OBAMACARE WARNING TO LOCKNLOAD: YOU ARE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR A REPEAT PROCEDURE

I'd pay $1,000.00 to see that!

Give us your source.

You obviously don't understand how politically correct many in senior leadership within the military are, remember the CSA said following the attack at Ft Hood the worse thing that could happen was it could effect diversity.

And as has been proven by the sidelining of Gen Boykin speaking out against Islam leads to sanctioning.

I often go bass fishing, sometimes I wait too long to set the hook and this results in the" hook, line and sinker" being swallowed by theinvis the fish.

Whenever this happens, I simply cut the line and let the fish go.

There isn't one single definition of sharia law/implementation even across extreme far right segment of Islam.

Like Christianity, Islam isn't a monolithic entity. Even among Protestant denomination, there are numerous branches/splits in Christianity and it's no less in Islam.

Apart from Shi'a/Sunni split, interpretation of Islam, liberal or puritanical, differs greatly even among one sect like Sunni, e.g., interpretation of Islam b/w Sunni Kurds and Sunnis in Saudi Arabia. Watch how Kurds who are Sunni interpret Koran/Islam/religious living and how Sunni in Saudi Arabia do.

For example, Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt is now claiming that their interpretation of sharia law is going to be loose in that head covering is going to be voluntary and banking interest, as well as many other practice, is going to be OK(not against sharia). Contrast that with sharia interpretation in Sunni Saudi Arabia or Shi'a Iran.

In Afghanistan, while back, when they did a research on why folks were joining and supporting Taliban, it wasn't because of sharia law or Taliban's interpretation of sharia law implementation. It was because corruption/necessity of bribes under US backed Karzai government was bleeding the country dry and most folks were joining Taliban because that was the only way they can support their family or starve to death.

Also, outward support for sharia and actual support in private are vastly different thing. Take theocratic Iran today....there is a huge demand for things that goes against ultra strict interpretation of sharia law like liquor, makeup, etc. W/o religious police/enforcement, folks do not follow sharia law.

Regarding extreme Islamic religious fundamentalists, one major reason for religious extremism is due to relative lack of affordable, public, secular education. Without affordable public option, many folks get indoctrinated in religious schools. This is especially true in Pakistan.

FWIW, the same trend is seen in US. Guess how many folks who have background in molecular genetics at university level believe in Creationism vs. folks who go to religious, private, Christian school in good, ole USA?

FWIW, religious extremism tend to decrease with economic development and secular education.

1 Corinthians 1:27

But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;

look at context of that statement.

What are the odds that Muslim Brotherhood or that any religious entity, Christian, Buddhism, Islam, etc. is monolithic?

Close to zero.

Check religious history of Christianity and Islam, both before and after Reformation. It's full of internecine conflict.

When folks stop thinking and justifying bias based on religion, it's time to think.

The only reason religious violence in Christianity has stopped or dropped is due to separation of religion and politics, including military power.

If church still commanded political power and military might, concept of peace as we know it in the West will greatly change.

Even one religious sect like Sunni Moslems are not monolithic.

Or Christian sect like Church of Latter Day Saints(there are several divergences for those that did not know).

And if you claim that Church of Latter Day Saints are not 'Christian,' there are splits among other Christian denominations.

Newt Gingrich explains why Michelle Bachman,Trent Franks, Louie Gohmert, Tom Rooney and Lynn Westmoreland have it right.

In defense of Michele Bachmann, Muslim Brotherhood probes

http:///www.politico.com/news/stories/0712/79104.html

You can rationalize as much as you want, but the military especially at the higher levels is PC. And for most part is blind to Islamists

Look at the case of Anwar Al-Aulaqi, who was brought in by DA to talk about muslim outreach, ten year later he was killed for being a leader in AQ.

Where in the article did it state that that Islam is interpreted and practiced the same way throughout the world? If that was the writer's opinion, why did he use "radical Islamists," or variations of that term, rather than just the all inclusive: Islamists? Or why would he include information that illustrates that Islam is not unified and The Muslim Bortherhood is not monolithic. A direct quote from the article:

"Just Friday, the Dubai chief of police warned about a Muslim Brotherhood effort to take over the emirates and seize their oil and natural gas wealth."

That's too bad. This place just won't be the same...