Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 2/3/2015 2:56:23 AM EDT
saw some video recommending "I series bonds."  Does that include TIPS and I bonds both or was he just referring to I bonds?  Went to treasury direct.gov, it seems like the main difference b/t TIPS & I bonds is that i bonds are not resellable.  Do you have to just sit on them for 10 or 30 years or whatever??  Seems like a big commitment.  Why would anyone buy i bonds rather than TIPS if I bonds are so illiquid?  

Also, do any or all bonds pay out year to year or only at the end when you redeem them do you get the interest?  

Would there be any kind of tax incentive to buy bonds out of pocket if you have not hit your Roth IRA contribution limit or would it be better to just direct your roth into bond funds or ETFs if that is what you want to do?

No ibonds or TIPS not only go up to protect aginst inflation, but the can also adjust down if there is delfation right, or not?  

Are there other types of bonds that a retail investor can by that do not adjust up (and down?) w/ CPI?

Why would people buy non inflation protected bonds?

What about bond ETFs and bond funds you could buy in your IRAs or as a retail investor.  What is the point of one vs the other vs just buying from treasury direct.gov?

Man, posting this just made me realize how severely ignorant I am about bonds

I would really appreciate any info b/c I am looking to save my gains before the bubble pops.  I'd rather be early than late.



Last question, if you buy a bond that does not adjust down for deflation to where in a deflationary environment it is worth more in real terms when you sell/redeem it than when you bought it, can that increasing in purchasing power be consider a form of capitol gains or does capitol gains only go by price in terms of US dollars?
Link Posted: 2/3/2015 7:56:16 AM EDT
[#1]
Bottom line up front:  unless you are or plan on using bond income to meet current and near term (up to about 10 years out) income requirements and you don't have enough (available to be) invested in equities which could yield enough to meet your income requirements...stay away from bonds.

Why?

1.  With real interest rates at/below zero, rates have no where to go but up.  When interest rates go up, bond prices (principle) go down = you lose.
2.  In the lock run, stocks will always (historically have) outperformed bonds so, again, in the long run, you will end up with more.

Strategy is to invest in equities while young and then convert (if necessary) equities to bonds when you start to live off the bond income.  The idea is if you are actually living off your investment income you can't afford the drawdown that may occur with stocks, whereas U.S. government bonds, at least if held to maturity, are guaranteed to return X (whatever coupon you bought them at).

Quoted:
saw some video recommending "I series bonds."  Does that include TIPS and I bonds both or was he just referring to I bonds?  Went to treasury direct.gov, it seems like the main difference b/t TIPS & I bonds is that i bonds are not resellable.  Do you have to just sit on them for 10 or 30 years or whatever??  Seems like a big commitment.  Why would anyone buy i bonds rather than TIPS if I bonds are so illiquid?

Who knows why people do what they do, especially when it comes to $.  

Also, do any or all bonds pay out year to year or only at the end when you redeem them do you get the interest?

T-Bonds pay semi-annually.  T-Bills and zero coupon bonds are purchased at a discount and your return is reflected in return of face value at term.


Would there be any kind of tax incentive to buy bonds out of pocket if you have not hit your Roth IRA contribution limit or would it be better to just direct your roth into bond funds or ETFs if that is what you want to do?

The simplest way would be to use a bond ETF.

No ibonds or TIPS not only go up to protect aginst inflation, but the can also adjust down if there is delfation right, or not?  

That sword cuts both ways, both for and against you as the case may be.


Are there other types of bonds that a retail investor can by that do not adjust up (and down?) w/ CPI?

Yes.  "Normal" corporate and Treasury instruments are not inflation adjusted.  The problem becomes

Why would people buy non inflation protected bonds?

Because inflation adjusted bonds, while they sound good, typically underperform bonds in general (i.e. nothing is free).


What about bond ETFs and bond funds you could buy in your IRAs or as a retail investor.  What is the point of one vs the other vs just buying from treasury direct.gov?

Treasury Direct purchases are electronic, remain in your TD account and cannot be held in an IRA.


Man, posting this just made me realize how severely ignorant I am about bonds

I would really appreciate any info b/c I am looking to save my gains before the bubble pops.  I'd rather be early than late.

Don't feel bad:  bonds are at the same time both exceedingly complex (google duration and how to immunize a bond portfolio) and exceedingly simple.  If you don't know what you are doing, you can get your head handed to you pretty quickly all the while thinking you had a bulletproof investment.  And, on the other hand, you can easily make money much more easily trading bonds (when conditions are right) than equities while enjoying things like a guaranteed minimum return.

Don't take this the wrong way, but if you admitted don't know enough about bonds but at the same time are willing to (attempt) to protect yourself from the impending collapse of "the bubble" using bonds, you should consider the possibility of doing yourself more financial harm attempting to avoid financial harm that just riding out whatever storm comes...if it comes at all.

What would I do if I were dead set on getting bonds?  Right now?  Short term bond ETF although realize that your real income will be negative even before taxes are taken into consideration.


Last question, if you buy a bond that does not adjust down for deflation to where in a deflationary environment it is worth more in real terms when you sell/redeem it than when you bought it, can that increasing in purchasing power be consider a form of capitol gains or does capitol gains only go by price in terms of US dollars?

Capital gains are capital gains (you didn't think the .gov was going to let you calculate income in real $, did you? )

View Quote
Link Posted: 2/3/2015 2:49:45 PM EDT
[#2]
well thank you so much sir.  I will go over it again...

okay, so a guy lived through a deflationary period, he would have been better served w/ regular bonds than I series bonds.

Let me rephrase that last question:
let's say buy a 10 yr "T Bill," regular type w/o inflation indexing.  In 10 yrs I get my $X back plus some $Y interest.  (I would assume that the $Y in interest would be reportable income on one's income taxes).  But what if the value of the dollar was larger at redemption than it was at issuance, let's say that in 10 years a dollar will have bought 30% more of a basket of goods.  Does the IRS consider that increase in the value of the dollar over the term of the bond as taxable per capitol gains?  What if the dollar looses value per inflation over the term, can you write it off as a loss?  Or, is the dollar's value relative to real goods immaterial and everything is just calculated in dollar terms only??
Link Posted: 2/3/2015 3:18:50 PM EDT
[#3]
regarding "the bubble" it seems that there is a geeneral deflationary trend in the economies.

To fight this is the ostensible reason the central banks are "printing money."  Much of this $$ has ended up in equies b/c those w/ access to the fed window find it porfitable to borrow as basically 0% and speculate to earn big returns.  Real estate is also inflated in a bubble, to a lesser degree, for the same reasons per this narrative.  The insiders are all playing along, front running the fed till the game stops.  The non insider should take his gains and get out before getting slaughtered like a greedy pig by the insiders.   When the bubble pops, there will be lots of hot money flowing to safety in cash and bonds(, maybe gold to but gold often looses in deflation)

This narrative is pretty confining to me for various reasons.  Largely b/c general demogaphic trends are pushing towards deflatiary collapse as money and credit is deleveraging/contracting along w/ popular spending, though in a longer term gov could react and cause hyper inflation farther out.  Anyway, in deflatioary inviroments, like abrupt deflation if you will, bonds & cash do best (provided the gov itself doesn't fail lol).


My strategy would be to protect my balance now w/ bonds/money market, and then to buy back into the market at some point when it is a bargin, though not necessarily at hte exact bottom b/c I am not in a position to know something that everyone else doesn't about where the exact bottom would be (again, try not to be too greedy).  

I am in my 30's so I can suffer volatitliy, but my long term prosepects would be much better off if I avoid getting slaughtered this time.
Link Posted: 2/9/2015 12:44:18 AM EDT
[#4]
You do know how duration, maybe more importantly the convexity of that duration,  works right?
Link Posted: 2/9/2015 11:39:22 AM EDT
[#5]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


regarding "the bubble" it seems that there is a geeneral deflationary trend in the economies.



To fight this is the ostensible reason the central banks are "printing money."  Much of this $$ has ended up in equies b/c those w/ access to the fed window find it porfitable to borrow as basically 0% and speculate to earn big returns.  Real estate is also inflated in a bubble, to a lesser degree, for the same reasons per this narrative.  The insiders are all playing along, front running the fed till the game stops.  The non insider should take his gains and get out before getting slaughtered like a greedy pig by the insiders.   When the bubble pops, there will be lots of hot money flowing to safety in cash and bonds(, maybe gold to but gold often looses in deflation)



This narrative is pretty confining to me for various reasons.  Largely b/c general demogaphic trends are pushing towards deflatiary collapse as money and credit is deleveraging/contracting along w/ popular spending, though in a longer term gov could react and cause hyper inflation farther out.  Anyway, in deflatioary inviroments, like abrupt deflation if you will, bonds & cash do best (provided the gov itself doesn't fail lol).





My strategy would be to protect my balance now w/ bonds/money market, and then to buy back into the market at some point when it is a bargin, though not necessarily at hte exact bottom b/c I am not in a position to know something that everyone else doesn't about where the exact bottom would be (again, try not to be too greedy).  



I am in my 30's so I can suffer volatitliy, but my long term prosepects would be much better off if I avoid getting slaughtered this time.
View Quote


I've always used bond index funds to invest in bonds. EDV (extended duration), BND (intermediate), and BSV (short duration) are the 3 I use. Rates are low but compared to other countries they are actually high and like you said any crash would probably cause rates to fall fast. You could also look into zero coupon treasuries. They can be sold and if rates do increase you could always hold and get the maturity value. You'd be losing the potential of higher interest rates if they increase rates but wouldn't actually lose money. If rates drop you could sell for a profit or just hold them. They are 10 year bonds.







 
Link Posted: 2/9/2015 11:51:30 AM EDT
[#6]
Good video on bonds from last year. This guy believes rates will continue lower.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6I2A4MW170
Link Posted: 2/10/2015 12:55:16 AM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Good video on bonds from last year. This guy believes rates will continue lower.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6I2A4MW170
View Quote



Lol, i watched that the other day.  

course, that guy does sell bonds, but he still had a lot of interesting argumets.

particualrly, that as low as US rates are, they still have room to be lower when you compare them to DE & JP, and I just don't see the deflationary trends ending unless gov starts essentially issuing cash directly rather than loaning it into existence.
Link Posted: 2/10/2015 12:55:48 AM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You do know how duration, maybe more importantly the convexity of that duration,  works right?
View Quote



not at all

I do underatnd that if interest rates fall then your bonds become more valuable on the seconday market b/c they provide a better fixed income stream than what is fresh out of the treasury.  Of course, if intersts rates rise they their market value plummets as peple can get better rates from new issuance.
Link Posted: 2/10/2015 1:05:52 AM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



not at all

I do underatnd that if interest rates fall then your bonds become more valuable on the seconday market b/c they provide a better fixed income stream than what is fresh out of the treasury.  Of course, if intersts rates rise they their market value plummets as peple can get better rates from new issuance.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
You do know how duration, maybe more importantly the convexity of that duration,  works right?



not at all

I do underatnd that if interest rates fall then your bonds become more valuable on the seconday market b/c they provide a better fixed income stream than what is fresh out of the treasury.  Of course, if intersts rates rise they their market value plummets as peple can get better rates from new issuance.


Yeah that's duration, convexity is at the speed of which your bond price fluctuates.

Also, with etf's and mutual funds your net asset value is at the mercy of the people wanting to sell or buy.

Also to answer your capital gain question, yes.

Look at what the pricing action was for the build america bonds from the time they came out to about 1 year to 6 months before the federal government stopped paying the interest subsidy.
Link Posted: 2/10/2015 1:19:12 AM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Also to answer your capital gain question, yes.

View Quote


fuck!  I am sorry to beleaguer the point, but what if I buy a house, let's say I pay it off, then I later sell it after a defationary collapse at a loss, numerically speking, but to where the dollar I got in the sale buy more goods than the dollars that I used to buy the house could have at that time?  Would I actually owe capitol gains for that too even though I lost money numerically speaking?  

Note that I am not arguing w/ you, seriously wondering though?  


What about the other side, say you buy stocks, and there is a hyperinflation to where you stocks are worth like 10x more in nominal/numerical terms (S&P 500 @ 180,000!), but their dollar value at time of sale only buys about the same amount of a basket of goods as when the S&P was at 18,000?  Capitol gains or no??
Link Posted: 2/10/2015 1:29:11 AM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Also, with etf's and mutual funds your net asset value is at the mercy of the people wanting to sell or buy.

Look at what the pricing action was for the build america bonds from the time they came out to about 1 year to 6 months before the federal government stopped paying the interest subsidy.
View Quote


So, just as the value of your bonds on the secondary market flucuates as relative to new bonds and other type of financial assets become available, when the bonds laddered are packaged together in a bond fund, the value of their copuons and redemption flucuates.  I suppose that though bonds are cash equlivents they are not always liquid at their face value in limited circumstances in a crisis when everyone and his brother is trying to out of bonds to get into some other asset (hot money).  Is that correct?
Link Posted: 2/10/2015 6:45:04 PM EDT
[#12]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So, just as the value of your bonds on the secondary market flucuates as relative to new bonds and other type of financial assets become available, when the bonds laddered are packaged together in a bond fund, the value of their copuons and redemption flucuates.  I suppose that though bonds are cash equlivents they are not always liquid at their face value in limited circumstances in a crisis when everyone and his brother is trying to out of bonds to get into some other asset (hot money).  Is that correct?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:



Also, with etf's and mutual funds your net asset value is at the mercy of the people wanting to sell or buy.



Look at what the pricing action was for the build america bonds from the time they came out to about 1 year to 6 months before the federal government stopped paying the interest subsidy.




So, just as the value of your bonds on the secondary market flucuates as relative to new bonds and other type of financial assets become available, when the bonds laddered are packaged together in a bond fund, the value of their copuons and redemption flucuates.  I suppose that though bonds are cash equlivents they are not always liquid at their face value in limited circumstances in a crisis when everyone and his brother is trying to out of bonds to get into some other asset (hot money).  Is that correct?


You're correct about them not being liquid during a crisis. EDV is an extended duration bond fund and during the 2008 crash it briefly spiked down a lot. Even though you would expect the opposite since money should have been flowing in from stock sales. I read this was because institutional investors had to raise cash fast to cover margin calls so bonds got sold. Just after the crash it went up a lot though.



 
Link Posted: 2/11/2015 1:44:58 AM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

You're correct about them not being liquid during a crisis. EDV is an extended duration bond fund and during the 2008 crash it briefly spiked down a lot. Even though you would expect the opposite since money should have been flowing in from stock sales. I read this was because institutional investors had to raise cash fast to cover margin calls so bonds got sold. Just after the crash it went up a lot though.
 
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Also, with etf's and mutual funds your net asset value is at the mercy of the people wanting to sell or buy.

Look at what the pricing action was for the build america bonds from the time they came out to about 1 year to 6 months before the federal government stopped paying the interest subsidy.


So, just as the value of your bonds on the secondary market flucuates as relative to new bonds and other type of financial assets become available, when the bonds laddered are packaged together in a bond fund, the value of their copuons and redemption flucuates.  I suppose that though bonds are cash equlivents they are not always liquid at their face value in limited circumstances in a crisis when everyone and his brother is trying to out of bonds to get into some other asset (hot money).  Is that correct?

You're correct about them not being liquid during a crisis. EDV is an extended duration bond fund and during the 2008 crash it briefly spiked down a lot. Even though you would expect the opposite since money should have been flowing in from stock sales. I read this was because institutional investors had to raise cash fast to cover margin calls so bonds got sold. Just after the crash it went up a lot though.
 



Right, so  though hot money would genrally be flowing into bonds in an equities bust, some times people need cash to cover margin calls or derivative losses or whatever.
Link Posted: 2/14/2015 2:17:17 PM EDT
[#14]
Former Director of the US Office of Management and Budget David Stockman talks about bonds:  http://kingworldnews.com/david-stockman-2-14-15/
Link Posted: 2/19/2015 3:51:43 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


fuck!  I am sorry to beleaguer the point, but what if I buy a house, let's say I pay it off, then I later sell it after a defationary collapse at a loss, numerically speking, but to where the dollar I got in the sale buy more goods than the dollars that I used to buy the house could have at that time?  Would I actually owe capitol gains for that too even though I lost money numerically speaking?  

Note that I am not arguing w/ you, seriously wondering though?  


What about the other side, say you buy stocks, and there is a hyperinflation to where you stocks are worth like 10x more in nominal/numerical terms (S&P 500 @ 180,000!), but their dollar value at time of sale only buys about the same amount of a basket of goods as when the S&P was at 18,000?  Capitol gains or no??
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Also to answer your capital gain question, yes.



fuck!  I am sorry to beleaguer the point, but what if I buy a house, let's say I pay it off, then I later sell it after a defationary collapse at a loss, numerically speking, but to where the dollar I got in the sale buy more goods than the dollars that I used to buy the house could have at that time?  Would I actually owe capitol gains for that too even though I lost money numerically speaking?  

Note that I am not arguing w/ you, seriously wondering though?  


What about the other side, say you buy stocks, and there is a hyperinflation to where you stocks are worth like 10x more in nominal/numerical terms (S&P 500 @ 180,000!), but their dollar value at time of sale only buys about the same amount of a basket of goods as when the S&P was at 18,000?  Capitol gains or no??


the IRS is just worried about the difference between what you paid and what you sold it for. not what your real return was.
Link Posted: 2/19/2015 3:53:12 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



not at all

I do underatnd that if interest rates fall then your bonds become more valuable on the seconday market b/c they provide a better fixed income stream than what is fresh out of the treasury.  Of course, if intersts rates rise they their market value plummets as peple can get better rates from new issuance.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
You do know how duration, maybe more importantly the convexity of that duration,  works right?



not at all

I do underatnd that if interest rates fall then your bonds become more valuable on the seconday market b/c they provide a better fixed income stream than what is fresh out of the treasury.  Of course, if intersts rates rise they their market value plummets as peple can get better rates from new issuance.


Convexity is the multiple at which your price may rise or fall relative to duration. It's like a slope where the higher the convexity is the steep the slope along the y axis (current rates on similar credit and maturity of bonds as the one you own) as you move along the x axis (price)
Link Posted: 2/19/2015 3:56:18 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


So, just as the value of your bonds on the secondary market flucuates as relative to new bonds and other type of financial assets become available, when the bonds laddered are packaged together in a bond fund, the value of their copuons and redemption flucuates.  I suppose that though bonds are cash equlivents they are not always liquid at their face value in limited circumstances in a crisis when everyone and his brother is trying to out of bonds to get into some other asset (hot money).  Is that correct?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Also, with etf's and mutual funds your net asset value is at the mercy of the people wanting to sell or buy.

Look at what the pricing action was for the build america bonds from the time they came out to about 1 year to 6 months before the federal government stopped paying the interest subsidy.


So, just as the value of your bonds on the secondary market flucuates as relative to new bonds and other type of financial assets become available, when the bonds laddered are packaged together in a bond fund, the value of their copuons and redemption flucuates.  I suppose that though bonds are cash equlivents they are not always liquid at their face value in limited circumstances in a crisis when everyone and his brother is trying to out of bonds to get into some other asset (hot money).  Is that correct?


Yes when you buy a bond fund you are at the mercy of the markets. If there is a big move for holders to liquidate then the fund manager needs to come up with the cash. He may have enough in cash or Ultra short term bonds at that time, if not then he is at the mercy of people wanting to buy those bonds. So, basically you are forced to sell bonds that have nothing wrong with them just because others want out.
Link Posted: 2/22/2015 4:27:01 PM EDT
[#18]
okay, thanks, well that answers my question about how a bond ETF or other fund can be so much more volatile, and profitable, in the short term than the underlying interest rate of the bonds therein.

It works both ways I suppose, whether people ware scrambling to liquidate out or to get in.
Link Posted: 2/23/2015 12:46:08 AM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
okay, thanks, well that answers my question about how a bond ETF or other fund can be so much more volatile, and profitable, in the short term than the underlying interest rate of the bonds therein.

It works both ways I suppose, whether people ware scrambling to liquidate out or to get in.
View Quote


Yep, it may be hard for you not having the software but you can look at what bond funds did in 93-95 compared to that actual individual bonds.
Link Posted: 3/8/2015 1:45:57 AM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Yep, it may be hard for you not having the software but you can look at what bond funds did in 93-95 compared to that actual individual bonds.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
okay, thanks, well that answers my question about how a bond ETF or other fund can be so much more volatile, and profitable, in the short term than the underlying interest rate of the bonds therein.

It works both ways I suppose, whether people ware scrambling to liquidate out or to get in.


Yep, it may be hard for you not having the software but you can look at what bond funds did in 93-95 compared to that actual individual bonds.


Well shit, a couple months back I slightly increased my bond allocation by shifting from stock funds to bond funds.   I thought I was basically buying bonds to protect my self from equities market volatility.  Now I see that buying a bond fund is not the same thing as buying bonds or money market in terms of protection from volatility and that hot money flows or shifts in interest rate policy can make the bond fund volatile.  A guy could basically get killed if he enterex/exited bond funds at volitile times...

Tell me, were bond funds volitile in the past couple months w/ the dollar strenthing?   Did I buy into a bond fund when it was expensive??  That was the vanguard total bond fund or something, 70% US gov, 30% corporate.  ETA: This one: Total Bond Index


There are no longer any vanguard straight money market funds, just a sort-of money market fund that "invests in short term securities."  If I were looking to park some money as "cash" free from stock or bond market volatitliy, I guess this is the best option I have??  Here it is: Prime Money Market Fund

I am looking to avoid the slaughter that is coming.  Most of my contributions have been since '09 so I've really benefitted from my entry time and I don't want to loose that benefit.   I suppose thet the fed etc can keep the stock market bubble inflated for a few years, or even get uit pumped up more and I might miss out on some gains, but I am not some insider who will know the last moment to get out.  Even those most optomistic about the SM's potential for near term growth say that furhter growth faces "headwinds."  Some say P/E ratios are nuts, other say they've been a good deal higher (like leading into crashes) and there is room to gain, but all agree they are at not a bargain.  .  

Thx
Link Posted: 3/8/2015 10:40:18 AM EDT
[#21]


Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History






Well shit, a couple months back I slightly increased my bond allocation by shifting from stock funds to bond funds.   I thought I was basically buying bonds to protect my self from equities market volatility.  Now I see that buying a bond fund is not the same thing as buying bonds or money market in terms of protection from volatility and that hot money flows or shifts in interest rate policy can make the bond fund volatile.  A guy could basically get killed if he enterex/exited bond funds at volitile times...





Tell me, were bond funds volitile in the past couple months w/ the dollar strenthing?   Did I buy into a bond fund when it was expensive??  That was the vanguard total bond fund or something, 70% US gov, 30% corporate.  ETA: This one: Total Bond Index
There are no longer any vanguard straight money market funds, just a sort-of money market fund that "invests in short term securities."  If I were looking to park some money as "cash" free from stock or bond market volatitliy, I guess this is the best option I have??  Here it is: Prime Money Market Fund





I am looking to avoid the slaughter that is coming.  Most of my contributions have been since '09 so I've really benefitted from my entry time and I don't want to loose that benefit.   I suppose thet the fed etc can keep the stock market bubble inflated for a few years, or even get uit pumped up more and I might miss out on some gains, but I am not some insider who will know the last moment to get out.  Even those most optomistic about the SM's potential for near term growth say that furhter growth faces "headwinds."  Some say P/E ratios are nuts, other say they've been a good deal higher (like leading into crashes) and there is room to gain, but all agree they are at not a bargain.  .  





Thx
View Quote



Everything that pays more than .5% is going to have some risk. The long term trend in interest rates has been down but short term it has been spiking up. I watch it every day whether I'm invested in bonds at the time or not. Vanguard has a short term bond fund BSV that is less risky and pays a little over 1%. My opinion is US rates will eventually go a lot further down. We pay almost a full point more than Italy and Spain which is crazy and Germany is only paying .35%. If any crisis happens and it will, money is going to flood into 10 year treasuries driving the rate down.





There are some bargains in stocks too. The market as a whole is due for a pull back but segments like oil and gas have come down a lot. I've been averaging into stocks like xom and slb both pay a higher dividend than bonds and if you own at least 100 shares you can sell calls on them to add to your return. I bought ATT recently also. They were paying 5.5% and are expanding into Mexico and South America so it should create some earnings growth. Another one I'm watching is BBL. They mine iron ore and other minerals and have pulled back a lot. If they cross into the upper 30s again they will pay over 6% and I'll buy.





I'm still 70% in cash though. Better to have the cash at low interest and available when a market crash happens. This bull market is 7 years old and nothing goes up forever. Ignore the PE though and look up the PEG or PEGY ratio. I think they are a better indicator.  





 





 
Link Posted: 3/8/2015 12:18:42 PM EDT
[#22]
I'll have to look into those two ratios you mentioned, never heard of them...

70% cash! That is committment.

I guess since what I am doing is buying back into the market when it drops some, I won't try and call the bottom b/c again I am not an insider, but if I buy in when it drops by nearly half I figure it will be a bargin in the long term.

Anyway, since that is my notion, I suppose that I need to be in "cash" rather than the bond fund, since we previously concluded that bonds can be illiquid in certain times.

That money marketish fund I linked in my last post is the only one available to me.
Link Posted: 3/12/2015 10:47:32 AM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Everything that pays more than .5% is going to have some risk. The long term trend in interest rates has been down but short term it has been spiking up. I watch it every day whether I'm invested in bonds at the time or not. Vanguard has a short term bond fund BSV that is less risky and pays a little over 1%. My opinion is US rates will eventually go a lot further down. We pay almost a full point more than Italy and Spain which is crazy and Germany is only paying .35%. If any crisis happens and it will, money is going to flood into 10 year treasuries driving the rate down.

There are some bargains in stocks too. The market as a whole is due for a pull back but segments like oil and gas have come down a lot. I've been averaging into stocks like xom and slb both pay a higher dividend than bonds and if you own at least 100 shares you can sell calls on them to add to your return. I bought ATT recently also. They were paying 5.5% and are expanding into Mexico and South America so it should create some earnings growth. Another one I'm watching is BBL. They mine iron ore and other minerals and have pulled back a lot. If they cross into the upper 30s again they will pay over 6% and I'll buy.

I'm still 70% in cash though. Better to have the cash at low interest and available when a market crash happens. This bull market is 7 years old and nothing goes up forever. Ignore the PE though and look up the PEG or PEGY ratio. I think they are a better indicator.  

 
 
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Well shit, a couple months back I slightly increased my bond allocation by shifting from stock funds to bond funds.   I thought I was basically buying bonds to protect my self from equities market volatility.  Now I see that buying a bond fund is not the same thing as buying bonds or money market in terms of protection from volatility and that hot money flows or shifts in interest rate policy can make the bond fund volatile.  A guy could basically get killed if he enterex/exited bond funds at volitile times...

Tell me, were bond funds volitile in the past couple months w/ the dollar strenthing?   Did I buy into a bond fund when it was expensive??  That was the vanguard total bond fund or something, 70% US gov, 30% corporate.  ETA: This one: Total Bond Index


There are no longer any vanguard straight money market funds, just a sort-of money market fund that "invests in short term securities."  If I were looking to park some money as "cash" free from stock or bond market volatitliy, I guess this is the best option I have??  Here it is: Prime Money Market Fund

I am looking to avoid the slaughter that is coming.  Most of my contributions have been since '09 so I've really benefitted from my entry time and I don't want to loose that benefit.   I suppose thet the fed etc can keep the stock market bubble inflated for a few years, or even get uit pumped up more and I might miss out on some gains, but I am not some insider who will know the last moment to get out.  Even those most optomistic about the SM's potential for near term growth say that furhter growth faces "headwinds."  Some say P/E ratios are nuts, other say they've been a good deal higher (like leading into crashes) and there is room to gain, but all agree they are at not a bargain.  .  

Thx

Everything that pays more than .5% is going to have some risk. The long term trend in interest rates has been down but short term it has been spiking up. I watch it every day whether I'm invested in bonds at the time or not. Vanguard has a short term bond fund BSV that is less risky and pays a little over 1%. My opinion is US rates will eventually go a lot further down. We pay almost a full point more than Italy and Spain which is crazy and Germany is only paying .35%. If any crisis happens and it will, money is going to flood into 10 year treasuries driving the rate down.

There are some bargains in stocks too. The market as a whole is due for a pull back but segments like oil and gas have come down a lot. I've been averaging into stocks like xom and slb both pay a higher dividend than bonds and if you own at least 100 shares you can sell calls on them to add to your return. I bought ATT recently also. They were paying 5.5% and are expanding into Mexico and South America so it should create some earnings growth. Another one I'm watching is BBL. They mine iron ore and other minerals and have pulled back a lot. If they cross into the upper 30s again they will pay over 6% and I'll buy.

I'm still 70% in cash though. Better to have the cash at low interest and available when a market crash happens. This bull market is 7 years old and nothing goes up forever. Ignore the PE though and look up the PEG or PEGY ratio. I think they are a better indicator.  

 
 


The dollar is at a 12 year high, commodity prices are getting their asses kicked and unemployment is at a 5 year low, but you think we are going to raise rates because the worst economies of the G20 have lower rates than us?

PEGY is going to put the future earnings growth into play.
Link Posted: 3/12/2015 4:37:11 PM EDT
[#24]


Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The dollar is at a 12 year high, commodity prices are getting their asses kicked and unemployment is at a 5 year low, but you think we are going to raise rates because the worst economies of the G20 have lower rates than us?





PEGY is going to put the future earnings growth into play.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:





Quoted:










Well shit, a couple months back I slightly increased my bond allocation by shifting from stock funds to bond funds.   I thought I was basically buying bonds to protect my self from equities market volatility.  Now I see that buying a bond fund is not the same thing as buying bonds or money market in terms of protection from volatility and that hot money flows or shifts in interest rate policy can make the bond fund volatile.  A guy could basically get killed if he enterex/exited bond funds at volitile times...





Tell me, were bond funds volitile in the past couple months w/ the dollar strenthing?   Did I buy into a bond fund when it was expensive??  That was the vanguard total bond fund or something, 70% US gov, 30% corporate.  ETA: This one: Total Bond Index
There are no longer any vanguard straight money market funds, just a sort-of money market fund that "invests in short term securities."  If I were looking to park some money as "cash" free from stock or bond market volatitliy, I guess this is the best option I have??  Here it is: Prime Money Market Fund





I am looking to avoid the slaughter that is coming.  Most of my contributions have been since '09 so I've really benefitted from my entry time and I don't want to loose that benefit.   I suppose thet the fed etc can keep the stock market bubble inflated for a few years, or even get uit pumped up more and I might miss out on some gains, but I am not some insider who will know the last moment to get out.  Even those most optomistic about the SM's potential for near term growth say that furhter growth faces "headwinds."  Some say P/E ratios are nuts, other say they've been a good deal higher (like leading into crashes) and there is room to gain, but all agree they are at not a bargain.  .  





Thx



Everything that pays more than .5% is going to have some risk. The long term trend in interest rates has been down but short term it has been spiking up. I watch it every day whether I'm invested in bonds at the time or not. Vanguard has a short term bond fund BSV that is less risky and pays a little over 1%. My opinion is US rates will eventually go a lot further down. We pay almost a full point more than Italy and Spain which is crazy and Germany is only paying .35%. If any crisis happens and it will, money is going to flood into 10 year treasuries driving the rate down.





There are some bargains in stocks too. The market as a whole is due for a pull back but segments like oil and gas have come down a lot. I've been averaging into stocks like xom and slb both pay a higher dividend than bonds and if you own at least 100 shares you can sell calls on them to add to your return. I bought ATT recently also. They were paying 5.5% and are expanding into Mexico and South America so it should create some earnings growth. Another one I'm watching is BBL. They mine iron ore and other minerals and have pulled back a lot. If they cross into the upper 30s again they will pay over 6% and I'll buy.





I'm still 70% in cash though. Better to have the cash at low interest and available when a market crash happens. This bull market is 7 years old and nothing goes up forever. Ignore the PE though and look up the PEG or PEGY ratio. I think they are a better indicator.  





 


 






The dollar is at a 12 year high, commodity prices are getting their asses kicked and unemployment is at a 5 year low, but you think we are going to raise rates because the worst economies of the G20 have lower rates than us?





PEGY is going to put the future earnings growth into play.



No I said US rates won't go up. At least not in the long term.





 
Link Posted: 3/13/2015 4:34:31 PM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

No I said US rates won't go up. At least not in the long term.
 
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:


Well shit, a couple months back I slightly increased my bond allocation by shifting from stock funds to bond funds.   I thought I was basically buying bonds to protect my self from equities market volatility.  Now I see that buying a bond fund is not the same thing as buying bonds or money market in terms of protection from volatility and that hot money flows or shifts in interest rate policy can make the bond fund volatile.  A guy could basically get killed if he enterex/exited bond funds at volitile times...

Tell me, were bond funds volitile in the past couple months w/ the dollar strenthing?   Did I buy into a bond fund when it was expensive??  That was the vanguard total bond fund or something, 70% US gov, 30% corporate.  ETA: This one: Total Bond Index


There are no longer any vanguard straight money market funds, just a sort-of money market fund that "invests in short term securities."  If I were looking to park some money as "cash" free from stock or bond market volatitliy, I guess this is the best option I have??  Here it is: Prime Money Market Fund

I am looking to avoid the slaughter that is coming.  Most of my contributions have been since '09 so I've really benefitted from my entry time and I don't want to loose that benefit.   I suppose thet the fed etc can keep the stock market bubble inflated for a few years, or even get uit pumped up more and I might miss out on some gains, but I am not some insider who will know the last moment to get out.  Even those most optomistic about the SM's potential for near term growth say that furhter growth faces "headwinds."  Some say P/E ratios are nuts, other say they've been a good deal higher (like leading into crashes) and there is room to gain, but all agree they are at not a bargain.  .  

Thx

Everything that pays more than .5% is going to have some risk. The long term trend in interest rates has been down but short term it has been spiking up. I watch it every day whether I'm invested in bonds at the time or not. Vanguard has a short term bond fund BSV that is less risky and pays a little over 1%. My opinion is US rates will eventually go a lot further down. We pay almost a full point more than Italy and Spain which is crazy and Germany is only paying .35%. If any crisis happens and it will, money is going to flood into 10 year treasuries driving the rate down.

There are some bargains in stocks too. The market as a whole is due for a pull back but segments like oil and gas have come down a lot. I've been averaging into stocks like xom and slb both pay a higher dividend than bonds and if you own at least 100 shares you can sell calls on them to add to your return. I bought ATT recently also. They were paying 5.5% and are expanding into Mexico and South America so it should create some earnings growth. Another one I'm watching is BBL. They mine iron ore and other minerals and have pulled back a lot. If they cross into the upper 30s again they will pay over 6% and I'll buy.

I'm still 70% in cash though. Better to have the cash at low interest and available when a market crash happens. This bull market is 7 years old and nothing goes up forever. Ignore the PE though and look up the PEG or PEGY ratio. I think they are a better indicator.  

 
 


The dollar is at a 12 year high, commodity prices are getting their asses kicked and unemployment is at a 5 year low, but you think we are going to raise rates because the worst economies of the G20 have lower rates than us?

PEGY is going to put the future earnings growth into play.

No I said US rates won't go up. At least not in the long term.
 


My apologies, don't hate me
Link Posted: 3/13/2015 8:25:32 PM EDT
[#26]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History




My apologies, don't hate me
View Quote


No problem. I figured you just misread it



 
Link Posted: 3/14/2015 10:07:28 PM EDT
[#27]
I'd suggest reading "Why Bother with Bonds" by Rick Van Ness, it will school you on Bonds, its written in laymans terms also.
Link Posted: 3/21/2015 11:33:02 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'd suggest reading "Why Bother with Bonds" by Rick Van Ness, it will school you on Bonds, its written in laymans terms also.
View Quote


okay.  thx


here is a good vid that goes into some detail about some bonds available from TD.gov in small denominations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQO6BEGEQe8

apparently, i bonds do not adjust down in the event of deflation, only up for inflation.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top