Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 2/28/2015 12:57:11 AM EDT
Me and my buddy were trying to see if there was any way for us to make contact without using a repeater. We're both techs at the moment. Distance is 23.9 miles, but as you'll see, he's in a hole.Any realistic way for us to make contact?



ETA: that hill is 100' higher than him..


Link Posted: 2/28/2015 1:23:43 AM EDT
[#1]
Satellites.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 1:37:35 AM EDT
[#2]
Have a friend in Arizona who had a similar problem.

After some experimentation, they discovered that using 6 meters was the only reliable solution for them. Some form of knife edge propagation made their comms bomb proof. If you both have HF rigs, I'd try both 6 and 10 meters.

If you're using HTs, a better antenna might help. I've managed a bit over 120 miles with a Yeasu FT-60 and a mag mount antenna, but I suspect the stars were aligned for that one!

Cheers...   Jim
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 8:54:08 AM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Have a friend in Arizona who had a similar problem.

After some experimentation, they discovered that using 6 meters was the only reliable solution for them. Some form of knife edge propagation made their comms bomb proof. If you both have HF rigs, I'd try both 6 and 10 meters.

If you're using HTs, a better antenna might help. I've managed a bit over 120 miles with a Yeasu FT-60 and a mag mount antenna, but I suspect the stars were aligned for that one!

Cheers...   Jim
View Quote

With VHF, he would need a 100' tower, or close to 100', depending on your antenna height to clear that hill.

10m with NVIS antennas.  This may work.

Bill
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 9:12:09 AM EDT
[#4]
I'd try 10m since you are both stuck with that right now (locally there is a 10m net every evening, most guys running verticals). 10m radios are pretty cheap (older Radio Shack rigs about $50) and antenna are easy to build.

A General Up-Grade will net you a great deal more room to play.  80m NVIS would more than likely do it.  I've done 80m as close as 12 miles (groundwave) and all over SC/NC 50+/- miles with a random wire about 8' above ground.

ETA:
Sorry, those acronyms and hamspeak is just so easy...
NVIS1
NVIS2
Random Wire1
Random Wire 2
Groundwave-random Youtube search
10m Dipole
10m Dipole from ARRL

and if you haven't heard, I podcast for guys just like Y'all: right here
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 10:21:15 AM EDT
[#5]
CW on 80m should do the trick (Techs have CW privileges on 80m from 3.525-3.600 MHz).  You would want a low horizontal antenna (loop or dipole) on each end.

ETA:  Did the software that generated that diagram give you an estimated path loss?
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 10:35:08 AM EDT
[#6]
Have you actually tried it?  There may be another path that isn't blocked as depicted in your cross section.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 11:02:19 AM EDT
[#7]
Use a Yagi and point it at the crest of the hill? Sharp-line diffraction? Just a really WAG.

Diffraction
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 11:05:45 AM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

A General Up-Grade will net you a great deal more room to play.  80m NVIS would more than likely do it.  I've done 80m as close as 12 miles (groundwave) and all over SC/NC 50+/- miles with a random wire about 8' above ground.
View Quote


I'm not much for random wires, as they randomly work or not, depending on specific length (really!), but
yes on NVIS, 80 m or 40 m.  

NVIS is a signal nearly straight up (Near Vertical) bounces off the ionosphere, and comes down nearby
(Incident Skywave) like pointing a water hose straight up and wetting down everyone nearby.

This is done on the lower HF bands, 80, 60, 40 meters, by using a dipole, OCFD, or other horizontal wire
antenna close to the ground, 6' to 10'.  This aims the signal up, much like having a mirror behind a candle.

I've seen HF contacts in as close as 5-30 miles done like this, an 80 m dipole 6' off the ground.  Remember
the old Army movies with the long whip antenna bent over and tied off to the front bumper?  Yes, that was
to clear tree limbs, but it also gave solid NVIS operation.

So... go get that General ticket!
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 11:38:04 AM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
10m with NVIS antennas.  This may work.
View Quote

NVIS is impossible on 10 meters.

If you have access to the top of that 100 foot hill, one option you might explore is a passive repeater.  High gain yagi pointed at one station connected via a short jumper to another high gain yagi pointed at the other station.  Antenna gain vs size considerations make higher frequencies more realistic for a passive repeater.

But as previously mentioned, first step is to actually try the path preferably on various bands.  Some variety of knife edge diffraction or reflective paths might make it happen, and those effects vary with frequency so need to try the different bands.  If you try directional antennas, realize that the signal path may well not be the most direct path between the two locations.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 11:41:54 AM EDT
[#10]
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 12:09:45 PM EDT
[#11]
Get out there and start experimenting, signals can bounce off things too along with knife edge propagation.  Both of you using something like my home made Yagi might help figuring it out too.  If you can get it to work then get better antennas and use radios with more watts.  
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 12:27:37 PM EDT
[#12]
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 2:46:42 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
One other thing that might work if you have the capabilities- 2m SSB with directional antennas.

But I'm willing to bet that 6m fm at 100w will do it. Back when the highway patrol and most police ran low-band VHF in that range the coverage for that kind of terrain on simplex was usually pretty good.

You could get some old surplus low band public safety radios and put them on 6M or 10m fm at 110w.
View Quote


Techs don't get access to the FM portion of 10m.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 3:22:52 PM EDT
[#14]
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 3:58:01 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Get out there and start experimenting, signals can bounce off things too along with knife edge propagation.  Both of you using something like my home made Yagi might help figuring it out too.  If you can get it to work then get better antennas and use radios with more watts.  
http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee73/tangotag_bucket/8168192C-694F-402B-9B30-DBE3E9D76597_zpscmmehuir.jpg
View Quote


I have been wanting to make that antenna for a long time.  Off to the garage to start scavenging.....
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 4:13:48 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

With VHF, he would need a 100' tower, or close to 100', depending on your antenna height to clear that hill.

10m with NVIS antennas.  This may work.

Bill
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Have a friend in Arizona who had a similar problem.

After some experimentation, they discovered that using 6 meters was the only reliable solution for them. Some form of knife edge propagation made their comms bomb proof. If you both have HF rigs, I'd try both 6 and 10 meters.

If you're using HTs, a better antenna might help. I've managed a bit over 120 miles with a Yeasu FT-60 and a mag mount antenna, but I suspect the stars were aligned for that one!

Cheers...   Jim

With VHF, he would need a 100' tower, or close to 100', depending on your antenna height to clear that hill.

10m with NVIS antennas.  This may work.

Bill



The reality of NVIS is the only real reliable NVIS frequency is 5 mhz and lower. And anything NVIS above 7mhz just does not exist.  Short skip can and does happen, but it is very rare at 28 mhz, and usually through E-Skip propagation. At 23 miles it is all going to be ground wave propagation, or LOS.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 4:55:21 PM EDT
[#17]
What have you tried so far? Obviously, 25 miles is too far if both of you use a hand-held 5W radio with a small antenna, even on a flat ground. Have you tried running 50 Watts with directional antennas?
You signal may partially refract or reflect off some buildings, hills. etc. Also raising antennas 30-40 ft. may help tremendously.
IMHO, your best choice is to upgrade to General and take advantage of NVIS, like mentioned previously. NVIS may work on 40m band but your best bet is the 80M band. 60 meters may work too but it's always too crowded. I routinely talk to stations 25-50 miles away on 80 meters, even with my small Tarheel mobile antenna and a 100W radio.
Cut your antenna to resonate on 3.820 Mhz. Anything above that is way to crowded at night. It's best to have an Extra ticket and stay below 3.800 Mhz.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 5:04:20 PM EDT
[#18]
First, have you tried to make contact? Using something like a full-power (e.g. 50W) 2M FM radio with a passable rooftop antenna?

A 100' hill is not that big, and contrary to popular belief the typical VHF propagation mode usually isn't line of sight, but some
mix of line of sight, edge diffraction, and scatter.

If that doesn't work, I'd probably try the same thing on 6M and 70cm if radios are available. If that still doesn't work, then,
staying within tech privledges, I'd try SSB on 2M and 70cm with normal antennas, and if that didn't work, move
to a decent gain (10dB) yagi. That will work. Troposcatter is a real thing.

Link Posted: 2/28/2015 5:17:44 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
First, have you tried to make contact? Using something like a full-power (e.g. 50W) 2M FM radio with a passable rooftop antenna?

A 100' hill is not that big, and contrary to popular belief the typical VHF propagation mode usually isn't line of sight, but some
mix of line of sight, edge diffraction, and scatter.

If that doesn't work, I'd probably try the same thing on 6M and 70cm if radios are available. If that still doesn't work, then,
staying within tech privledges, I'd try SSB on 2M and 70cm with normal antennas, and if that didn't work, move
to a decent gain (10dB) yagi. That will work. Troposcatter is a real thing.

View Quote



There is truth there, the best thing to do is try it.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 8:33:45 PM EDT
[#20]
Hide 2 back-to-back yagis on the hilltop.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 8:50:23 PM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Hide 2 back-to-back yagis on the hilltop.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
View Quote

This may work too! But like Gamma and seek2 said, line-of-sight isn't all it's cracked up to be.
I'd try the 10el Yagi and 50W on both ends first, then maybe try the passive antennas like quoted above.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 9:13:02 PM EDT
[#22]
Or try using something like Olivia
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 10:18:59 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted: After some experimentation, they discovered that using 6 meters was the only reliable solution for them. Some form of knife edge propagation made their comms bomb proof. If you both have HF rigs, I'd try both 6 and 10 meters.
View Quote
Try different bands. 10m, 6m, 2m, and 70cm. VHF/UHF can do some interesting things. Knife edge prop being one of them. Haven't tried it myself. The microwave guys have completed successful contacts by bouncing their signal off the rain droplets of approaching thunderstorms. Not exactly bulletproof reliable communications but you get the idea.

Antennas. Go beam of some kind. Say you get a yagi with a gain of 6db. Feed the 50w from a run of the mill VHF mobile into that and you have an ERP of 200w compared to a dipole in the direction the beam is pointing. More importantly is that the beam receives signals better than a dipole in the direction the beam is pointing while rejecting signals off to the sides and rear.

Here I participate in a weekly 2m simplex net. Net control is 32 miles away. His antenna is on a 100ft tower. Due to HOA restrictions all my stuff is in the attic. In some ways my net control is like your op on the left of your graphic and I'm the guy in the hole. Slam dunk comms 100% of the time.

Experiment and let us know what works.

Check my math on the ERP calc please. I just got off a 14 hour day and the brain is toast.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 11:01:23 PM EDT
[#24]
What made that plot?
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 11:06:01 PM EDT
[#25]
Cell phone

I believe meteor scatter and moon bounce work at VHF.

Are there any passes in the hills, not in a straight line between the stations, that would allow the signal to be reflected off another hill or building?

Quoted:
What made that plot?
View Quote


Yeah that's pretty sexy!
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 11:49:30 PM EDT
[#26]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Get out there and start experimenting, signals can bounce off things too along with knife edge propagation.  Both of you using something like my home made Yagi might help figuring it out too.  If you can get it to work then get better antennas and use radios with more watts.  

http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee73/tangotag_bucket/8168192C-694F-402B-9B30-DBE3E9D76597_zpscmmehuir.jpg
View Quote




 
Is the coax choke necessary?




I built one of those without it and the SWR and impedance look ok on the analyser after tweaking the driven element length and messing around with the shape of the hairpin match.
Link Posted: 3/1/2015 12:42:44 AM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

  Is the coax choke necessary?


I built one of those without it and the SWR and impedance look ok on the analyser after tweaking the driven element length and messing around with the shape of the hairpin match.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Get out there and start experimenting, signals can bounce off things too along with knife edge propagation.  Both of you using something like my home made Yagi might help figuring it out too.  If you can get it to work then get better antennas and use radios with more watts.  
http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee73/tangotag_bucket/8168192C-694F-402B-9B30-DBE3E9D76597_zpscmmehuir.jpg

  Is the coax choke necessary?


I built one of those without it and the SWR and impedance look ok on the analyser after tweaking the driven element length and messing around with the shape of the hairpin match.

I never tested it on a meter.  It was a group project for our ARES/RACES group.  We built about twenty all using the same plans, which said to add the coil choke if the antenna would be used for Tx and not just for receiving.  Our antennas get regularly used for fox hunts.  Personally, I've used it to check into nets held on repeaters beyond my normal HT range.  I have also used it for simplex with HTs mine using the Yagi and a friend using a High-Gain on his HT where the distance was too great for both radios with just using High-Gain antennas.  We coordinated the call using cell phones initially, his report was with the Yagi the audio was crystal clear where he couldn't even hear me with the squelch open and me using the High-Gain antenna.  I'm completely sold on hand held Yagis.
Link Posted: 3/1/2015 2:16:56 AM EDT
[#28]
Quoted:
Me and my buddy were trying to see if there was any way for us to make contact without using a repeater. We're both techs at the moment. Distance is 23.9 miles, but as you'll see, he's in a hole.Any realistic way for us to make contact?

http://oi57.tinypic.com/2qmnju1.jpg

ETA: that hill is 100' higher than him..


View Quote


What's the distance to the hill from each house? A passive repeater may be a good alternative but in the scheme of things, passive repeaters are extremely lossy. You essentially sum the path loss of point a to the passive repeater and then point b to the passive repeater. Then you can calculate wether or not it will be a strong enough signal to use. It's a much greater loss (usually close to 2x plus line loss in the jumper) compared to a direct LOS hop.

Another question, did your propagation program tell you by how much height you need in order to clear the 60% of the first fresnel zone?

A
Link Posted: 3/1/2015 8:23:11 PM EDT
[#29]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:





With VHF, he would need a 100' tower, or close to 100', depending on your antenna height to clear that hill.



10m with NVIS antennas.  This may work.



Bill
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:

Have a friend in Arizona who had a similar problem.



After some experimentation, they discovered that using 6 meters was the only reliable solution for them. Some form of knife edge propagation made their comms bomb proof. If you both have HF rigs, I'd try both 6 and 10 meters.



If you're using HTs, a better antenna might help. I've managed a bit over 120 miles with a Yeasu FT-60 and a mag mount antenna, but I suspect the stars were aligned for that one!



Cheers...   Jim



With VHF, he would need a 100' tower, or close to 100', depending on your antenna height to clear that hill.



10m with NVIS antennas.  This may work.



Bill




 
I didn't think NVIS reflections started until about the 40m-80m bands...??
Link Posted: 3/1/2015 8:31:30 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

  I didn't think NVIS reflections started until about the 40m-80m bands...??
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Have a friend in Arizona who had a similar problem.

After some experimentation, they discovered that using 6 meters was the only reliable solution for them. Some form of knife edge propagation made their comms bomb proof. If you both have HF rigs, I'd try both 6 and 10 meters.

If you're using HTs, a better antenna might help. I've managed a bit over 120 miles with a Yeasu FT-60 and a mag mount antenna, but I suspect the stars were aligned for that one!

Cheers...   Jim

With VHF, he would need a 100' tower, or close to 100', depending on your antenna height to clear that hill.

10m with NVIS antennas.  This may work.

Bill

  I didn't think NVIS reflections started until about the 40m-80m bands...??


They don't
Link Posted: 3/1/2015 11:32:20 PM EDT
[#31]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:





I never tested it on a meter.  It was a group project for our ARES/RACES group.  We built about twenty all using the same plans, which said to add the coil choke if the antenna would be used for Tx and not just for receiving.  Our antennas get regularly used for fox hunts.  Personally, I've used it to check into nets held on repeaters beyond my normal HT range.  I have also used it for simplex with HTs mine using the Yagi and a friend using a High-Gain on his HT where the distance was too great for both radios with just using High-Gain antennas.  We coordinated the call using cell phones initially, his report was with the Yagi the audio was crystal clear where he couldn't even hear me with the squelch open and me using the High-Gain antenna.  I'm completely sold on hand held Yagis.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:

Get out there and start experimenting, signals can bounce off things too along with knife edge propagation.  Both of you using something like my home made Yagi might help figuring it out too.  If you can get it to work then get better antennas and use radios with more watts.  

http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee73/tangotag_bucket/8168192C-694F-402B-9B30-DBE3E9D76597_zpscmmehuir.jpg


  Is the coax choke necessary?





I built one of those without it and the SWR and impedance look ok on the analyser after tweaking the driven element length and messing around with the shape of the hairpin match.



I never tested it on a meter.  It was a group project for our ARES/RACES group.  We built about twenty all using the same plans, which said to add the coil choke if the antenna would be used for Tx and not just for receiving.  Our antennas get regularly used for fox hunts.  Personally, I've used it to check into nets held on repeaters beyond my normal HT range.  I have also used it for simplex with HTs mine using the Yagi and a friend using a High-Gain on his HT where the distance was too great for both radios with just using High-Gain antennas.  We coordinated the call using cell phones initially, his report was with the Yagi the audio was crystal clear where he couldn't even hear me with the squelch open and me using the High-Gain antenna.  I'm completely sold on hand held Yagis.




 
I did some googling around after I posted and I guess the choke is to keep RF off of the feedline since it is right in the midst of the antenna elements. Which would make sense why it is recommended for antennas that will be used to transmit.




I have mine mounted on a tripod and was experimenting with APRS today. (Which is a great way to get a signal report without bothering other hams too much or taking up a lot of time on the air). I turned the antenna away from a known digipeater and sure enough, it didn't send back my packet, where it does when the antenna is aimed at it. I guess the antenna really is pretty directional. :D
Link Posted: 3/2/2015 4:23:00 PM EDT
[#32]
Sorry to just get back. So far we just tried HTs with stock rubber duckys. I have one of the roll up slimjim antennas i was going to hoist off the ground a ways and try but havent yet due to the cold/rainy/snowy weather thats been going on. I wanted to get some advice before i just started throwing money at different radios/antennas. I plan on making that tape measure yagi as i have everything needed except for the coax, so we will both have one of those to try.

The program i used is Radio Mobile, i used the online version, but there is one you can download too. Seems like a pretty good program, especially for somebody who knows what theyre doing

The guy who posted satellites now has me looking into making contact with SO-50 .

But thanks for all the suggestions and like has been said, we really need to start trying stuff.  We are going to try with 2m first, and then move on to something else if need be. Feel free to keep the suggestions coming, im trying to soak up all the knowledge i can.
Link Posted: 3/2/2015 4:46:24 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The program i used is Radio Mobile, i used the online version, but there is one you can download too. Seems like a pretty good program, especially for somebody who knows what theyre doing
View Quote

Did it give you an estimated path loss?
Link Posted: 3/2/2015 6:26:37 PM EDT
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Sorry to just get back. So far we just tried HTs with stock rubber duckys. I have one of the roll up slimjim antennas i was going to hoist off the ground a ways and try but havent yet due to the cold/rainy/snowy weather thats been going on. I wanted to get some advice before i just started throwing money at different radios/antennas. I plan on making that tape measure yagi as i have everything needed except for the coax, so we will both have one of those to try.

The program i used is Radio Mobile, i used the online version, but there is one you can download too. Seems like a pretty good program, especially for somebody who knows what theyre doing

The guy who posted satellites now has me looking into making contact with SO-50 .

But thanks for all the suggestions and like has been said, we really need to start trying stuff.  We are going to try with 2m first, and then move on to something else if need be. Feel free to keep the suggestions coming, im trying to soak up all the knowledge i can.
View Quote


OK, you really need to use something with significantly more power than an HT. HTs will work for true line of sight, and will give passable results on flat-ish terrain from 2 to maybe 10 miles tops, but they're not going to work for this unless you can actually eyeball each other. If money is tight I'd suggest either a couple used 2M mobiles or two new Kenwood TM-281s or Yaesu FT-1900s.
Link Posted: 3/2/2015 8:01:01 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Sorry to just get back. So far we just tried HTs with stock rubber duckys. I have one of the roll up slimjim antennas i was going to hoist off the ground a ways and try but havent yet due to the cold/rainy/snowy weather thats been going on. I wanted to get some advice before i just started throwing money at different radios/antennas. I plan on making that tape measure yagi as i have everything needed except for the coax, so we will both have one of those to try.

The program i used is Radio Mobile, i used the online version, but there is one you can download too. Seems like a pretty good program, especially for somebody who knows what theyre doing

The guy who posted satellites now has me looking into making contact with SO-50 .

But thanks for all the suggestions and like has been said, we really need to start trying stuff.  We are going to try with 2m first, and then move on to something else if need be. Feel free to keep the suggestions coming, im trying to soak up all the knowledge i can.
View Quote


I'm also tempted to build a yagi and try for some HT satellite contacts. But that'll be it's own build thread.
Link Posted: 3/2/2015 8:21:23 PM EDT
[#36]


2m kilowatt amplifier.......I'm just saying.
Link Posted: 3/2/2015 10:21:41 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
http://www.w6pql.com/2m/engraved-panel.jpg

2m kilowatt amplifier.......I'm just saying.
View Quote
That and a couple longboom yagis will get you moonbounce. However our OP distance is a bit less aggressive.

5w HTs are not going to do what you want to do. No matter the antenna. I'm still sticking with 50w mobiles as base rigs such as the FT-1900 coupled with a compact yagi or log periodic will net you the results. At a minimum start with the 50w rig and give it a try with a good vertical such as the Diamond X50. If no-go then give the gain antennas a try.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top