User Panel
Posted: 4/5/2014 9:51:15 AM EDT
I finally got all the parts needed to get started with changing the heatsink on my KX3 to a larger one. This should help keep the KX3 cooler on high duty cycle digital modes like JT65, JT9, Olivia, and PSK31. If it gets too hot, the frequency can start to drift.
I'm trying to reproduce the results from this link K9-Bob referenced in the other thread. http://blog.danegardner.com/2014/03/elecraft-kx3-heatsink-upgrade.html The high res pics in that link are great! Parts and Supplies
|
|
|
|
BD, any chance of getting some data with just the new heat sink and before you install all the other stuff?
|
|
|
|
|
Can you post a picture of the KX3 with the factory heat sink off?
Thanks BD! |
|
I did not realize it had a factory heatsink, I thought it just used the case
|
|
There's enough depth in the new design for fins. I wonder why he didn't take that approach (it would cut the weight down as well) since it maximizes airflow area.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Just got new hard drive and OS, HRD, WSJT-X working last night. May be able to play radio this evening. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Ping for updates? Just got new hard drive and OS, HRD, WSJT-X working last night. May be able to play radio this evening. Thank you good sir! |
|
Just compiled data from the new heatsink installed without any other mods. Sent the data to gcw to overlay on the first set of data from the original heatsink. Stay tuned for another update.
|
|
|
Quoted:
So....the one without cooling fins didn't help much? View Quote I'll reserve judgement until I see the plots GCW is preparing, but I see little difference. I haven't done anything but swap heatsinks, yet. I'd prefer NOT to do anything but change them. Truthfully, even with the original heatsink, my KX3 never cut back to 5w because of high temp. This is after TXing for 3 hours @ 10w on WSJT-X. Maybe if it was in the sun with an OAT (Outside Air Temp) in the 90's |
|
Thanks for the update.
I would have hoped to see better results given the cost. Maybe the larger surface area of the Canadian heat sink will do better. |
|
Quoted:
I'll reserve judgement until I see the plots GCW is preparing, but I see little difference. I haven't done anything but swap heatsinks, yet. I'd prefer NOT to do anything but change them. Truthfully, even with the original heatsink, my KX3 never cut back to 5w because of high temp. This is after TXing for 3 hours @ 10w on WSJT-X. Maybe if it was in the sun with an OAT (Outside Air Temp) in the 90's View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So....the one without cooling fins didn't help much? I'll reserve judgement until I see the plots GCW is preparing, but I see little difference. I haven't done anything but swap heatsinks, yet. I'd prefer NOT to do anything but change them. Truthfully, even with the original heatsink, my KX3 never cut back to 5w because of high temp. This is after TXing for 3 hours @ 10w on WSJT-X. Maybe if it was in the sun with an OAT (Outside Air Temp) in the 90's I don't know what I was doing then, because I got it to auto temp switch to 5W dozens of times as well as having to dial it down to 3W several times with the factory heat sink. I'll probably get the same add on heat sink, though I will probably sand the paint off and add heat transfer paste to it when I install the new heat sink. |
|
|
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes I didn't do the procedure myself, but the guy I bought it from did. Elecraft KX3 with Extras I also forgot to note that I've performed the VFO temperature compensation calibration procedure (http://www.elecraft.com/manual/KX3%2...20rev%20A8.pdf) so it's nice and stable for digital modes like JT65. |
|
Quoted:
Thanks for the update. I would have hoped to see better results given the cost. Maybe the larger surface area of the Canadian heat sink will do better. View Quote This would seem to indicate that the critical thermal interface is therefore that between the PA transistors and the case. I'd suggest that you add the thermal grease as suggested in the original article. In fact it would be a very interesting experiment to see what that alone does with the stock heatsink. That's probably going to be the biggest bang for the buck with the larger heatsink just being icing on the cake. |
|
BigDaddy,
Thanks for the time, effort and expense to run these experiments and post the resulting data for us. The approach and detail is amazing compared to what is usually found in equipment reviews elsewhere on the web. As has been mentioned before, this is definitely the best Ham forum on the internet! |
|
Quoted:
BigDaddy, Thanks for the time, effort and expense to run these experiments and post the resulting data for us. The approach and detail is amazing compared to what is usually found in equipment reviews elsewhere on the web. As has been mentioned before, this is definitely the best Ham forum on the internet! View Quote You're very welcome! This is the greatest place to experiment and have questions answered , ain't it? What a great bunch of folks! |
|
Well, I managed to finally get my KX3 to automatically reduce power due to "Hi Temp". This was with the new N8WTT heatsink. Had it on since I got home from work about 2000Z. Over the next 5 hours I was in and out of the shack, cherry picking interesting stations when I saw them. Almost entirely at 5w output. That is until I saw an Asiatic Russian station calling CQ. Tried a few times at 5w, but no dice. Turned it up to Max (12w with 13.8VDC from the power supply). The max with battery power is normally 10w. PAI and OSC temps climbed quickly to 60°C and 50°C respectively. At 61°C PAI, received a "HI TEMP" warning and the power output automatically cut back to 5w. Reduced power out to demanding 5w on the next round and only got about 2.5w on the power meter. Let it cool down for several minutes and again tried to TX @ 5w, this time successfully. I usually have the ceiling fan in the shack on, but did not have it on when this happened.
|
|
|
I didn't perform the temp comp procedure with my KX3 personally. So I have a lot of unanswered questions about how this is done.
The Elecraft XG50 is a simple 49.380 MHz signal source specifically designed for use with the KX3 Extended VFO Temperature Compensation Procedure. Powered from a 12VDC source, the XG50 produces a stable -36dBm signal. ( 0.000251 mW ) I ordered an Elecraft XG50 Kit to help perform this procedure. The plan is to build the small kit, perform the procedure, and then ship (on my dime) the XG50 to who ever wants to use it for their own KX3. When that person is finished, he can ship it to anyone else that needs to use it. Not mine, but this sample is what it'll look like. |
|
Quoted:
I didn't perform the temp comp procedure with my KX3 personally. So I have a lot of unanswered questions about how this is done. The Elecraft XG50 is a simple 49.380 MHz signal source specifically designed for use with the KX3 Extended VFO Temperature Compensation Procedure. Powered from a 12VDC source, the XG50 produces a stable -36dBm signal. ( 0.000251 mW ) I ordered an Elecraft XG50 Kit to help perform this procedure. The plan is to build the small kit, perform the procedure, and then ship (on my dime) the XG50 to who ever wants to use it for their own KX3. When that person is finished, he can ship it to anyone else that needs to use it. http://home.comcast.net/~gregbell/Elecraft XG50 Manual Pic of Board.jpg Not mine, but this sample is what it'll look like. http://home.comcast.net/~gregbell/Elecraft XG50 Red.jpg http://home.comcast.net/~gregbell/Elecraft XG50 Green Front.jpg http://home.comcast.net/~gregbell/Elecraft XG50 Green Rear.jpg View Quote First dibs! |
|
Quoted:
I didn't perform the temp comp procedure with my KX3 personally. So I have a lot of unanswered questions about how this is done. The Elecraft XG50 is a simple 49.380 MHz signal source specifically designed for use with the KX3 Extended VFO Temperature Compensation Procedure. Powered from a 12VDC source, the XG50 produces a stable -36dBm signal. ( 0.000251 mW ) I ordered an Elecraft XG50 Kit to help perform this procedure. The plan is to build the small kit, perform the procedure, and then ship (on my dime) the XG50 to who ever wants to use it for their own KX3. When that person is finished, he can ship it to anyone else that needs to use it. http://home.comcast.net/~gregbell/Elecraft XG50 Manual Pic of Board.jpg Not mine, but this sample is what it'll look like. http://home.comcast.net/~gregbell/Elecraft XG50 Red.jpg http://home.comcast.net/~gregbell/Elecraft XG50 Green Front.jpg http://home.comcast.net/~gregbell/Elecraft XG50 Green Rear.jpg View Quote Very nice! What does it do? Edit: perhaps if I actually read the post that I quoted I would be better off. I think I get it now... Interested because I'm very close to pulling the trigger on one for some camping/hiking this summer. |
|
Quoted:
Well, I managed to finally get my KX3 to automatically reduce power due to "Hi Temp". View Quote And I may have hurt the radio some, too. It no longer takes dozens of TX's to reach the temp limit (and it only did that once ). Now when TXing @ just 5w for a JT65 QSO, the power cuts back almost immediately to 2.5w. It's almost as if heat tranfer paste has burned or melted away, and the heat can't dissipate through the heatsink like it did before. This is just a gut feeling from the way it acted before and how it's changed now. Anyone seen or heard anything like this? |
|
Quoted:
And I may have hurt the radio some, too. It no longer takes dozens of TX's to reach the temp limit (and it only did that once ). Now when TXing @ just 5w for a JT65 QSO, the power cuts back almost immediately to 2.5w. It's almost as if heat tranfer paste has burned or melted away, and the heat can't dissipate through the heatsink like it did before. This is just a gut feeling from the way it acted before and how it's changed now. Anyone seen or heard anything like this? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Well, I managed to finally get my KX3 to automatically reduce power due to "Hi Temp". And I may have hurt the radio some, too. It no longer takes dozens of TX's to reach the temp limit (and it only did that once ). Now when TXing @ just 5w for a JT65 QSO, the power cuts back almost immediately to 2.5w. It's almost as if heat tranfer paste has burned or melted away, and the heat can't dissipate through the heatsink like it did before. This is just a gut feeling from the way it acted before and how it's changed now. Anyone seen or heard anything like this? Sounds more like something may have come loose (or the heat made the paste ooze out) You may want to snug things back up |
|
The molten pools of goo must have solidified. TX'd a CQ at 12w, then reduced to 5w to complete the JT65 QSO. Didn't get nearly as hot as it did before.
|
|
Also received the case for the Elecraft XG50. It was made on a 3D printer specifically for this application. Elecraft XG50 Case. Chris sent me 2 because the first one fit the circuit board a little snug, so he resized it to 101% and sent both. The XG50 should be here tomorrow, according to Elecrafts UPS package tracking.
|
|
|
Interesting.
If it is assumed that your "work outs" were essentially the same (a poor assumption) AND that shack temperature was the same for all tests (data missing), then it would appear that worst case for stock was 54, worst case for the "little" heatsink was 52 and for the "big" heatsink was 51. Not a huge difference, although just eyeballing the data the average temp. seemed lower with the big heatsink, as it should. My take-aways are that if you are operating at 10W at less than 70F ambient then you don't need a better heatsink and that one can expect a maximum rise from ambient of approx. 30C with the big heatsink and 34C with the stock. This means the maximum ambient operating temp's for high power/high duty are 80 to 86F, depending on the heatsink. Did both heatsinks get the full "Dane Gardner" installation? In the future if somebody else decides to do this experiment better data could be obtained by performing a continuous key-down into a dummy load and graph the results minute by minute, understanding the final PA section temperature will be worse into less than perfect VSWR. Given BigDaddy's results, people having overheating problems are probably operating at elevated ambient temp's and/or into some higher VSWRs or at higher than 10W. |
|
Thanks for the update! Now we just need to get you the proaudioeng version(which is officially endorsed by the SideKX guy) for comparison !
|
|
Quoted:
Did both heatsinks get the full "Dane Gardner" installation? View Quote None of the heatsinks got the full "Dane Gardner" installation. The only change was the heatsink itself. I have all the components for the full meal deal, but I'm not sure it's necessary for how most will operate the KX3. More than 2 or 3 hours at a time @ 10w is beyond my requirements for WSJT-X with JT65/JT9 operation using the KX3. For increased power and longer sessions, I'd just use my 7200. |
|
Quoted:
None of the heatsinks got the full "Dane Gardner" installation. The only change was the heatsink itself. I have all the components for the full meal deal, but I'm not sure it's necessary for how most will operate the KX3. More than 2 or 3 hours at a time @ 10w is beyond my requirements for WSJT-X with JT65/JT9 operation using the KX3. For increased power and longer sessions, I'd just use my 7200. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Did both heatsinks get the full "Dane Gardner" installation? None of the heatsinks got the full "Dane Gardner" installation. The only change was the heatsink itself. I have all the components for the full meal deal, but I'm not sure it's necessary for how most will operate the KX3. More than 2 or 3 hours at a time @ 10w is beyond my requirements for WSJT-X with JT65/JT9 operation using the KX3. For increased power and longer sessions, I'd just use my 7200. Ah, ok, that explains why the differences were not very dramatic. So the big heatsink alone equates to only about 5 degrees (generous) of operating temperature range. Dane reported 10 degrees of improvement with the small heatsink. It would be interesting to see what somebody got with the full "Gardner" treatment and the big heatsink. For a portable rig like the KX3, especially where it might be operated in direct sunlight, obtaining 10 or 15 degrees improvement in thermal rise could be very valuable. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.