Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 4/16/2015 12:49:29 PM EDT
Link Posted: 4/16/2015 2:06:42 PM EDT
[#1]
Link Posted: 4/16/2015 2:15:53 PM EDT
[Last Edit: shortround] [#2]
You're welcome.

Just saying...

To stay on point, these new "low" mounts, just how much lower are they than the standard?  One of the things keeping me from using Acogs on other firearms such as the FAL and M14-type has been the fact that the standard Acog height causes you to have a strained or no cheek weld unless the rifle comb is built up.  If these are down in the realm of a standard scope for height, it would definitely be worth taking another look.
Link Posted: 3/5/2016 10:33:09 AM EDT
[#3]
ACOG is so reliable that I wonder if there will come a time when all service weapons like the m4 carbine  will be equipped with one. If you lack an optic, you are at a severe disadvantage. In almost all conditions.

I think an ACOG is even more reliable than iron sites, which I havent used in 15 years, except on a shotty and even there aimpoint rules.

I like the ta11 model 3.5x35mm but not sure it is the best choice, or for everyone, a 1.5x or 2x is a good one size fits all (or none).

Even a compact is light years ahead of iron sites.
Link Posted: 10/28/2016 1:20:51 AM EDT
[#4]
Thank you !!!!!!
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top