User Panel
|
I'm up for natural, but I'm not sure if my film camera has EXIF data attached with a photo.
|
|
|
I'll buy a foam board from the dollar store and put the date in.
|
|
|
I have an idea for my unlimited one, but have to get feeling a bit better first. Gotta clean up my bedroom to make room to set up the lights where I'd need them. It's already pretty clean, but I'd need to move a table and some other stuff.
|
|
Question. Are these supposed to be single-frame shots only? No pano? No stacking? No HDR?
Just want to know what I have to work with. Any multi-frame shot I might consider would all be taken at the same time, and wouldn't involve any photoshop chicanery other than stacking or panoramas |
|
Quoted:
Question. Are these supposed to be single-frame shots only? No pano? No stacking? No HDR? Just want to know what I have to work with. Any multi-frame shot I might consider would all be taken at the same time, and wouldn't involve any photoshop chicanery other than stacking or panoramas View Quote I'm quite curious how you'd brenizer yourself. I'm just guessing that's what you had in mind |
|
Quoted:
I'm quite curious how you'd brenizer yourself. I'm just guessing that's what you had in mind<img src="http://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/smiley_abused.gif" /> View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
<strong>Quoted:</strong>
Question. Are these supposed to be single-frame shots only? No pano? No stacking? No HDR? Just want to know what I have to work with. Any multi-frame shot I might consider would all be taken at the same time, and wouldn't involve any photoshop chicanery other than stacking or panoramas I'm quite curious how you'd brenizer yourself. I'm just guessing that's what you had in mind<img src="http://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/smiley_abused.gif" /> I'm Curious as well... For the sake of the contest, id say just submit all of the frames or a shot of the rough composite. The spirit of the rule here is to just make sure you don't gram your favorite sunset shot and chop yourself into it. You need to actually be in the scene. |
|
Quoted:
I swear, if your portrait looks like the cover for Bohemian Rhapsody due to double/quad exposures... Then again, he'd have to arf it up with a horse mask or T-Rex suit. http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/4B19/production/_86352291_bohemianrhapsody.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Question. Are these supposed to be single-frame shots only? No pano? No stacking? No HDR? Just want to know what I have to work with. Any multi-frame shot I might consider would all be taken at the same time, and wouldn't involve any photoshop chicanery other than stacking or panoramas I swear, if your portrait looks like the cover for Bohemian Rhapsody due to double/quad exposures... Then again, he'd have to arf it up with a horse mask or T-Rex suit. http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/4B19/production/_86352291_bohemianrhapsody.jpg I'm going to do that picture with no shenanigans. |
|
|
Quoted:
I think we need to define what type of picture is acceptable/necessary/desired here. My initial call for a contest (in NorthPolar's thread) was for a selfie portrait. Selfie is self explanatory. Portrait might not be. There are a lot of definitions of portrait, and we could argue them all day, but the generally accepted definition of portrait is a photograph or painting of an individual that primarily features the head/neck/shoulders/upper body and emphasizes their expression. If a do a google image search for "portrait" you'll get a very accurate representation of what a portrait truly is: http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d157/Gatordonald/Arfjunk/Screen%20Shot%202017-03-01%20at%208.37.38%20AM_zpsfrbltqyc.png But I think we just need to be clear on what our objective is View Quote A selfie is a self-portrait. A portrait/self-portrait can be full body and also include environment. It might technically be called an environmental portrait, but it is still a portrait. |
|
Quoted:
A selfie is a self-portrait. A portrait/self-portrait can be full body and also include environment. It might technically be called an environmental portrait, but it is still a portrait. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I think we need to define what type of picture is acceptable/necessary/desired here. My initial call for a contest (in NorthPolar's thread) was for a selfie portrait. Selfie is self explanatory. Portrait might not be. There are a lot of definitions of portrait, and we could argue them all day, but the generally accepted definition of portrait is a photograph or painting of an individual that primarily features the head/neck/shoulders/upper body and emphasizes their expression. If a do a google image search for "portrait" you'll get a very accurate representation of what a portrait truly is: http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d157/Gatordonald/Arfjunk/Screen%20Shot%202017-03-01%20at%208.37.38%20AM_zpsfrbltqyc.png But I think we just need to be clear on what our objective is A selfie is a self-portrait. A portrait/self-portrait can be full body and also include environment. It might technically be called an environmental portrait, but it is still a portrait. Personally, I agree with NoVaGator in the sense that a portrait is a more intimate shot. It should definitely not lose the subject to its surroundings in the photo. I would like to see this go the more traditional route as well. The subject should fill the majority of the frame and be the obvious focus of the shot. When I have a client I typically take three shots as a part of the portrait session. One full length, one tighter (waist up or so) and one tight traditional portrait. Like this. |
|
Taking a selfie , is that different from giving a selfie?
Don't mind me... I've been drinking |
|
OK, here's my submission for the open class. Thought I could use it for the limited class, but I'm really using two lights.
Shot from tripod with remote, light source is the headlights from the rented Ford Explorer. I fully expected to see a tyrannosaurus come crashing out of the woods at any moment. Taken near Paauilo, Big Island, Hawaii, March 3, 2017. Note the EXIF says 11 pm on the 2nd; I hadn't set my camera for local time, so it was really at 5 am on the 3rd. 24mm, 1.6 sec, f/5.6, ISO 400. Do I get extra credit for wearing my ARF visor? Midnight On The Road Of Good And Evil FS by FredMan, on Flickr |
|
And here's my Natural entry. Kiluaea caldera, HI.
Couldn;t quite get the lava and myself in focus, but f/22 is as small as the aperture gets on the 24-120. Seeing as how the distance to me was about 20 feet, and thr distance to the lava was about 1,000 feet, I think it came out OK. 120mm, f/22, 0.3 sec, ISO 400. FS Kilauea Caldera by FredMan, on Flickr |
|
Quoted:
How and when do we submit entries? This one doesn't count because it was taken about a month ago, but if something comes up, I might have an entry. ... And, trying to stand perfectly still for the full 20-30 second exposure is pretty hard. http://i1186.photobucket.com/albums/z362/0471861731/DSC_6819Az_zpszuah6zcr.jpg View Quote Updated OP with that info at the top. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Should this be my natural entry? Not sure... https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/24268/dupemaster-Natural-small-1-158978.JPG View Quote that's pretty good! |
|
|
Quoted:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/564/33128192341_2973cda116_c.jpg Took this picture before I realized that what was desired was a concentrated, focused picture of a person's physical features. Oh, what the hell, posting this anyways. This place is a favorite of mine because no one goes to the place. I was hesitant to travel on the dirt road to get here when I drove a Camry, but I got a new car, so voila. View Quote It's cool. Although I agree that a portrait is traditionally a tighter shot, a self portrait is up to the one taking the photo. |
|
Quoted:
OK, here's my submission for the open class. Thought I could use it for the limited class, but I'm really using two lights. Shot from tripod with remote, light source is the headlights from the rented Ford Explorer. I fully expected to see a tyrannosaurus come crashing out of the woods at any moment. Taken near Paauilo, Big Island, Hawaii, March 3, 2017. Note the EXIF says 11 pm on the 2nd; I hadn't set my camera for local time, so it was really at 5 am on the 3rd. 24mm, 1.6 sec, f/5.6, ISO 400. Do I get extra credit for wearing my ARF visor? Midnight On The Road Of Good And Evil FS by FredMan, on Flickr View Quote Thats pretty sweet! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Should this be my natural entry? Not sure... https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/24268/dupemaster-Natural-small-1-158978.JPG that's pretty good! Thanks! That was the last shot of the set and I did a quick edit while having breakfast with my son this morning. I'm going through the set now and see a couple I like more. I'll keep the final entry quiet till the end. |
|
Quoted:
These are good suggestions. I would take it from natural light to maybe a one light limit, this way the guys who only have one light don't feel completely outgunned it the unlimited category. That or just adding a third category so we have our bases covered. (production/limited/open). So far we'd be looking at: Two categories. (limited/unlimited) Judging on both out of camera (color corrected) and processing. Originality View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
We *could* have a 2-pic contest... one "unlimited" and one natural light I would also propose the following: a before/after retouch component. "Before" could include global LR/PS adjustments but no local adjustments. "After" would include a normal portrait retouch. These are good suggestions. I would take it from natural light to maybe a one light limit, this way the guys who only have one light don't feel completely outgunned it the unlimited category. That or just adding a third category so we have our bases covered. (production/limited/open). So far we'd be looking at: Two categories. (limited/unlimited) Judging on both out of camera (color corrected) and processing. Originality Are the items in red officially part of the rules? My specific Q is on the second item: out of camera (color corrected) Does this mean that color correcting is an acceptable tweak to an out-of-camera entry? My normal workflow is to apply a lens profile correction and a custom color profile correction to all images. (A standard Color Passport workflow) If you're not working with a correction card, then your color correction would be limited to temp and tint. But "color corrected" does not include exposure, contrast, highlight, shadows, whites, blacks, clarity, vibrance, saturation. Right? |
|
Quoted:
Are the items in red officially part of the rules? My specific Q is on the second item: out of camera (color corrected) Does this mean that color correcting is an acceptable tweak to an out-of-camera entry? My normal workflow is to apply a lens profile correction and a custom color profile correction to all images. (A standard Color Passport workflow) If you're not working with a correction card, then your color correction would be limited to temp and tint. But "color corrected" does not include exposure, contrast, highlight, shadows, whites, blacks, clarity, vibrance, saturation. Right? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
We *could* have a 2-pic contest... one "unlimited" and one natural light I would also propose the following: a before/after retouch component. "Before" could include global LR/PS adjustments but no local adjustments. "After" would include a normal portrait retouch. These are good suggestions. I would take it from natural light to maybe a one light limit, this way the guys who only have one light don't feel completely outgunned it the unlimited category. That or just adding a third category so we have our bases covered. (production/limited/open). So far we'd be looking at: Two categories. (limited/unlimited) Judging on both out of camera (color corrected) and processing. Originality Are the items in red officially part of the rules? My specific Q is on the second item: out of camera (color corrected) Does this mean that color correcting is an acceptable tweak to an out-of-camera entry? My normal workflow is to apply a lens profile correction and a custom color profile correction to all images. (A standard Color Passport workflow) If you're not working with a correction card, then your color correction would be limited to temp and tint. But "color corrected" does not include exposure, contrast, highlight, shadows, whites, blacks, clarity, vibrance, saturation. Right? I'm thinking just standard color temp and tint is ok. Any more and it's hard to call it "out of camera" I just think it would be cool to see what people can do with the editing process. |
|
Quoted:
Should this be my natural entry? Not sure... https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/24268/dupemaster-Natural-small-1-158978.JPG View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I'll submit this one for the natural lighting category. http://i1186.photobucket.com/albums/z362/0471861731/_DSC6905Az_zpskxy5t0sf.jpg View Quote |
|
And here's my Limited entry. Big shout out to Petzl Corporation for providing the light source.
Know how hard it is to stand still for 15 seconds? This hard! Mauna Kea Sunrise FS by FredMan, on Flickr |
|
Quoted:
Depends. Are you concealing the remote trigger in one of your hands with those crossed arms? If so, then I say yes ... because that's exactly what I'm doing in mine. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Should this be my natural entry? Not sure... https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/24268/dupemaster-Natural-small-1-158978.JPG Nah, I was using the timer and running back and forth. It was snowing and there was about an inch of snow on the ground. That slushy, slipery kind of snow. Standing on a slant, there were a couple of near falls. |
|
ENTRANCE UPDATE: For PERSEC and to have the highest posable resolution for those who will need to pixel peep, I'll create a passworded page on my site to host the photos. EMAIL me the photos and I'll post them up and send you the link and password. NAME YOUR PHOTO with your username and what category it is IE: DUPEMASTER Natural or DUPEMASTER Limited. View Quote Is this required? I can resubmit mine at full resolution. How about PMing me your email? |
|
|
So I may or may not have a submission for this. It has kind of been an insane week, plus gearing up for a weekend project. Will try to take some today if possible.
|
|
|
You bastards could have told me this before I stayed up till 2:30 shooting my Open shot.
How long do we need? Till Wednesday work for you? |
|
|
Quoted:
I will try but no promises. I just moved into a new place. In a foreign country as well so lots of work going on here. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You bastards could have told me this before I stayed up till 2:30 shooting my Open shot. How long do we need? Till Wednesday work for you? I will try but no promises. I just moved into a new place. In a foreign country as well so lots of work going on here. Give me a date, I'm sure no one objects to stretching it out a bit. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.