|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 8:49:14 AM
[Last Edit: 2/11/2012 8:49:14 AM by AeroE]
THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2012 10:46:45 PM
Originally Posted By Beretta-Inox:
"never rely on reloads"? i dont go by that hell i trust my reloads more than factory. Im the one doing quality check. and some people claim that if you use your reloads in a self defense situation then the DA will claim your loads are more deadly or some BS if its a good shoot, then its a good shoot |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2012 10:58:43 PM
Massad Ayoob has documented a handful of cases in which handloads complicated the defense b/c the brilliant crime scene techs did their deductions based on the factory case stamp rather than the other loads in the magazine or written in the reload book.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2012 11:55:08 PM
All my SD stuff is hand loaded these days.
.357 Mag 125gr Hornady XTPs for the J-Frame .357 Mag 180gr Hornady XTPs for the 5" Smith .40S&W 180gr Hornady XTPs for the M&P40 and the 4006 Tac 5.56mm 65gr Sierra Game Kings for the various ARs The only guns in the house that use factory ammo are the Mossberg 590A1 (which is for the wife anyway) and a 50s vintage High Standard .22LR 9 shot revolver (which, incidentally, Ive never fired) Mas Ayoob is full of shit on this one. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2012 11:57:43 PM
So it's more of a legal issue than the dependability of the reload. That's good to know, I too believe in my reloads. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 12:01:37 AM
Originally Posted By Sturmgewehr-JD: All my SD stuff is hand loaded these days. .357 Mag 125gr Hornady XTPs for the J-Frame .357 Mag 180gr Hornady XTPs for the 5" Smith .40S&W 180gr Hornady XTPs for the M&P40 and the 4006 Tac 5.56mm 65gr Sierra Game Kings for the various ARs The only guns in the house that use factory ammo are the Mossberg 590A1 (which is for the wife anyway) and a 50s vintage High Standard .22LR 9 shot revolver (which, incidentally, Ive never fired) Mas Ayoob is full of shit on this one. What kinds of loads are you using for the .357 XTPs? I picked up a box of 158gr not too long ago and my manuals are short on load data for it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 12:32:13 AM
The only incident I remember reading about that involved handloads was a suicide. I think the gun shot residue pattern didn't match the story told to the officers. I could imagine a scenario where handloads with a large charge of a dirty powder like Unique might throw enough unburned powder residue to make it seem as if the shooter was closer, but that's a real stretch, In a shooting the main focus will be to determine if the shooting was justified or not. As far a dependability goes I have had a few rounds of my match handloads that didn't have powder dropped- once. The slider on my Dillon SDB stuck. I have also had a few rounds that wouldn't chamber due to my crimp die not being adjusted properly. The total was maybe 15 bad rounds out of several thousand rounds I have loaded. Those could be a big problem if needed in a SD situation. I have an updated SDB now so the powder problem won't re-occur, and I check the rounds in a case gauge now. I prefer my handloads due to them being very accurate in my pistols, and I can rely on them completely now. I shoot a hard cast 200gr LSWC, which ought to do the job if needed. Jim |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 12:42:21 AM
I've got some factory ammo when dick's had a sale, but I have lots of reloads stocked up. Any intruder will get some 230gr HP 45acp.
I know my reloads are good and I will trust them over any factory loads. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 6:59:04 AM
Mas Ayoob is full of shit on this one.
Not only is he full of shit, he gets paid to do seminars preaching his shit. He's kinda like the Al Gore of the shooting world. Making up bull shit scenarios, then getting paid to teach you how to avoid a situation that does not exist. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 7:39:24 AM
Originally Posted By steve4102:
Mas Ayoob is full of shit on this one.
Not only is he full of shit, he gets paid to do seminars preaching his shit. He's kinda like the Al Gore of the shooting world. Making up bull shit scenarios, then getting paid to teach you how to avoid a situation that does not exist. This. Everything I shoot is hand loads. I carry hand loads. They are all optimized for MY firearms. I have spent much time perfecting them and my techniques in loading them. No factory can do that. Any and all ammo for rifles that may be called upon for defense will be sealed with a sealant on both neck and primer annulus. All rifle ammo is single stage loaded and all charges are individually weighed so there is no doubt as to whether or not everything is correct. All ammo has been chronographed as well. The only thing I buy as far as factory ammo now is either surplus in military calibers for practice, or new factory if I need cases and it's on sale cheap enough that I can shoot it and reload cheaper than just buying the cases by themselves to start with. 6.8 is a prime example of that, as is .45 acp from time to time. Pistol ammo is loaded on a simple Lee turret press, and I have trained myself as part of the procedure to visually check the powder in each and every round before placing a bullet in the case. It might be a tad slower, but it is one reason I've not moved on to a better/faster press with a bullet feeder. If you've seen the kids in the Madrases on the news rocking back and forth reading the Koran, that's what I look like, except I'm rocking back and forth looking in the case. I've so far had one (ONE ) 1, load of any kind that wasn't correct. It was in a workup for a load for a new .45 acp that I didn't follow my normal procedure. I have loaded close to 20,000 rounds of .45 acp, 2000 rounds of 9mm, 1500 rounds of 7.62x39, 3000 rounds of 5.56/.223, 6000 rounds of .308, 2500 rounds of 6.8. There are a lot of folks who've loaded 10 times more than I have. Out of all my loads, I have had 1 round that wasn't right. I have pushed pressures in some, as you will do in working some of them up, but function wise, and in the actual settled upon loads, there has been 1 in all of that. Contrast that to factory bought ammo. I have had a multitude of issues with almost every caliber listed even in good brass cases loads from good American companies. Many, many times the Russian and other steel cased stuff has had issues, and even some of the Com Block brass stuff as well. I have even had high dollar defense ammo have issues with FT fire, or noticeable problems before I chambered or loaded it. I think all of us have. I trust myself more to load for my life, than someone loading for a paycheck. Ayoob needs to stop his spiel with this nonsensical argument, because he is only hurting those that carry their own by giving this type of bullshit legs due to his "supposed " credibility. The larger portion of this country that carries lives in municipalities that wouldn't have a clue as to what you shot a guy with to begin with. Most wouldn't think of it, or even send it out to a lab to be checked. Unless you have some absolute weird Hollywood plot type situation, no one would ever even consider it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 7:56:52 AM
Why take the chance? You're up on the witness stand and the attorney asks "so you made your own deadly bullets" ? It could turn a close case. They can make you look like a real nut job. The jurors will most likely be a bunch of fools.
I don't carry reloads. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 8:34:45 AM
I have loaded SD rounds for a few years now and I am quite sure that if I ever have to use my weapon in a SD situation I am quite sure they will take my gun and I will wind up in Court and the Prosecutor will try to portray me as some type of Rambo bullet making maniac I will be able to prove without doubt that my rounds are loaded well withing safe operating limits and are equalivlent to Factory rounds but even after it's all said and done I am quite sure I will be out a large sum of money defending my safety and justifying my decision to the trigger.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 8:36:10 AM
Originally Posted By zw123:
Why take the chance? You're up on the witness stand and the attorney asks "so you made your own deadly bullets" ? It could turn a close case. They can make you look like a real nut job. The jurors will most likely be a bunch of fools. I don't carry reloads. Total internet nonsense.... If this was true there would be cases out there to cite. Your lawyer would object as it is irrelevant and inflammatory. In ANY deadly force case, the simple question to be asked and answered is this: WAS DEADLY FORCE REASONABLE AND JUSTIFIED? That's the ONLY LEGAL ISSUE THAT CAN BE EVALUATED. In the event you are in a trial, that decision has been made, thus you have been charged and are defending your actions. The MANNER in which death was dealt is of no legal consequence. "WHY" death was dealt, AND was it REASONABLE and NECESSARY, is the only issue at hand. This topic shows up now and again and there is NO documented case that was SOLELY decided because the use of hand loaded ammo.... PERIOD, end of discussion. There have been cases where the issue was introduced, but it had NO IMPACT on the case. Some of the cases folks try to cite DO NOT deal specifically with the use of HANDLOADS, they question the REASONABLNESS of the shooters actions. Commercially manufactured products ARE NOT the only instruments a person may use to defend their life or the life of another person.... think about it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 8:37:46 AM
[Last Edit: 2/11/2012 8:40:21 AM by steve4102]
Originally Posted By zw123:
Why take the chance? You're up on the witness stand and the attorney asks "so you made your own deadly bullets" ? It could turn a close case. They can make you look like a real nut job. The jurors will most likely be a bunch of fools. I don't carry reloads. If you are worried about it, by all means carry Factory Ammo. Speaking of "take the chance" you may want to also think about your choice of firearm as well. After all, if the Prosecution can make you look like a "nut job" because you handload he can also make you look like a "nut Job" depending on your choice of firearm. "Ladies and Gentleman of the jury, this is the 45 caliber handgun Mr. X use to kill poor Leroy. That's right a 45 caliber, the biggest baddest handgun caliber made. Mr X has several other handguns in smaller more friendly calibers like the 9mm. For those members of the jury that do not know what a 9mm is, it's this tiny little guy I hold in my hand, it is also what many Law Enforcement Officers across the county use. Oh, I'm sorry, You can't see this tiny little bullet, here I'll come closer and pass it around, don't drop it though, we may never find it it the carpet. When Mr X armed himself that night he did not take his smaller more friendly 9mm, NOOOO, he took the biggest baddest handgun he owned. He new that if he was going to shoot someone his massive 45 caliber would do the most damage and without a doubt kill his victim instantly. He did not arm himself that night to protect, he armed himself to KILL. If only Mr X would have taken the smaller 9mm for protection instead of his 45 for the sole purpose of killing his victim, poor Leroy might still be alive today." There how that for a bull shit scenario. That said, if that nut job Ayoob was preaching this crap there are those would certainly by into it. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 8:42:01 AM
I've carried reloads (sometimes factory ammo) in my handguns for years for personal self defense. Same with the rifles. When I road trip they are more likely to have reloads with me (because I'm going to do some shooting sometime that weekend) than factory ammo.
I've had more duds, split cases, failures to chamber due to screwed up brass/bullets with factory ammo than I have with my reloads. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 8:43:05 AM
Mas is not full of shit on this. Mas' course is about CYA in court. There is a valid reason to not carry handloads. When using factory loads the evidence specs is documented by the manufacturer. There are documented cases of DAs/prosecuteors calling handloads more lethal and rambo-like mentality etc. It's in several cases. It's also come up in civil cases frequently. It has complicated things for a DEFENDANT that was involved in a justified shooting in self-defense.Yes, it's BS and untrue of course, but it's how some prosecutors think in anti-states where they'll do anything to get guns out of the law abiding citizen's possesion. Why go through the possibility of that complication - especially in an anti-state, when the ammo specs could be on the box stub in your safe if anyone ever wants to know what you shot with? It's not a question of whether the handloads are better, worse, more or less reliable. It's perception and image. And remember, in states like MA, NY, CA, IL etc., people don't know anything about guns and use of lethal force - except they're icky. That includes DAs and some cops and most of the population.
It's to protect yourself from unscrupulous attorneys with a personal agenda against the 2A. It's not about the performance of handloads. As it is, I shoot them often, I keep them in the AR and I stack them deep for SHTF. I just carry factory loads, in my pistols on the street. That's the gun(s) that are more likely to see action and come into scrutiny. But to say a man is full of shit for forwarding information about what has actually happened in courts is dim. The info is there about what has happened to some people - you decide. -JC |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 8:46:15 AM
But to say a man is full of shit for forwarding information about what has actually happened in courts is dim.
Please post links to actual court cases were a "good shoot" was turned bad due to handloaded ammo. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 8:51:09 AM
Take it to GD.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 8:51:22 AM
Originally Posted By Slopes-2-Shores:
Mas is not full of shit on this. Mas' course is about CYA in court. There is a valid reason to not carry handloads. When using factory loads the evidence specs is documented by the manufacturer. There are documented cases of DAs/prosecuteors calling handloads more lethal and rambo-like mentality etc. It's in several cases. It's also come up in civil cases frequently. It has complicated things for a DEFENDANT that was involved in a justified shooting in self-defense.Yes, it's BS and untrue of course, but it's how some prosecutors think in anti-states where they'll do anything to get guns out of the law abiding citizen's possesion. Why go through the possibility of that complication - especially in an anti-state, when the ammo specs could be on the box stub in your safe if anyone ever wants to know what you shot with? It's not a question of whether the handloads are better, worse, more or less reliable. It's perception and image. And remember, in states like MA, NY, CA, IL etc., people don't know anything about guns and use of lethal force - except they're icky. That includes DAs and some cops and most of the population. It's to protect yourself from unscrupulous attorneys with a personal agenda against the 2A. It's not about the performance of handloads. As it is, I shoot them often, I keep them in the AR and I stack them deep for SHTF. I just carry factory loads, in my pistols on the street. That's the gun(s) that are more likely to see action and come into scrutiny. But to say a man is full of shit for forwarding information about what has actually happened in courts is dim. The info is there about what has happened to some people - you decide. -JC Cite those cases and lets take a CLOSE look at what was questioned and what impact there was... |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 8:54:56 AM
For the "i know my own quality" crowd....
Yeah, from the point where the components come into your possession. But before that? I don't know how old my stuff is, how it was stored, etc. How do I know the primers i'm buying weren't tossed as a partially defective lot and somehow ended up on the shelves anyway? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 8:56:50 AM
How do you know that that wasn't the case in your factory ammo?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 9:03:07 AM
Originally Posted By zw123:
Why take the chance? You're up on the witness stand and the attorney asks "so you made your own deadly bullets" ? It could turn a close case. They can make you look like a real nut job. The jurors will most likely be a bunch of fools. I don't carry reloads. And your response should be, I taylor make my ammo because it is cheaper and more accurate than factory mass produced ammo. My handloads are accurate and by using them I can actually hit what I am aiming at, less chance of injuring an innocent bystander. Most of the LEO I know have a very difficult time hitting what they are aiming at, mainly because of their choice of inaccurate Super Hot Self Defense ammunition. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 9:09:49 AM
Just break out the charts and FBI literature when you ask the attending police officers what they use.
When they respond with Ranger T's and other +P and +P+ ammo, compare that to your slower , closer to standard pressure hand loads, and ask why the officers need such lethal ammunition. Their answer. " We need to be able to stop a threat as quickly as possible so that we can protect the public, and so that we can get home to our families safe." Your answer. " Thank you for your service officer. My children want me home safe too." |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 9:14:01 AM
Originally Posted By steve4102:
But to say a man is full of shit for forwarding information about what has actually happened in courts is dim.
Please post links to actual court cases were a "good shoot" was turned bad due to handloaded ammo. I'm not going to dig through buried notes, he has and it's there if you want to see it. And I don't think it's ever turned a good shoot bad. But any complication - in civil or criminal court is bad. I will consider removing possible problems that can create even small complications, not the far end possibility of a conviction / ruling against me. Any possibility of any evidence being questionable costs more money. Why bother? You can get up there and tell them this or that or anything being the professional witness that you are. But the manufacturers have already done it and have better lawyers. I want to avoid any complications, it's complicated enough sometimes. You do what you want. It's not a bad idea to avoid possible problems, no matter how remote. -JC |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 9:38:35 AM
[Last Edit: 2/11/2012 9:39:17 AM by steve4102]
Originally Posted By pavlovwolf:
Just break out the charts and FBI literature when you ask the attending police officers what they use. When they respond with Ranger T's and other +P and +P+ ammo, compare that to your slower , closer to standard pressure hand loads, and ask why the officers need such lethal ammunition. Their answer. " We need to be able to stop a threat as quickly as possible so that we can protect the public, and so that we can get home to our families safe." Your answer. " Thank you for your service officer. My children want me home safe too." Good one, I like it! Don't forget any good attorney never asks a question he doesn't already know the answer to. So, if asked "Why do you manufacture your own man killing ammunition?" Answer truthfully with something very simple and to the point and through him for a loop. "Handloaders are one of the first true recycles and environmentally conscious. We do not leave our spent brass cases all over the ground polluting the environment, we pick them up and reuse them. We not only recycle our own brass and plastic cases we also pick up and recycle the mess those that shoot only factory ammunition have left behind. As handloaders we do not shoot lead bullets into Mother Earth and forget about her. No, we sift though the backstops and dirt banks and remove all that harmful lead and recycle it. As handloader, we leave nothing behind to damage Mother Earth, unlike those that only shoot factory ammunition." |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 9:41:58 AM
I want to avoid any complications, it's complicated enough sometimes. You do what you want. It's not a bad idea to avoid possible problems, no matter how remote.
What do you carry? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 9:50:35 AM
I use them for the house guns and would use them for carry
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 10:23:44 AM
Here's the article they're talking about
Daniel Bias case Read it to the end and draw your own conclusions. The "regular bullets weren't deadly enough for you" argument is not the big reason I recommend against handloads for defense. The forensic replicability factor is the main reason. Listen to John Lanza, who had to fight for Danny Bias' future in court.
"When a hand load is used in an incident which becomes the subject of a civil or criminal trial, the duplication of that hand load poses a significant problem for both the plaintiff" or the prosecutor and the defendant. Once used, there is no way, with certainty, to determine the amount of powder or propellant used for that load. This becomes significant when forensic testing is used in an effort to duplicate the shot and the resulting evidence on the victim or target. Stippling or powder residue, and its amount, would relate to the distance between the barrel of the firearm and the victim or target. Lack of powder residue would reflect a distant shot as opposed to the presence of powder residue which would reflect or prove a close shot," explains Attorney Lanza, who adds, "With the commercial load, one would be in a better position to argue the uniformity between the loads used for testing and the subject load." |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 10:42:55 AM
[Last Edit: 2/11/2012 10:44:08 AM by pavlovwolf]
Originally Posted By WayneD:
Here's the article they're talking about Daniel Bias case Read it to the end and draw your own conclusions. The "regular bullets weren't deadly enough for you" argument is not the big reason I recommend against handloads for defense. The forensic replicability factor is the main reason. Listen to John Lanza, who had to fight for Danny Bias' future in court.
"When a hand load is used in an incident which becomes the subject of a civil or criminal trial, the duplication of that hand load poses a significant problem for both the plaintiff" or the prosecutor and the defendant. Once used, there is no way, with certainty, to determine the amount of powder or propellant used for that load. This becomes significant when forensic testing is used in an effort to duplicate the shot and the resulting evidence on the victim or target. Stippling or powder residue, and its amount, would relate to the distance between the barrel of the firearm and the victim or target. Lack of powder residue would reflect a distant shot as opposed to the presence of powder residue which would reflect or prove a close shot," explains Attorney Lanza, who adds, "With the commercial load, one would be in a better position to argue the uniformity between the loads used for testing and the subject load." That is a stupid argument. No one is going to be carrying every single hand load that they've assembled in their weapon. Furthermore, you aren't going to have emptied every round that you have loaded into the target. Every hand loader will normally have many unfired bullets that are exact duplicates of what he was using when he defended himself. No one throws a powder charge that is so inconsistent that it cannot be duplicated every other time they load a round. Every hand loader with any sense also has his load data written down. This will include the primer type and brand, the powder type and charge weight, the bullet type and weight, and the case manufacturer. That recipe' is repeated over and over and is consistent shot to shot or the hand loader would no rely on it. In fact, one of the major reasons for hand loading is in fact because the hand loader can produce a more consistent load that can the factory. Any lawyer that can't state that fact with clarity should flip burgers instead. With that consistency, it would be very easy to use ballistic gel tests to prove anything that needed to be proved. Again, any lawyer that is not capable of getting a gel test or other tests set up to prove whatever is necessary to free his client should be working in an entirely different field. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 10:54:05 AM
I have wondered this as well. Zero malfunctions on my reloads, thousands. A few malfunctions with "quality" commercial, many with commie surplus.
I have commercial loaded in my carry gun because my reloads are FMJ. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 11:00:23 AM
Since my XD has a fully supported chamber I run my reloads for self defense (Albeit my intended attacker is most likely a four legged variety) so I run them right past what a factory loading will offer.
So, I kind of feel like if I grabbed a box of factory ammo for human bean defense I would be leaving a little on the table ![]() |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 11:09:03 AM
[Last Edit: 2/11/2012 11:09:26 AM by pale_pony]
I have heard more than one defense attorney say that if you are going to CCW, you really need to call your local sheriff's office or PD and ask what round they issue for duty and then carry the same.
Supposedly saves a lot of headaches down the road. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 11:24:31 AM
How does one go about proving what their load was? All you can do is make a claim that cannot be substantiated.
In the civil case, where the surviving BG, or his family sues you, good luck proving your "expertise" in handloading. Don't forget to cite your professional training in ammunition manufacturing. In a shooting scenario, you usually have seconds to make decisions. A prosecutor, or personal injury attorney will have eons to research and decide matters. Remember how stupid people seem to be over represented on juries. If you don't believe Ayoob's credibility, how about we take out a piece of paper and draw a line down the middle. On one side, list all of his court appearances, training experience and references. Then, on the other side, list yours. Betcha it looks a little lopsided. I am a reloader myself. I enjoy it immensely and have been very happy with what I "create" on my own. But, the few bucks I save over factory ammo in my carry gun, would be small satisfaction in comparison to the added cost of complicating my defense in court. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 11:25:03 AM
[Last Edit: 2/11/2012 2:35:38 PM by WayneD]
Originally Posted By pavlovwolf:
Originally Posted By WayneD:
Here's the article they're talking about Daniel Bias case Read it to the end and draw your own conclusions. The "regular bullets weren't deadly enough for you" argument is not the big reason I recommend against handloads for defense. The forensic replicability factor is the main reason. Listen to John Lanza, who had to fight for Danny Bias' future in court.
"When a hand load is used in an incident which becomes the subject of a civil or criminal trial, the duplication of that hand load poses a significant problem for both the plaintiff" or the prosecutor and the defendant. Once used, there is no way, with certainty, to determine the amount of powder or propellant used for that load. This becomes significant when forensic testing is used in an effort to duplicate the shot and the resulting evidence on the victim or target. Stippling or powder residue, and its amount, would relate to the distance between the barrel of the firearm and the victim or target. Lack of powder residue would reflect a distant shot as opposed to the presence of powder residue which would reflect or prove a close shot," explains Attorney Lanza, who adds, "With the commercial load, one would be in a better position to argue the uniformity between the loads used for testing and the subject load." That is a stupid argument. No one is going to be carrying every single hand load that they've assembled in their weapon. Furthermore, you aren't going to have emptied every round that you have loaded into the target. Every hand loader will normally have many unfired bullets that are exact duplicates of what he was using when he defended himself. No one throws a powder charge that is so inconsistent that it cannot be duplicated every other time they load a round. Every hand loader with any sense also has his load data written down. This will include the primer type and brand, the powder type and charge weight, the bullet type and weight, and the case manufacturer. That recipe' is repeated over and over and is consistent shot to shot or the hand loader would no rely on it. In fact, one of the major reasons for hand loading is in fact because the hand loader can produce a more consistent load that can the factory. Any lawyer that can't state that fact with clarity should flip burgers instead. With that consistency, it would be very easy to use ballistic gel tests to prove anything that needed to be proved. Again, any lawyer that is not capable of getting a gel test or other tests set up to prove whatever is necessary to free his client should be working in an entirely different field. Do you think that notes written by the defendant are going to be acceptable in court? That's like trying to use the defendant's diary saying he was at home watching TV on July 8th as evidence. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 11:26:25 AM
[Last Edit: 2/11/2012 11:31:30 AM by SrBenelli]
Originally Posted By steve4102:
Originally Posted By zw123:
Why take the chance? You're up on the witness stand and the attorney asks "so you made your own deadly bullets" ? It could turn a close case. They can make you look like a real nut job. The jurors will most likely be a bunch of fools. I don't carry reloads. If you are worried about it, by all means carry Factory Ammo. Speaking of "take the chance" you may want to also think about your choice of firearm as well. After all, if the Prosecution can make you look like a "nut job" because you handload he can also make you look like a "nut Job" depending on your choice of firearm. "Ladies and Gentleman of the jury, this is the 45 caliber handgun Mr. X use to kill poor Leroy. That's right a 45 caliber, the biggest baddest handgun caliber made. Mr X has several other handguns in smaller more friendly calibers like the 9mm. For those members of the jury that do not know what a 9mm is, it's this tiny little guy I hold in my hand, it is also what many Law Enforcement Officers across the county use. Oh, I'm sorry, You can't see this tiny little bullet, here I'll come closer and pass it around, don't drop it though, we may never find it it the carpet. When Mr X armed himself that night he did not take his smaller more friendly 9mm, NOOOO, he took the biggest baddest handgun he owned. He new that if he was going to shoot someone his massive 45 caliber would do the most damage and without a doubt kill his victim instantly. He did not arm himself that night to protect, he armed himself to KILL. If only Mr X would have taken the smaller 9mm for protection instead of his 45 for the sole purpose of killing his victim, poor Leroy might still be alive today." There how that for a bull shit scenario. That said, if that nut job Ayoob was preaching this crap there are those would certainly by into it. You know...... there was a case where a guy got crucified for shooting an attacker with a 10mm and the DA pretty much made the same argument you "sarcastically" made above.....
ETA: Yeap, it's bullshit. If a shoot is otherwise "good", there should be no issue made of the ammo.... or gun, used in said shooting. And if you or I were sitting on a jury, there'd be no worry that such a bullshit tactic would work. ................................................ 'cept juries don't always have "gun people" sitting on 'em. Or people with common sence, for that matter.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 11:27:01 AM
Originally Posted By packingXDs:
Originally Posted By Sturmgewehr-JD:
All my SD stuff is hand loaded these days. .357 Mag 125gr Hornady XTPs for the J-Frame .357 Mag 180gr Hornady XTPs for the 5" Smith .40S&W 180gr Hornady XTPs for the M&P40 and the 4006 Tac 5.56mm 65gr Sierra Game Kings for the various ARs The only guns in the house that use factory ammo are the Mossberg 590A1 (which is for the wife anyway) and a 50s vintage High Standard .22LR 9 shot revolver (which, incidentally, Ive never fired) Mas Ayoob is full of shit on this one. What kinds of loads are you using for the .357 XTPs? I picked up a box of 158gr not too long ago and my manuals are short on load data for it. Not speaking for S-JD, but I've used this data with success (comes from Hodgon's 2011 Reloading annual magazine). 158 gr. XTP C.O.L = 1.580" Case length: 1.285" Primer: Winchester Small Pistol Magnum Winchester 296 powder 15.0 gr. @ 1418 fps (28,600 CUP) to 16.7 gr. @ 1591 fps (40,700 CUP) (10" test barrel with 1:18.75" twist) I've gone up 16.5 gr. and it worked nicely in a S&W Model 19 w/ 6" barrel. XTPs are very accurate and consistent bullets. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 11:30:18 AM
If you are going to get hung out by a prosecutor for a good shoot its not going to matter if you used "deadly home made bullets", a "high powered sniper rifle," "assault rifle," or whatever other bullshit. If you have shitty SD laws and an anti-gun DA you will be demonized in court, hand loads or not.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 8:32:33 PM
You know...... there was a case where a guy got crucified for shooting an attacker with a 10mm and the DA pretty much made the same argument you "sarcastically" made above.
I know of the case, but I was only a little sarcastic. I meant what I said, If you are worried about what ammo you carry then you better worry about what firearm and Caliber you carry as well. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 8:40:25 PM
Originally Posted By backbencher: Massad Ayoob has documented a handful of cases in which handloads complicated the defense b/c the brilliant crime scene techs did their deductions based on the factory case stamp rather than the other loads in the magazine or written in the reload book. Then sort your brass by head stamp and only carry one type. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 8:46:25 PM
Eh, I had a feeding problem today in one of my reloads. I think I had a sizing issue. Or maybe I didn't seat the bullet far enough.
One failure in 200 rounds I can live with for range use. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 8:55:14 PM
10mm
Handloaded Gold Dots. Yep, I'm screwed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 10:24:34 PM
Originally Posted By VBC:
Originally Posted By packingXDs:
Originally Posted By Sturmgewehr-JD:
All my SD stuff is hand loaded these days. .357 Mag 125gr Hornady XTPs for the J-Frame .357 Mag 180gr Hornady XTPs for the 5" Smith .40S&W 180gr Hornady XTPs for the M&P40 and the 4006 Tac 5.56mm 65gr Sierra Game Kings for the various ARs The only guns in the house that use factory ammo are the Mossberg 590A1 (which is for the wife anyway) and a 50s vintage High Standard .22LR 9 shot revolver (which, incidentally, Ive never fired) Mas Ayoob is full of shit on this one. What kinds of loads are you using for the .357 XTPs? I picked up a box of 158gr not too long ago and my manuals are short on load data for it. Not speaking for S-JD, but I've used this data with success (comes from Hodgon's 2011 Reloading annual magazine). 158 gr. XTP C.O.L = 1.580" Case length: 1.285" Primer: Winchester Small Pistol Magnum Winchester 296 powder 15.0 gr. @ 1418 fps (28,600 CUP) to 16.7 gr. @ 1591 fps (40,700 CUP) (10" test barrel with 1:18.75" twist) I've gone up 16.5 gr. and it worked nicely in a S&W Model 19 w/ 6" barrel. XTPs are very accurate and consistent bullets. I like Packing's loads which are more aggressive than my own. The 125gr XTPs get 12.5gr of Blue Dot on a CCI Small Pistol (non magnum) primer The 180gr XTPs get 10.5gr of Blue Dot on the same primer. Both are loaded in Speer or Starline Nickle cases. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2012 10:26:31 PM
Originally Posted By callgood:
10mm Handloaded Gold Dots. Yep, I'm screwed. You're not screwed....... you're farked!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2012 7:26:33 AM
Originally Posted By steve4102:
I want to avoid any complications, it's complicated enough sometimes. You do what you want. It's not a bad idea to avoid possible problems, no matter how remote.
What do you carry? I carry either a G26 or one of my J-Frames (442 & M60), and occasionally both. I carry almost daily. I have other handguns that aren't concealed carry guns too. I shoot reloads through the AR often and wouldn't hesitate to carry them in it if need be. The Glock doesn't like them (the ones I have at least). I have some .357 loads that are just great and super accurate and I carry them in the wilderness. I don't own a press. I have a friend that loads and we get together a few times a year and roll some. I've never had an ammo related failure in the .223 loads in over 2K down the tube. When I get a press and kit .223/5.56 and .357 will be what I get it for. And I'm looking forward to the day when I have space and $$ to start loading. -JC |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2012 7:36:00 AM
Originally Posted By Sturmgewehr-JD: Originally Posted By VBC: Originally Posted By packingXDs: Originally Posted By Sturmgewehr-JD: All my SD stuff is hand loaded these days. .357 Mag 125gr Hornady XTPs for the J-Frame .357 Mag 180gr Hornady XTPs for the 5" Smith .40S&W 180gr Hornady XTPs for the M&P40 and the 4006 Tac 5.56mm 65gr Sierra Game Kings for the various ARs The only guns in the house that use factory ammo are the Mossberg 590A1 (which is for the wife anyway) and a 50s vintage High Standard .22LR 9 shot revolver (which, incidentally, Ive never fired) Mas Ayoob is full of shit on this one. What kinds of loads are you using for the .357 XTPs? I picked up a box of 158gr not too long ago and my manuals are short on load data for it. Not speaking for S-JD, but I've used this data with success (comes from Hodgon's 2011 Reloading annual magazine). 158 gr. XTP C.O.L = 1.580" Case length: 1.285" Primer: Winchester Small Pistol Magnum Winchester 296 powder 15.0 gr. @ 1418 fps (28,600 CUP) to 16.7 gr. @ 1591 fps (40,700 CUP) (10" test barrel with 1:18.75" twist) I've gone up 16.5 gr. and it worked nicely in a S&W Model 19 w/ 6" barrel. XTPs are very accurate and consistent bullets. I like Packing's loads which are more aggressive than my own. The 125gr XTPs get 12.5gr of Blue Dot on a CCI Small Pistol (non magnum) primer The 180gr XTPs get 10.5gr of Blue Dot on the same primer. Both are loaded in Speer or Starline Nickle cases. Thanks fellas. My books had next to no load data on them. Looks like I will need to do some powder shopping since all I keep in stock is Unique, Bullseye, and Power Pistol. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2012 7:36:20 AM
Originally Posted By pilotman:
For the "i know my own quality" crowd.... Yeah, from the point where the components come into your possession. But before that? I don't know how old my stuff is, how it was stored, etc. How do I know the primers i'm buying weren't tossed as a partially defective lot and somehow ended up on the shelves anyway? I have never once had a bad primer for reloading. I have run across many bad primers in factory ammo though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2012 7:40:18 AM
[Last Edit: 2/12/2012 7:41:37 AM by America-first]
In Florida; whether you use reloads or factory ammunition doesn't mean a damn in a good shoot and neither can you be sued in civil court as a result of the legal useof a firearm in self defense either.
I haven't reloaded in decades, but when I did, it was to load custom ammunition for reliability and accuracy rather than to save money and I would trust those rounds as much, and even more, than factory ammo. These days I use the same factory loaded, law enforcement ammunition utilized by the "authorities"; not for any non existent, imaginary, legal reasons, but because it's the most effective ammunition I can get my hands on both for reliability and terminal performance. It's possible that the laws of some states do make some sort of distinction and people would be wise to research the facts; but too many people like to make up their own bullshit laws based on what they believe is their own "common sense", and then post them on the internet. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2012 7:42:37 AM
Originally Posted By WayneD:
Originally Posted By pavlovwolf:
Originally Posted By WayneD:
Here's the article they're talking about Daniel Bias case Read it to the end and draw your own conclusions. The "regular bullets weren't deadly enough for you" argument is not the big reason I recommend against handloads for defense. The forensic replicability factor is the main reason. Listen to John Lanza, who had to fight for Danny Bias' future in court.
"When a hand load is used in an incident which becomes the subject of a civil or criminal trial, the duplication of that hand load poses a significant problem for both the plaintiff" or the prosecutor and the defendant. Once used, there is no way, with certainty, to determine the amount of powder or propellant used for that load. This becomes significant when forensic testing is used in an effort to duplicate the shot and the resulting evidence on the victim or target. Stippling or powder residue, and its amount, would relate to the distance between the barrel of the firearm and the victim or target. Lack of powder residue would reflect a distant shot as opposed to the presence of powder residue which would reflect or prove a close shot," explains Attorney Lanza, who adds, "With the commercial load, one would be in a better position to argue the uniformity between the loads used for testing and the subject load." That is a stupid argument. No one is going to be carrying every single hand load that they've assembled in their weapon. Furthermore, you aren't going to have emptied every round that you have loaded into the target. Every hand loader will normally have many unfired bullets that are exact duplicates of what he was using when he defended himself. No one throws a powder charge that is so inconsistent that it cannot be duplicated every other time they load a round. Every hand loader with any sense also has his load data written down. This will include the primer type and brand, the powder type and charge weight, the bullet type and weight, and the case manufacturer. That recipe' is repeated over and over and is consistent shot to shot or the hand loader would no rely on it. In fact, one of the major reasons for hand loading is in fact because the hand loader can produce a more consistent load that can the factory. Any lawyer that can't state that fact with clarity should flip burgers instead. With that consistency, it would be very easy to use ballistic gel tests to prove anything that needed to be proved. Again, any lawyer that is not capable of getting a gel test or other tests set up to prove whatever is necessary to free his client should be working in an entirely different field. Do you think that notes written by the defendant are going to be acceptable in court? That's like trying to use the defendant's diary saying he was at home watching TV on July 8th as evidence. Hand written and computer notes are used to prosecute people all the time. Using them for defense should be as easy but it isn't. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2012 7:48:51 AM
Originally Posted By zw123:
Why take the chance? You're up on the witness stand and the attorney asks "so you made your own deadly bullets" ? It could turn a close case. They can make you look like a real nut job. The jurors will most likely be a bunch of fools. I don't carry reloads. I don't understand #1 - how someone can become afraid of everything. #2 - how people can make it through life being afraid and worrying about everything. Seriously, some of you people make up and are worried about the stupidest, most insignificant things. It must be a horrible, miserable existence to constantly worry and think about this stuff instead of just enjoying life. I feel sorry for some of yall. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2012 7:52:18 AM
Originally Posted By Ponyboy:
Originally Posted By zw123:
Why take the chance? You're up on the witness stand and the attorney asks "so you made your own deadly bullets" ? It could turn a close case. They can make you look like a real nut job. The jurors will most likely be a bunch of fools. I don't carry reloads. I don't understand #1 - how someone can become afraid of everything. #2 - how people can make it through life being afraid and worrying about everything. Seriously, some of you people make up and are worried about the stupidest, most insignificant things. It must be a horrible, miserable existence to constantly worry and think about this stuff instead of just enjoying life. I feel sorry for some of yall. What an excellent post. ![]() |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2012 8:21:06 AM
[Last Edit: 2/12/2012 8:22:47 AM by pavlovwolf]
Originally Posted By scottedward58:
Originally Posted By WayneD:
Originally Posted By pavlovwolf:
Originally Posted By WayneD:
Here's the article they're talking about Daniel Bias case Read it to the end and draw your own conclusions. The "regular bullets weren't deadly enough for you" argument is not the big reason I recommend against handloads for defense. The forensic replicability factor is the main reason. Listen to John Lanza, who had to fight for Danny Bias' future in court.
"When a hand load is used in an incident which becomes the subject of a civil or criminal trial, the duplication of that hand load poses a significant problem for both the plaintiff" or the prosecutor and the defendant. Once used, there is no way, with certainty, to determine the amount of powder or propellant used for that load. This becomes significant when forensic testing is used in an effort to duplicate the shot and the resulting evidence on the victim or target. Stippling or powder residue, and its amount, would relate to the distance between the barrel of the firearm and the victim or target. Lack of powder residue would reflect a distant shot as opposed to the presence of powder residue which would reflect or prove a close shot," explains Attorney Lanza, who adds, "With the commercial load, one would be in a better position to argue the uniformity between the loads used for testing and the subject load." That is a stupid argument. No one is going to be carrying every single hand load that they've assembled in their weapon. Furthermore, you aren't going to have emptied every round that you have loaded into the target. Every hand loader will normally have many unfired bullets that are exact duplicates of what he was using when he defended himself. No one throws a powder charge that is so inconsistent that it cannot be duplicated every other time they load a round. Every hand loader with any sense also has his load data written down. This will include the primer type and brand, the powder type and charge weight, the bullet type and weight, and the case manufacturer. That recipe' is repeated over and over and is consistent shot to shot or the hand loader would no rely on it. In fact, one of the major reasons for hand loading is in fact because the hand loader can produce a more consistent load that can the factory. Any lawyer that can't state that fact with clarity should flip burgers instead. With that consistency, it would be very easy to use ballistic gel tests to prove anything that needed to be proved. Again, any lawyer that is not capable of getting a gel test or other tests set up to prove whatever is necessary to free his client should be working in an entirely different field. Do you think that notes written by the defendant are going to be acceptable in court? That's like trying to use the defendant's diary saying he was at home watching TV on July 8th as evidence. Hand written and computer notes are used to prosecute people all the time. Using them for defense should be as easy but it isn't. I didn't get around to responding to the hand written notes part. You said what I would have except that notes that can be proven to clearly predate the incident would be easy to get into evidence. As an addition to that though. All of the data a hand loader uses is in data books. Most of us have our equipment set up to throw a charge on handgun ammo that stays set up even though we aren't loading at the moment due to convenience. That data will support that our ammo was indeed within the limits of the published data, and was no more " deadly" than the accepted norm. Furthermore, any notes that are at the load bench, will likely also contain data with notes of powder charges, pressure signs, accuracy etc of all the work up to the carry load. That data usually will have the date of the loading and testing as well, and will generally predate whatever the event was by quite some time, since most of us know not to trust anything for carry that we haven't tested for hundreds of rounds and over some time period. For instance. My auto disk is set up to throw 5.0gr of Bullseye, for the 230gr XTP. The dies and everything else are all still set up in the turret. My data book and other papers are right there with the corresponding data. That data has dates on it that are over 10 years old showing the work up of the load, and the velocity through a chronograph from that date, as well as the accuracy achieved. That sort of date can and would be admissible in court. Furthermore, in South Carolina, we have the Castle Doctrine, and are also a No Retreat state. No defense on our property is prosecuted, and very little if any unless under extremely extenuating circumstances would be even in a shooting out in public. About the only way you will be prosecuted here is if you shoot a guy in the back, or some other stupid thing that would be a bad shoot anyway. If you are in a state where you are concerned over this. Simply load all of your ammo into Remington, Winchester, or the like, and use the same primers that they use. Beyond a visual recognition of the case head, a good shoot is not going to result in a study of the powder used in the act of defense. |
|