|
|
Posted: 7/27/2012 10:26:31 AM
THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT Just spit balling. Any thoughts? Doc |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/28/2012 3:27:48 AM
I think there's more to go. Look how much we have gone in the last 5-6 years. Take a value oriented bow company like bear - their 2nd cheapest bow is faster than the fastest bow Hoyt offered - their speed bow - 6 years ago and it cost 3x what the bear does.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2012 1:32:27 PM
[Last Edit: 7/29/2012 1:33:37 PM by M4Madness]
The bow industry gained about 70 FPS or so from around 2000 to 2008, going from a then astounding 300 FPS to the current 370 or so. While the speeds have leveled off somewhat over the last few years, manufacturers have been able to make productive changes to their bows while still maintaining their peak speeds. Take BowTech for example. Their low brace height 2008 82nd Airborne had a rating of 350 FPS, while their center-pivot bows were slower. Today, the have managed to get the same speed out of the superior center-pivot design and increased brace height. We may not break 400 FPS for some time, but we will see more efficient, quiet bows catching up with the current top speeds.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2012 9:00:34 PM
I think while the speed gains may be a slow go for a while, I think we'll see improvements in weight reduction and noise.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/1/2012 4:40:54 PM
Originally Posted By IIRC:
I think while the speed gains may be a slow go for a while, I think we'll see improvements in weight reduction and noise. I guess I was thinking that also. Maybe they are concentrating more on weight reduction and other areas than just speed. Doc |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2012 5:37:58 PM
I started looking at bows recently. I have an old Bear and an even older Hoyt. My draw weight for each was 84 pounds. Much to my suprise, most of the new bows are considerably lower. Have the new designs changed so that upping the draw weight won't gain anything, or is low draw weight the current industry trend?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2012 7:38:00 PM
Originally Posted By wag_bag:
I started looking at bows recently. I have an old Bear and an even older Hoyt. My draw weight for each was 84 pounds. Much to my suprise, most of the new bows are considerably lower. Have the new designs changed so that upping the draw weight won't gain anything, or is low draw weight the current industry trend? mid 50's to mid 60's are the 80-90 pound range twenty years ago. Poundage is going down while still retaining speed. Now we just laugh at people with 80+ limbs unless there is a reason shooting it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2012 7:42:30 PM
Originally Posted By RabidMonkeyPox:
Originally Posted By wag_bag:
I started looking at bows recently. I have an old Bear and an even older Hoyt. My draw weight for each was 84 pounds. Much to my suprise, most of the new bows are considerably lower. Have the new designs changed so that upping the draw weight won't gain anything, or is low draw weight the current industry trend? mid 50's to mid 60's are the 80-90 pound range twenty years ago. Poundage is going down while still retaining speed. Now we just laugh at people with 80+ limbs unless there is a reason shooting it. But is there not something to be gained by an arrow traveling faster than an animal is able to react to the sound of the bow? I suppose my interest in all this comes from trying to get to a speed where the arrow will hit the animal before he can react to the noise of the bow and getting enough energy to get pass through on anything I care to hunt. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2012 8:59:23 PM
If you're shooting at 5 grains of arrow weight per pound of draw weight, it won't matter if you're shooting 60, 70, 80, etc.
300 grain arrow at 60 pounds = 350 grains at 70 pounds = 400 grains at 80 pounds. The speed and energy delivered by modern cams makes those heavy draw weights obsolete. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2012 9:08:05 PM
Originally Posted By IIRC:
If you're shooting at 5 grains of arrow weight per pound of draw weight, it won't matter if you're shooting 60, 70, 80, etc. 300 grain arrow at 60 pounds = 350 grains at 70 pounds = 400 grains at 80 pounds. The speed and energy delivered by modern cams makes those heavy draw weights obsolete. Does this mean that we have reached speeds that exceed a animals ability to "jump" an arrow? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2012 9:53:51 PM
Nope, and its highly unlikely we ever will. Sound travels through air at approx 1100 fps
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2012 11:28:53 PM
This is a big reason why I went back to shooting traditional. You never have to worry about being behind the curve on technology.
Not knocking compound shooters, but when I started looking for a bow again and saw the options didn't even look or feel like a bow, I decided to go back to my roots. I was at the shop today and saw an iPod carrier for compounds. Maybe that's a sign of a plateau? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2012 8:59:51 AM
Originally Posted By Durka-Durka:
an iPod carrier for compounds. Why? When does it stop |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2012 2:28:56 AM
Look at the technology in rests and sights. I just changed out my PSE sights for TruGlo sights just because my old Durango cannot accept the two hole quiver... HOLY CRAP THERE IS A LIGHT TO ILLUMINATE THE OPTICS!!!
Also there are drop away rests and new technology in smaller stabilizers... There is quite a bit of technology out there... more coming. We are human... We are not really made to "plateau" |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/19/2012 6:26:36 PM
just thinking that maybe that iphone holder on the bow could be for video or camera?
I think we have trouble thinking about where technology is headed. I remember in the early-mid 90s saying to a friend "do you think we will ever be able to make cds like we do tapes?" his response was "nooooooo way" not more then 5 years later everyone had a cdr in their home computer. where bow technology is going is somewhere great and itll be awesome to see. we may never hit that 400fps level (I think we will eventually) but we might have bows so quite the deer or targets never hear it coming. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2012 3:33:48 PM
[Last Edit: 8/20/2012 3:34:12 PM by Durka-Durka]
Here's what I saw at Academy Sports the other day.
http://www.amazon.com/S4-Gear-JackKnife-Smartphone-Mount/dp/B007IW7DXA/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1345490943&sr=8-2&keywords=cell+phone+holder%2C+bow With the ability to view and share their footage filmed right from their bow, its social media live in the woods!
I quit shooting years ago because I felt like I was expending more energy looking up and buying the latest and greatest and not actually doing something I enjoy, which is shooting a bow. Now I'm shooting traditional and I couldn't be happier. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/20/2012 4:04:30 PM
Originally Posted By Durka-Durka:
Here's what I saw at Academy Sports the other day.
http://www.amazon.com/S4-Gear-JackKnife-Smartphone-Mount/dp/B007IW7DXA/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1345490943&sr=8-2&keywords=cell+phone+holder%2C+bow With the ability to view and share their footage filmed right from their bow, its social media live in the woods!
I quit shooting years ago because I felt like I was expending more energy looking up and buying the latest and greatest and not actually doing something I enjoy, which is shooting a bow. Now I'm shooting traditional and I couldn't be happier. That's as outdated as your trad. equipment. This is the Iphone mount you really want. http://www.firenock.com/main.php?page=iBowSight Seriously though, You should just enjoy what you have and not try to keep up with the Jones. I shoot a 5 year old bow, I bought it then lost my hunting ground. I am just now getting back into it and shoot a lot. I don't need to match others stuff. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/21/2012 11:05:26 PM
Originally Posted By postpostban:
Originally Posted By Durka-Durka:
Here's what I saw at Academy Sports the other day.
http://www.amazon.com/S4-Gear-JackKnife-Smartphone-Mount/dp/B007IW7DXA/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1345490943&sr=8-2&keywords=cell+phone+holder%2C+bow With the ability to view and share their footage filmed right from their bow, its social media live in the woods!
I quit shooting years ago because I felt like I was expending more energy looking up and buying the latest and greatest and not actually doing something I enjoy, which is shooting a bow. Now I'm shooting traditional and I couldn't be happier. That's as outdated as your trad. equipment. This is the Iphone mount you really want. http://www.firenock.com/main.php?page=iBowSight Seriously though, You should just enjoy what you have and not try to keep up with the Jones. I shoot a 5 year old bow, I bought it then lost my hunting ground. I am just now getting back into it and shoot a lot. I don't need to match others stuff. LoL is there such a thing as a Fudd when it comes to archery? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/22/2012 12:40:04 AM
Originally Posted By wag_bag: In order for that to happen, the arrow would have to be traveling at close to the speed of sound. That simply isn't going to happen, as physics will limit that. The other thing to keep in mind is that the heavier your arrow, the quieter your bow will be. That will help mitigate jumping the string more than higher speed will. What the heavier draw weight will enable you to do is shoot a heavier arrow, but the heavier draw weight also means more energy transmitted as sound. A 70# bow of today will kill any animal on this continent. Unless
you're hunting dangerous game in Africa, 80# is just extra wear &
tear on your shoulders.Originally Posted By RabidMonkeyPox: Originally Posted By wag_bag: I started looking at bows recently. I have an old Bear and an even older Hoyt. My draw weight for each was 84 pounds. Much to my suprise, most of the new bows are considerably lower. Have the new designs changed so that upping the draw weight won't gain anything, or is low draw weight the current industry trend? mid 50's to mid 60's are the 80-90 pound range twenty years ago. Poundage is going down while still retaining speed. Now we just laugh at people with 80+ limbs unless there is a reason shooting it. But is there not something to be gained by an arrow traveling faster than an animal is able to react to the sound of the bow? I suppose my interest in all this comes from trying to get to a speed where the arrow will hit the animal before he can react to the noise of the bow and getting enough energy to get pass through on anything I care to hunt. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/23/2012 5:47:39 PM
Originally Posted By loonybin:
Originally Posted By wag_bag:
In order for that to happen, the arrow would have to be traveling at close to the speed of sound. That simply isn't going to happen, as physics will limit that. The other thing to keep in mind is that the heavier your arrow, the quieter your bow will be. That will help mitigate jumping the string more than higher speed will. What the heavier draw weight will enable you to do is shoot a heavier arrow, but the heavier draw weight also means more energy transmitted as sound. A 70# bow of today will kill any animal on this continent. Unless you're hunting dangerous game in Africa, 80# is just extra wear & tear on your shoulders.
Originally Posted By RabidMonkeyPox:
Originally Posted By wag_bag:
I started looking at bows recently. I have an old Bear and an even older Hoyt. My draw weight for each was 84 pounds. Much to my suprise, most of the new bows are considerably lower. Have the new designs changed so that upping the draw weight won't gain anything, or is low draw weight the current industry trend? mid 50's to mid 60's are the 80-90 pound range twenty years ago. Poundage is going down while still retaining speed. Now we just laugh at people with 80+ limbs unless there is a reason shooting it. But is there not something to be gained by an arrow traveling faster than an animal is able to react to the sound of the bow? I suppose my interest in all this comes from trying to get to a speed where the arrow will hit the animal before he can react to the noise of the bow and getting enough energy to get pass through on anything I care to hunt. Then comes in Hoyt's new RKT cam. I picked up a Carbon Element a week ago with this new cam. The draw weight is so much easier at heavier poundage. My 65# RKT draws easier than all my other bows in the low 50's. I predict Hoyt, well because this is one of the first cams I have seen recently to use this easier draw at heavier pounds approach; that we will see bows start to creep back up into the 80 and 90# draw range and having average people be able to draw them back in the near future without terrible difficulty. Hell I've shot a 77# RKT cam and it felt like it was in the mid sixties. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/24/2012 2:11:43 AM
Originally Posted By RabidMonkeyPox: That RKT cam better be miles beyond whatever is on their CRX32 and Rampage XT, because those bow about tore my shoulder ... at 60#. The cams on my Maitland Retribution are smoother than any other hybrid or binary cam system I've tried (and they've been out since 2011). So far my bow has an IBO of 335fps and meets it (chrono'd a 416gr arrow at 284fps, 70#, 27.5" DL with peep & loop). I see no need to leave my already smoooooooth cams for other smooth cams that are slower. Hoyt doesn't have the corner on smooth "speed" cams –– in fact they're latecomers, and still the majority of bows sold are 60# bows which kill everything in North America. Originally Posted By loonybin: Originally Posted By wag_bag: In order for that to happen, the arrow would have to be traveling at close to the speed of sound. That simply isn't going to happen, as physics will limit that. The other thing to keep in mind is that the heavier your arrow, the quieter your bow will be. That will help mitigate jumping the string more than higher speed will. What the heavier draw weight will enable you to do is shoot a heavier arrow, but the heavier draw weight also means more energy transmitted as sound. A 70# bow of today will kill any animal on this continent. Unless you're hunting dangerous game in Africa, 80# is just extra wear & tear on your shoulders.Originally Posted By RabidMonkeyPox: Originally Posted By wag_bag: I started looking at bows recently. I have an old Bear and an even older Hoyt. My draw weight for each was 84 pounds. Much to my suprise, most of the new bows are considerably lower. Have the new designs changed so that upping the draw weight won't gain anything, or is low draw weight the current industry trend? mid 50's to mid 60's are the 80-90 pound range twenty years ago. Poundage is going down while still retaining speed. Now we just laugh at people with 80+ limbs unless there is a reason shooting it. But is there not something to be gained by an arrow traveling faster than an animal is able to react to the sound of the bow? I suppose my interest in all this comes from trying to get to a speed where the arrow will hit the animal before he can react to the noise of the bow and getting enough energy to get pass through on anything I care to hunt. Then comes in Hoyt's new RKT cam. I picked up a Carbon Element a week ago with this new cam. The draw weight is so much easier at heavier poundage. My 65# RKT draws easier than all my other bows in the low 50's. I predict Hoyt, well because this is one of the first cams I have seen recently to use this easier draw at heavier pounds approach; that we will see bows start to creep back up into the 80 and 90# draw range and having average people be able to draw them back in the near future without terrible difficulty. Hell I've shot a 77# RKT cam and it felt like it was in the mid sixties. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/27/2012 12:46:28 PM
I went from an old Bear Whitetail II to a new Mathews Z7x and all the trimmings.
Talk about a radical difference....... I really like the tiny size of this bow as I hunt in ground blinds as well as from fixed, climbers and ladder stands. Not so much climbers anymore as I've fallen 2X I went from loud arcing arrow shots to lazer beam speed and incredible accuracy/repeatability. I shoot better from 30yds than at 20 now...?? I cant see changing ANYTHING anytime soon |
|