You said "amp", what kind of power levels and frequency bands are you talking about?
A quality RG8X size cable works well for this application unless you're using more power than it can handle. Davis RF RG8X-LL (or the same cable branded The Wireman CQ118 at a higher cost) is what I prefer for this, the fine stranded center conductor, softer jacket material, and foam dielectric makes a very flexible, easy handling cable. The 100% shield helps with noise pickup and RF issues also.
Something else to consider is using right angle connectors, where applicable to your installation and usage.
If you're using higher power, the similarly constructed 400 size cable from Davis RF model WM106 (or Wireman #106) is a good option, which I prefer over the Times Ultraflex types for a variety of reasons.
Quoted:
Isn't rg59 75 ohm?
View Quote
Yes, as is the RG11 he also mentioned. Presumably he's just letting the tuner handle the small degree of mismatch, for HF it's pretty trivial.
RG59 & RG6 types almost universally use solid center conductors, and often copper-coated steel, due to the typical use of F connectors, so they're less flexible. RG6 would actually make a quasi-reasonable coax for HF at low to moderate power levels, if you're willing to deal with the slight mismatch. What would actually be an almost ideal coaxial cable for a large percentage of amateur radio needs would be a flexible version of LMR300/RF300, which is an RG6 size low loss 50 ohm cable. An Italian manufacturer is making something almost like that but the dimensions are just slightly off from the other -300 stuff on the market, so you're probably limited to that companies' own connectors.