Quote History Quoted:
I love the idea in concept.
In practice, I predict it would be a nightmare. Folks here will have very different ideas about what does and does not constitute "breaking news," even if we reach consensus on that folks will ignore any defined criteria all too often, and it would create a whole new front in the "DUPE" wars.
I hope I am wrong about all of that, because I could see it being very useful and a positive addition to the site.
View Quote
Just thinking out loud....and way above my pay grade
Its clearly a forum only created for broadcasting BREAKING NEWS, even then sent only to Members with a Subscription, to email or SMS. Breaking news doesnt happen everyday, on a busy busy week it may occur twice a day- a week or two would probably fit on page one easily. Really no excuse to DUPE in there.
Probably a good idea to install a failsafe. Upon posting it goes email/sms to Staff to authorize & release (maybe even any and all volunteer mods to insure a lot of people have a chance to help disperse and maintain the real time continuum). Kinda like the 7 second delay in radio, a little check system.
And
clearly tacked up top, SPAM, April Fools, I was just fucking around- locked until Obama gets reelected.
But your last line is what I was kinda thinking about, "very useful and positive addition to the site". Even Active topics only users (
) only get news when they check in. I only surf here and there at work. Breaking news SMS I'd get no matter what no matter where. AQ attacking downtown Seattle and Im in a movie? I know while Im eating popcorn the S is hTF outside.