Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Log In

A valid email is required.
Password is required.
Posted: 2/5/2012 2:27:08 PM EST
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 2:30:11 PM EST
Scale is a little off.

Don't those things have a wingspan larger than a B-52?
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 2:30:19 PM EST


In.
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 2:35:20 PM EST
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 2:35:49 PM EST
U-2 was carrier capable
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 2:36:04 PM EST
In preperation for 30 seconds over Tehran?
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 2:39:43 PM EST
Looks like a stupid photoshop out of grandpas crusty emails. BTW: Did you see the video of the loop an F-35 did out of VTOL! It was awesome!
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 2:53:38 PM EST
Old pic and photochopped; S-3's parked infront of the island and they've been decommissioned for a few years now, and so has the USS Constellation.
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 2:54:19 PM EST
Constellation (CV-64) was retired in 2003.

That's a really bad 'shop.

Besides, seven B-2s would exceed the value of a whole carrier battle group.
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 2:57:28 PM EST

Originally Posted By capnrob97:
Scale is a little off.

Don't those things have a wingspan larger than a B-52?

Yeah, a B-2 has a 172ft wingspan.
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 2:58:46 PM EST
That's just silly.
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 2:59:11 PM EST
FAKE! All carrier based aircraft "Must" have wing fold, or other space saving capability. Yes the U-2 did a few carrier trials, but nothing ever became of it. They just wanted to test the pheasability of launching the U-2 from a carrier. To make mission planning easier.
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 3:00:22 PM EST
It's too bad Hazegray hasn't been updated in nearly 10 years. It was a great naval site.
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 3:01:54 PM EST
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 3:02:46 PM EST
Originally Posted By retroangles:
FAKE! All carrier based aircraft "Must" have wing fold, or other space saving capability. Yes the U-2 did a few carrier trials, but nothing ever became of it. They just wanted to test the pheasability of launching the U-2 from a carrier. To make mission planning easier.


They did land/launch a C-130.
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 3:03:36 PM EST
[Last Edit: 2/5/2012 3:12:17 PM EST by raven]
The stealth coating of the B2's skin needs special care after flight, it needs environmentally controlled hangars. There are few bases it can operate out of. I don't think a carrier could service it.
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 3:10:27 PM EST
This is a shop. I can tell by the pixels.
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 3:12:32 PM EST
Originally Posted By raven:
The stealth coating of the B2's skin needs special care after flight, one of the reasons there are so few bases for it. I don't think a carrier could service it.[/quote

New disposable b-2
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 3:17:18 PM EST
Originally Posted By AKSig:

Originally Posted By capnrob97:
Scale is a little off.

Don't those things have a wingspan larger than a B-52?

Yeah, a B-2 has a 172ft wingspan.


A B-52 wingspan is 185 feet.

I fail to see how a B-2 has a bigger wingspan.
Link Posted: 2/5/2012 3:37:50 PM EST

Originally Posted By tt350z:
Originally Posted By AKSig:

Originally Posted By capnrob97:
Scale is a little off.

Don't those things have a wingspan larger than a B-52?

Yeah, a B-2 has a 172ft wingspan.


A B-52 wingspan is 185 feet.

I fail to see how a B-2 has a bigger wingspan.

I was talking about the scale. Hence the part in red.


Top Top