https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNR33nEat7s

Maga-Fest Austrailia!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpQhbMrVDv0

Mega-Fest: Atlanta!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvXoIYuVzLc

Biblical Israel Tours: Israel and Jordan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QH2K2Q71jmA

Biblical Israel Tours<>Walk In The Word

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4EaWPIlNYY

Latest Scientific Evidence for God's Existence /Hugh Ross PhD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3j7vYfegaQ

Debate at CalTech: Scientific Argument for a Creator<>Dr. Hugh Ross vs. Victor J. Stenger

A better Title for that would have been "The Theory of Evolution vs. The Gap Theory" which are both wrong.

Alright brother, let me stick a bag of popcorn in the microwave, pop the top on a coke zero and let's see what you've got then?
Ok?
I'm sure this is going to be good too!

Alright Professor.....................Go!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kk1RnwbFIps

Revelation TV Interviews Richard Dawkins

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cv3wTRLh7Xk

Richard Dawkins takes on Islam (AL Jazeera TV)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thM3SHCXP0o

The God Within

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEV5AFFcZ-s

THRIVE<>What on Earth will it Take?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjpCKZ7cEoY

MIND SCIENCE

I started wth this one. Only 20m in, but so far it is excellent.

Thanks for posting!

Yes sir!!
My pleasure.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKGFezN0Cd4

Scientific Evidence for the Christian Faith<>Dr. Hugh Ross

Thank you for posting all of this. I've been wanting to check some of these out for several weeks but I've been extremely busy. Hopefully I'll have some time tonight to review a couple. I've seen some interesting stuff lately and I'm not sure whether or not it's in your list. If it's alright with you I might add some. Of particular interest to me was a scientist who made the claim that they are unable to find anywhere within DNA that defines the body plan of each organism. It obviously dictates certain traits, but nothing specific to the overall body plan. For instance, the body plan of a goat vs the body plan of an ape. I'll have to see if I can find it again.

Go for it!
I say the more heads in on this the absolute better!
Thanks for the input brother!
Jimmie

btw. I find this stuff very interesting, and educational, and should be quite meaningful to all of us all the way around.
As time goes by, certain scientific theory is actually helping to prove the existence of a super-intelligent causal agent as the discovery through modern science should first indicate, then validate, and then vindicate the existence of the God of the Bible as it always should have done and in the past has been actively done!

It is  actually more the natural order of things especially when we are attempting to understand not just the creation that we experience around us, but the origins of the creation of mankind itself!

Thanks again...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY5sjCGqsNg

Journey Toward Creation<>Dr. Hugh Ross

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpOTgzcE2e4

Answers In JOB<>Dr. Hugh Ross

My problem with Hugh Ross is that he is a Progressive Creationist, claiming millions of years during creation.
From the first contact satan had with man, he has tried to sway them from the Word through deception. If Ross can discredit the 1st chapter of the Bible, with a gap theory, then what does that tell the would be believer about the rest of the Bible?
Ex. 31:17 “It is a sign between Me and the sons of Israel forever; for in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, but on the seventh day He ceased from labor, and was refreshed.”

Ross attempts to make the Bible fit scientific theory.
Col. 2:8 See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deception, according to the tradition of men, according to the elementary principles of the world, rather than according to Christ.

Ross claims (Creation and Times pp. 63-64) that God created carnivorous animals from the beginning, contradicting the Word.
Gen. 1:29 Then God said, “Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the surface of all the earth, and every tree which has fruit yielding seed; it shall be food for you;
Gen. 1:30 and to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the sky and to every thing that moves on the earth which has life, I have given every green plant for food”; and it was so.

Ross says (Creation and Times p. 73) all land animals and birds are not descended from the creatures on the ark, contradicting Genesis.
Gen. 6:7 The LORD said, “I will blot out man whom I have created from the face of the land, from man to animals to creeping things and to birds of the sky; for I am sorry that I have made them.”
Gen 6:17 “Behold, I, even I am bringing the flood of water upon the earth, to destroy all flesh in which is the breath of life, from under heaven; everything that is on the earth shall perish.

Ross claims that the flood of Noah was only local, contradicting the Bible.
Gen. 7:19 The water prevailed more and more upon the earth, so that all the high mountains everywhere under the heavens were covered.

If Ross was right about it only being a local flood, then that would make God a liar, since many people and animals have been killed in local floods since that time.
Gen. 9:11 “I establish My covenant with you; and all flesh shall never again be cut off by the water of the flood, neither shall there again be a flood to destroy the earth.”

2Peter 3:6 through which the world at that time was destroyed, being flooded with water.
2Peter 3:7 But by His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.
If Ross was correct about it being only a local flood, would that make it only a local fire also?

Ross claims (Fingerprints of God p. 159) that stars were created before the 1st day, again contradicting Genesis.
Gen. 1:16 God made the two great lights, the greater light to govern the day, and the lesser light to govern the night; He made the stars also.
Gen. 1:19 There was evening and there was morning, a fourth day.

Ross says some plants were created on days 2,4&5, when the Bible says day 3.
Ross says some sea creatures were created on days 3,4&6, when the Bible says day 5.
Ross says some creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals were created on days 4&5, when the Bible says day 6.

Ross's "Creation and Time" says that there could not be creation with the appearance of age, trying to justify the time required to see stars from such a great distance, and fit in with his millions of years theory. The Word says that God stretched out the heavens, which wouldn't require these millions of years to see the stars.
Adam was created full grown too.

I just don't buy into his Gap, millions of years theory, which is a mixture of the Holy with evolutionary theory.
The word "day" in Genesis is translated from the Hebrew word "yom". When yom is qualified with a number, it is referring to one 24 hour period, just like every other use of yom in the Bible.

It does matter what one believes concerning the days of creation in Genesis 1. All ideas that place eons of time into or before creation, undermine the gospel, by placing death, bloodshed, disease, thorns and suffering before sin and the fall.

Well, if this is the way that you choose to believe, then believe that way.
He has a website and he does take questions.
Go submit this to him if you want, I'm sure it will paste.

I'm not going to go to his site and argue with him. I was merely pointing out his contradictions with the Bible.
Ross is a scientist trying to squeeze our Father into a scientific box.
I'll stick with the Word of YHVH, not the word of Mr. Ross.

Do what you want, however their are some scientific articles which he has explained such as when did time begin in the creative process that I find somewhat intriguing to say the least.
I have also heard some hypothesis from Dr. Ross such as he believes that the great deluge of Noah's day was only a partial flood because the Bible states that its parameters which were only included to be in the known world at that time according to his theory about that.
And that this also coincides also with the flood account that is listed and detailed in the Koran I'm told.
And in this, I am not in agreement with Dr. Ross either on this point of argument.
If the flood waters covered the highest mountain peak of that time and in that region, In would think that the flood waters probably spiked at somewhere in the neighborhood of up to 25,000 ft. or higher depending on the eroding process if you are a young earth student or advocate of the earth's topography, contours, and features approximately some 5,400 years ago.
There is evidence and I have personally seen some of it from Gulf of Mexico core samples which explained to me by one of the leading geologists from Meridian Oil Company based in Houston Texas, back in 1988 when I  worked in their corporate office directly under the corporate general manager of affairs and administration, way back then, that looked very compelling to me, that is, once I understood what it was that I was looking at.

These samples do imply and scientifically concur with a massive and immediate influx of fresh water that was introduced into the Gulf of Mexico as evidenced by all of the salt water brine and other forms of shrimp dying off very quickly and other shelled organisms that are certainly present in the core samples that I examined under the direction of the company's chief geologist; a fresh water influx and ultimate flood some 5,400 years ago.
I live in North Central Texas and have small sea shells in the earth around my house that are from an inland sea which existed here at one time, which possibly dates back to that same period also.
I know this because shells of these types would not survive in the soil without degrading and then ultimately disintegrating leading to a much earlier period, say 100,000 to 500,000 years ago, and also coupled with their close proximity to the surface of the ground which is extremely shallow.
And for the most part the ground around here is fairly rocky also.
But in this, if true, or if even only partially correct, this also leaves room and scientific grounds as the samples might indicate, for a much older world than six-thousand years and some change.

Biblically some of it does stack up to the genealogical records of the Bible, or at least as much as I can tell, as other evidence seems to refute a young earth's total record altogether.
So, I do hear what your saying, and I do not take anything for granted in these programs which are listed, as you should or probably shouldn't have seen some of the ones which did not make the grade for the RF because of their obvious bogus content and so-forth.

I believe however, that Dr. Ross is not completely in error about some of his scientific theories and as there are many so-called, "Gaps" in the word of God as one might studiously scrutinize it, as there are also according to the evidences, certainly many gaps in the science and the archeological findings that we have currently in our possession and understanding and on the current level of science that we are dealing with now. There is certainly nothing wrong with examining things about creation and God, if we do these things with an earnest heart and a desire to learn more than we know now. And in these things, we should always strive to learn new things whether they be right or wrong. It is a process which for the most part we all as people can and will experience everyday concerning the choices that we will make about what we may or may not believe in ultimately.
And some scientists as we are not, probably more than many lay-type persons would know that there are many wrongs and failures to deal according to the scientific proving process as it stands through the scientific method according to the modern scientific processes of this current hour.
If science has brought us good things such as energy, aerospace engineering, and great strides concerning internal medicine, just to name a few, then I think that science has the right and obligation to prove God also. So whether the science is right or wrong without substantial suppression I believe that these amazing and wonderful things will point a way to God that no reasoning man or woman could ever refuse not to believe in, just as we believe now.
I believe that this provable information already exists.
I believe that Dr. Ross knows and understands this too.
It seems as if he has dedicated his life to it and tries to promote it in an robust and scientific manner as I believe that God has equipped him to do.
I fault no man or woman who solemnly believes that he or she is doing the right thing even if at one point they are not doing it so much.
And I believe that this shows character in a person in both circumstances, and usually with this sort of personal trait working in and for someone, usually the truth and integrity are not lagging very far behind them.
Even in us, if we are to be truthful about ourselves especially when we study about things such as these.

Thanks,

SAE

tappages

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auygJmEcgLY

Evidence for Creation<>''Genetics Confirm The Bible"

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9_o7NGTkJc

Our Solar System<>Evidence Of Creation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zsn16uxZ_4o

Bethlehem Star Scientifically Confirms Biblical Events

Great thread brother SAE!

Thank you!
I am humbled.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ej8m4I5qdJA

"Archaeologist Findings From Ancient Biblical Cities" (documentary)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rvTtyNK20I

"Secrets Behind The Dead Sea Scrolls" (new documentary 2014)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kiuEqUjucg

"Atheist Detective Examines Gospels Becomes Christian"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CckvmtM3V1Y

Richard Dawkins Talks With Penn Jillette The Magician (June 6, 2014)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCtt4F4Ihu4

Richard Dawkins<>"On A Big Debate About God" (June 12, 2014)

So after watching this video, how much of a debate about, "God," do you think really takes place here?
What do you believe that the main objective of this, "debate," was really was all about?

Thanks,

SAE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gr8Az3QQZdI

"Our Created Solar System"

 

Well, there is always hope brother!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQrf6r-9ozc

"STARGAZE HD" (Biblically cited formations shown)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHL8UU0BEgk

"Tracing Your Ancestors Through History" (Table of Nations in Genesis)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uwye-Hw1N1c

"THE GOD DELUSION?" / Dr. Marc Surtees Refutes Richard Dawkins