed, #510
nightstalker
In for a Penny, In for a Pound
Online
Posts: 29106
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 11:51:16 PM
[Last Edit: 12/23/2012 11:52:32 PM by nightstalker]
Originally Posted By us-kiwi:

Originally Posted By nightstalker:
Here is an excerpt from CA law. Not a violation.

(31) The loan of a large-capacity magazine for use solely as a prop for a motion picture, television, or video production.
(32) The purchase of a large-capacity magazine by the holder of a special weapons permit issued pursuant to Section 12095, 12230, 12250, 12286, or 12305, for any of the following purposes:
(A) For use solely as a prop for a motion picture, television, or video production.
(B) For export pursuant to federal regulations.
(C) For resale to law enforcement agencies, government agencies, or the military, pursuant to applicable federal regulations.
-- SeanNewton - 29 Oct 2007
CA =/= DC




I know, and all Gregory meant to show was how easy it was to get one in Washington D.C.

CA legislators are the most prolific and thorough bunch of law makers on earth when it comes to guns. Not even close.

once you have paid him the Dane-geld, you never get rid of the Dane

Elections, the advance auction of stolen goods.

When words lose their meaning, a people can move neither hand nor foot.
scottedward58
Inkie
Offline
Posts: 10110
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/23/2012 11:54:51 PM
Originally Posted By Skip237:
Originally Posted By DK-Prof:
Originally Posted By Strongbow:
Originally Posted By d1jinx:
I thought the same thing . But he prob got it from local law enforcement. It looks fairly used.


Yup... that's my thought. But who knows?


That is a good point.


How is it a good point? He is in possession of a prohibited item. There is no exemption in the law because you know somebody or got it from LE.


All it proves is a cop broke the law by transferring a prohibited item and something that might be department property.
"I have a right to nothing which another has a right to take away." letter to Uriah Forrest, 1787, T. Jefferson "It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government." Thomas Paine
mcornell
Put Not Your Faith in Princes
Offline
Posts: 4984
Feedback: 100% (40)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 12:29:55 AM
Is there any evidence that the mag was functional or an actual 30 rounder (as opposed to a pinned 10 rounder)?

Unless the reporter came into the mag illegally, this is just silly.

If a reporter went to a police evidence locker to do a story about drugs and touched a baggy of drugs to set up some pictures, should the reporter go to jail for "possession".

Dollars to donuts this mag was either property of the DC police (or other law enforcement agency) and the cop was in the studio (so no one would get hurt by the dangerous mag) or it was non-functioning.
The best part of all your self-inflicted drama is how happy it makes you.. how you're deeply fulfilled to your core, and how it makes you a better human being. It's freaking inspirational. - MMcCall
bstonemega
Atoadaso!
Online
Posts: 3875
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 12:32:49 AM
Originally Posted By mcornell:
Is there any evidence that the mag was functional or an actual 30 rounder (as opposed to a pinned 10 rounder)?

Unless the reporter came into the mag illegally, this is just silly.

If a reporter went to a police evidence locker to do a story about drugs and touched a baggy of drugs to set up some pictures, should the reporter go to jail for "possession".

Dollars to donuts this mag was either property of the DC police (or other law enforcement agency) and the cop was in the studio (so no one would get hurt by the dangerous mag) or it was non-functioning.


I don't know, the mag looks legit. It needs to be investigated, I don't want illegal mags on the street.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Smart people talk about ideas, average people talk about events, stupid people talk about people.
Sirveaux
I'M HUGE!
Offline
Posts: 2433
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 12:38:21 AM
Originally Posted By mcornell:
Is there any evidence that the mag was functional or an actual 30 rounder (as opposed to a pinned 10 rounder)?

Unless the reporter came into the mag illegally, this is just silly.

If a reporter went to a police evidence locker to do a story about drugs and touched a baggy of drugs to set up some pictures, should the reporter go to jail for "possession".

Dollars to donuts this mag was either property of the DC police (or other law enforcement agency) and the cop was in the studio (so no one would get hurt by the dangerous mag) or it was non-functioning.


He said it was a 30 rounder... and he held up an actual 10 rounder afterwards.

Occam's razor, a well as Gregory's words and easy visual confirmation suggest that it was indeed what he said it was. Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, David Gregory said it was a duck, then he held up a chicken to compare it to, saying "this isn't a duck" about 10 seconds later in the segment. It's probably a duck.

Gun laws are byzantine - and it should come as no shock that those seeking more of them don't realize they're violating them. That's much of the point of calling it out.
anhedonist
Member
Offline
Posts: 73
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 2:53:36 AM
Getting attention from the Brits.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2252726
UKjohn
At the going down of the sun
Offline
Posts: 10859
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 5:34:33 AM

Originally Posted By Sirveaux:
OODA, things may look a bit different when you log out and log back in.

good man
MADE IN ENGLAND

By usptac:
Sadly, there are mass graves all over Europe, full of the wrong people.

by sherrick13
Shit, you Brits would stir shit up just to keep the others off balance.
xmission
Doomsday Machine Boy
Offline
Posts: 4974
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 6:13:22 AM
Originally Posted By Sirveaux:
Originally Posted By whiskerz:
Was he in dc ? Be could do a interview from any studio.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile


Meet the Press is filmed in the DC studios of WRC TV:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WRC-TV#Programs


And I believe Wayne LaPierre mentioned "This town" in reference to DC during the interview.
Democrats : For slavery then, for slavery now.
xmission
Doomsday Machine Boy
Offline
Posts: 4975
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 6:22:44 AM
[Last Edit: 12/24/2012 6:26:21 AM by xmission]




Both mags.






Oh, and he knows it.
Democrats : For slavery then, for slavery now.
Sirveaux
I'M HUGE!
Offline
Posts: 2437
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 6:41:29 AM
Originally Posted By BatcaveSouth:
On Drudge: Ha Here's the page the Drudge link connected to


http://thepatriotperspective.wordpress.com/2012/12/23/david-gregory-violates-dc-gun-law-on-national-tv/


Somewhere around 230,000 views or so for just that single page. No freakin' clue how much traffic for everywhere else it's been picked up by and how far out it's gotten now, obviously.


Can't stop the signal.
eracer
Building up my immunity to Iocane...
Offline
Posts: 15018
Feedback: 100% (14)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 7:18:39 AM

Originally Posted By nightstalker:
Here is an excerpt from CA law. Not a violation.

(31) The loan of a large-capacity magazine for use solely as a prop for a motion picture, television, or video production.
(32) The purchase of a large-capacity magazine by the holder of a special weapons permit issued pursuant to Section 12095, 12230, 12250, 12286, or 12305, for any of the following purposes:
(A) For use solely as a prop for a motion picture, television, or video production.
(B) For export pursuant to federal regulations.
(C) For resale to law enforcement agencies, government agencies, or the military, pursuant to applicable federal regulations.
-- SeanNewton - 29 Oct 2007

Are the MTP studios in California?
"You sold a Reverberating Carbonizer with Mutate Capacity to an unlicensed Cephalopoid?"
sterinn
PO-TAY-TOES
Offline
Posts: 1049
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 7:45:38 AM
Originally Posted By eracer:

Originally Posted By nightstalker:
Here is an excerpt from CA law. Not a violation.

(31) The loan of a large-capacity magazine for use solely as a prop for a motion picture, television, or video production.
(32) The purchase of a large-capacity magazine by the holder of a special weapons permit issued pursuant to Section 12095, 12230, 12250, 12286, or 12305, for any of the following purposes:
(A) For use solely as a prop for a motion picture, television, or video production.
(B) For export pursuant to federal regulations.
(C) For resale to law enforcement agencies, government agencies, or the military, pursuant to applicable federal regulations.
-- SeanNewton - 29 Oct 2007

Are the MTP studios in California?


Nope, DC
Welcome to the New United States of Amurika
Where it isn't allowed to have or do things that others have not chosen on their own-
JIMBEAM
Member
Offline
Posts: 19350
Feedback: 100% (19)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 8:14:13 AM
David is probably meeting with NBC legal this morning.
"All compromise is based on give and take, but there can be no give and take on fundamentals. Any compromise on mere fundamentals is a surrender. For it is all give and no take." -Ghandi
limaxray
Canned sunshine, anyone?
Offline
Posts: 10034
Feedback: 100% (49)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 8:49:21 AM
[Last Edit: 12/24/2012 8:50:49 AM by limaxray]
Originally Posted By DK-Prof:

I have been saying the same thing consistently, and you have been getting more and more bizarre in your desperate attempt to try to make some ludicrous point about my HYPOTHETICAL situation.

I GET the fact that you want to be as petty and silly as the antis, in some attempt to try to win the battle or propaganda and perception. But, wars of principle are NOT won by being petty and silly. Gun rights have been moving in the RIGHT direction for the past 15 years or so, and all along, WE have been principled, and THEY have been getting more and more shrill and hysterical.

If you want to adopt those tactics, knock yourself out. But please don't tell lies about what I am saying. My words in this thread are clear for anyone to read, and NOWHERE did I make the argument that (in my hypothetical case) the "temporary borrowing" should only be okay for "the elite" - in fact, I was very specific in my example of the child, that I meant the logic to apply to anyone.


Feel free to apologize for the bullshit you posted, but given your posts in this thread, I won't be holding my breath.


Alinksy's Rules for Radicals #4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”

Seems to work pretty effectively. Most of the converts I make are because I point out how silly gun laws are, and how serious the penalties for breaking them are.
"Three, two, one, keyturn."

"If there must be trouble let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." - Thomas Paine

If you're gonna be stoopid, ya gotta be tough.
PreemptiveStrike
Offline
Posts: 2547
Feedback: 100% (30)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 9:05:00 AM
Not being carried by the "major" networks yet.
Brewgod
Member
Offline
Posts: 482
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 10:33:14 AM
It would be hilarious to see video of him 'splaining this to a pissed-off judge on Christmas morning....lol...
كافر
Not sure if this is double reverse sarcasm or anti-double flipped reverse sarcasm masquerading as gibberish. - Kurg

DamascusKnifemaker
Ебать BHO
NRAMilitary
Offline
Posts: 7473
Feedback: 100% (8)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 10:47:32 AM
I just shot FNC an email asking why they are not investigating this.
This is Nevada, we don't care how you did it in California.
I'm Republican because not everyone can be on welfare.
eracer
Building up my immunity to Iocane...
Offline
Posts: 15043
Feedback: 100% (14)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 10:49:47 AM

Originally Posted By sterinn:
Originally Posted By eracer:

Originally Posted By nightstalker:
Here is an excerpt from CA law. Not a violation.

(31) The loan of a large-capacity magazine for use solely as a prop for a motion picture, television, or video production.
(32) The purchase of a large-capacity magazine by the holder of a special weapons permit issued pursuant to Section 12095, 12230, 12250, 12286, or 12305, for any of the following purposes:
(A) For use solely as a prop for a motion picture, television, or video production.
(B) For export pursuant to federal regulations.
(C) For resale to law enforcement agencies, government agencies, or the military, pursuant to applicable federal regulations.
-- SeanNewton - 29 Oct 2007

Are the MTP studios in California?


Nope, DC

Exactly...
"You sold a Reverberating Carbonizer with Mutate Capacity to an unlicensed Cephalopoid?"
tmurph01
Member
Offline
Posts: 314
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 12:35:29 PM
Seeing more and more press about this today. Keep up the pressure, emails, and hpone calls boys! We need to keep the pressure on him and the enforcement agencies. If nothing else, a statement from NBC, Himself, or law enforcement needs to be made, but I demand justiice!!!
-Travis
Montani Semper Liberi
Skip237
McCarthy was Right
Military
Offline
Posts: 3831
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 2:34:33 PM
Needs cock sauce...

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
http://thewhereclause.blogspot.com
widerstehe
Team Member
Offline
Posts: 3094
Feedback: 100% (5)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 2:36:33 PM
Cliff notes please:

Did this fuckstick get charged with a crime yet?
nightstalker
In for a Penny, In for a Pound
Online
Posts: 29118
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 3:10:21 PM
I looked up the code online and there do not seem to be any exceptions for educational purposes.
once you have paid him the Dane-geld, you never get rid of the Dane

Elections, the advance auction of stolen goods.

When words lose their meaning, a people can move neither hand nor foot.
Skip237
McCarthy was Right
Military
Offline
Posts: 3834
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 3:22:38 PM
Originally Posted By DK-Prof:
[snip]

Your grasping at straws is getting funnier by the moment.

I did not in any way say what you claim. I did not try to "excuse" any criminal behavior by "the elite" - nor did I at any point say or imply that my hypothetical should be any DIFFERENT if Joe Blow had borrowed a magazine from a D.C. cop (say for a magazine photo shoot, or an art project or anything like that).

In fact, I have previously given examples of a D.C. cop letting a kid shoot his duty weapon. So BY MY OWN WORDS, clearly I am not talking about something that should be okay for "the elite" but not for the average person, because the very example I gave to make my point involved a kid being allowed to shoot a gun.

So, either so are unable to read and comprehend simple English, or your argument is now so weak, that you are forced to LIE about what I have been saying.

This entire time, I have merely pointed out that IF they temporarily borrowed a magazine from law enforcement, then it does not seem to be any kind of serious crime, even though as a technicality, of course the argument could be made. Furthermore, my point has also been that no prosecutor or judge would ever take this seriously, no more than a prosecutor or judge would take someone seriously that claimed a kid should be charged with a felony, if a cop let the kid shoot his gun. My ENTIRE POINT is based on a purely hypothetical case (that may not even be true). As I have repeatedly stated - and you apparently have trouble comprehending - if it turns out that he got the magazine somewhere other than on loan from law enforcement, of course he should be charged with a crime.

I have been saying the same thing consistently, and you have been getting more and more bizarre in your desperate attempt to try to make some ludicrous point about my HYPOTHETICAL situation.

I GET the fact that you want to be as petty and silly as the antis, in some attempt to try to win the battle or propaganda and perception. But, wars of principle are NOT won by being petty and silly. Gun rights have been moving in the RIGHT direction for the past 15 years or so, and all along, WE have been principled, and THEY have been getting more and more shrill and hysterical.

If you want to adopt those tactics, knock yourself out. But please don't tell lies about what I am saying. My words in this thread are clear for anyone to read, and NOWHERE did I make the argument that (in my hypothetical case) the "temporary borrowing" should only be okay for "the elite" - in fact, I was very specific in my example of the child, that I meant the logic to apply to anyone.


Feel free to apologize for the bullshit you posted, but given your posts in this thread, I won't be holding my breath.


You said...

Originally Posted By DK-Prof:

If a news organization went to the DC police and asked them if they could borrow a magazine to use in a news story, and the police okayed it, and the news organization returned it to the police after the show, it would be hard to argue that he would be "in possession" of it in any meaningful sense. The point would be such a technical one, that a judge would dismiss it, even if a prosecutor wanted to purse it, is my guess.

IF they borrowed it from law enforcement, I don't really see it as being substantially different from a news story showing a reporter shooting full auto or something. Just because news footage shows the reporter standing with an NFA gmu or dealer sample doesn't mean they are somehow "in possession" of an NFA item that doesn't belong to them, because the owner is presumably standing right off camera.

My point is just that IF they actually went to the trouble of talking to LEO and borrowing it from them, I am not that outraged about it.

IF they didn't do that, then I completely agree that David Gregory should be charged with a crime.


A crime is a crime is a crime. There is nothing in DC's law that exempts individuals who have LE's blessing. We are not a third world dictatorship where the law is subjectively applied because some elitist gun-grabbing Libtard wants to make a point. To believe that puts the Liberal ideology above law and ultimately reason. It's just like Bloomtard calling for an LE strike demanding gun control which he claims will make his city safe. How many Americans would have been robbed, raped, and murdered in an LE strike?!??!! Again, agenda before law and reason.

If you would stop digging yourself in you would realize I am the one being principled. This "journalist" wanted to make 30 rounders appear dangerous, easy to get, and in need of regulation. He told a lie. That lie was also a crime because the narrative he is trying to create is wholly different from reality in the District of Columbia.

If all men are held to the same standard, the world becomes more just. If Liberals want to create laws, they should have to live by those laws. The great lie of Liberalism, as illustrated in the last election, is that there is a "free lunch." Someone else will pay and you are exempt. It is a reality of special people with special privileges.

Go ahead and give them quarter. They'll give you none--you aren't one of their special people.

And you want me to apologize to you?

Why don't you back us up and help us fight these people in every way possible instead of making excuses?
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
http://thewhereclause.blogspot.com
Hedonist
Keep shooting, my friends...
Offline
Posts: 23313
Feedback: 100% (4)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/24/2012 3:38:45 PM
This is black and white, open and shut.

He's guilty. Busted right on TV.

The only remaining issue is if LE will do the right thing, or the political thing.

LE exists to enforce laws, failing to enforce this "in your face" violation will make LE inept or complicit. Which is it?

Page:  / 30