|
|
Posted: 9/19/2011 8:18:53 PM
Whos working on it? Edsr told me that striker was the guy to send it to?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2011 8:40:51 PM
For the NRA icons? I'll be doing those myself and not sure if anyone else will help.
I'll post an official NRA icon thread along with the requirements. Just give me a day or two. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2011 8:57:10 PM
+1 vallopez2000
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2011 9:11:05 PM
Originally Posted By supremeweasel67:
Nice improvement. I do have a concern (Not a complaint) over something that was posted. If someone has multiple postings (like was mentioned about the brass). Except say it was Magazines. I only had so much $$$ allocated this month and bought x number of magazines. I complete the transaction, leave feedback, and get feedback left. However, next month comes, and the seller still has some magazines left over, and I have this month's allocated $$$ to make purchase. So I make another purchase in same EE ad, and complete transaction. But, I will not receive any feedback. That doesn't seem to be "fair" (for lack of better word). It was a separate transaction, and should be counted as such. Credit where credit is due. Getting 200 +1 from 1 guy isn't as valuable as getting 200 +1 from 200 people. I had the same thought, both as a seller and buyer. Maybe this has to be this way because of the software? No matter if you are a REPEAT seller or buyer, you still work just as hard to be sure that the deal is completed efficiently and at a high standard for both parties. Seems a bit off to not be recognized for this just because the other person has already done business with you...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2011 9:17:17 PM
Originally Posted By miguelag:
+1 vallopez2000 ![]() |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2011 9:19:04 PM
Originally Posted By hawk1: I agree.Originally Posted By supremeweasel67:
Nice improvement. I do have a concern (Not a complaint) over something that was posted. If someone has multiple postings (like was mentioned about the brass). Except say it was Magazines. I only had so much $$$ allocated this month and bought x number of magazines. I complete the transaction, leave feedback, and get feedback left. However, next month comes, and the seller still has some magazines left over, and I have this month's allocated $$$ to make purchase. So I make another purchase in same EE ad, and complete transaction. But, I will not receive any feedback. That doesn't seem to be "fair" (for lack of better word). It was a separate transaction, and should be counted as such. Credit where credit is due. Getting 200 +1 from 1 guy isn't as valuable as getting 200 +1 from 200 people. I had the same thought, both as a seller and buyer. Maybe this has to be this way because of the software? No matter if you are a REPEAT seller or buyer, you still work just as hard to be sure that the deal is completed efficiently and at a high standard for both parties. Seems a bit off to not be recognized for this just because the other person has already done business with you...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2011 9:24:32 PM
test to see my feedback
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2011 9:31:17 PM
I like it. Nice improvement!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2011 9:53:03 PM
[Last Edit: 9/19/2011 10:17:52 PM by slanky]
Originally Posted By GoatBoy: This was something we added a few weeks ago and will be focused on soon. The idea is to get more people into lifetime/voting levels of the NRA so we can continue our strong showing in elections and getting Black Rifle supporters on the board. We are at the forefront of those changes and we want to continue to exert our strength in getting more of the right people on the NRA board! They are doing a great job (totally kicking ass!) in both Tactical Rifle support and firearm sports like 3 Gun. We are very lucky to be working with the NRA and the more we do, the stronger our voice will be! Oooh I finally can have an icon under my name... sweet! Now to convince you to add ham radio icons next |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2011 10:18:43 PM
Originally Posted By slanky: Originally Posted By GoatBoy: This was something we added a few weeks ago and will be focused on soon. The idea is to get more people into lifetime/voting levels of the NRA so we can continue our strong showing in elections and getting Black Rifle supporters on the board. We are at the forefront of those changes and we want to continue to exert our strength in getting more of the right people on the NRA board! They are doing a great job (totally kicking ass!) in both Tactical Rifle support and firearm sports like 3 Gun. We are very lucky to be working with the NRA and the more we do, the stronger our voice will be! Oooh I finally can have an icon under my name... sweet! Now to convince you to add ham radio icons next QSL |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2011 10:58:10 PM
Originally Posted By supremeweasel67:
Originally Posted By hawk1:
I agree.
Originally Posted By supremeweasel67:
Nice improvement. I do have a concern (Not a complaint) over something that was posted. If someone has multiple postings (like was mentioned about the brass). Except say it was Magazines. I only had so much $$$ allocated this month and bought x number of magazines. I complete the transaction, leave feedback, and get feedback left. However, next month comes, and the seller still has some magazines left over, and I have this month's allocated $$$ to make purchase. So I make another purchase in same EE ad, and complete transaction. But, I will not receive any feedback. That doesn't seem to be "fair" (for lack of better word). It was a separate transaction, and should be counted as such. Credit where credit is due. Getting 200 +1 from 1 guy isn't as valuable as getting 200 +1 from 200 people.
I had the same thought, both as a seller and buyer. Maybe this has to be this way because of the software? No matter if you are a REPEAT seller or buyer, you still work just as hard to be sure that the deal is completed efficiently and at a high standard for both parties. Seems a bit off to not be recognized for this just because the other person has already done business with you...
I will agree. That's a good argument. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2011 11:02:17 PM
+1 for bennnn
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2011 11:28:53 PM
I'm mildly curious as to the timeline that "old" feedback will be added to the system.
And am also eagerly awaiting the NRA life memberhip eagle info. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2011 11:39:21 PM
Originally Posted By Seven-Shooter: I'm mildly curious as to the timeline that "old" feedback will be added to the system. And am also eagerly awaiting the NRA life memberhip eagle info. As fast as our little Mod fingers can type. ![]() |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2011 11:44:51 PM
+1 kansascandr
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2011 11:45:45 PM
Originally Posted By Gatorhunt: Done yet?Originally Posted By Seven-Shooter: I'm mildly curious as to the timeline that "old" feedback will be added to the system. And am also eagerly awaiting the NRA life memberhip eagle info. As fast as our little Mod fingers can type. ![]() Notice your is complete!!!! ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2011 12:35:49 AM
Originally Posted By supremeweasel67: Originally Posted By Gatorhunt: Done yet?Originally Posted By Seven-Shooter: I'm mildly curious as to the timeline that "old" feedback will be added to the system. And am also eagerly awaiting the NRA life memberhip eagle info. As fast as our little Mod fingers can type. ![]() Notice your is complete!!!! ![]() ![]() We don't even have access to it ..... yet. ![]() Must of been my fairy god mother. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2011 12:51:23 AM
[Last Edit: 9/20/2011 12:53:59 AM by shooter_tx]
Originally Posted By andrasik:
Originally Posted By supremeweasel67:
Originally Posted By hawk1:
I agree.Originally Posted By supremeweasel67:
Nice improvement. I do have a concern (Not a complaint) over something that was posted. If someone has multiple postings (like was mentioned about the brass). Except say it was Magazines. I only had so much $$$ allocated this month and bought x number of magazines. I complete the transaction, leave feedback, and get feedback left. However, next month comes, and the seller still has some magazines left over, and I have this month's allocated $$$ to make purchase. So I make another purchase in same EE ad, and complete transaction. But, I will not receive any feedback. That doesn't seem to be "fair" (for lack of better word). It was a separate transaction, and should be counted as such. Credit where credit is due. Getting 200 +1 from 1 guy isn't as valuable as getting 200 +1 from 200 people. I had the same thought, both as a seller and buyer. Maybe this has to be this way because of the software? No matter if you are a REPEAT seller or buyer, you still work just as hard to be sure that the deal is completed efficiently and at a high standard for both parties. Seems a bit off to not be recognized for this just because the other person has already done business with you...
I will agree. That's a good argument. +1. I mean, if you had four (or fourteen) flawless transactions with a member, the subsequent transactions aren't going to count... But then the two of you do a fifth (or fifteenth) transaction and you completely fuck the guy over... I'd imagine that repeat transaction would count. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2011 12:57:42 AM
[Last Edit: 9/20/2011 12:59:22 AM by shooter_tx]
Under the old system, were we allowed to leave feedback for Site Sponsors (Bushmaster, Trijicon, LaRue) and Industry Partners (AIM, PK, 44MAG, Magpul, Bravo Company, etc), even if that transaction wasn't the result of an EE thread/sale?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2011 1:00:36 AM
I think I I know I just doubled up on feedback for
sa1248 and I think I did it for PHO3N1X (I was the seller - they were buyers) Am I in the right thread for that? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2011 1:02:49 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2011 1:37:26 AM
Originally Posted By MMcfpd: Originally Posted By TempExp: Originally Posted By bcw107: Hypothetical situation. Let's say I post "what's this worth" in Gen Firearms Discussion. I get an IM from another member saying it's worth X and he'd like to buy it. Would then I need to create a WTS ad and then go through this process? Or what about some of the Pay It Forward type threads where members help each other out and then get left feedback. I gather there will no longer be the ability to leave a +1 for those types of things? And a related situation - I just went to post a +1 for ADCO but the transaction that merited the acknowledgement was not the result of any ADCO EE ads. How would that feedback be posted? Ditto here. I purchased an EE sale related item through an IM and wanted to leave feedback for the seller when I saw the new system. I'm a new member and would like to see the +1 reciprocated when I leave +1 for the seller. How do we handle these? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2011 4:22:37 AM
Originally Posted By GoatBoy:
1) Old Feedback will be input into the system by the staff. It will be marked clearly as being part of the old system for reference. (No comments in the old system at this point, just the feedback numbers.) Phew this is a big relief! It took me 6 years and some excellent ARFCOMmer's (those who were awesome enough to leave FB), to get what I've got. Would've hated losing that.
I think there should be an option to remove FB left for people who just ignore the courtesy. BUT that's okay, I'm looking forward to using the new system! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2011 6:22:09 AM
I am sure the feedback will not get loose as it is usually tied up. However, we still might lose it.
Originally Posted By tominjax: Please tell me we're not going to loose the feedback we've already acquired |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2011 6:42:08 AM
Some have mentioned taking feedback from IM's ?
Not quite sure what that means - please excuse my ignorance on this. I know not all have posted feedback for transactions I have made in the past Cheers on the new system though ! This will be most excellent. |
|
|