Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 7/27/2014 4:00:16 AM EDT
Federal judge rules DC ban on gun carry rights unconstitutional


A federal judge in the District of Columbia on Saturday overturned
the city's total ban on residents being allowing to carry firearms
outside their home, declaring the law "unconstitutional" in a
landmark decision for gun-rights activists.

Judge Frederick Scullin Jr. wrote in his ruling in Palmer v. District
of Columbia that the right to bear arms extends outside the home,
therefore gun-control laws in the nation's capital are "unconstitutional."

"We won," Alan Gura, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs, told Fox
News in a phone interview. "I'm very pleased with the decision that
the city can't forbid the exercise of a fundamental constitutional right.

Gura said he expects the District to appeal this decision but added,
"We'll be happy to keep the fight going."

The decision leaves no gray area in gun-carrying rights.

Judge Sculin extensively referenced the Supreme Court decisions in
District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. Chicago (2010)
to concluding "there is no longer any basis on which this court can
conclude that the District of Columbia's total ban on the public
carrying of ready-to-use handguns outside the home is constitutional
under any level of scrutiny."

The court ordered the city to now allow residents from the District
and other states to carry weapon within its boundaries.

Judge Scullin wrote that the court "enjoins Defendants from enforcing
the home limitations of [D.C. firearms laws] unless and until such
time as the District of Columbia adopts a licensing mechanism
consistent with constitutional standards enabling people to exercise
their Second Amendment right to bear arms."

The defendants are the city government and Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier.

This case has dragged in the courts for five years. Gura has twice
asked the federal appeals court to force Judge Scullin to issue a
decision. The five plaintiffs filed in 2009, and the case was argued
twice, most recently in Oct. 2012.

George Lyon, a D.C. resident and registered gun owner is one of the
plaintiffs in Palmer.

"I am gratified that after a long wait our right to protect ourselves
and our families has been vindicated," Lyon, a lawyer, said Saturday.

He urged Mayor Vincent Gray, a Democrat, and the Democrat-controlled
City Council to "swiftly enact a concealed carry law that protects
the rights of law abiding citizens to protect themselves."

Gray and D.C. City Council Chairman Phil Mendelson did not respond
immediately for a request for comment.

Read more at: Fox News

As a Life Member of SAF, its always good to see my friends Alan and Joe succeed on our behalf!  Nicely done SAF!!!  Working together....we will prevail!
Link Posted: 7/27/2014 4:02:44 AM EDT
[#1]
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A federal judge on Saturday overturned Washington D.C.'s ban on carrying handguns outside the home, saying it was unconstitutional.

"There is no longer any basis on which this Court can conclude that the District of Columbia's total ban on the public carrying of ready-to-use handguns outside the home is constitutional under any level of scrutiny," Judge Frederick Scullin said in an opinion.

"Therefore, the Court finds that the District of Columbia's complete ban on the carrying of handguns in public is unconstitutional," he added in his 19-page ruling.

The court ordered the city to allow residents to carry handguns outside their homes and to let non-residents carry them as well.

Scullin made the ruling in the PALMER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al case, which has been dragging on for five years.

In 2008, the Supreme Court struck down D.C.'s all-out ban on handguns on the basis that it violated the right to bear arms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment.

An appeals court in 2011 required handguns to be registered.

Souce Reuters: No link available at this time
Link Posted: 7/27/2014 4:05:15 AM EDT
[#2]
Link Posted: 7/27/2014 8:17:43 AM EDT
[#3]
Link Posted: 7/27/2014 7:55:04 PM EDT
[#4]
How long to they have to set rules, application process, reciprocity, ect. Basically when do citizens get the go ahead?
Link Posted: 7/27/2014 7:59:59 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
How long to they have to set rules, application process, reciprocity, ect. Basically when do citizens get the go ahead?
View Quote

As we sit any registered handgun owned by a resident in DC is legal for CC. Those of us outside can CC.
Link Posted: 7/28/2014 11:42:36 AM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

As we sit any registered handgun owned by a resident in DC is legal for CC. Those of us outside can CC.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
How long to they have to set rules, application process, reciprocity, ect. Basically when do citizens get the go ahead?

As we sit any registered handgun owned by a resident in DC is legal for CC. Those of us outside can CC.


I see basically constituational carry is enacted until they get their regs together. Emily miller from emily gets a gun has reported law enforcement is not to enforce any carry rules
Link Posted: 7/29/2014 10:22:39 PM EDT
[#7]
Nevermind the judge put his decision hold
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top