User Panel
Posted: 9/30/2014 7:13:43 PM EDT
58 Solar panels deployed , total STC 12,000 watts.
House runs, pretty much autonomous on a 4100 watt battery based system, The other 8 kilowatts are going onto the grid. Local utility pays 6 cents per KW-Hr. There's gotta be a better use for that energy. . . . (20) SolarWorld 260 watt mono, made in Oregon; deployed on grid 29 September, 2014 |
|
[#1]
Indoor vegetable grow room? Bell peppers, tomatoes, etc year round?
Uses the most power during sun hours... LED lights these days are impressive for lower power usage... |
|
[#2]
Running 4500 watts to water heater. and around 1500 watts of lights at the moment.
Ran engine block heater for awhile on Wife's vehicle this morning, waste some power to make room in the batteries for more solar amps. . Total production yesterday was 44 Kilowatt hours. 10 KW-Hr went in the batteries, 24 KW-H went onto the grid, and I used 10 KW-H at the shop. . . Ran some numbers on lighting efficiency. LED are getting better, but not yet as efficient as the F96T8 tubes. CREE 18 watt LED claim 1600 Lumens... 89 Lumens per watt ( initial, spec is 70% decay over 15,000 hour life ) , ACTUAL lifespan is unknown. F96T8 SPX50 are claiming 5650 Lumens from 59 watts 95 Lumens per watt, that is mean output over lifespan of 20,000 hours, they seem to go about 8 years in use here. |
|
[#3]
Are you bragging?
I think he's just bragging. What do you think? |
|
[#4]
Where'd you get all these panels?
Second the greenhouse option. Make the man think you're growing a forest of weed. |
|
[#5]
I'm assuming your sized your system for winter conditions and you have lots of excess power right now? I have a tiny little off-grid system, I just stop conserving so much when the sun is shining. If some Watts are lost, I don't really care.
Not clear on what you mean by '4100 watt battery based system.' At 48V this would only be 85 Ah, which can't be right. Or is it that only 34% (4100/12000) of the Watts produced by your panels are being used to charge the batteries? |
|
[#6]
|
|
[#7]
Quoted: Where'd you get all these panels? Second the greenhouse option. Make the man think you're growing a forest of weed. View Quote 14 Kyocera 130 watt f rom Japan. 8 Sanyo 220 watt Mexican modules, 2 Sharp 175 watt, and 2 BPsolarex 85 watt panels are charging 24 volt, 1600 AmpHour flooded lead acidbattery bank. House runs exclusive from a pair of Outback inverters, since 2003.. . 2nd array is grid tied: 12 Panasonic 230 watt modules, from Tennessee, direct feed to power grid via Schneider TX3300 inverter. 16 Kilowatt Hours today . 3rd array, online since yesterday: 20 SolarWorld 260 watt mono modules, made in Hillsboro Oregon, grid tied via Schneider TX5000 inverter. Produced 28 Kilowatt Hours today |
|
[#9]
Buy a Tesla or 3 and charge them batteries. go completely energy independent
|
|
[#11]
Do you have any high demand applications that you do somewhat irregularly? IE, dehydrating things, casting bullets with an electric lead-pot etc? Those are all things you can do now to take advantage of the increased solar output. I'm assuming your output will be greatly diminished this winter due to the decreased light you will get...
Other options I can think of will just be spewed randomly as they come to me... Do you have an interest in pre-made meals? I like to cook, I like home-made food, I don't always have time to make a good, wholesome meal so it's nice to have frozen, pre-prepared meals that can just be dropped in the oven etc and be done with little/no prep work that day. If so, you can do a lot of your prep of those items now vs. later. The increased energy usage of cooking/prepping those items plus the usage from freezing them would ultimately save you some energy down the road and help to consume some of the energy excess you have right now. Some ideas include pre-cooked taco meat so you can just microwave it and make tacos/nachos/etc, pre-prepped lasagna that you just put in the oven and bake, pre-baked dinner rolls that you just heat & eat. The possibilities are endless. |
|
[#12]
I like the greenhouse idea. I've heard that bit coin mining is productive but a major cost is electricity which in your case could generate income while you are riding the peak energy.
|
|
[#13]
|
|
[#14]
|
|
[#15]
|
|
[#16]
Run the meter backwards during the day and forward during the night.
|
|
[#17]
|
|
[#18]
Quoted:
58 Solar panels deployed , total STC 12,000 watts.House runs, pretty much autonomous on a 4100 watt battery based system, The other 8 kilowatts are going onto the grid. Local utility pays 6 cents per KW-Hr. There's gotta be a better use for that energy. View Quote Bake some cookies, while using a space heater and the air conditioner. |
|
[#19]
|
|
[#20]
Have you ever considered building some supports and taking the panels off your house's exterior? They could be free-standing or even roof top supports. You might even get better utilization of the solar energy on your property (more peak power, more total daily energy).
Do you do these installations professionally, or perhaps, as a sideline business? Did you design the system you have or did it just "evolve"? |
|
[#21]
Quoted:
Running 4500 watts to water heater. and around 1500 watts of lights at the moment. Ran engine block heater for awhile on Wife's vehicle this morning, waste some power to make room in the batteries for more solar amps. . Total production yesterday was 44 Kilowatt hours. 10 KW-Hr went in the batteries, 24 KW-H went onto the grid, and I used 10 KW-H at the shop. . . Ran some numbers on lighting efficiency. LED are getting better, but not yet as efficient as the F96T8 tubes. CREE 18 watt LED claim 1600 Lumens... 89 Lumens per watt ( initial, spec is 70% decay over 15,000 hour life ) , ACTUAL lifespan is unknown. F96T8 SPX50 are claiming 5650 Lumens from 59 watts 95 Lumens per watt, that is mean output over lifespan of 20,000 hours, they seem to go about 8 years in use here. View Quote I was also going to recommend grow lights, either indoor or to supplement an outdoor greenhouse. Depending on your location, usually to extend daylight hours or added Lumens/heat. 600 watt High Pressure Sodium = 90,000 Lumens/150 Lumens per watt (high efficiency reflector recommended) Life span of 1-2 years continuous before significant decay. |
|
[#22]
Trollslayer:
As you've observed, the HOUSE charging system has indeed evolved, starting out as one pair of Kyocera 130 watt modules, one 24 volt OUTBACK inverter and a pair of deep cycle 8D batteries. Initially, the inverter maintained power to my refrigerator, range hood, and kitchen outlets, strictly a back-up grid failure system. It was able to keep the reefer running for 48 hours, without generator or grid power.. I added panels and batteries over the years. The last addition to the House system is the pole mounted array of (8) 220 watt SANYO modules facing south, at which time I moved 6 of the Kyocera 130 watt modules to a west facing vertical orientation. the house array is optimized for winter production, when I use more power. It gives up a lot of annual potential, but I can seldom use more than 18 or 20 Kilowatt hours into the battery bank, exceptions are after a week of cloudy days, or when EQUALIZING the battery bank. .... One other benefit of vertical or near vertical mounting is keeping snow from sticking to the panels. . . House can go 8 days on batteries, with careful conservation. Normal heavy use will take the batteries down after 3 or 4 days, with no sun. . Nope, not in the solar business. The solar power is strictly hobby stuff for me. I like energy, and like having my OWN personal supply. |
|
[#23]
Certainly a tilt is required even without snow, even in the tropics. You need a flushing action to keep them clean. Still, IMO, you should get them off your house and onto stand-alone mounts, even if the mount is vertical.
|
|
[#24]
Quoted: I'm assuming your sized your system for winter conditions and you have lots of excess power right now? I have a tiny little off-grid system, I just stop conserving so much when the sun is shining. If some Watts are lost, I don't really care. Not clear on what you mean by '4100 watt battery based system.' At 48V this would only be 85 Ah, which can't be right. Or is it that only 34% (4100/12000) of the Watts produced by your panels are being used to charge the batteries? View Quote 14 x 130 watt kyocera 8 x 220 watt Sanyo 2 x 175 watt panasonic 2 x 85 watt BP pair of Outback FM80 charge controllers stacked pair of Outback Power inverters. house runs 100 percent, from a 1600 Amp hour, 24 volt battery bank. standalone system, utility grid is backup, along with a pair of Honda eu3000 generators, just in case of emergency.
|
|
[#28]
|
|
[#29]
Very nice. Be prepared for all of that stuff to start crapping out on you in a few years though. Solar is currently a bad technology for many applications. It's too damn expensive, inefficient and doesn't last long enough to pay for itself. It's really nice to be off the grid though.
|
|
[#30]
The weak spot in LED and more efficient lights is the power supplies.
Electrolytic caps other than hermetic solid tantalum have very high failure rates and short lives. |
|
[#31]
Quoted:
It's too damn expensive, inefficient and doesn't last long enough to pay for itself. View Quote Wait, say what? Solar doesn't last long enough to pay for itself? Current solar prices are well under $1/watt, throw in the federal tax credit and ever increasing electric rates and the pay-off is rather short. FWIW, I ran the numbers on the setup that I'm working on right now. At my current electric rates, the price I paid for panels, the stuff I scrounged (wire) and the few things I need to buy yet, the payoff is well under 10 years. The warranty alone on the panels is 25 years from a reputable company. The biggest risk is the batteries and charge controller; buy from a reputable source... Have you ever used solar? Or are you talking out your ass based upon something you read on the internet? FWIW, my mentor on my solar project has lived off-grid, with solar power since the 80's. At that time he was spending over $7/watt on panels alone and it was more cost-effective for him to go that route. Fast forward to today and it is now VERY cost-effective for people that are even currently on line-power. |
|
[#32]
Quoted:
The weak spot in LED and more efficient lights is the power supplies. Electrolytic caps other than hermetic solid tantalum have very high failure rates and short lives. View Quote This phenomenon and leaking, low discharge rate batteries (even Duracells) have killed or will kill all your electronics. IMO, they constitute built-in obsolescence. |
|
[#35]
Ham radio? Big HF base unit, or maybe set up your own repeater network? That way you can make your own comms too
|
|
[#37]
Have 3 HF stations.
And a 2 meter machine on the hill. All battery powered.
|
|
[#38]
|
|
[#39]
Quoted:
Wait, say what? Solar doesn't last long enough to pay for itself? Current solar prices are well under $1/watt, throw in the federal tax credit and ever increasing electric rates and the pay-off is rather short. FWIW, I ran the numbers on the setup that I'm working on right now. At my current electric rates, the price I paid for panels, the stuff I scrounged (wire) and the few things I need to buy yet, the payoff is well under 10 years. The warranty alone on the panels is 25 years from a reputable company. The biggest risk is the batteries and charge controller; buy from a reputable source... Have you ever used solar? Or are you talking out your ass based upon something you read on the internet? FWIW, my mentor on my solar project has lived off-grid, with solar power since the 80's. At that time he was spending over $7/watt on panels alone and it was more cost-effective for him to go that route. Fast forward to today and it is now VERY cost-effective for people that are even currently on line-power. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It's too damn expensive, inefficient and doesn't last long enough to pay for itself. Wait, say what? Solar doesn't last long enough to pay for itself? Current solar prices are well under $1/watt, throw in the federal tax credit and ever increasing electric rates and the pay-off is rather short. FWIW, I ran the numbers on the setup that I'm working on right now. At my current electric rates, the price I paid for panels, the stuff I scrounged (wire) and the few things I need to buy yet, the payoff is well under 10 years. The warranty alone on the panels is 25 years from a reputable company. The biggest risk is the batteries and charge controller; buy from a reputable source... Have you ever used solar? Or are you talking out your ass based upon something you read on the internet? FWIW, my mentor on my solar project has lived off-grid, with solar power since the 80's. At that time he was spending over $7/watt on panels alone and it was more cost-effective for him to go that route. Fast forward to today and it is now VERY cost-effective for people that are even currently on line-power. Half your panels will not last ten years and your panel manufacturer will probably be out of business in three. Best case you get a prorated credit if they are still around. Solar is about being green and being off the grid. It's will not save you any money with the current technology. |
|
[#40]
The weak spot in LED and more efficient lights is the power supplies.
Electrolytic caps other than hermetic solid tantalum have very high failure rates and short lives. View Quote Exactly. People buy LEDs and they wonder why they crap out after a few months or a few years. The LEDs, if cooled properly, will last years. The electronics (power supply) are cheap junk though, and will fail long before the LEDs do. Same thing with CFLs. I have ten year old CFLs that work fine and my newer ones only last a year or so. Also, the power has alot to do with it. With incandescents, you can see the power dip and spike. With new style bulbs you don't see it but it's slowly frying the electronics. |
|
[#41]
Quoted:
Half your panels will not last ten years and your panel manufacturer will probably be out of business in three. Best case you get a prorated credit if they are still around. Solar is about being green and being off the grid. It's will not save you any money with the current technology. View Quote Interesting... do you have direct experience with this? What brand panels did you have that failed before the ten year mark and the company was out of business? FWIW, Sharp and many other big-name manf's have been around a while and they aren't going anywhere anytime soon... do you have evidence to counter that?? I'm genuinely curious... |
|
[#43]
Quoted:
Interesting... do you have direct experience with this? What brand panels did you have that failed before the ten year mark and the company was out of business? FWIW, Sharp and many other big-name manf's have been around a while and they aren't going anywhere anytime soon... do you have evidence to counter that?? I'm genuinely curious... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Half your panels will not last ten years and your panel manufacturer will probably be out of business in three. Best case you get a prorated credit if they are still around. Solar is about being green and being off the grid. It's will not save you any money with the current technology. Interesting... do you have direct experience with this? What brand panels did you have that failed before the ten year mark and the company was out of business? FWIW, Sharp and many other big-name manf's have been around a while and they aren't going anywhere anytime soon... do you have evidence to counter that?? I'm genuinely curious... Yes. You can spend alot of money with a good brand name like BP and it'll last a while, or you can buy the cheap stuff and it'll fail pretty quickly. Either way it never works out financially. The internet is full of examples of solar companies failing in the last few years including the one I can see from my house called BlueChip Energy. There are also tons of examples of high failure rates in the industry, including this one: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/29/business/energy-environment/solar-powers-dark-side.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 I would actually love to see an example of a ten year old solar farm that didn't have to have lots of equipment replaced. China took an inefficient technology and started making it as cheaply as possible. It's just like what happened with LED light bulbs several years ago. China pumped out crap that failed quickly: http://www.ledsmagazine.com/articles/2010/09/ftc-sues-lights-of-america-over-deceptive-claims-for-led-lamps.html Give solar 20 years and it'll be where it needs to be. It's not ready yet. |
|
[#44]
Quoted:Yes. You can spend alot of money with a good brand name like BP and it'll last a while, or you can buy the cheap stuff and it'll fail pretty quickly. Either way it never works out financially. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:Yes. You can spend alot of money with a good brand name like BP and it'll last a while, or you can buy the cheap stuff and it'll fail pretty quickly. Either way it never works out financially. Who said a reputable company takes "a lot of money" to buy panels from? Have you even checked solar prices in the last couple years? You can buy panels from a reputable less than $1/watt in many cases. Quoted:
The internet is full of examples of solar companies failing in the last few years including the one I can see from my house called BlueChip Energy. You can't give me the name of a company that was bogus from the start as an example of one that failed. Of course the company is going to fail if they base their entire business model on lies and deceit. You want the real truth on BlueChip Energy look here Like I said previously, I'm talking about reputable companies. Companies that have been around for quite some time, producing quality panels for quite some time... Quoted:There are also tons of examples of high failure rates in the industry, including this one: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/29/business/energy-environment/solar-powers-dark-side.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 For some reason that article won't open for me, but I bet it's an isolated incident (possibly installation related) or the panels are from a subpar manufacturer. Where is the follow-up that tells why they failed? What manufacturer made them? Quoted:I would actually love to see an example of a ten year old solar farm that didn't have to have lots of equipment replaced. Solar farm? I don't know of many, but they often aren't the best place to look either. Most solar farms are installed with the bottom line in mind, which means lots of cutting corners, lots of cheap product etc... And "solar farms" haven't been popular for all that long. I can show you plenty of places that have had privately owned solar for a LONG time... Are you mad at solar panels because you used to work at BlueChip or something? The problem with this becoming popular technology is that you have companies springing up all over the place that are making panels. Most of them don't have a clue what they're doing, or they aren't in it to grow a business, they just want the quick, easy money and to get out. That's the problem, they aren't in it for the long-haul. You have to seek out the companies that ARE in it for the long-haul... |
|
[#45]
From the NY Times article that you cannot open:
Published: May 28, 2013: LOS ANGELES — The solar panels covering a vast warehouse roof in the sun-soaked Inland Empire region east of Los Angeles were only two years into their expected 25-year life span when they began to fail.
Coatings that protect the panels disintegrated while other defects caused two fires that took the system offline for two years, costing hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost revenues. It was not an isolated incident. Worldwide, testing labs, developers, financiers and insurers are reporting similar problems and say the $77 billion solar industry is facing a quality crisis just as solar panels are on the verge of widespread adoption. View Quote Also, here is a partial list of solar companies that aren't likely to honor their warranties: 2009 to 2010 Bankrupt, closed, acquired Advent Solar (emitter wrap-through Si) acquired by Applied Materials Applied Solar (solar roofing) acquired by Quercus Trust OptiSolar (a-Si on a grand scale) closed Ready Solar (PV installation) acquired by SunEdison Solasta (nano-coaxial solar) closed SV Solar (low-concentration PV) closed Senergen (depositing silane onto free-form metallurgical-grade Si substrates) closed Signet Solar (a-Si) bankrupt Sunfilm (a-Si) bankrupt Wakonda (GaAs) closed 2011 Bankrupt, closed EPV Solar (a-Si) bankrupt Evergreen (drawn Si) bankrupt Solyndra (CIGS) bankrupt SpectraWatt (c-Si) bankrupt Stirling Energy Systems (dish engine) bankrupt Acquisition, sale Ascent Solar (CIGS) acquired by TFG Radiant Calyxo (CdTe) acquired by Solar Fields from Q.cells HelioVolt (CIGS) acquired by Korea's SK Innovation National Semiconductor Solar Magic (panel optimizers) exited systems business NetCrystal (silicon on flexible substrate) acquired by Solar Semiconductor Soliant (CPV) acquired by Emcore 2012 Bankrupt, closed Abound Solar (CdTe) bankrupt AQT (CIGS) closed Ampulse (thin silicon) closed Arise Technology (PV modules) bankrupt Azuray (microinverters) closed BP (c-Si panels) exits solar business Centrotherm (PV manufacturing equipment) bankrupt CSG (c-Si on glass) closed by Suntech Day4 Energy (cell interconnects) delisted from TSX exchange ECD (a-Si) bankrupt Energy Innovations (CPV) bankrupt Flexcell (a-Si roll-roll BIPV) closed GlobalWatt (solar) closed GreenVolts (CPV) closed Global Solar Energy (CIGS) closed G24i (DSCs) bankrupt in 2012, re-emerged as G24i Power with new investors Hoku (polysilicon) shut down its Idaho polysilicon production facility Inventux (a-Si) bankrupt Konarka (OSCs) bankrupt Odersun (CIGS) bankrupt Pramac (a-Si panels built with equipment from Oerlikon) insolvent Pairan (Germany inverters) insolvent Ralos (developer) bankrupt REC Wafer (c-Si) bankrupt Satcon (BoS) bankrupt Schott (c-Si) exits c-Si business Schuco (a-Si) shutting down its a-Si business Sencera (a-Si) closed Siliken (c-Si modules) closed Skyline Solar (LCPV) closed Siemens (CSP, inverters, BOS) divestment from solar Solar Millennium (developer) insolvent Solarhybrid (developer) insolvent Sovello (Q.cells, Evergreen, REC JV) bankrupt SolarDay (c-Si modules) insolvent Solar Power Industries (PV modules) bankrupt Soltecture (CIGS BIPV) bankrupt Sun Concept (developer) bankrupt Acquisition, fire sale, restructuring Oelmaier (Germany inverters) insolvent, bought by agricultural supplier Lehner Agrar Q.Cells (c-Si) insolvent, acquired by South Korea's Hanwha Sharp (a-Si) backing away from a-Si, retiring 160 of its 320 megawatts in Japan Solibro (CIGS) Q-Cells unit acquired by China's Hanergy Solon (c-Si) acquired by UAE's Microsol Scheuten Solar (BIPV) bankrupt, then acquired by Aikosolar SolFocus (CPV) layoffs, restructuring for sale Sunways (c-Si, inverters) bought by LDK, restructuring to focus on BIPV and storage 2013 Bankrupt, closed Bosch (c-Si PV module) exits module business Concentrator Optics (CPV) bankrupt Suntech Wuxi (c-Si) bankrupt Acquisition, sale, restructuring Diehl (Germany inverters) inverter division sold to PE firm mutares AG ISET (CIGS) moving into "microsolar" MiaSolé (CIGS) acquired by China's Hanergy Nanosolar (CIGS) restructuring for sale NuvoSun (CIGS) acquired by Dow Twin Creeks (kerfless Si) acquired by GT Advanced Technology Wuerth Solar (installer) business turned over to BayWa |
|
[#46]
Companies that are acquired, divested, or restructured; or that exit a line of business are still required to honor warranties. Bankruptcy or closure of the entire business is another matter, obviously. I don't have anything like OP has, but I've had 14 sharp 240 panels in service for about 18 months w/o a single issue. |
|
[#47]
I have 58 PV modules in service.
14 are made in mexico. The rest are USA. The panels operational life will exceed my own, most likely. I still use the first solar panel I acquired, in 1989, a Solarex mx-60 After 25 years it is putting out around 90 percent of its rated power....like it always did. I use it for charging batteries on snow plow truck, and other various homestead vehicles.
|
|
[#48]
The Cold Climate Housing Research folks did a house up north of Fairbanks that incorporated a hot water storage tank that stored heat in the summer and used it to heat the house for most of the winter. Maybe you could do something similar to that? Would be much less efficient I would imagine since you are going solar=>electricity=>heat rather than solar=>heat as they had done. Just a thought..
|
|
[#49]
4500 watt tank type water heater, keeps the shop bathroom warm, and soaks up a fair bit of surplus electricity.
been cloudy, rainy last couple weeks. Only made about 11 kilowatt hours yesterday, probably less then 4 today.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.