User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 11/9/2014 12:27:04 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Holden_McRoyne]
[#1]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan: All the bags that have been kicked have been much larger and/or supported the rear of the rifle on their own. Shoot or don't it's up to you. I'm not trying to be argumentative. You're the one doing all the work, so it's obviously your call. It seems like it would be less work for you if the rules were set up so that they could be applied consistently, instead of requiring case-by-case determinations. But if you want to decide case-by-case, that's fine by me. Can you tell me whether this is allowed? Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/9/2014 1:31:36 AM EDT
[#2]
Didnt take pics at the range today.
 Remington .223 700 Varmint Timney trigger HS Precision stock (5R take off) Timney rail Warne rings Zeiss 6.5-20X Conquest 50 gr V-max 26.1 H4895 First time to the range after putting this rifle together. First five shot group after sighting it in.  And five five shot groups  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/10/2014 8:31:21 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Holden_McRoyne:
I'm not trying to be argumentative. You're the one doing all the work, so it's obviously your call. It seems like it would be less work for you if the rules were set up so that they could be applied consistently, instead of requiring case-by-case determinations. But if you want to decide case-by-case, that's fine by me. Can you tell me whether this is allowed? http://www.crosstac.com/shop-all-products/tactical-rear-squeeze-bag-pre-filled/ Thanks. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Holden_McRoyne:
Originally Posted By akethan:
All the bags that have been kicked have been much larger and/or supported the rear of the rifle on their own. Shoot or don't it's up to you. I'm not trying to be argumentative. You're the one doing all the work, so it's obviously your call. It seems like it would be less work for you if the rules were set up so that they could be applied consistently, instead of requiring case-by-case determinations. But if you want to decide case-by-case, that's fine by me. Can you tell me whether this is allowed? http://www.crosstac.com/shop-all-products/tactical-rear-squeeze-bag-pre-filled/ Thanks. That would be fine. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/10/2014 10:10:43 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan: That would be fine. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan: Originally Posted By Holden_McRoyne: Originally Posted By akethan: All the bags that have been kicked have been much larger and/or supported the rear of the rifle on their own. Shoot or don't it's up to you. I'm not trying to be argumentative. You're the one doing all the work, so it's obviously your call. It seems like it would be less work for you if the rules were set up so that they could be applied consistently, instead of requiring case-by-case determinations. But if you want to decide case-by-case, that's fine by me. Can you tell me whether this is allowed? http://www.crosstac.com/shop-all-products/tactical-rear-squeeze-bag-pre-filled/ Thanks. That would be fine. Sweet. Thank you!
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 11/10/2014 7:46:40 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Face454]
[#5]
SPR division, 100 yards. Face454 Noveske Afghan 5.56 with PA 4-16 scope. 77 grain Winchester match. 1.559", 1.548", 1.162", 2.487", 2.766" Average = 1.9044" MOA Average = 1.8189"
 Untitled by asp_762, on Flickr
 Untitled by asp_762, on Flickr
 Untitled by asp_762, on Flickr
 Untitled by asp_762, on Flickr
|
|
|
IN, USA
|
Posted: 11/11/2014 4:02:45 PM EDT
[Last Edit: avboiler11]
[#6]
avboiler11: 700 "Rem-Age" 6.5 Creedmoor w/ Manners T2 Mini-Chassis - Vortex HST 4-16x44 - Factory 140 A-Max. 100 yard groups: 0.67"/0.44"/0.95"/1.00"/0.84"/0.83". Average = 0.788" or 0.753 MOA
*group sizes above measured center-to-center, prior to me discovering this thread *four groups shot prone with bipod and sand sock rear rest, two groups shot from a bench with bipod and sand sock rear rest 
|
|
|
IN, USA
|
Posted: 11/11/2014 4:06:29 PM EDT
[Last Edit: avboiler11]
[#7]
avboiler11: Savage 110 223 Ackley Improved with McMillan A5 - Vortex HST 4-16x44 - 80gr Amax over 24.9gr 8208XBR. 100 yard groups: 0.55"/0.72"/0.72"/0.72"/0.75"/0.50". Average = 0.66" or 0.63 MOA
*group sizes above measured center-to-center, prior to me discovering this thread *all groups shot prone with bipod and sand sock rear rest 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/11/2014 4:48:05 PM EDT
[#8]
avboiler11 you are missing your pic of the target at range.
|
|
|
|
IN, USA
|
Posted: 11/11/2014 5:02:57 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan:avboiler11 you are missing your pic of the target at range. Yeah, I don't have that as I didn't discover this thread until after I got back from the range today (ie. didn't know it was a "rule") and was too busy shooting before the rain moved in to take pictures of the target downrange. However, the power of the interwebs had me find this photo of the range I was at (Clark State Forest, Henryville IN): 
I was shooting prone to the right of this exact bench, with the targets paced on the far berm just to the left of the vertical log over the man in the yellow shirt's left shoulder. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/11/2014 7:42:41 PM EDT
[#10]
Pulled from the wall of claim ... 
M4HK33: No need to. (join in the MOA thread) There are already plenty of rifles in that thread that outshoot OBR's at 1/3 to 1/2 the cost. He likes to run his mouth and make fun but won't man up and post his own entry. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/11/2014 7:54:54 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Pulled from the wall of claim ...
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Pulled from the wall of claim ...
M4HK33: No need to. (join in the MOA thread) There are already plenty of rifles in that thread that outshoot OBR's at 1/3 to 1/2 the cost. He likes to run his mouth and make fun but won't man up and post his own entry. You know how it is. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/11/2014 9:28:27 PM EDT
[#12]
I actually posted the last sentence about said poster.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/11/2014 9:45:11 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan:
I actually posted the last sentence about said poster. 
|
|
|
|
VA, USA
|
Posted: 11/12/2014 1:54:47 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan: That would be fine. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan: Originally Posted By Holden_McRoyne: Originally Posted By akethan: All the bags that have been kicked have been much larger and/or supported the rear of the rifle on their own. Shoot or don't it's up to you. I'm not trying to be argumentative. You're the one doing all the work, so it's obviously your call. It seems like it would be less work for you if the rules were set up so that they could be applied consistently, instead of requiring case-by-case determinations. But if you want to decide case-by-case, that's fine by me. Can you tell me whether this is allowed? http://www.crosstac.com/shop-all-products/tactical-rear-squeeze-bag-pre-filled/ Thanks. That would be fine. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/12/2014 3:34:40 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan:
This challenge has been running for a while. I'm not the originator just the current caretaker. 
I do believe the inspiration for it came from SH. You are correct good sir
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 3:40:48 PM EDT
[#16]
I know its not official, im printing out a sheet and shooting next week for my official spot.
|
|
|
|
AZ, USA
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 4:50:08 PM EDT
[Last Edit: JmacAr]
[#17]
Consider this my placeholder, but I have a question regarding the rear bag...
This is the only bag that I have and I don't remember who made it so I can't give you the website URL. **Edit** Just checked the link earlier in this thread, 100% sure it's this bag: http://www.triadtactical.com/Red-Tac-Gear-Rear-Bag.html Just want to know if the results will be official or un-official Picture next to my shoe to give a size reference.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 5:15:28 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By JmacAr:
Consider this my placeholder, but I have a question regarding the rear bag... This is the only bag that I have and I don't remember who made it so I can't give you the website URL. **Edit** Just checked the link earlier in this thread, 100% sure it's this bag: http://www.triadtactical.com/Red-Tac-Gear-Rear-Bag.html Just want to know if the results will be official or un-official
Picture next to my shoe to give a size reference. http://i60.tinypic.com/2yy9grb.jpg Too big |
|
|
|
OR, USA
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 5:15:41 PM EDT
[Last Edit: SpeyRod]
[#19]
Question:
I shot 5 today and have everything for the claim. Average .875 moa. The first group blew it out pretty good. I would like to reshoot a slightly modified load. If I submit an .875 today and shoot a better one this weekend will I be able to replace my entry with the better target? 1st submission: SPR, Spey Rod, LaRue Predatobr 16" 5.56, Burris signature select 3-12, Handloaded 77gr SMK over Varget, Groups: 1.583, 1.010, 1.081, 1.148, .879 = Average 1.1402 - .224 = .9161/1.047=.8751 Range set up: Rear bag and 4x6 
Target on 100 yd board: 
|
|
|
AZ, USA
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 5:19:15 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan: Too big Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan: Originally Posted By JmacAr: Consider this my placeholder, but I have a question regarding the rear bag... This is the only bag that I have and I don't remember who made it so I can't give you the website URL. **Edit** Just checked the link earlier in this thread, 100% sure it's this bag: http://www.triadtactical.com/Red-Tac-Gear-Rear-Bag.html Just want to know if the results will be official or un-official Picture next to my shoe to give a size reference. http://i60.tinypic.com/2yy9grb.jpg Too big |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 5:19:43 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SpeyRod:
Question: I shot 5 today and have everything for the claim. Average .875 moa. The first group blew it out pretty good. I would like to reshoot a slightly modified load. If I submit an .875 today and shoot a better one this weekend will I be able to replace my entry with the better target? Placeholder for later submission: <a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/1moa_zpseb401e18.jpeg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/1moa_zpseb401e18.jpeg</a> of course |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 5:33:53 PM EDT
[#22]
Makes me happy to see more people participating.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 5:42:57 PM EDT
[#23]
I changed some of the bag requirement wording and added some already approved bags.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 5:43:16 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Mike_P:
Makes me happy to see more people participating. Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 5:48:51 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Originally Posted By Mike_P:
Makes me happy to see more people participating. Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place. You might try shooting better. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 5:57:02 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Originally Posted By Mike_P:
Makes me happy to see more people participating. Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place. Bring it! I've got a vortex viper 1-4x on my Tar with one of your new match barrels. Maybe I should put a better scope on it and see if it's up for the task! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 5:59:45 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Mike_P:
Bring it! I've got a vortex viper 1-4x on my Tar with one of your new match barrels. Maybe I should put a better scope on it and see if it's up for the task! Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Mike_P:
Originally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Originally Posted By Mike_P:
Makes me happy to see more people participating. Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place. Bring it! I've got a vortex viper 1-4x on my Tar with one of your new match barrels. Maybe I should put a better scope on it and see if it's up for the task! You two get a room or post in the old GD thread. 
|
|
|
|
AZ, USA
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 6:02:59 PM EDT
[Last Edit: JmacAr]
[#28]
Akethan,
I promise I'm not trying to be a pain in the ass, but can you just double check the measurements for me on this...I think the triad bag could go on the approved list. Approved bag: http://www.crosstac.com/shop-all-products/tactical-rear-squeeze-bag-pre-filled/ 6" Long 4" across Approved bag: http://www.laruetactical.com/shooting-bag-accuracy-first-shooting-rest-bag 8" Long 5" across The bag I linked has the same dimensions: http://www.triadtactical.com/Red-Tac-Gear-Rear-Bag.html 6" Long 4" across Hope to get out to the range tomorrow for this |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 6:15:17 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By JmacAr:
Akethan, I promise I'm not trying to be a pain in the ass, but can you just double check the measurements for me on this...I think the triad bag could go on the approved list. Approved bag: http://www.crosstac.com/shop-all-products/tactical-rear-squeeze-bag-pre-filled/ 6" Long 4" across Approved bag: http://www.laruetactical.com/shooting-bag-accuracy-first-shooting-rest-bag 8" Long 5" across The bag I linked has the same dimensions: http://www.triadtactical.com/Red-Tac-Gear-Rear-Bag.html 6" Long 4" across Hope to get out to the range tomorrow for this
Post a pic of it in your hand. |
|
|
|
AZ, USA
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 6:23:58 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan: Post a pic of it in your hand. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan: Originally Posted By JmacAr: Akethan, I promise I'm not trying to be a pain in the ass, but can you just double check the measurements for me on this...I think the triad bag could go on the approved list. Approved bag: http://www.crosstac.com/shop-all-products/tactical-rear-squeeze-bag-pre-filled/ 6" Long 4" across Approved bag: http://www.laruetactical.com/shooting-bag-accuracy-first-shooting-rest-bag 8" Long 5" across The bag I linked has the same dimensions: http://www.triadtactical.com/Red-Tac-Gear-Rear-Bag.html 6" Long 4" across Hope to get out to the range tomorrow for this Post a pic of it in your hand. Here ya go, if I need to post the measurements of the bag I will, but it's definitely 6x4, just like the other bag . |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 6:26:25 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Old_Painless:
You might try shooting better.
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Old_Painless:
Originally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Originally Posted By Mike_P:
Makes me happy to see more people participating. Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place. You might try shooting better.
That's #7 on the takeover checklist. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 6:38:30 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
That's #7 on the takeover checklist.
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Originally Posted By Old_Painless:
Originally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Originally Posted By Mike_P:
Makes me happy to see more people participating. Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place. You might try shooting better.
That's #7 on the takeover checklist.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 7:06:44 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By JmacAr:
Here ya go, if I need to post the measurements of the bag I will, but it's definitely 6x4, just like the other bag .
http://i59.tinypic.com/2nu58c7.jpg Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By JmacAr:
Originally Posted By akethan:
Originally Posted By JmacAr:
Akethan, I promise I'm not trying to be a pain in the ass, but can you just double check the measurements for me on this...I think the triad bag could go on the approved list. Approved bag: http://www.crosstac.com/shop-all-products/tactical-rear-squeeze-bag-pre-filled/ 6" Long 4" across Approved bag: http://www.laruetactical.com/shooting-bag-accuracy-first-shooting-rest-bag 8" Long 5" across The bag I linked has the same dimensions: http://www.triadtactical.com/Red-Tac-Gear-Rear-Bag.html 6" Long 4" across Hope to get out to the range tomorrow for this
Post a pic of it in your hand. Here ya go, if I need to post the measurements of the bag I will, but it's definitely 6x4, just like the other bag .
http://i59.tinypic.com/2nu58c7.jpg Uhhhhhhg. Okay |
|
|
|
OR, USA
|
Posted: 11/14/2014 11:15:56 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Mike_P:
Bring it! I've got a vortex viper 1-4x on my Tar with one of your new match barrels. Maybe I should put a better scope on it and see if it's up for the task! Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Mike_P:
Originally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Originally Posted By Mike_P:
Makes me happy to see more people participating. Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place. Bring it! I've got a vortex viper 1-4x on my Tar with one of your new match barrels. Maybe I should put a better scope on it and see if it's up for the task! I mounted a Leupold 1.25-4 VXR on my Tar after load development. It shot just as well….
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/15/2014 9:08:42 AM EDT
[Last Edit: InfiniteGrim]
[#35]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Originally Posted By Mike_P:
Makes me happy to see more people participating. Me too, but I'm plottin' how I'm gonna knock you out of 1st place. There is no reason to try save yourself the ammo and send it to me, when I finally get back to the range after a year or so I will take my first place spot back, since I still am the longest to be in first 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/15/2014 5:22:50 PM EDT
[#36]
My entry in the 22 division for any 22 with iron sights at 25 yds.
Lichter50: Mossberg M44US - Stock Iron Sights - CCI Standard Velocity 40gr Groups: 0.3285 + 0.4695 + 0.271 + 0.603 + 0.5135 = 0.4371 avg |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/22/2014 4:18:00 PM EDT
[#37]
tag , for later it just started raining
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/29/2014 9:41:14 PM EDT
[Last Edit: cms81586]
[#38]
TRG-22 in .308win with a US Optics SN-3 3.7-17x44 with GAP reticle.
Handloads are 178gr Hornady HTBP's over 43gr of Varget in TAA 7.62 NATO brass and Fed 210M primers Was shot off the bipod and a drop pouch under the rear. It still required consistent hand pressure as per the rules. I left my sand sock in the truck. If it don't count let me know and I'll go reshoot. Tactical comforter since my shooting mat is also in the truck. 
ETA: Bolt Division with magnified optics; cms81586; Sako TRG-22 in .308 Win; Factory rifle with no modifications; US Optics SN-3 3.7x17x44 mil/mil with GAP reticle; Handloads using TAA 7.62 brass, 178gr BTHP, 43.0gr Varget, Fed 210M primers; Groups: 0.397"/0.269"/0.472"/0.597"/0.462" = avg. 0.439" = 0.419 MOA |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/29/2014 10:42:18 PM EDT
[Last Edit: FALARAK]
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan:
Too big Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan:
Originally Posted By JmacAr:
Consider this my placeholder, but I have a question regarding the rear bag... This is the only bag that I have and I don't remember who made it so I can't give you the website URL. **Edit** Just checked the link earlier in this thread, 100% sure it's this bag: http://www.triadtactical.com/Red-Tac-Gear-Rear-Bag.html Just want to know if the results will be official or un-official
Picture next to my shoe to give a size reference. http://i60.tinypic.com/2yy9grb.jpg Too big Many shooters on the wall have already used the Triad tactical rear bag, and it is exactly the same size as the bag you approved above on this same page. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/29/2014 10:47:31 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SpeyRod:
Question: I shot 5 today and have everything for the claim. Average .875 moa. The first group blew it out pretty good. I would like to reshoot a slightly modified load. If I submit an .875 today and shoot a better one this weekend will I be able to replace my entry with the better target? 1st submission: SPR, Spey Rod, LaRue Predatobr 16" 5.56, Burris signature select 3-12, Handloaded 77gr SMK over Varget, Groups: 1.583, 1.010, 1.081, 1.148, .879 = Average 1.1402 - .224 = .9161/1.047=.8751 Range set up: Rear bag and 4x6 <a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/Setup_zpsb30cf783.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/Setup_zpsb30cf783.jpg</a> Target on 100 yd board: <a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/target_zpse1d65a64.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/target_zpse1d65a64.jpg</a> <a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/1moa_zpseb401e18.jpeg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/1moa_zpseb401e18.jpeg</a> <a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/872_zpsc7dcdcd3.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/872_zpsc7dcdcd3.jpg</a> If we are bagging on bags - then this bag which holds the rifle in a V is not cool, to my understanding. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2014 10:47:54 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Pulled from the wall of claim ...
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Pulled from the wall of claim ...
M4HK33: No need to. (join in the MOA thread) There are already plenty of rifles in that thread that outshoot OBR's at 1/3 to 1/2 the cost. He likes to run his mouth and make fun but won't man up and post his own entry. submit for the CSASS, I'll submit for the AFRCOM challenge. but like your views on the CSASS, its a waste of time |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2014 11:32:55 AM EDT
[Last Edit: LaRue_Tactical]
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By m4hk33:
submit for the CSASS, I'll submit for the AFRCOM challenge. but like your views on the CSASS, its a waste of time Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By m4hk33:
Originally Posted By LaRue_Tactical:
Pulled from the wall of claim ...
M4HK33: No need to. (join in the MOA thread) There are already plenty of rifles in that thread that outshoot OBR's at 1/3 to 1/2 the cost. He likes to run his mouth and make fun but won't man up and post his own entry. submit for the CSASS, I'll submit for the AFRCOM challenge. but like your views on the CSASS, its a waste of time Hey stalkAR, had you scared up and handed me a $1/4 million bucks, I'd have gladly thrown a submission into the doomed CSASS solicitation. 
ETA - 5 shot groups up top, 3 shots on the bottom,18" PredatOBR ... 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2014 12:29:46 PM EDT
[Last Edit: ReconB4]
[#43]
lol
congratulations you've bested MDMOORE99: Olympic Arms K8 5.56 - Primary Arms 4-14X44 Mil FFP Scope - Handloads. Groups .562/.876/.736/1.171/.724=avg .8138" = .777 MOA by .013 you did good Although it has been stated, I'll remind everyone that this is not GD. Let's keep the posts in the tech forum from straying away from it's intended subject. These kind of statements can be taken to PM or GD. Let's stay on track guys. (ReconB4) |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2014 12:37:29 PM EDT
[Last Edit: LaRue_Tactical]
[#44]
^^^
Is your beloved CSASS a 5.56 shooting hand loads ? ETA - My apologies accuracy guys, to keep this thread tight, I promise I won't feed it no more. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2014 1:36:28 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By m4hk33:
lol congratulations you've bested MDMOORE99: Olympic Arms K8 5.56 - Primary Arms 4-14X44 Mil FFP Scope - Handloads. Groups .562/.876/.736/1.171/.724=avg .8138" = .777 MOA by .013 you did good Post an entry and stop trolling or get out locked out of this forum. This isn't GD. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2014 1:37:21 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By FALARAK:
If we are bagging on bags - then this bag which holds the rifle in a V is not cool, to my understanding. http://s10.postimg.org/gvzvo852x/screenshot_20.png Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By FALARAK:
Originally Posted By SpeyRod:
Question: I shot 5 today and have everything for the claim. Average .875 moa. The first group blew it out pretty good. I would like to reshoot a slightly modified load. If I submit an .875 today and shoot a better one this weekend will I be able to replace my entry with the better target? 1st submission: SPR, Spey Rod, LaRue Predatobr 16" 5.56, Burris signature select 3-12, Handloaded 77gr SMK over Varget, Groups: 1.583, 1.010, 1.081, 1.148, .879 = Average 1.1402 - .224 = .9161/1.047=.8751 Range set up: Rear bag and 4x6 <a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/Setup_zpsb30cf783.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/Setup_zpsb30cf783.jpg</a> Target on 100 yd board: <a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/target_zpse1d65a64.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/target_zpse1d65a64.jpg</a> <a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/1moa_zpseb401e18.jpeg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/1moa_zpseb401e18.jpeg</a> <a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Psycodog/media/872_zpsc7dcdcd3.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v606/Psycodog/872_zpsc7dcdcd3.jpg</a> If we are bagging on bags - then this bag which holds the rifle in a V is not cool, to my understanding. http://s10.postimg.org/gvzvo852x/screenshot_20.png No, it is not cool. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2014 1:53:21 PM EDT
[#47]
Hey akethan....is the drop pouch I used as a rear bag acceptable or do you need me to reshoot?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2014 2:01:45 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By cms81586:
Hey akethan....is the drop pouch I used as a rear bag acceptable or do you need me to reshoot? I can't really tell how big it is from the pic but since it's not a rest or bag I'll go ahead and let it go. Can you post in the proper format? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2014 4:22:12 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan:
I can't really tell how big it is from the pic but since it's not a rest or bag I'll go ahead and let it go. Can you post in the proper format? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan:
Originally Posted By cms81586:
Hey akethan....is the drop pouch I used as a rear bag acceptable or do you need me to reshoot? I can't really tell how big it is from the pic but since it's not a rest or bag I'll go ahead and let it go. Can you post in the proper format? Now updated with missing info at the bottom of the post added. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2014 7:46:06 PM EDT
[Last Edit: akethan]
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By cms81586:
Now updated with missing info at the bottom of the post added. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By cms81586:
Originally Posted By akethan:
Originally Posted By cms81586:
Hey akethan....is the drop pouch I used as a rear bag acceptable or do you need me to reshoot? I can't really tell how big it is from the pic but since it's not a rest or bag I'll go ahead and let it go. Can you post in the proper format? Now updated with missing info at the bottom of the post added. Good shooting! You are the first person I have removed from the Wall of Claim since I took over the thread on 8/10/2013. 
|
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
