User Panel
Posted: 7/1/2015 11:13:54 AM EDT
So I have a few questions about yalls go to rifle. What components do yall use? What caliber? Why do you have it setup that way? I'm starting to build my go to rifle and was wondering if I should go with a different caliber. Right now I have a .223, a .50 Beowulf, and a 6.8 I'm selling because it's not quite what I want. There's nothing wrong with the caliber, it's the upper I don't like. I don't have any ammo for if so it might not be the caliber I'm looking for or it might be. I don't recall if there's a thread about this already sorry if there is.
|
|
For SHTF discussion you might be better off in the Survival forum.
However this could be argued a lot of ways. On one hand 5.56 and 9mm would be a good choice because there is a lot of it around. On the other hand an exotic caliber would be best because everyone else is going to go for the 5.56 and 9mm. So pick what you like and go from there. |
|
Go to caliber is 5.56mm, using Black Hills 77gr. OTM, its a Colt 6920 with an ACOG
|
|
SHTF I'm all about Scout tactics. Light, fast, avoid a fight and if I come under direct contact high volume of fire. I choose the 5.56 because its lighter and I can get more rounds on target faster.
|
|
I use a suppressed SBR w/ geiselle saa. Light and not nearly as loud so my hearing wouldn't be destroyed right away. I like my aimpoint T1 cause that's my home defense set up with a surefire x300.
Basically my home defense gun is my all around weapon. |
|
I use an 11.5" SBR with a Specwar 556 suppressor and a 1-4 scope on it. Works great. It is loud with the suppressor off as I have a brake on it.
|
|
|
I use a BCM EAG carbine with either an Aimpoint PRO, Leupold 1.5-5X, or Larue irons.
Vickers sling and a Surefire P2X Fury. Pmag 40s.... |
|
Daniel Defense MK18 with a Aimpoint PRO, Surefire X300U and a SDN-6 on the way handles everything I need it to.
|
|
plenty of options but my question for you are you lone wolfing this or are you having a group. and are you evading or engaging
A lot of need-to knows are needed. |
|
The main thing for a serious use rifle is reliability. The mil specs are a proven recipe for reliability, and are a good starting point. Also, for a rifle you're carrying in the field, weight is an issue. Forget the bench shooter mindset about squeezing every bit of sub-MOA accuracy out of your rig... if you can shoot inside of 4 MOA, you are fine for combat purposes. So I like pencil or gov't profile barrels, chrome lined bores, and 5.56 chambers. Leave the heavy barrels and hybrid match chambers to the bench huggers. If you've built a solid rifle, the optics need to be equally solid. So no Chinese crap. An Aimpoint PRO is pretty hard to beat for a red dot. You'll want a good sling... I like the padded VCAS. Also remember that it is dark half the time, and the action doesn't stop when the sun sets. Night vision is ideal, but you'll at least want a good rifle mounted white light. You will also need some load bearing gear to carry mags and your other gear in the field. Once again, don't get cheap crap. You can find a serviceable belt or chest rig to get you started at the Army surplus store. I could go on and on a about training, etc., but that's not what you asked about.
|
|
556 for sure, The whole caliber debate is boring and been hashed over a billion times with the same results.
I don't find that one gun is necessary or suits my needs as well as a few set up correctly. Car gun, CQB gun, short with a 1/3 co witness Red dot sight and flashlight. I dont care about fancy this or that on this gun, a semi stock 11.5 works well enough for me. My woods, hunting,general use rifle, I like something along the lines of a MOD Holland. Mil scope variable power in the 2.5-10 to the 4-14 or there about. High quality barrel, full length freefloat, suppressor ,Back up RDS or side sights ,so basically a scoped tricked carbine. I keep a Kiss type rifle around just because they are so rugged and dependable, kill a coon in the chicken coop and what not. I did run a 1-whatever scope for a time but found it to be less then ideal in ever role. |
|
5.56
lightweight Accurate Cheap Good to great ballistic performance Easy to reload Low recoil Did i mention cheap? My go to rifle is a BCM 16" middy, on a spikes tactical lower, with moe furniture, DD 1.5 rear sight. (Im saving up for an aimpoint) |
|
|
556 either rifle or carbine length. Buy quality, BCM, LMT, Colt, Spikes. Stay away from ARs that use proprietary parts.
|
|
I think the AK is the quintessential SHTF carbine. There are few more rugged and simple carbines out there that can endure lack of care yet still be reliable and combat accurate. One can easily hit man-sized targets at 200 yards, which is way beyond most combat engagement distances especially during SHTF scenarios.
My AK's are SLR-95's and I have two 6.8spc AR's, as much as I'd like to prefer to take the AR's, my instincts say grab the AK's when sh*t gets serious. |
|
First you need to define what SHTF means to you.
Does it mean TEOTWAWKI, New Orleans after the hurricane, or something milder where a person is in a disaster zone without power and little or no police presence for a few days or at most a few weeks? You will also have to account for your potential tactical situations. Everyone has to tailor their caliber choice and weapon configuration to their circumstances. My all around weapon has a 5.56mm 18” barrel and collapsing stock. I have other choices that would be better for specific situations. |
|
for a SHTF scenario I would go with my .22lr then my AR and THEN a .308 Remington 700. My top 3 pics for SHTF rifles. Currently I have a .22lr and 5.56 Im working on getting a 308 together. Mainly saving for suppressors for these top 3
|
|
I tend to think of "SHTF" from a Second Amendment perspective. Ask yourself, if I wanted to go out and disrupt TPTB and make my locale as "ungovernable" as possible, right here right now, what kind of things would I be doing? There are many ways to go about it, but if your plan is to shoot it out in the streets or at your "compound" with large numbers of the bad guys' goons, your plan sucks. Think elimination of key personnel; and think escape and evasion, and living to fight another day.
|
|
Quoted:
I think the AK is the quintessential SHTF carbine. There are few more rugged and simple carbines out there that can endure lack of care yet still be reliable and combat accurate. One can easily hit man-sized targets at 200 yards, which is way beyond most combat engagement distances especially during SHTF scenarios. My AK's are SLR-95's and I have two 6.8spc AR's, as much as I'd like to prefer to take the AR's, my instincts say grab the AK's when sh*t gets serious. View Quote Thats cute |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I think the AK is the quintessential SHTF carbine. There are few more rugged and simple carbines out there that can endure lack of care yet still be reliable and combat accurate. One can easily hit man-sized targets at 200 yards, which is way beyond most combat engagement distances especially during SHTF scenarios. My AK's are SLR-95's and I have two 6.8spc AR's, as much as I'd like to prefer to take the AR's, my instincts say grab the AK's when sh*t gets serious. Thats cute He's opinion is legitimate. An AK is fine, an AR is fine, a 30-30 is fine. The software > the hardware. |
|
5.56mm (not 223) is a good way to go. There's plenty of special flavor-of-the-month cartridges on the market; most try to solve a non-existant problem and in a year or two ammo gets really scarce.
Other than that, quality parts, light weight (every ounce counts), sling, flashlight, and (if funds allow) a quality optic appropriate to your environment. |
|
Go with whatever you are trained on. I spent over 30 years carrying a M16/M4 and mine is set up as I carried a M4 for 20 yrs (5.56, 14.5", SOPMOD stock, Surefire Scout light, Aimpoint M2 and BUIS). I've got several old LBEs set up that I know and have several plated carriers also set up. My M4 is a General Purpose Rifle for me from hunting (have taken several whitetails with it), HD and service rifle competition capable to 500 yds with carrying handle.
CD |
|
Quoted:
5.56mm (not 223) is a good way to go. There's plenty of special flavor-of-the-month cartridges on the market; most try to solve a non-existant problem and in a year or two ammo gets really scarce. Other than that, quality parts, light weight (every ounce counts), sling, flashlight, and (if funds allow) a quality optic appropriate to your environment. View Quote Not an ammo argument but this is not true. If you think that 5.56 m855 is a better option (not considering price) than something like .223 60gr Hornady TAP you are mistaken. Surplus 556 is a great low cost option but it is not going to perform anywhere close to some of these .223 rounds. The problem with x193/855 is inconsistent performance whenever it hits a soft target... a .223 projectile that is designed to expand within that critical first 4-6 inches solves that very real problem. |
|
I think we should discuss what kind SHTF scenario is floating in your head. After that I would love to read what kind of a strategy you worked out for your scenario. Cause zombies most likely are not coming. Same goes to aliens. Russians and Koreans won't be storming our borders. Economic collapse? Wide long lasting blackout? Bugging in or out?
Almost every detail can change your armory drastically. |
|
I am partial for my new 300 blackout. Using subsonic ammo with my suppressor it is very quiet. It is also an SBR 10.2 inches.
Ammo will be hard to come by except for my stash that is why I have tons of 22lr and 5.56 stocked up. |
|
Quoted:
I think we should discuss what kind SHTF scenario is floating in your head. After that I would love to read what kind of a strategy you worked out for your scenario. Cause zombies most likely are not coming. Same goes to aliens. Russians and Koreans won't be storming our borders. Economic collapse? Wide long lasting blackout? Bugging in or out? Almost every detail can change your armory drastically. View Quote unless russia doesnt like the idea of us bringing troops and tanks there.... :/ |
|
Quoted:
Simple. Compact. Efficient. I like it. To answer OP's question, mine is a Noveske/KAC hybrid 11.5" in 5.56 http://imageshack.com/a/img537/742/sDonhT.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I think the AK is the quintessential SHTF carbine. There are few more rugged and simple carbines out there that can endure lack of care yet still be reliable and combat accurate. Actually there are several, with the AR at the top of that list. To answer OP's question, mine is an LMT 10.5 in 5.56 http://i.imgur.com/vrA67oy.jpg]http://i.imgur.com/vrA67oy.jpg]http://i.imgur.com/vrA67oy.jpg Simple. Compact. Efficient. I like it. To answer OP's question, mine is a Noveske/KAC hybrid 11.5" in 5.56 http://imageshack.com/a/img537/742/sDonhT.jpg Paint my rifle, please :) |
|
Quoted:
Go to caliber is 5.56mm, using Black Hills 77gr. OTM, its a Colt 6920 with an ACOG View Quote Why a Hague Convention compliant non-expanding bullet for SHTF? Hunting type soft points or expanding monolithic copper bullets like Barnes TSX have vastly better terminal performance. My SHTF load uses a Barnes 62 grain TSX. Milspec ammo, even the best, makes no sense to me when good hunting ammo works much better. You are not in the Army or Marines. A 16" 5.56 carbine with this type load would be hard to beat. Team it with a .22LR and 12 gauge shotgun and you have the bases covered in a survival mode, end of civilized society, breakdown od order scenario. |
|
|
|
I will never understand the "go to" A2. Its like the hipsters who still listen to vinyl records and use typewriters instead of laptops. Quoted:
all 5.56 I prefer fn barrels or bcm Iam also a devote of BDC reticules. I like to go from 100 meters to 500 mrters without altering my scope's setting. unless it's a red dot then its eotech my newest add is to make my 2 go to rifles NVD capable- no pics of those yet. http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/ROKbeef01/2010-04-2811-00-27_0079.jpg I'm an SBR person because of the layout of where I live but I think this is an awesome rifle. (Except those lights suck without an LED conversion... but that makes the IR thing useless) |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I think the AK is the quintessential SHTF carbine. There are few more rugged and simple carbines out there that can endure lack of care yet still be reliable and combat accurate. One can easily hit man-sized targets at 200 yards, which is way beyond most combat engagement distances especially during SHTF scenarios. My AK's are SLR-95's and I have two 6.8spc AR's, as much as I'd like to prefer to take the AR's, my instincts say grab the AK's when sh*t gets serious. Thats cute And true! |
|
For me, if SHTF, I want a reliable and lightweight/compact carbine, preferably a SBR. It'll be 5.56, running Magpul PMAGs.
BCM, DD, LMT, Aimpoint, Trijicon, Nightforce, Surefire, and a few other names come to mind. |
|
18" A2 for me....but close enough! Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
5.56, 20" A2 is my go to weapon. Same here. And lots of ammo. I will never understand the "go to" A2. Its like the hipsters who still listen to vinyl records and use typewriters instead of laptops. Because ~ 1 year after the balloon goes up, iron sights will rule the world! A fixed carry handle upper is more durable than a flat top with bolted on sights, esp if those sights are flip up. Also, I am not a fan of metal handguards either bare, or with more techy crap hanging on them that will fail over time. For short term crises scenarios, or when resupply is an option, there can be some advantage to technology, but long term SHTF? Forget about it. |
|
Quoted:
Because ~ 1 year after the balloon goes up, iron sights will rule the world! A fixed carry handle upper is more durable than a flat top with bolted on sights, esp if those sights are flip up. Also, I am not a fan of metal handguards either bare, or with more techy crap hanging on them that will fail over time. For short term crises scenarios, or when resupply is an option, there can be some advantage to technology, but long term SHTF? Forget about it. View Quote so long as you don't run it over with a truck, an ACOG will last forever too. tritium will burn out, but its pretty much useless anyway. so long as there is ambient light, the reticle will glow. i too don't see the point in a fixed FSB and carry handle. |
|
Quoted:
so long as you don't run it over with a truck, an ACOG will last forever too. tritium will burn out, but its pretty much useless anyway. so long as there is ambient light, the reticle will glow. i too don't see the point in a fixed FSB and carry handle. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Because ~ 1 year after the balloon goes up, iron sights will rule the world! A fixed carry handle upper is more durable than a flat top with bolted on sights, esp if those sights are flip up. Also, I am not a fan of metal handguards either bare, or with more techy crap hanging on them that will fail over time. For short term crises scenarios, or when resupply is an option, there can be some advantage to technology, but long term SHTF? Forget about it. so long as you don't run it over with a truck, an ACOG will last forever too. tritium will burn out, but its pretty much useless anyway. so long as there is ambient light, the reticle will glow. i too don't see the point in a fixed FSB and carry handle. Fixed it for you. Glass can break and get obstructed through snow, rain, dust, debree, etc. I also am not a fan of the sight picture / reticle. Also, it adds ~ one full pound of weight, making your gun more sluggish. |
|
Quoted:
Because ~ 1 year after the balloon goes up, iron sights will rule the world! A fixed carry handle upper is more durable than a flat top with bolted on sights, esp if those sights are flip up. Also, I am not a fan of metal handguards either bare, or with more techy crap hanging on them that will fail over time. For short term crises scenarios, or when resupply is an option, there can be some advantage to technology, but long term SHTF? Forget about it. View Quote techy crap like a light? I disagree... I think that some people get off to the "bare bones" design bc it makes them feel rugged and manly but a quality optic and light will make your rifle a more effective tool. The A2 rear sight is just as vulnerable as the base of a removable carry handle. If the optic fails then i have irons available to me. If you feel more comfortable with the A2 thats awesome but I really think you are kinda fooling yourself on this one. Love A2s... much sexier than something like a CQBR but IMO functionally inferior. |
|
Quoted:
techy crap like a light? I disagree... I think that some people get off to the "bare bones" design but a quality optic and light will make your rifle a more effective tool. The A2 rear sight is just as vulnerable as the base of a removable carry handle. If the optic fails then i have irons available to me. If you feel more comfortable with the A2 thats awesome but I really think you are kinda fooling yourself on this one. Love A2s... much sexier than something like a CQBR but IMO functionally inferior. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Because ~ 1 year after the balloon goes up, iron sights will rule the world! A fixed carry handle upper is more durable than a flat top with bolted on sights, esp if those sights are flip up. Also, I am not a fan of metal handguards either bare, or with more techy crap hanging on them that will fail over time. For short term crises scenarios, or when resupply is an option, there can be some advantage to technology, but long term SHTF? Forget about it. techy crap like a light? I disagree... I think that some people get off to the "bare bones" design but a quality optic and light will make your rifle a more effective tool. The A2 rear sight is just as vulnerable as the base of a removable carry handle. If the optic fails then i have irons available to me. If you feel more comfortable with the A2 thats awesome but I really think you are kinda fooling yourself on this one. Love A2s... much sexier than something like a CQBR but IMO functionally inferior. Lights can be good when they work, but glass can break and batteries get used up, etc. We're talking long term collapse of society here, not a short term mission with resupply, etc. |
|
Quoted:
Lights can be good when they work, but glass can break and batteries get used up, etc. We're talking long term collapse of society here, not a short term mission with resupply, etc. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Because ~ 1 year after the balloon goes up, iron sights will rule the world! A fixed carry handle upper is more durable than a flat top with bolted on sights, esp if those sights are flip up. Also, I am not a fan of metal handguards either bare, or with more techy crap hanging on them that will fail over time. For short term crises scenarios, or when resupply is an option, there can be some advantage to technology, but long term SHTF? Forget about it. techy crap like a light? I disagree... I think that some people get off to the "bare bones" design but a quality optic and light will make your rifle a more effective tool. The A2 rear sight is just as vulnerable as the base of a removable carry handle. If the optic fails then i have irons available to me. If you feel more comfortable with the A2 thats awesome but I really think you are kinda fooling yourself on this one. Love A2s... much sexier than something like a CQBR but IMO functionally inferior. Lights can be good when they work, but glass can break and batteries get used up, etc. We're talking long term collapse of society here, not a short term mission with resupply, etc. I understand.... but i still think you should use what you can while you can. I don't believe that the fixed A2 handle is really any more durable than the removable handle. I love that simplistic design but I perform better with some of the techy crap on my rifle and i will use it until i am forced to go without it. I practice with both. |
|
Quoted:
Fixed it for you. Glass can break and get obstructed through snow, rain, dust, debree, etc. I also am not a fan of the sight picture / reticle. Also, it adds ~ one full pound of weight, making your gun more sluggish. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Because ~ 1 year after the balloon goes up, iron sights will rule the world! A fixed carry handle upper is more durable than a flat top with bolted on sights, esp if those sights are flip up. Also, I am not a fan of metal handguards either bare, or with more techy crap hanging on them that will fail over time. For short term crises scenarios, or when resupply is an option, there can be some advantage to technology, but long term SHTF? Forget about it. so long as you don't run it over with a truck, an ACOG will last forever too. tritium will burn out, but its pretty much useless anyway. so long as there is ambient light, the reticle will glow. i too don't see the point in a fixed FSB and carry handle. Fixed it for you. Glass can break and get obstructed through snow, rain, dust, debree, etc. I also am not a fan of the sight picture / reticle. Also, it adds ~ one full pound of weight, making your gun more sluggish. That's why I tend to run the same light on all my builds. Plenty of replacements and parts on hand. |
|
Quoted:
Lights can be good when they work, but glass can break and batteries get used up, etc. We're talking long term collapse of society here, not a short term mission with resupply, etc. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Because ~ 1 year after the balloon goes up, iron sights will rule the world! A fixed carry handle upper is more durable than a flat top with bolted on sights, esp if those sights are flip up. Also, I am not a fan of metal handguards either bare, or with more techy crap hanging on them that will fail over time. For short term crises scenarios, or when resupply is an option, there can be some advantage to technology, but long term SHTF? Forget about it. techy crap like a light? I disagree... I think that some people get off to the "bare bones" design but a quality optic and light will make your rifle a more effective tool. The A2 rear sight is just as vulnerable as the base of a removable carry handle. If the optic fails then i have irons available to me. If you feel more comfortable with the A2 thats awesome but I really think you are kinda fooling yourself on this one. Love A2s... much sexier than something like a CQBR but IMO functionally inferior. Lights can be good when they work, but glass can break and batteries get used up, etc. We're talking long term collapse of society here, not a short term mission with resupply, etc. your logic is flawed. Magazines fail WAY more often that optics, do you advocate using single-shots because when you loose your balloons all the feed-lips are going to fall in the gravel? |
|
Quoted:
your logic is flawed. Magazines fail WAY more often that optics, do you advocate using single-shots because when you loose your balloons all the feed-lips are going to fall in the gravel? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Because ~ 1 year after the balloon goes up, iron sights will rule the world! A fixed carry handle upper is more durable than a flat top with bolted on sights, esp if those sights are flip up. Also, I am not a fan of metal handguards either bare, or with more techy crap hanging on them that will fail over time. For short term crises scenarios, or when resupply is an option, there can be some advantage to technology, but long term SHTF? Forget about it. techy crap like a light? I disagree... I think that some people get off to the "bare bones" design but a quality optic and light will make your rifle a more effective tool. The A2 rear sight is just as vulnerable as the base of a removable carry handle. If the optic fails then i have irons available to me. If you feel more comfortable with the A2 thats awesome but I really think you are kinda fooling yourself on this one. Love A2s... much sexier than something like a CQBR but IMO functionally inferior. Lights can be good when they work, but glass can break and batteries get used up, etc. We're talking long term collapse of society here, not a short term mission with resupply, etc. your logic is flawed. Magazines fail WAY more often that optics, do you advocate using single-shots because when you loose your balloons all the feed-lips are going to fall in the gravel? No, they don't. |
|
Quoted:
Because ~ 1 year after the balloon goes up, iron sights will rule the world! A fixed carry handle upper is more durable than a flat top with bolted on sights, esp if those sights are flip up. Also, I am not a fan of metal handguards either bare, or with more techy crap hanging on them that will fail over time. For short term crises scenarios, or when resupply is an option, there can be some advantage to technology, but long term SHTF? Forget about it. View Quote you do realize that aimpoints will run constantly for up to ~8 years depending on model. ACOGs will work forever. BUT iron sights will be fine as your SHTFantasy will never happen.. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.