Quote History Quoted:
I have no idea, what is the difference? It just called JuiJitsu class. All the groundwork was started from guard.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
I also made an assumption. Is it JuiJitsu or Brazilian JuiJitsu?
With BJJ, we started with everything from the guard. Posture from on-top, to passing and control from bottom to sweeps.
I have no idea, what is the difference? It just called JuiJitsu class. All the groundwork was started from guard.
This is the part where I start the internet martial art war...
...there are probably a few reading who are by far more experienced.
Etymology...maybe semantics...more likely what the class focuses on teaching. Then you get into what you were taught at your specific class, where n=1.
The short answer is probably not a lot. Honestly, what threw me was when you said you started with ankle locks. We weren't allowed to even attempt an ankle lock...unless your opponent did something stupid...until about blue belt. We would get too many new guys that would get swept by another new guy out of guard and then the only thing they could grab was an ankle or leg so they would start "cranking" on it trying desperately to get a submission. I think what they were trying to avoid is that at best it makes you into a poor guard passer and at worst gets someone hurt when you finally get the ankle lock right.
Also, we focused very heavily on getting into guard as a way to control the fight. Whether it was a scramble from a failed takedown, bad sweep from bottom or good pass from top man. We didn't do a whole lot of takedown drills and then it was generally focused on stuffing the takedown to get control and get into guard.
So basically...your statement about starting with ankle locks, then saying you did a lot of takedown drills.
You're still one day better than you were yesterday.