Posted: 12/26/2014 10:38:27 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote History Quoted:
What is there to discuss? You believe, against all IT best practices and all advice to the contrary, including from the manufacturer who EOL the software, that it is more secure than the currently being updated software on the market. If you worked for me I would throw you out on your ear, because your IT "knowledge" is a complete failure. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They are quite safe, I assure you. Anyway, like I said, XP is probably much less at risk that win7
That's one of the most absurd assertions I have ever seen on this site.
This is a discussion site. I'd be happy to discuss it, but apparently all you know is LOL.
What is there to discuss? You believe, against all IT best practices and all advice to the contrary, including from the manufacturer who EOL the software, that it is more secure than the currently being updated software on the market. If you worked for me I would throw you out on your ear, because your IT "knowledge" is a complete failure.
My point, as stated in my other posts was that XP has been having holes patched for years. Theoretically, vulnerabilities are harder for hackers to find compared to a brand new OS, and they are more likely to be looking at ways into win7 than XP. It's not an assertion, but speculation on my part. The machines that we have running XP are locked down with Solidcore.
|
|