Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 4/15/2014 11:20:30 AM EDT
[#1]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:





Why don't you explain why you think the boxers are harder on head gaskets and remove all confusion



View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:


Quoted:

Many better options out there for the same or less money. It doesn't look too bad though.



I'll never own a boxer motor. Terrible gas mileage and many people don't consider the effects of gravity on a flat positioned motor.



Edit: Also, when the engine is shut down, coolant (and possibly other fluids) will remain in contact with the headgasket. If these fluids aren't properly maintained then it will eat away at the headgasket causing premature failures. In an in-line or V motor the fluids settle below the headgasket.




I can't agree with your headgasket scenario.  A properly burped coolant system will not have any air  moving around in it.  Are you talking about the subaru 2.5 headgasket problems? Those are crappy headgaskets from the start from what I understand.




Where is everyone getting the idea that I said there is air in the coolant system? I learned to read in second grade....


Why don't you explain why you think the boxers are harder on head gaskets and remove all confusion







 
The combination of gravity comment and coolant comment.  It isn't that we can't read, it has more to do with you not making any sense.
Link Posted: 4/16/2014 7:54:42 AM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

  The combination of gravity comment and coolant comment.  It isn't that we can't read, it has more to do with you not making any sense.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

  The combination of gravity comment and coolant comment.  It isn't that we can't read, it has more to do with you not making any sense.


Actually it is about reading, because I already explained what I meant in a previous post.

Edit: Explained it twice actually..
Quoted:
Edit: to clarify for those who are confused, when I said settle I meant the majority of coolant is below the head gasket

Quoted:
About the coolant settling thing; I already clarified but again, no the coolant will not settle. But there is more coolant in contact with the head gasket at any given time. Which is what I meant by settle. My mistake, should have clarified from the beginning


Edit2: Here's some added reading material (about subaru motors, just did a quick search) for everyone.....
Reading 1
Reading 2
Link Posted: 4/16/2014 9:55:43 AM EDT
[#3]
From Link 1:
The single biggest back to a boxer engine is that the critical engine fluids such as coolant and oil will remain in contact with the gaskets as opposed to an Inline or V engine the fluids drain down or only contact the side of a gasket rather than gravity forcing it to stay on top.  This is where Subaru has kind of gotten themselves in trouble in my opinion as the maintenance aspects of a Boxer need to be different than that of an inline 4 cylinder engine for example.  If the oil is contaminated with fuel, and the coolant ph levels increased the gaskets will be eaten away, they don’t have a choice.  The single most important thing you can do with your Subaru is change the oil and change the coolant the way YOUR driving style dictates, how you use the car is what matters not some hard to understand fiction put into a maintenance booklet so the ownership costs look lower than they actually are.
View Quote

That doesn't make any sense in regards to coolant.  It doesn't have anywhere to drain to.  There is no draining involved.  And under what circumstances is the "top" of a head gasket exposed to these fluids?

Link 2 doesn't say anything at all about coolant "draining" or not, and otherwise doesn't talk about why the gaskets were failing, beyond a brief implication that it's because of the gasket material chemically decomposing as a result of prolonged contact with the coolant, which is going to be the case with any engine design.  It's an issue of improper gasket material, not engine layout.
Link Posted: 4/16/2014 10:34:56 AM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
From Link 1:

That doesn't make any sense in regards to coolant.  It doesn't have anywhere to drain to.  There is no draining involved.  And under what circumstances is the "top" of a head gasket exposed to these fluids?

Link 2 doesn't say anything at all about coolant "draining" or not, and otherwise doesn't talk about why the gaskets were failing, beyond a brief implication that it's because of the gasket material chemically decomposing as a result of prolonged contact with the coolant, which is going to be the case with any engine design.  It's an issue of improper gasket material, not engine layout.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
From Link 1:
The single biggest back to a boxer engine is that the critical engine fluids such as coolant and oil will remain in contact with the gaskets as opposed to an Inline or V engine the fluids drain down or only contact the side of a gasket rather than gravity forcing it to stay on top.  This is where Subaru has kind of gotten themselves in trouble in my opinion as the maintenance aspects of a Boxer need to be different than that of an inline 4 cylinder engine for example.  If the oil is contaminated with fuel, and the coolant ph levels increased the gaskets will be eaten away, they don’t have a choice.  The single most important thing you can do with your Subaru is change the oil and change the coolant the way YOUR driving style dictates, how you use the car is what matters not some hard to understand fiction put into a maintenance booklet so the ownership costs look lower than they actually are.

That doesn't make any sense in regards to coolant.  It doesn't have anywhere to drain to.  There is no draining involved.  And under what circumstances is the "top" of a head gasket exposed to these fluids?

Link 2 doesn't say anything at all about coolant "draining" or not, and otherwise doesn't talk about why the gaskets were failing, beyond a brief implication that it's because of the gasket material chemically decomposing as a result of prolonged contact with the coolant, which is going to be the case with any engine design.  It's an issue of improper gasket material, not engine layout.


Do you own one of these types of motors? Because you sure are stubborn..
Edit: The quote you posted kind of implicates everything you're trying to defend anyways..
Link Posted: 4/16/2014 10:42:38 AM EDT
[#5]
I used to own an 89 GL with the 1.8 boxer engine.  It was a complete piece of shit and I had to replace both heads before I ever drove it (they both had cracks due to a clogged radiator).  There was no more or less HG material exposed to coolant in that engine than in any other engine.  It's an issue with the gasket material, not with how the cylinders are laid out.

ETA:  The quote I posted doesn't make any sense, and what am I "trying to defend"?
Link Posted: 4/16/2014 10:51:22 AM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I used to own an 89 GL with the 1.8 boxer engine.  It was a complete piece of shit and I had to replace both heads before I ever drove it (they both had cracks due to a clogged radiator).  There was no more or less HG material exposed to coolant in that engine than in any other engine.  It's an issue with the gasket material, not with how the cylinders are laid out.

ETA:  The quote I posted doesn't make any sense, and what am I "trying to defend"?
View Quote


It seems, to me anyway, that you're trying to defend that the design of the motor has no effect as to why the headgaskets go out so prematurely.
It's really not just the material the gasket is made of.. I don't know how you need it explained so you understand what I'm saying. I've even given outside sources. The quote you posted makes absolute sense, which is why I don't know what else to say. I suppose you have to have been working on motors for a long time to understand just how everything works, and why the things that don't make sense immediately actually do make sense overall.
Link Posted: 4/16/2014 11:07:59 AM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Its the scion/toyota.  Top gear had a spot on it.  It's rear wheel drive apparently.  
View Quote


Yep.

It hits all of the marks for me.  If I ever get the $$ for a sport car....this one is probably it.  I'd take an S2000 too, but am worried about fitting in it (i'm tall).
Link Posted: 4/16/2014 11:12:21 AM EDT
[#8]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Actually it is about reading, because I already explained what I meant in a previous post.



Edit: Explained it twice actually..
Edit2: Here's some added reading material (about subaru motors, just did a quick search) for everyone.....

Reading 1

Reading 2

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:



  The combination of gravity comment and coolant comment.  It isn't that we can't read, it has more to do with you not making any sense.





Actually it is about reading, because I already explained what I meant in a previous post.



Edit: Explained it twice actually..


Quoted:

Edit: to clarify for those who are confused, when I said settle I meant the majority of coolant is below the head gasket



Quoted:

About the coolant settling thing; I already clarified but again, no the coolant will not settle. But there is more coolant in contact with the head gasket at any given time. Which is what I meant by settle. My mistake, should have clarified from the beginning




Edit2: Here's some added reading material (about subaru motors, just did a quick search) for everyone.....

Reading 1

Reading 2







Sigh.  
Link Posted: 4/16/2014 11:23:48 AM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Sigh.  
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

  The combination of gravity comment and coolant comment.  It isn't that we can't read, it has more to do with you not making any sense.


Actually it is about reading, because I already explained what I meant in a previous post.

Edit: Explained it twice actually..
Quoted:
Edit: to clarify for those who are confused, when I said settle I meant the majority of coolant is below the head gasket

Quoted:
About the coolant settling thing; I already clarified but again, no the coolant will not settle. But there is more coolant in contact with the head gasket at any given time. Which is what I meant by settle. My mistake, should have clarified from the beginning


Edit2: Here's some added reading material (about subaru motors, just did a quick search) for everyone.....
Reading 1
Reading 2



Sigh.  



Has the FA20 engine in the BRZ/FRS experienced high head gasket failure rates yet? If the answer to that question is "No", then the entire discussion is irrelevant.
Link Posted: 4/16/2014 2:22:03 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Has the FA20 engine in the BRZ/FRS experienced high head gasket failure rates yet? If the answer to that question is "No", then the entire discussion is irrelevant.
View Quote


No. However, it hasn't been around all that long yet.
Link Posted: 4/17/2014 6:51:31 AM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Has the FA20 engine in the BRZ/FRS experienced high head gasket failure rates yet? If the answer to that question is "No", then the entire discussion is irrelevant.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Has the FA20 engine in the BRZ/FRS experienced high head gasket failure rates yet? If the answer to that question is "No", then the entire discussion is irrelevant.


This person answered your question for you.

Quoted:
No. However, it hasn't been around all that long yet.

Link Posted: 4/17/2014 7:20:20 AM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


This person answered your question for you.


View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Has the FA20 engine in the BRZ/FRS experienced high head gasket failure rates yet? If the answer to that question is "No", then the entire discussion is irrelevant.


This person answered your question for you.

Quoted:
No. However, it hasn't been around all that long yet.




Yeah, I saw that, you know, when he posted it after I posted.

Just trying to bring the tread back on topic.
Link Posted: 4/17/2014 8:29:54 AM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Yeah, I saw that, you know, when he posted it after I posted.

Just trying to bring the tread back on topic.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Has the FA20 engine in the BRZ/FRS experienced high head gasket failure rates yet? If the answer to that question is "No", then the entire discussion is irrelevant.


This person answered your question for you.

Quoted:
No. However, it hasn't been around all that long yet.




Yeah, I saw that, you know, when he posted it after I posted.

Just trying to bring the tread back on topic.


Just making sure I reciprocate for your sarcastic response.
Link Posted: 4/17/2014 8:53:10 AM EDT
[#14]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Just making sure I reciprocate for your sarcastic response.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:


Quoted:

Has the FA20 engine in the BRZ/FRS experienced high head gasket failure rates yet? If the answer to that question is "No", then the entire discussion is irrelevant.




This person answered your question for you.




Quoted:

No. However, it hasn't been around all that long yet.









Yeah, I saw that, you know, when he posted it after I posted.



Just trying to bring the tread back on topic.




Just making sure I reciprocate for your sarcastic response.




 
I am not being sarcastic in this thread, just want to be clear I just think you don't know what you're talking about.
Link Posted: 4/17/2014 10:47:31 AM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

  I am not being sarcastic in this thread, just want to be clear I just think you don't know what you're talking about.
View Quote


Wasn't referring to you, however, you're entitled to that. Does it make you right? I think not.
But either way it's your car, I won't tell you what to own and what not to own. Just trying to give some first hand experience advice.

Cheers!
Link Posted: 4/17/2014 1:11:37 PM EDT
[#16]
Link Posted: 4/17/2014 1:25:42 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Ok, this thread is pushing the limit for a technical forum.

Let's work at ignoring the trolling, and focus on discussing the car itself.
View Quote


Feel free to lock it up. I don't get the feeling it's going to get better.

I don't need the thread anymore
Link Posted: 4/17/2014 1:38:45 PM EDT
[#18]
Off topic, personal attacks.
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top