Author
Message
jhlewis10
Member
Offline
Posts: 123
Feedback: 0% (0)
Posted: 11/16/2010 10:34:00 AM

THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT
What length and type of coax are you all using for your Go-Boxes? Starting my project this weekend. I have the dry box, 857D, VX-170, tuner, Signalink, few batteries and battery tender.
Gamma762
criticality accident
Offline
Posts: 15684
Feedback: 90% (10)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/16/2010 11:29:15 AM
For what frequency and what coax length?
This is...a clue. - Pat_Rogers
CO, FL, MI, SC, NH, NV - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
jhlewis10
Member
Offline
Posts: 124
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/16/2010 2:03:29 PM
30-40 feet in length.

2 meters, 20,40,80.
ARMALITE-FAN
Offline
Posts: 6254
Feedback: 100% (29)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/16/2010 2:06:18 PM
Good quality RG-8X is really handy for HF. In shorter lengths works OK for VHF
338winmag
Team Member
Offline
Posts: 11548
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/16/2010 2:24:17 PM
LMR240 ultraflex.
If you don't have the guts to fight them in court you won't have the guts to fight them in combat.
-.-/..-./...../--./-./.--
Gamma762
criticality accident
Offline
Posts: 15690
Feedback: 90% (10)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/16/2010 2:24:19 PM
[Last Edit: 11/16/2010 2:31:27 PM by Gamma762]
Originally Posted By jhlewis10:
30-40 feet in length.

2 meters, 20,40,80.

Times-Microwave LMR240ultraflex is pretty handy stuff, very flexible and loss should be very reasonable at 2m (~1.75dB @ 146MHz for 50 feet). Belden 9258 is similar.

A good quality flexible RG58 size foam cable like Belden 8219 would be perfectly acceptable for the HF frequencies, for that matter could get by with that for 2m for a run that short with about 1dB additional loss on 2m for a 50 foot run.
This is...a clue. - Pat_Rogers
CO, FL, MI, SC, NH, NV - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
jhlewis10
Member
Offline
Posts: 125
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/16/2010 2:34:50 PM
Perfect thanks.
Gamma762
criticality accident
Offline
Posts: 15692
Feedback: 90% (10)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/16/2010 2:59:02 PM
I would recommend longer than 30-40 feet especially for the HF antenna. I'd probably have 100' of Belden 8219 for HF (1.3dB loss at 10Mhz for 100').
This is...a clue. - Pat_Rogers
CO, FL, MI, SC, NH, NV - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
HankEllis
Offline
Posts: 106
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/16/2010 3:42:08 PM
To keep it simple. 50ft minimum length for freq down to 40m. 100ft minimum for 80m. 50 feet of coax will act as a quarter wave stub on 80m. AFM clued me in on this and verified it myself.

RG-8X works fine for the HF bands but losses becomes an issue on VHF. I use LMR-240 Ultraflex at a minimum for VHF. Prefer LMR-400 on VHF/UHF but I'm not carting that bulky heavy stuff around for a field situation.
A_Free_Man
Member
Offline
Posts: 22123
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/16/2010 8:42:12 PM
I use Mini-8 (RG-8X) for my HF go kit. I have it on round extension cord reels. And as stated, works fine in shorter lengths for VHF.
"To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." --Ted Nugent
BigDaddy0004
Member
Offline
Posts: 1679
Feedback: 100% (23)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/16/2010 11:07:14 PM
Originally Posted By A_Free_Man:
I use Mini-8 (RG-8X) for my HF go kit. I have it on round extension cord reels. And as stated, works fine in shorter lengths for VHF.




Worf: No! Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects. (dreamily) And claw at you.

You can go a long way with a smile. You can go a lot farther with a smile and a gun. -Al Capone
A_Free_Man
Member
Offline
Posts: 22125
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/17/2010 6:35:02 AM
Originally Posted By BigDaddy0004:
Originally Posted By A_Free_Man:
I use Mini-8 (RG-8X) for my HF go kit. I have it on round extension cord reels. And as stated, works fine in shorter lengths for VHF.


http://home.comcast.net/~gregbell/Coax Reel.jpg




That is EXACTLY what I have, same reel and all.
"To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." --Ted Nugent
jhlewis10
Member
Offline
Posts: 126
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/17/2010 11:08:08 AM
Originally Posted By HankEllis:
To keep it simple. 50ft minimum length for freq down to 40m. 100ft minimum for 80m. 50 feet of coax will act as a quarter wave stub on 80m. AFM clued me in on this and verified it myself.

RG-8X works fine for the HF bands but losses becomes an issue on VHF. I use LMR-240 Ultraflex at a minimum for VHF. Prefer LMR-400 on VHF/UHF but I'm not carting that bulky heavy stuff around for a field situation.


I did not realize that I needed a minimum of 100 feet of coax for my 80 meter NVIS dipole. I am trying to keep one box self contained, and dont think I will be able to fit 100 feet in. I will test this. Thanks.
HankEllis
Offline
Posts: 107
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/17/2010 2:57:57 PM
[Last Edit: 11/17/2010 2:58:37 PM by HankEllis]
Originally Posted By jhlewis10:
Originally Posted By HankEllis:
To keep it simple. 50ft minimum length for freq down to 40m. 100ft minimum for 80m. 50 feet of coax will act as a quarter wave stub on 80m. AFM clued me in on this and verified it myself.
I did not realize that I needed a minimum of 100 feet of coax for my 80 meter NVIS dipole. I am trying to keep one box self contained, and dont think I will be able to fit 100 feet in. I will test this. Thanks.
The formula is: (468 / Freq) * Vf = Minimum coax length.
Freq is the lowest frequency of the band your working with. 3.500 Mhz for the 80m band. Vf is velocity factor of the coax you're working with. You can measure the velocity factor with an antenna analyser such as the MFJ-269 or find a reasonable value by searching online. For RG-8X I find .85 give or take a little. Run the numbers and you come up with 113.7 ft as the half wave. 100 ft is close enough.

You can test this easily with an antenna analyser. Run out a 50 ft length of coax. No terminination except the connector. No dummy load, no antenna. Run the analyser through the band you're targeting making note of where the coax starts to resonate. Sure enough a 50ft length of coax will start to resonate toward the upper end of the 80m band. Your RF radiating out of the coax is not a good thing. Add another 50 ft of coax and try again. Doesn't resonate and problem solved.

Gamma762
criticality accident
Offline
Posts: 15710
Feedback: 90% (10)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/17/2010 3:04:07 PM
Originally Posted By jhlewis10:
Originally Posted By HankEllis:
To keep it simple. 50ft minimum length for freq down to 40m. 100ft minimum for 80m. 50 feet of coax will act as a quarter wave stub on 80m. AFM clued me in on this and verified it myself.
RG-8X works fine for the HF bands but losses becomes an issue on VHF. I use LMR-240 Ultraflex at a minimum for VHF. Prefer LMR-400 on VHF/UHF but I'm not carting that bulky heavy stuff around for a field situation.

I did not realize that I needed a minimum of 100 feet of coax for my 80 meter NVIS dipole. I am trying to keep one box self contained, and dont think I will be able to fit 100 feet in. I will test this. Thanks.

Use the RG-58 type that I suggested.
This is...a clue. - Pat_Rogers
CO, FL, MI, SC, NH, NV - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
A_Free_Man
Member
Offline
Posts: 22128
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/17/2010 8:59:54 PM
468 / 3.900 mhz x .84 (velocity factor of RG-8X) = 100.8' for a halfwave at 3.900 mhz.

It's also appx 2 halfwaves at 40 meters, or 4 halfwaves at 20 meters.

Coax length DOES matter.

"To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." --Ted Nugent
ar-jedi
Intellectually adrift
Offline
Posts: 9064
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/17/2010 11:15:10 PM
Originally Posted By A_Free_Man:
Coax length DOES matter.

how so?

consider two cases –– the first where the antenna itself is a reasonable match to the coax's 50ohm characteristic impedance, and a second where it is not.

ar-jedi

Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
-- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
A_Free_Man
Member
Offline
Posts: 22129
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/18/2010 12:53:04 AM
A perfectly good antenna at 1.4 or 1.5:1 SWR on, say, 80 meters.

Put 50' of RG-8X to it, and the readings are squirrely, high SWR, 6 ohms... as if shorted out.

Unscrew the coax from the antenna, check with analyzer again, 6 ohms. What?

It is a 1/4 wave... and is a shorted stub.

SWR readings are good on the antenna on 40 and 20 meters, as it should be, but bad on 80 meters.

Put 100' of RG-8X, which is a halfwave at 80 meters, and everything is good.

A halfwave of feedline repeats the antenna's impedance every half wavelength and multiples thereof.

A quarter wavelength (50' at 3.8-3.9 mhz) is a shorted stub. 75', 80', 37.573', are all OK at 80 meters. It's just that pesky 1/4 wavelength that is the problem.

So, some guys say BS, feedline length does not matter, and others say it does. My actual measurements say it does.

Here it is in writing:

The Fifty Ohm Enigma, or, “Have you got a match?”

http://emrcorp.com/techinfo/PDF/The_Fifty_Ohm_Enigma_w_Logo_03-01-10.pdf < That is a pdf download.

Particularly page 10 - Coaxial Line Segments As “Repeater” Sections and “Stubs.”
"To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." --Ted Nugent
Gamma762
criticality accident
Offline
Posts: 15720
Feedback: 90% (10)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/18/2010 1:34:10 AM
A 1/4 wave of coax is NOT a "shorted stub", it is however a transformer. It will take a high impedence and flip it to low and vice versa. Under most conditions this isn't going to make an antenna mismatch any worse, just different.

Other than avoiding a 1/4 wave or other odd 1/4 wave resonant length there is no need to pick any particular length of cable. If you have a reasonably matched load there is no need to even worry about the 1/4 wave resonances.
This is...a clue. - Pat_Rogers
CO, FL, MI, SC, NH, NV - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
pcsutton
Member ....but not a 3rd member
Offline
Posts: 13653
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/18/2010 12:37:36 PM
[Last Edit: 11/18/2010 12:37:59 PM by pcsutton]
Or a guy could be a dumbass like me and just use an SG-230 at the antenna feed point....making feedline length pretty much a moot point.
"I am compensating. If I could kill stuff with my dick from 200 yards I would not need a firearm would I?"-Zanther
"I swear, there is a limited amount of intelligence in the world and the population is increasing." - 96Ag
Sua Sponte!
ar-jedi
Intellectually adrift
Offline
Posts: 9065
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/18/2010 7:01:07 PM
[Last Edit: 11/18/2010 7:31:02 PM by ar-jedi]
Originally Posted By A_Free_Man:
A perfectly good antenna at 1.4 or 1.5:1 SWR on, say, 80 meters.

so, this particular "perfectly good" antenna presents a "reasonable" load to a transmitter directly connected to it. in other words, it is roughly 50ohms resistive. is this correct?

Originally Posted By A_Free_Man:
Put 50' of RG-8X to it, and the readings are squirrely, high SWR, 6 ohms... as if shorted out.

how? you have already asserted that the antenna presents a "reasonable" load which approximates a 50ohm impedance, and this benign load is now terminating the length of coax. so we have a 50ohm source, a 50ohm impedance transmission line, and a (roughly) 50ohm load. how did we end up with a high SWR? please explain this further.

Originally Posted By A_Free_Man:
Unscrew the coax from the antenna, check with analyzer again, 6 ohms. What?

you are now measuring the impedance of a different system: a 50ohm characteristic impedance coax terminated with a very high (infinite) impedance. this configuration results in a marked reflection at the far end, and an attendant high SWR. or said in RF speak, the return loss (S11 parameter) is low. how is the impedance of the unterminated coax ("6 ohms") the same as the impedance ("6 ohms") of the combination of the coax and the antenna –– the latter which you have stated approximates a 50ohm load?

Originally Posted By A_Free_Man:
A halfwave of feedline repeats the antenna's impedance every half wavelength and multiples thereof.

an unterminated halfwave length of coax has a very feedpoint high impedance, because of the reflection at the far end. a halfwave length of coax terminated with a 50ohm load (or nearly so) at the far end has a 50ohm system impedance. in this case there is no (or little) reflection, and the SWR is low (return loss = S11 = high).

we can further hypothesize and extrapolate from these two examples that any length of coax, if terminated with an impedance close the to coax's characteristic impedance, has no impact on the overall antenna system impedance presented to the transmitter. said another way, adding/subtracting coax will result in more/less resistive loss, but the SWR will remain low despite the varied length of the coax. is this not the case?

Originally Posted By A_Free_Man:
It is a 1/4 wave... and is a shorted stub.

Originally Posted By A_Free_Man:
A quarter wavelength (50' at 3.8-3.9 mhz) is a shorted stub.

an unterminated 1/4 wavelength long piece of coax results in a very low impedance ("shorted") stub –– because there is a high (infinite) impedance present at the end of it. put a 50ohm termination on the end, such as a well-behaved antenna, and you have a (nearly) 1:1 SWR and no "short".

ar-jedi


Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
-- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
A_Free_Man
Member
Offline
Posts: 22130
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/18/2010 7:50:09 PM
Well, I get a reading of 1.4:1 SWR with 100' coax at 3.920 mhz.


Here's another.

http://www.qsl.net/co8tw/coax.htm



What I do know is, 100' of RG-8X works fine on 75 m. 50' doesn't.

Until this experience I though coax length didn't matter.


"To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." --Ted Nugent
A_Free_Man
Member
Offline
Posts: 22133
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/20/2010 9:26:24 AM
[Last Edit: 11/20/2010 9:28:17 AM by A_Free_Man]
Coax length is also being discussed on the Buddipole yahoo group. This link was posted.

https://docs. google.com/ leaf?id=0B7IoW_ mP1hrhMTdmZDRhMj EtOTcyMy00MDlmLW IyYzYtODk0NjA2YT U3ZmM2&sort= name&layout= list&num= 50




From the ARRL Antenna Handbook.
"To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." --Ted Nugent
KC-10Boom
Member
Military
Offline
Posts: 1819
Feedback: 100% (11)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/20/2010 12:55:13 PM

Originally Posted By BigDaddy0004:
Originally Posted By A_Free_Man:
I use Mini-8 (RG-8X) for my HF go kit. I have it on round extension cord reels. And as stated, works fine in shorter lengths for VHF.


http://home.comcast.net/~gregbell/Coax Reel.jpg


Son of a bitch... Pure genius.
Displaced Texan.

NKAWTG... N!
A_Free_Man
Member
Offline
Posts: 22134
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/20/2010 1:08:26 PM
Just like that... here's mine.

"To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." --Ted Nugent
BigDaddy0004
Member
Offline
Posts: 1681
Feedback: 100% (23)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/20/2010 1:23:44 PM
[Last Edit: 11/20/2010 1:24:45 PM by BigDaddy0004]
Originally Posted By KC-10Boom:

Originally Posted By BigDaddy0004:
Originally Posted By A_Free_Man:
I use Mini-8 (RG-8X) for my HF go kit. I have it on round extension cord reels. And as stated, works fine in shorter lengths for VHF.


http://home.comcast.net/~gregbell/Coax Reel.jpg


Son of a bitch... Pure genius.





Worf: No! Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects. (dreamily) And claw at you.

You can go a long way with a smile. You can go a lot farther with a smile and a gun. -Al Capone