So my understanding is that the conversion removes the ir filter, and normal pictures will have a red hue, but the camera can take normal pictures if I use an IR-blocking filter, and nice IR pics if I use any grade IR pass filter.

This camera would not have an IR pass filter installed inside.

Anyone have experience?

I want to do a little IR photography because I live around some interesting places for it.

So would the full-spectrum be a good idea for a camera that could basically serve two functions, ie normal pics and IR pics?

I know I will need to by several different filters for the lenses I buy.

This would be a converted Sony A6000 mirrorless.

are you in my mind?
I've been looking at IR camera stuff for two or three days straight now..

Considering the cost of converting, you guys might want to look at the Fuji X-T1 that's built from the ground up as an IR camera.  

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/4180583057/fujifilm-announces-x-t1-ir-for-infrared-photography

I've converted a few old Sony Cybershot cameras to IR for use in trailcameras for hunting but that's the extent of my knowledge.  You are correct that all images will have a red hue to them.

I also converted an old Sony cybershot.



In addition to the IR pass-through filter, get a 92 'deep-red' filter for doing false-color IR shots.  This filter lets through just a little bit of the far red visible spectrum.



My straight IR filter is actually an extra sure-fire tac-light lens cap.



Eventually I'm going to get a full-spectrum DSLR.  I'd like to try some UV stuff too.