Site Notices
9/18/2014 11:03:27 AM
[ARCHIVED THREAD] - 7.62x51   (Page 1 of 7)
ARCHIVED ARCHIVED
  Previous Page
Page:  / 7
Author
Message
hotbiggun42
Member
Offline
Posts: 13723
Feedback: 100% (82)
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:30:59 PM
Anyone catch the show about snipers on the boob tube yesterday. They were interviewing a sniper who made the statement that 7.62x51 at 1000yds has the same impact as being shot point blank with a 357 magnum . Is there a more versital round currently used by the military?
The Founding Fathers envisioned a robustly Christian yet religiously tolerant America, with churches serving as vital institutions that would eclipse the state in importance.. Ron Paul
DriftPunch
Stone Waste of White
Offline
Posts: 19309
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:31:54 PM
5.56*45
hotbiggun42
Member
Offline
Posts: 13724
Feedback: 100% (82)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:36:17 PM
Originally Posted By DriftPunch:
5.56*45


Sniper was dropping the bad guys at 850yds. do you think 5.56 would have been more effective?
The Founding Fathers envisioned a robustly Christian yet religiously tolerant America, with churches serving as vital institutions that would eclipse the state in importance.. Ron Paul
sporter
Offline
Posts: 6266
Feedback: 100% (139)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:36:52 PM
[Last Edit: 1/11/2012 6:37:13 PM by sporter]
7.62 NATO is no joke.
DriftPunch
Stone Waste of White
Offline
Posts: 19310
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:38:33 PM

Originally Posted By hotbiggun42:
Originally Posted By DriftPunch:
5.56*45


Sniper was dropping the bad guys at 850yds. do you think 5.56 would have been more effective?

No, but you said you wanted versatility. Try a shoulder fired rifle or carbine in full auto in 7.62*51. Try to carry as many rounds of 7.62*51 as you can with 5.56*45.

The reduced range is gladly sacrificed.


LuvBUSHmaster
ESTO VIR "Be a Man"
Offline
Posts: 14188
Feedback: 100% (33)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:39:47 PM
Originally Posted By hotbiggun42:
Anyone catch the show about snipers on the boob tube yesterday. They were interviewing a sniper who made the statement that 7.62x51 at 1000yds has the same impact as being shot point blank with a 357 magnum . Is there a more versital round currently used by the military?


Rifles are in a different playing field than handguns in regards to terminal ballistics.

I carry a handgun because a carbine/rifle would be to obtrusive.
"There comes a time when every man feels the urge to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, & start slitting throats" Mencken
hotbiggun42
Member
Offline
Posts: 13726
Feedback: 100% (82)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:41:24 PM
Originally Posted By DriftPunch:

Originally Posted By hotbiggun42:
Originally Posted By DriftPunch:
5.56*45


Sniper was dropping the bad guys at 850yds. do you think 5.56 would have been more effective?

No, but you said you wanted versatility. Try a shoulder fired rifle or carbine in full auto in 7.62*51. Try to carry as many rounds of 7.62*51 as you can with 5.56*45.

The reduced range is gladly sacrificed.




While i disagree with your above evaluation the sniper man did say that 7.62x51 was most effective past 200yds. It was really a good show.
The Founding Fathers envisioned a robustly Christian yet religiously tolerant America, with churches serving as vital institutions that would eclipse the state in importance.. Ron Paul
zimpete
Offline
Posts: 492
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:42:14 PM

Ex Navy guy from work says 7.62x51 is way better than any .308

Stonerriflefan44
Member
Offline
Posts: 12536
Feedback: 100% (14)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:42:22 PM
An M24 can not be compared to a M16/AR pattern rifle, completely different roles. That being said there are documented kills with SPRs and DMR type rifles at 800m and greater.
TheTracker
Member
Offline
Posts: 21905
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:42:38 PM
That sounds about right.
hotbiggun42
Member
Offline
Posts: 13727
Feedback: 100% (82)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:43:38 PM
Originally Posted By LuvBUSHmaster:
Originally Posted By hotbiggun42:
Anyone catch the show about snipers on the boob tube yesterday. They were interviewing a sniper who made the statement that 7.62x51 at 1000yds has the same impact as being shot point blank with a 357 magnum . Is there a more versital round currently used by the military?


Rifles are in a different playing field than handguns in regards to terminal ballistics.

I carry a handgun because a carbine/rifle would be to obtrusive.


I wasnt trying to compare a rifle to a handgun. I was just surprised at how effective 7.62 was out to 1000yds
The Founding Fathers envisioned a robustly Christian yet religiously tolerant America, with churches serving as vital institutions that would eclipse the state in importance.. Ron Paul
LuvBUSHmaster
ESTO VIR "Be a Man"
Offline
Posts: 14190
Feedback: 100% (33)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:44:41 PM
Originally Posted By hotbiggun42:
Originally Posted By LuvBUSHmaster:
Originally Posted By hotbiggun42:
Anyone catch the show about snipers on the boob tube yesterday. They were interviewing a sniper who made the statement that 7.62x51 at 1000yds has the same impact as being shot point blank with a 357 magnum . Is there a more versital round currently used by the military?


Rifles are in a different playing field than handguns in regards to terminal ballistics.

I carry a handgun because a carbine/rifle would be to obtrusive.


I wasnt trying to compare a rifle to a handgun. I was just surprised at how effective 7.62 was out to 1000yds


Understood and yep.

"There comes a time when every man feels the urge to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, & start slitting throats" Mencken
DetroitPatriot
Member
Offline
Posts: 989
Feedback: 100% (57)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:44:41 PM
7.62 x 51 will wreck your day.

DP
Jinxsters
I see what you did there.
Military
Online
Posts: 7175
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:46:17 PM
Originally Posted By DetroitPatriot:
7.62 x 51 will wreck your day.

DP


Most rounds would wreck somebody's day, some are more then others.
"I sent [these soldiers] here and asked them to go, [and] if they die there without me then would [that] I never again bear the title of king" ~ King Richard "The Lionheart"
TheTracker
Member
Offline
Posts: 21906
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:47:27 PM

Originally Posted By hotbiggun42:
Originally Posted By LuvBUSHmaster:
Originally Posted By hotbiggun42:
Anyone catch the show about snipers on the boob tube yesterday. They were interviewing a sniper who made the statement that 7.62x51 at 1000yds has the same impact as being shot point blank with a 357 magnum . Is there a more versital round currently used by the military?


Rifles are in a different playing field than handguns in regards to terminal ballistics.

I carry a handgun because a carbine/rifle would be to obtrusive.


I wasnt trying to compare a rifle to a handgun. I was just surprised at how effective 7.62 was out to 1000yds


It's impacting at somewhere between 500 to 600 ft pounds of energy
ArmyInfantryVet
Member
Military
Offline
Posts: 33396
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:47:35 PM
[Last Edit: 1/11/2012 6:50:56 PM by ArmyInfantryVet]
My favorite quote about 7.62 NATO

"When you're walking through the swamps of Vietnam, up to your chin in warm mud. You can take tremendous comfort in that fact that the M14 puts down range 7.62 millimeter NATO round that is capable of punching through the jungle, of punching through vegetation and still killing the Vietcong or the NVA guy and....... killing the guy behind him."

Sslous
Offline
Posts: 1525
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:49:35 PM
Originally Posted By zimpete:

Ex Navy guy from work says 7.62x51 is way better than any .308



What is with these navy guys. The one I know tells me bat shit insane storys.
hotbiggun42
Member
Offline
Posts: 13728
Feedback: 100% (82)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:51:05 PM
Originally Posted By Sslous:
Originally Posted By zimpete:

Ex Navy guy from work says 7.62x51 is way better than any .308



What is with these navy guys. The one I know tells me bat shit insane storys.


My Brother is retired Navy I will have to ask him about this
The Founding Fathers envisioned a robustly Christian yet religiously tolerant America, with churches serving as vital institutions that would eclipse the state in importance.. Ron Paul
USMCTanker
Disgruntled former GySgt of Marines
Military
Offline
Posts: 6631
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:52:16 PM
I have a Sgt Maj. friend of mine that was back here a couple of weeks ago from II MEF. We were talking about the M14 and the 7.62mm NATO cartridge. He used to be on the USMC rifle team, and is a distinguished marksman. He was telling me how the 5.56mm match-grade rifles they were using at 1000 meters (with 77 gr projectile) would barely "plop" through the target cheese cloth and paper, and wouldn't have any energy left after impact. They tried using them for a period of time and went back to the M14 NM rifles they'd been using prior.

I don't know how long ago that was as I didn't ask, but I thought it was pretty interesting stuff. He said the 77 gr rounds had to be loaded singly, as they were too long to fit in the magazine.
I require alcohol, red meat, hot naked women, and large quantities of small arms and ammo. My other hobbies are soft, furry bunny rabbits, pretty butterflies, and balloons in pastel colors.
pcsutton
Member ....but not a 3rd member
Offline
Posts: 19990
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:53:15 PM
M-118 LR is some great stuff. I reload clone M-118's with the only difference being I use Varget.

Out to 1000 yds. If I can see ya....I can hit ya. Stand off distance rocks!!
"I am compensating. If I could kill stuff with my dick from 200 yards I would not need a firearm would I?"-Zanther
"I swear, there is a limited amount of intelligence in the world and the population is increasing." - 96Ag
Sua Sponte!
danno-in-michigan
Offline
Posts: 5639
Feedback: 100% (24)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:53:26 PM
FMJ 7.62 really isn't a great choice for any application.
hotbiggun42
Member
Offline
Posts: 13729
Feedback: 100% (82)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:55:22 PM
Originally Posted By pcsutton:
M-118 LR is some great stuff. I reload clone M-118's with the only difference being I use Varget.

Out to 1000 yds. If I can see ya....I can hit ya. Stand off distance rocks!!


I have 1k rounds of M118LR I just dont get a chance to shoot it often
The Founding Fathers envisioned a robustly Christian yet religiously tolerant America, with churches serving as vital institutions that would eclipse the state in importance.. Ron Paul
ArmyInfantryVet
Member
Military
Offline
Posts: 33398
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:56:16 PM
[Last Edit: 1/11/2012 6:57:36 PM by ArmyInfantryVet]

Originally Posted By pcsutton:
M-118 LR is some great stuff. I reload clone M-118's with the only difference being I use Varget.

Out to 1000 yds. If I can see ya....I can hit ya. Stand off distance rocks!!

I'd imagine that M118LR could compete with .30-06 of old. Pretty neat.

But then again, with new projectiles and propellants; modern .30-06 can rival magnum cartridges.
winddummy82
Labor Omnia Vincit. UBC L.U. #13
Offline
Posts: 8311
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:56:39 PM
Originally Posted By sporter:
7.62 NATO is no joke.


do tell
living well is the best revenge! lotsa beans mafia!!!
R.I.P. CPT Ritz, SSG Epps, SSG Ortiz... AIRBORNE ALL THE WAY!!! c2/325 abn inf 1983 - 1986 M60 gunners shoot more;o)~
hotbiggun42
Member
Offline
Posts: 13730
Feedback: 100% (82)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:56:44 PM
Originally Posted By danno-in-michigan:
FMJ 7.62 really isn't a great choice for any application.


I don't know if you are joking or not but I have read that here before. I don't understand it but everyone has opinions.
The Founding Fathers envisioned a robustly Christian yet religiously tolerant America, with churches serving as vital institutions that would eclipse the state in importance.. Ron Paul
USMCTanker
Disgruntled former GySgt of Marines
Military
Offline
Posts: 6632
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 6:59:02 PM
From a range management perspective, M118LR has a longer SDZ from the firing points than standard 7.62mm ball. I remember range L5 used to be rated for M118LR, and required more prep by the RSO / OIC due to the increased range.
I require alcohol, red meat, hot naked women, and large quantities of small arms and ammo. My other hobbies are soft, furry bunny rabbits, pretty butterflies, and balloons in pastel colors.
USMCTanker
Disgruntled former GySgt of Marines
Military
Offline
Posts: 6633
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 7:01:12 PM
Originally Posted By ArmyInfantryVet:

Originally Posted By pcsutton:
M-118 LR is some great stuff. I reload clone M-118's with the only difference being I use Varget.

Out to 1000 yds. If I can see ya....I can hit ya. Stand off distance rocks!!

I'd imagine that M118LR could compete with .30-06 of old. Pretty neat.

But then again, with new projectiles and propellants; modern .30-06 can rival magnum cartridges.


Standard 7.62mm NATO rd with 147 gr bullet and ball propellants has the same ballistics as cal. .30 M2 ball with 150 gr bullet and IMR 4895 extruded propellants, IIRC.
I require alcohol, red meat, hot naked women, and large quantities of small arms and ammo. My other hobbies are soft, furry bunny rabbits, pretty butterflies, and balloons in pastel colors.
stevelish
Offline
Posts: 1146
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 7:05:12 PM
Holy @#$%!!! I've never seen a thread like this. Evar.
Bradders
Designated Gun Plumber
Offline
Posts: 25623
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 7:08:58 PM
At 1000yds with a 175 SMK and mv of 2650 fps, .762 will have 585 ft/lbs energy
At point blank, .357 mag with a 158 will have 774 ft/lbs
Fullpower
Member
Offline
Posts: 3622
Feedback: 100% (16)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 7:10:55 PM
One of the many cool things about the 7.62 NATO cartridge is.....
The AR10 rifle.
ReallyLongAction
Online
Posts: 4292
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 7:11:20 PM
[Last Edit: 1/11/2012 7:12:03 PM by ReallyLongAction]
Originally Posted By USMCTanker:
Originally Posted By ArmyInfantryVet:

Originally Posted By pcsutton:
M-118 LR is some great stuff. I reload clone M-118's with the only difference being I use Varget.

Out to 1000 yds. If I can see ya....I can hit ya. Stand off distance rocks!!

I'd imagine that M118LR could compete with .30-06 of old. Pretty neat.

But then again, with new projectiles and propellants; modern .30-06 can rival magnum cartridges.


Standard 7.62mm NATO rd with 147 gr bullet and ball propellants has the same ballistics as cal. .30 M2 ball with 150 gr bullet and IMR 4895 extruded propellants, IIRC.



Every source I have read lists 150gr. 7.62 Nato at 2800 fps, and 150gr. M2 ball at 2910. I'm just going from what I've read. Even still, they're no doubt close.
This is at the muzzle.


Handloading for the .30-06 with that big 'ol case is a whole 'nother story.........
Windustsearch
Member
Offline
Posts: 19353
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 7:20:25 PM
[Last Edit: 1/11/2012 7:21:41 PM by Windustsearch]
Originally Posted By Bradders:
At 1000yds with a 175 SMK and mv of 2650 fps, .762 will have 585 ft/lbs energy
At point blank, .357 mag with a 158 will have 774 ft/lbs


That would be a heck of a hot .357 mag load. I think most 158 gr loads are more like 580, unless you are talking out of a rifle.

Rich_V
Member
Offline
Posts: 4291
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 7:28:57 PM
Originally Posted By Windustsearch:
Originally Posted By Bradders:
At 1000yds with a 175 SMK and mv of 2650 fps, .762 will have 585 ft/lbs energy
At point blank, .357 mag with a 158 will have 774 ft/lbs


That would be a heck of a hot .357 mag load. I think most 158 gr loads are more like 580, unless you are talking out of a rifle.



FMJ 30 cal vs .357 expanding bullet, which do you think will cause more damage?
Tough times breed strong people; Strong people create good times; Good times breed weak people; Weak people create tough times
Shawnmt6601
Kuwabatake Sanjuro
Offline
Posts: 10294
Feedback: 100% (25)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 7:32:07 PM
[Last Edit: 1/11/2012 7:35:05 PM by Shawnmt6601]
Originally Posted By hotbiggun42:
Originally Posted By DriftPunch:

Originally Posted By hotbiggun42:
Originally Posted By DriftPunch:
5.56*45


Sniper was dropping the bad guys at 850yds. do you think 5.56 would have been more effective?

No, but you said you wanted versatility. Try a shoulder fired rifle or carbine in full auto in 7.62*51. Try to carry as many rounds of 7.62*51 as you can with 5.56*45.

The reduced range is gladly sacrificed.




While i disagree with your above evaluation the sniper man did say that 7.62x51 was most effective past 200yds. It was really a good show.





the sniper that made the longest kill in Iraq with a 7.62 also preferred the 556 in using the MK 262 and made most of his kills wit that combo, also said it seemed to do more damage. you can see you tube interviews of him saying it and it is in a issue of SOF from about 2 months ago and the Book Trigger Men


ETA 77 grain ammo is not too long to fit in a mag most high power shooters use it all the time and the MK 262 is 77 and does not need to be singly loaded, 80s do, not 77s, that is bullshit and the NM M16 has out shot the NM M14 at Perry all the time
"Just like every serial killer already knows, eventually fantasy does not do it for you anymore"

I have to return some video tapes.

shikata ga nai

Rincon_11
Unlicensed chilli chemist
Offline
Posts: 4259
Feedback: 100% (4)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 7:32:42 PM
7.62x52.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
It's, BACON!
bafordman
Don't mind me, I am just quoting the internet.
Offline
Posts: 3034
Feedback: 100% (9)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 7:34:01 PM
Originally Posted By danno-in-michigan:
FMJ 7.62 really isn't a great choice for any application.


Someone correct me if I'm wrong but don't the Geneva Convention says we must use a non-expanding round.

7.62 > 5.56



"If ever a time should come when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of it's experienced patriots to prevent it's ruin". Samuel Adams
SecurityForcesmember
Offline
Posts: 5217
Feedback: 100% (4)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 7:37:28 PM
Originally Posted By hotbiggun42:
Originally Posted By pcsutton:
M-118 LR is some great stuff. I reload clone M-118's with the only difference being I use Varget.

Out to 1000 yds. If I can see ya....I can hit ya. Stand off distance rocks!!


I have 1k rounds of M118LR I just dont get a chance to shoot it often


Start reloading and you'll have more than 1K of it....

Lake city cases, approx 43 grains of cannister grade RL15, and a 175 SMK loaded to 2.81 COAL is pretty much a dupe my friend. For added target destruction, use the 178 AMAX in place of the 175 SMK.
SecurityForcesmember
Offline
Posts: 5218
Feedback: 100% (4)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 7:40:55 PM
Originally Posted By ReallyLongAction:
Originally Posted By USMCTanker:
Originally Posted By ArmyInfantryVet:

Originally Posted By pcsutton:
M-118 LR is some great stuff. I reload clone M-118's with the only difference being I use Varget.

Out to 1000 yds. If I can see ya....I can hit ya. Stand off distance rocks!!

I'd imagine that M118LR could compete with .30-06 of old. Pretty neat.

But then again, with new projectiles and propellants; modern .30-06 can rival magnum cartridges.


Standard 7.62mm NATO rd with 147 gr bullet and ball propellants has the same ballistics as cal. .30 M2 ball with 150 gr bullet and IMR 4895 extruded propellants, IIRC.



Every source I have read lists 150gr. 7.62 Nato at 2800 fps, and 150gr. M2 ball at 2910. I'm just going from what I've read. Even still, they're no doubt close.
This is at the muzzle.


Handloading for the .30-06 with that big 'ol case is a whole 'nother story.........


Lake city measures MV at I think 68 feet from the muzzle.... And handloading -06 gives the shooter a whole new world. It really is a fantastic round. Also, 2910 sounds too hot and too fast for M2 ball. M2 is M1 ammo, I though m1 ammo was close to 2750 fps but I may be mistaken.
Gilly
Online
Posts: 2204
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 8:12:56 PM
Versatiity is the key word. Some units prefer .300 Win Mag or .338 Lapua for reaching out and touching people. That said, there aren't any battle rifles in those calibers.

My answer would by 7.62x51
swede1986
The swedish version of Mr. T
Online
Posts: 13334
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 8:14:36 PM
Originally Posted By bafordman:
Originally Posted By danno-in-michigan:
FMJ 7.62 really isn't a great choice for any application.


Someone correct me if I'm wrong but don't the Geneva Convention says we must use a non-expanding round.

7.62 > 5.56





It's the Hague Convention which the US signed but never ratified. The US still abides by it though for political reasons.
I Pity The FOOL!

hotbiggun42
Member
Offline
Posts: 13731
Feedback: 100% (82)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 8:37:26 PM
Originally Posted By stevelish:
Holy @#$%!!! I've never seen a thread like this. Evar.


needs more Ron Paul huh.
The Founding Fathers envisioned a robustly Christian yet religiously tolerant America, with churches serving as vital institutions that would eclipse the state in importance.. Ron Paul
Ragin_Cajun
Cuddly as a Crowbar
Military
Offline
Posts: 11127
Feedback: 100% (4)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 8:40:18 PM
Originally Posted By Sslous:
Originally Posted By zimpete:

Ex Navy guy from work says 7.62x51 is way better than any .308



What is with these navy guys. The one I know tells me bat shit insane storys.


Whadda ya expect? The poor guy was in the Canadian Navy. How would you like to do a 3 year sea-duty tour on a rowboat
Ohne Schwefel und Salpeter gibt's keine Freiheit!
LARRYG
USN 1969-1973
Offline
Posts: 52484
Feedback: 100% (23)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 8:57:07 PM
Originally Posted By Bradders:
At 1000yds with a 175 SMK and mv of 2650 fps, .762 will have 585 ft/lbs energy
At point blank, .357 mag with a 158 will have 774 ft/lbs


Yeah, but we aren't talking about .762.

If it's a Colt, it's a copy of an original ArmaLite.

I am not LARRYG36.

Racing is life. Anything that happens before or after is just waiting.

If your AR10 is marked Geneseo, IL, it's still an AR10 no matter what some people say.
LARRYG
USN 1969-1973
Offline
Posts: 52485
Feedback: 100% (23)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 9:05:04 PM
Originally Posted By USMCTanker:
I have a Sgt Maj. friend of mine that was back here a couple of weeks ago from II MEF. We were talking about the M14 and the 7.62mm NATO cartridge. He used to be on the USMC rifle team, and is a distinguished marksman. He was telling me how the 5.56mm match-grade rifles they were using at 1000 meters (with 77 gr projectile) would barely "plop" through the target cheese cloth and paper, and wouldn't have any energy left after impact. They tried using them for a period of time and went back to the M14 NM rifles they'd been using prior.

I don't know how long ago that was as I didn't ask, but I thought it was pretty interesting stuff. He said the 77 gr rounds had to be loaded singly, as they were too long to fit in the magazine.


What about this one?

In one of the best kept secrets of National Match history, the Army Marksmanship Unit has been shooting AMU-built National Match grade AR-10's for the past two years. Their work has culminated with the acceptance of the AR-10NM for use "across the board" in NRA Service Rifle competition.

If it's a Colt, it's a copy of an original ArmaLite.

I am not LARRYG36.

Racing is life. Anything that happens before or after is just waiting.

If your AR10 is marked Geneseo, IL, it's still an AR10 no matter what some people say.
zhick
Member
Offline
Posts: 1924
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 9:15:04 PM
Originally Posted By pcsutton:
M-118 LR is some great stuff. I reload clone M-118's with the only difference being I use Varget.

Out to 1000 yds. If I can see ya....I can hit ya. Stand off distance rocks!!


I'll second this sentiment. Properly loaded 175 BTHP match ammo will stay supersonic to just past 1K in the 7.62x51. Good medicine.
DriftPunch
Stone Waste of White
Offline
Posts: 19313
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 10:55:45 PM

Originally Posted By bafordman:
Originally Posted By danno-in-michigan:
FMJ 7.62 really isn't a great choice for any application.


Someone correct me if I'm wrong but don't the Geneva Convention says we must use a non-expanding round.

7.62 > 5.56




You are wrong. The Hague convention requires FMJ, but it doesn't mention unstable bullets or bullets that fracture easily. These things were not understood or really even seen at the time it was written, and it was never updated.
IchWarrior
Resident Non-LEO Dog KIller
Offline
Posts: 6781
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 10:58:52 PM
Originally Posted By Rincon_11:
7.62x52.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile


Trim your cases, asshole.
Zenvo
Member
Offline
Posts: 843
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 11:00:07 PM
Originally Posted By DriftPunch:

Originally Posted By bafordman:
Originally Posted By danno-in-michigan:
FMJ 7.62 really isn't a great choice for any application.


Someone correct me if I'm wrong but don't the Geneva Convention says we must use a non-expanding round.

7.62 > 5.56




You are wrong. The Hague convention requires FMJ, but it doesn't mention unstable bullets or bullets that fracture easily. These things were not understood or really even seen at the time it was written, and it was never updated.


1. If our enemy doesn't follow the Geneva Convention then we shouldn't either when fighting that enemy.

2. .308 is the best round ever....well aside from the .338 but who wants to pay for that?
LARRYG
USN 1969-1973
Offline
Posts: 52501
Feedback: 100% (23)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 11:04:40 PM
Originally Posted By Zenvo:
Originally Posted By DriftPunch:

Originally Posted By bafordman:
Originally Posted By danno-in-michigan:
FMJ 7.62 really isn't a great choice for any application.


Someone correct me if I'm wrong but don't the Geneva Convention says we must use a non-expanding round.

7.62 > 5.56




You are wrong. The Hague convention requires FMJ, but it doesn't mention unstable bullets or bullets that fracture easily. These things were not understood or really even seen at the time it was written, and it was never updated.


1. If our enemy doesn't follow the Geneva Convention then we shouldn't either when fighting that enemy.

2. .308 is the best round ever....well aside from the .338 but who wants to pay for that?


It's the Hague Convention that forbids expanding bullets, not the Geneva Convention.
If it's a Colt, it's a copy of an original ArmaLite.

I am not LARRYG36.

Racing is life. Anything that happens before or after is just waiting.

If your AR10 is marked Geneseo, IL, it's still an AR10 no matter what some people say.
Combat_Jack
Wet Behind The Ears LT
Military
Online
Posts: 62379
Feedback: 100% (15)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 11:13:34 PM
Originally Posted By SecurityForcesmember:
Originally Posted By hotbiggun42:
Originally Posted By pcsutton:
M-118 LR is some great stuff. I reload clone M-118's with the only difference being I use Varget.

Out to 1000 yds. If I can see ya....I can hit ya. Stand off distance rocks!!


I have 1k rounds of M118LR I just dont get a chance to shoot it often


Start reloading and you'll have more than 1K of it....

Lake city cases, approx 43 grains of cannister grade RL15, and a 175 SMK loaded to 2.81 COAL is pretty much a dupe my friend. For added target destruction, use the 178 AMAX in place of the 175 SMK.


Temp sensitive though. Some guys use Varget because of that.
Happy men don't volunteer. Boris Pasternak.
ArmyInfantryVet
Member
Military
Offline
Posts: 33403
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/12/2012 2:59:14 AM
[Last Edit: 1/12/2012 2:59:42 AM by ArmyInfantryVet]

Originally Posted By LARRYG:
Originally Posted By USMCTanker:
I have a Sgt Maj. friend of mine that was back here a couple of weeks ago from II MEF. We were talking about the M14 and the 7.62mm NATO cartridge. He used to be on the USMC rifle team, and is a distinguished marksman. He was telling me how the 5.56mm match-grade rifles they were using at 1000 meters (with 77 gr projectile) would barely "plop" through the target cheese cloth and paper, and wouldn't have any energy left after impact. They tried using them for a period of time and went back to the M14 NM rifles they'd been using prior.

I don't know how long ago that was as I didn't ask, but I thought it was pretty interesting stuff. He said the 77 gr rounds had to be loaded singly, as they were too long to fit in the magazine.


What about this one?

In one of the best kept secrets of National Match history, the Army Marksmanship Unit has been shooting AMU-built National Match grade AR-10's for the past two years. Their work has culminated with the acceptance of the AR-10NM for use "across the board" in NRA Service Rifle competition.


Only a fool would take a M14 over a AR-10.

  Previous Page
Page:  / 7
[ARCHIVED THREAD] - 7.62x51   (Page 1 of 7)
ARCHIVED ARCHIVED