Posted: 7/12/2015 10:50:55 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote History Quoted:
First, my 2000 YTD number includes NK, UA, AS, FX. WN and 5X. Its being published as 1500, but I called it 2000 for both easy math and the knowledge that classes of 20 or so have been run here and there and aren't reflected in the numbers. So, the 2000 is a good number IMO because it includes a 25% overage View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quote History Quoted:
First, my 2000 YTD number includes NK, UA, AS, FX. WN and 5X. Its being published as 1500, but I called it 2000 for both easy math and the knowledge that classes of 20 or so have been run here and there and aren't reflected in the numbers. So, the 2000 is a good number IMO because it includes a 25% overage
So your numbers left out the airline that has hired the most this year.
Quoted:
Second, just because 50% of the seniority list is retiring doesn't mean that the refill rate for the pool of applicants isn't growing at the same pace. Thus, there are still probably hundreds if not thousands of current and qualified aviators (by which I define as 1000TPIC, 4000+ TT. jet type rated and/or multiple type ratings, 4 year college degree or lower military equivalents, with at least one internal LoR) for EVERY SLOT, when analyzed on a month to month basis. Throw in people qualified under stated minimums (which we all exist for one reason) then the numbers grow even higher. However, because of the HR, we all know that the more restrictive definition of current and qualified is the more realistic for the vast majority of people flying.
Hiring managers at both AAL and DAL have stated that they believe their pool of applicants is the same pool of applicants at all the other big carriers...many who are not necessarily "qualified," in their eyes. As you stated, just because someone has 4,000TT and 1,000TPIC doesn't mean they're "qualified" in the eyes of that respective company. I had 2 regional FOs in my class that had zero TPIC, 1 type and <4kTT.
Quoted:
Third, anticipating pilot hiring in the future is laughable. It might come to pass, but airlines are the prime example of "Past performance doesn't equal future results. You can and will lose money." In 1999-2000, UA was hiring at the rates you're suggesting, and less than 24 months later, was furloughing people, some for DECADES, like it was their job. If you don't think that any management group wouldn't love to shunt thousands of pilots back into the regionals, then I've the last 30 years of evidence to the contrary. Combined with the Union's complicity in doing so to save the top 5% of the lists (the guys who helped to create this situation in 1978 in many cases) shortages simply come and go in aviation.
I 100% agree to the saying "past performance doesn't equal future results." How about instead of shortage, we'll call it a high amount pilot retirements and "potential hiring," would that make you feel better? Of my group of friends in the military and civilian, a greater percentage have been hired than not.
Quoted:
Combined with the Union's complicity in doing so to save the top 5% of the lists (the guys who helped to create this situation in 1978 in many cases) shortages simply come and go in aviation.
Wait..so you are calling it a shortage?
|
|