I was all set for the Omega and drooled when it came out. Then I found out that it is rated for barrels that are 16" or longer for 6.8. I have several suppressors, and the longer I use rifle cans for night hog hunting private land using supersonic rounds (i.e. try real hard to not wake the rancher's wife up at 3AM), the realizations is that if using supersonic rounds, you're managing the boom of the powder only and the supersonic crack is going to be the same for all suppressors when used on the same rifle and same round. Just about all of them do an effective job at managing the boom for my purposes. If I have to be very, very quiet, I use an integral 77/44. For my purposes, weight and durability are the two leading factors. I have an older stainless steel 30 caliber can that is a freaking TANK at 34 ounces. Does it work great? Yes. Do I like to carry it around on the end of a 12.5" 6.8? Hell no. SilencerCo would already be spending my $$ if the Omega was rated for a 12.5" 6.8.
My dealer called me today to tell me that ThunderBeast Arms Corp just let him know that my Ultra 7 shipped to him. It's basically the same size as the Omega (1.5"x7") but weighs 11.5 ounces in direct thread version vs the Omega's 14 ounces, and is rated down to 10" barrels on 6.8. Lighter and better rating. Worked for me, and TBAC has a great reputation (as does SilencerCO).