User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 3:10:58 PM EDT
[#1]
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the Outback the official car of lesbians?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 3:14:54 PM EDT
[#2]
Mazda CX5? Any used AWD audi
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 3:46:58 PM EDT
[#3]
You cant go wrong with a Subaru ..
I prefer the Forester over the Outback though.. I like the more SUV/truck look over the station wagon lower rear. What about the Crosstrek? its very sporty lookign IMHO - but id go with the Forester Brian |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 4:38:47 PM EDT
[#4]
I would look else where since in real world driving you are more likely to see 23-25mpg highway than 30+ subaru way over estimated on highway MPG's.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 7:44:54 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I would look else where since in real world driving you are more likely to see 23-25mpg highway than 30+ subaru way over estimated on highway MPG's. If he's buying the four banger, I doubt that. We get high twenties on the highway with our 3.6, which is on par with what Subie calls for. I don't see a reason why the same wouldn't be true for the four pot. OP......it's not a "cool" car but it's a great car. We have a 2010 (our second Outback) and it's been flawless over the last five years and 80k. Better in the snow than my Hemi Ram was, too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 7:46:07 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If he's buying the four banger, I doubt that. We get high twenties on the highway with our 3.6, which is on par with what Subie calls for. I don't see a reason why the same wouldn't be true for the four pot. OP......it's not a "cool" car but it's a great car. We have a 2010 (our second Outback) and it's been flawless over the last five years and 80k. Better in the snow than my Hemi Ram was, too. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I would look else where since in real world driving you are more likely to see 23-25mpg highway than 30+ subaru way over estimated on highway MPG's. If he's buying the four banger, I doubt that. We get high twenties on the highway with our 3.6, which is on par with what Subie calls for. I don't see a reason why the same wouldn't be true for the four pot. OP......it's not a "cool" car but it's a great car. We have a 2010 (our second Outback) and it's been flawless over the last five years and 80k. Better in the snow than my Hemi Ram was, too. We average about 26-28 in the mountains in our 2010 4 banger CVT.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 8:02:31 PM EDT
[#7]
Old boss regularly got 30 on trips in his. Think it was a 12 or 13. He always though it was funny that it had more ground clearance than his suburban.
Every time I try to be realistic about what I could use it is at the top of the list. I like the crosstrek looks a lot better but the outback beats it in space. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 9:13:49 PM EDT
[#8]
They are fun to pass people in lifter trucks in the woods with as well since they are damn near flat underneath and Primitive Racing in Tigard OR makes tube bumpers and skid plates for them. They are in the prototype phase for the 15+ at the moment. I had their skid on my OBS and that thing took a beating.
It isn't uncommon to see lifted Subarus around here.
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 11:17:37 PM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
Mentioned in another thread, but I'm looking for a more fuel efficient, small SUV than my current ride. My tarket price is $30K and the new 2015 Subaru Outback seems to tick most of my boxes at 33/25 mpg. I have scheduled a test drive this saturday, but have been catching flak from familiy and friends for picking a "boring family car." So, any suggestions for a "sportier" or more "luxury" car that will hit around my target price? All wheel drive and good fuel economy is a must, and used is okay too. Mazda CX-5 2.5. Similar fuel economy to the subaru, but significantly faster/sportier. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 11:31:14 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Mazda CX-5 2.5. Similar fuel economy to the subaru, but significantly faster/sportier. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Mentioned in another thread, but I'm looking for a more fuel efficient, small SUV than my current ride. My tarket price is $30K and the new 2015 Subaru Outback seems to tick most of my boxes at 33/25 mpg. I have scheduled a test drive this saturday, but have been catching flak from familiy and friends for picking a "boring family car." So, any suggestions for a "sportier" or more "luxury" car that will hit around my target price? All wheel drive and good fuel economy is a must, and used is okay too. Mazda CX-5 2.5. Similar fuel economy to the subaru, but significantly faster/sportier. I have no doubt it is faster but isnt it quite a bit smaller too?? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/24/2014 12:02:44 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I have no doubt it is faster but isnt it quite a bit smaller too?? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Mentioned in another thread, but I'm looking for a more fuel efficient, small SUV than my current ride. My tarket price is $30K and the new 2015 Subaru Outback seems to tick most of my boxes at 33/25 mpg. I have scheduled a test drive this saturday, but have been catching flak from familiy and friends for picking a "boring family car." So, any suggestions for a "sportier" or more "luxury" car that will hit around my target price? All wheel drive and good fuel economy is a must, and used is okay too. Mazda CX-5 2.5. Similar fuel economy to the subaru, but significantly faster/sportier. I have no doubt it is faster but isnt it quite a bit smaller too?? Slightly, but still comparable regarding passenger/cargo volume. subaru: Passenger volume 108.1 cubic feet (with available moonroof: 104.5 cubic feet) Cargo volume 35.5 cubic feet Maximum cargo volume 73.3 cubic feet with rear seat lowered Mazda: EPA passenger volume (cu ft, without moonroof) 103.8 103.8 Not Available EPA passenger volume (cu ft, with moonroof) Not Available 102.3 102.3 EPA cargo volume, rear seatback up/folded (cu ft) 34.1 / 64.8 34.1 / 65.4 |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/24/2014 12:12:24 AM EDT
[#12]
I am surprised it is that close. With as long as the outback is I would have figured it had a lot more room in the back for gear.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/24/2014 12:43:58 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I am surprised it is that close. With as long as the outback is I would have figured it had a lot more room in the back for gear. That is the great thing about certain crossovers, they are shorter overall but are able to accommodate a lot inside. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
