[ARCHIVED THREAD] - SHTF?   (Page 4 of 4)
ARCHIVED ARCHIVED
Page:  / 4
Next Page  
Author
Message
jacuzz1
Offline
Posts: 623
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/11/2012 11:02:41 AM
I used to own a store in New Haven Connecticut. I have learned first hand that some people are simply not capable of rational thought. People of this ilk are the most dangerous in the world. They have no respect for human life , not even their own.

My fellow Americans, if you have not already armed yourselves , do so post haste.


God Speed.
M4tth3w
Member
Offline
Posts: 26
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/11/2012 11:15:14 AM
Shithawks.. they're commin' bubbles...
J75player
Peace through superior shot placment
NRA
Online
Posts: 3537
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/11/2012 11:52:54 AM
[Last Edit: 8/11/2012 11:55:46 AM by J75player]
I will try to answer your OP from top to bottom...

but what is SHTF? Can anyone give an example of a "SHTF" scenario in our modern day and in our blessed country where the use of a high powered rifle with a range of hundreds of yards would be warranted?
If you are a civilian faced with a situation which justifies your use of deadly force to defend yourself, it is safe to say the bad guy is pretty close to you. If he is out of the range of handguns and enters "rifle range", then you would have a hard time justifying why you didn't just run to safety.

SHTF is anything well and beyond normal operation of your day to day life. some people draw that line at a fender bender, some people at the power going out for 12 hours, some people don't consider it
SHTF until all utilities are lost and you will be cut off from the "modern" world for days. where people draw that line usually seems to be based on hope prepared they are. when you have
adequate supplies, knowledge and equipment, what would be total SHTF for one person can be made to "normal everyday operation" for the prepared.


to the second part....nearly anything that you could use a handgun for, an AR would work better. longer range, better stopping power, easier to aim, holds more ammo, penetrates soft armor.
Aurora,CO would have been very nice to have someone with an AR in the theater besides the badguy, at handgun could have done the job, but not as well as an AR. beyond that, the badguys have AR's AK's and other rifles
too. a handgun in the hands of your above average civilian has a maximum effective range of about 25yards. now the badguy has an AR and is shooting at you from a mere 100 yards. he can hit you all day
long, your only hope is a very lucky hit with an artillery trajectory. doesn't even have to be an EVIL semiauto. badguy can set up outside your range with an old bolt action .30-06, even if every other civi had
a handgun, they would be helpless. look up Charles Whitman and the Texas bell tower shooting. police had to climb the town and shoot their way in to stop him.
so basically, no, it is very easy to see many situation where a justified shoot can occur from 25yards to the maximum effective range of your AR.

Even then, a man walking around with an assault rifle is more likely to endanger himself by presenting himself as a threat to law enforcement.
no, I am law enforcement. I would LOVE it if we lived in a country where everyone would walk around with a slung AR to the grocery store. I work in the country
and it is quite normal for people to walk around their property with all sorts of firearms in their hands or slung on their shoulder.
an armed socioty is a polite socioty.
think of it this way, I am PAID to drive around town all day with a loaded AR next to me for the very reason that a SHTF event might happen.
you should be armed too

Have you ever thought of the overpenetration of the 22 caliber bullet propelled at 3000fps through your walls, your neighbor's walls, etc?
yes, they have, that is one of the reasons an AR and the 5.56 round is great for home defense. the vast majority of defensive rounds for the AR
will either start to tumble or break apart after going through your average wall. yes, as with any firearm (including your handgun) you need to be aware of
your target and what is beyond. but this isn't the movies where the bullet will laser clean through 4 houses and kill the guy on the other side.
a 5.56 round will penetrate one wall, maybe even the second, may injure but probably wont kill if it hit someone on the other side of that second wall.
whollyshite
Online
Posts: 35
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/11/2012 12:10:33 PM
[Last Edit: 8/11/2012 12:14:16 PM by whollyshite]
OP-
I’m a little surprised by your posted background that you would not understand what a breakdown in society mixed with a bunch of crazy zealots looks like. Per your history, you have spent time in an environment that shows some of the worst sides of human behavior. That IS the concept of SHTF. The only differences in the two scenarios are the players.

With that said, I hope you do feel comfortable inside the US as we all hope to feel. But think of the chaos that can happen in an instant on a mass scale that you have seen but it occurring, not necessarily for the same reasons, on our own soil. And remember, it has happened before in the US many times, both on a large scale and a small scale. Don’t think it can’t happen again. It can and, odds are, will. Maybe not in our lifetime, but at some point, it will. History has proven this with almost every society. While many in society feel that we have “evolved” beyond this, I believe they are kidding themselves. But whatever helps us all sleep at night.

My mindset when it comes to SHTF and assault rifles can be summed up in a few phrases:
“It’s better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it”
“Be prepared”
and…
“When seconds count, the police are minutes away” (No shot at our LEOs, it’s just that they can’t be everywhere at all times)

On top of all of this, it’s one hell of a fun hobby! Hopefully, that’s all it ever turns out to be.

Also, thank you for your service. Don’t think because you sit at a desk that it is not admirable. I’m sure your position provides a valuable service to the cause.

Strudle54
Offline
Posts: 1213
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/11/2012 2:22:35 PM
If you lived in the gulf during Katrina, you experienced a mini-SHTF scenario. New Orleans was essentially law-less for several days.
johnny12gauge
Member
Offline
Posts: 135
Feedback: 100% (4)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/11/2012 4:04:18 PM
Originally Posted By RR_Broccoli:

Originally Posted By TheOTHERmaninblack:

Originally Posted By Chrazy-Chris:
Hey guys,

I'm a bit taken back by the number of people on here referring to their rifles as "SHTF" setups. I fully understand and support the use of firearms for self defense, but what is SHTF? Can anyone give an example of a "SHTF" scenario in our modern day and in our blessed country where the use of a high powered rifle with a range of hundreds of yards would be warranted?

If you are a civilian faced with a situation which justifies your use of deadly force to defend yourself, it is safe to say the bad guy is pretty close to you. If he is out of the range of handguns and enters "rifle range", then you would have a hard time justifying why you didn't just run to safety.

Let me start- As I type this I can envision a scenario where a crazy is shooting up the neighborhood, so you run and grab your AR to take him out from a range. I also think of the fallout of Hurricane Katrina where looting went beyond wild and several people were shot. Even then, a man walking around with an assault rifle is more likely to endanger himself by presenting himself as a threat to law enforcement.

What can you guys come up with? Help me understand. Have you ever thought of the overpenetration of the 22 caliber bullet propelled at 3000fps through your walls, your neighbor's walls, etc? Honestly, every time I see "SHTF" on this forum my first thought is that the member is using it as an excuse to spend oogles of money on stuff you can "depend your life one." Are U.S. civilians really depending their life on their ARs? We are lucky enough to live in a country where our civilians can lay their heads down at night and go about daily business without wondering if they will survive to see the next day. Much of the world's population is not afforded this luxury.

Let the S H T F....


Hmmm... Join date Aug 12 Post count 3.

Analyzing proper response................

http://files.myopera.com/danieltowsey/blog/TrollSpray.jpg


Surprised it took this long.

Joined in the last week. Three posts. Challenging all sorts of stuff like we are stupid.

I smell DU troll.

OP, go participate and read for a while and come back when you have something to offer.



+1



12

never underestimate the stupidity of people....they prove me right everyday
gsoto188
Offline
Posts: 33
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/17/2012 11:34:07 PM
Terminator-Salvation..the humans all had ARs

all4bao
Member
Offline
Posts: 328
Feedback: 100% (6)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/18/2012 12:08:58 AM
Originally Posted By JCHammer:
This reminds me of my brainwashed Aunt. Everytime I would see her she would ask me: "why do you have a big gun in your house and not 1 but 3 boxes of ammo".... I would always reply it is called a rifle and I am suppose to have one and know how to use it because i am responsible for my families safety which includes unforseen scenarios. Ironically 3 years later tornados swept through their neighborhood bringing down houses and power poles and trees and electric lines across the streets in multiple neighborhoods including the one she lived in. She was astonished on how fast the looters, strangers she had never seen came to her and other houses kicking down doors taking food and tv's and etc..... I asked her what did you do? she replied, I hid in the basement of my own house and hoped they did not come to my house. She said it was the longest four days of her life. she could here fighting and crying and screaming. She is now a proud owner of a 12gauge shotgun and a 38 special..... The world and media teaches people it cannot happen to you. They trust the news, they trust the media but do not trust you. She can hear me now.


Sounds like a typical liberal to me.
paddymurphy
Offline
Posts: 10202
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/20/2012 1:04:21 AM
JMHO

SHTF:Riots, home invasion, burglary, natural disaster etc

TEOTWAKI:Civil war zombies etc
Sixtigers
Uneducated Poor White Trash
NRAMilitary
Offline
Posts: 6064
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/20/2012 7:36:31 AM
[Last Edit: 8/20/2012 7:40:23 AM by Sixtigers]
Originally Posted By Chrazy-Chris:
Hey guys,

I'm a bit taken back by the number of people on here referring to their rifles as "SHTF" setups. I fully understand and support the use of firearms for self defense, but what is SHTF? Can anyone give an example of a "SHTF" scenario in our modern day and in our blessed country where the use of a high powered rifle with a range of hundreds of yards would be warranted?

If you are a civilian faced with a situation which justifies your use of deadly force to defend yourself, it is safe to say the bad guy is pretty close to you. If he is out of the range of handguns and enters "rifle range", then you would have a hard time justifying why you didn't just run to safety.

Let me start- As I type this I can envision a scenario where a crazy is shooting up the neighborhood, so you run and grab your AR to take him out from a range. I also think of the fallout of Hurricane Katrina where looting went beyond wild and several people were shot. Even then, a man walking around with an assault rifle is more likely to endanger himself by presenting himself as a threat to law enforcement.

What can you guys come up with? Help me understand. Have you ever thought of the overpenetration of the 22 caliber bullet propelled at 3000fps through your walls, your neighbor's walls, etc? Honestly, every time I see "SHTF" on this forum my first thought is that the member is using it as an excuse to spend oogles of money on stuff you can "depend your life one." Are U.S. civilians really depending their life on their ARs? We are lucky enough to live in a country where our civilians can lay their heads down at night and go about daily business without wondering if they will survive to see the next day. Much of the world's population is not afforded this luxury.

Let the S H T F....




Originally Posted By Chrazy-Chris:
Hey all, OP here-

Thanks for all the responses- even the less than friendly ones. When I initially read SHTF I was thinking more along the lines of smaller scale self-defense situations. Now I understand that SHTF can vary between mass-scale rioting, zombie apocalypse, WWIII, etc.

There have been several assumptions made about me and my "liberal" view. Here are a few facts that you may or may not care about that may surprise you:
-I am not a troll. I am not a liberal blogger trying to make a gun nut make a ridiculous quote. I have been wandering these forums for months as I build my first AR. I never signed up due to the email requirement because I didn't want to use my official email (but I gave in because I really like this forum).
-I am active duty military currently serving in Afghanistan. I didn't get the deployment I volunteered for so instead of spending my tour outside the wire where the action is, I'm stuck at a desk. I've spent my down-time ordering parts here and there to put together a "clone" of my issued M4 to train with on my own time for my next deployment, hopefully a real one. (Now that I'll have it, it probably would be my go-to weapon in the case of SHTF, but I'm not calling it that).
-I HAVE read One Second After and seen "Red Dawn."
-CO is my current duty station, not where I was born and raised- dear old NE. Go Big Red! My last station was in CA, so I know what liberal means and trust me, this is not it.

Now a couple observations:
-There is some saying out there about "perspective being reality." I'm not trying to brag or claim that I'm a hardened vet or anything like that, but when you've spent time in a real war zone where people are constantly trying to kill the f*ck out of you, it affects your perspective. When I'm stateside, I'm sheltered from these people because of U.S. service members much braver than myself. Perhaps that's why I don't particularly feel like I need to have an M4 ready to rock and/or roll in my home. I do feel uncomfortable in public without my CW, though.
-Before ever even seeing "SHTF" I HAVE considered SHTF scenarios (especially after reading One Second After, good book- you guys would love it) and thought about what I would do. The first thing that came to my mind was opening up the gun safe. I have an assortment of firearms, all which serve a purpose from trapsooting to hunting to daily self defense, but never considered one specifically for SHTF. I always just thought I would grab whatever fit the circumstances. I have an "emergency bag" which includes an extra box of 9mm. Now that I (will) have an AR, I'll probably throw a few loaded mags in there for it, too. Will I keep my M4 loaded with one in the chamber under the bed? No. You guys can have it when the zombies get me (after you drill my safe). Sorry, no Red Ryder in there, though

There are a ton of awesome responses in this thread and some really funny ones, too. I don't have a good internet connection here so I haven't had a chance to watch some of the videos posted, but I definitely look forward to it.

Time for me to get back to work... thanks for the distraction and keep on rockin in the free world.



Sir, you smell of troll.

Your first post addresses the AR15, and begs askance. "Why does a CIVILIAN need such a dangerous, high-powered rifle?" You list many anti-gun talking points. You did realize that this was AR15.com, did you not? That this is a firearms enthusiast website, and this forum dedicated to survival-related topics? To post anything disparaging towards civilian ownership of what is arguably the most common rifle in America is going to engender lots of responses. That is the definition of trolling.

Then, in your second post, you claim you are building one. Why? To coin a phrase: "Why does a CIVILIAN need such a dangerous, high-powered rifle?"

You also claim to be military. You claim to be military, and stationed in Afghanistan, and still cling to the notion that you do not understand how SHTF relates to civilians. How is that possible?

You then make a statement describing how wonderfully safe America is, and how her citizens don't need things like M4s to be secure...then without missing a beat, talk about carrying a concealed weapon in order to feel secure.

Your original question seemed to be "What is this SHTF you speak of, and why do I need an M4 to be ready for it?" while proclaiming that you've read One Second After. I answer that you needn't worry about it––you're not going to understand it. It's not something you'll "get".

You say you're serving in a war zone, where people are "constantly trying to kill the fuck out of you", and that such affects your perspective. How, exactly, did this affect your perspective?
Explain to me how being in a war zone where your life is threatened daily has affected your outlook on the human race, your place in it, and how it has caused you to believe that having a loaded weapon under your bed for your immediate defense is a bad thing.

You don't sound true. Perhaps it's my old, out-of-touch, slightly cynical outlook on other people, but something about these two posts––which are the only things I have to associate with you––don't ring true for a military man stationed in a combat zone overseas.

They smell of troll.

Gentlemen, I apologize. I know this isn't what we do in the Survival Forums. I apologize for my temporary lack of manners when dealing with a new poster in this forum. I know this is not how we do business here.

What I meant to say was "Chris, welcome to the Forum. There's good people here––I hope you find information you can use."
Originally Posted By NorCal_LEO:
"Panache is when you pop your collar and rock the douchebag beard while looking for something to kill with an RPG."
PA22-400
The first SF shower pic
Offline
Posts: 9290
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/20/2012 9:48:12 AM
Hey guys I know the OP sounds like that troll from CO that came in here over a year ago asking about how to hide a gun in the ground.

It looks as though the OP is beginning to starve here and go away, so that matches one more detail of a troll.

Lets just let him starve.
Asking for opinions on the internet and then getting upset for getting them is like stirring up a hornets' nest and then getting pissed because you got stung.
Halffast: post 1725
Chrazy-Chris
Offline
Posts: 48
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/20/2012 2:43:06 PM
Still here... I've been very busy lately and don't have the time to put together an extensive reply but I'll be on it next time I get the opportunity.



....still not a troll. Sorry for the smell? Per my original post, I just don't see why every other post on this forum has to do with having a rifle specifically for SHTF? When you consider how well the AR would fill this role, it makes some sense. Regardless, I'm still surprised by how many people devote the amount of time and money towards a rifle to fill this role. Per my second post, whenever I imagined a SHTF scenario, I imagined myself grabbing a gun from the safe that would get the job done at the time.

OverScoped
Member
Offline
Posts: 4118
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/20/2012 6:57:17 PM
[Last Edit: 8/20/2012 6:58:18 PM by OverScoped]

Originally Posted By Chrazy-Chris:


I just don't see why every other post on this forum has to do with having a rifle specifically for SHTF? When you consider how well the AR would fill this role, it makes some sense. Regardless, I'm still surprised by how many people devote the amount of time and money towards a rifle to fill this role.


I searched your post and threads here on AR15.com and i see that most of your posts are in the AR Discussions section. You originaly Posted this thread in there too. A mod moved it in here. I see you are building your own AR and having discussions about 18" vs. 20" and what optics are good. Good for you, people in those sections will be glad to help you with that.


This forum section is for prepper types and outdoorsman types. Many of us have AR's because it is our hobby. Some of us dont even have one, but we like talking about them and prepping too, and those folks fit right in.

If you want to know why we choose AR's for whatever SHTF, its because those rifles are our choice.

What rifle do you think is the SHTF choice over at Galil.com or at Uzi.com or FN FAL.com or Kel-Tec.com?? You got it pal.
http://www.hardcorehammers.com/
Awesome Hammers------Made in the USA
bluefalcon
No bounce. No play.
Military
Offline
Posts: 10580
Feedback: 100% (19)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/20/2012 8:35:07 PM
Rifles are far more effective than pistols at everything except shoving into a holster inside your waistband. Just because you CAN hit a person at much greater range with a rifle than you can with a pistol doesn't mean that's how you intend to use it. Still, "SHTF" is a very general term that might be used to refer to anything from a personal SHTF such as an intruder or a power outage all the way through a Mad Max zombie nuclear holocaust. It is certainly plausible that one might find occasion to defend themselves from attackers armed with rifles in an extended Katrina/Watts riots type situation.

Yes, we have occasionally considered the penetrative ability of the 5.56x45mm cartridge. Please spend a little time reading in the ammo sub forum and maybe take a look at the Box o' Truth site, too.
"I have always believed that real political discourse in the houses should involve fisticuffs. Otherwise, you have a bunch of co-conspirators or apathetic mouth breathers." - ValleyGunner
Altair
Never trade luck for skill.
Online
Posts: 2872
Feedback: 100% (9)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/20/2012 8:42:37 PM
Originally Posted By Chrazy-Chris:
Hey guys,

I'm a bit taken back by the number of people on here referring to their rifles as "SHTF" setups. I fully understand and support the use of firearms for self defense, but what is SHTF? Can anyone give an example of a "SHTF" scenario in our modern day and in our blessed country where the use of a high powered rifle with a range of hundreds of yards would be warranted?


An event where a rifle is necessary in an SHTF role is rare, but you did point out some correctly below. It is more in reference to a possible future event like an economic collapse or a without rule of law situation like post natural disasters.


If you are a civilian faced with a situation which justifies your use of deadly force to defend yourself, it is safe to say the bad guy is pretty close to you. If he is out of the range of handguns and enters "rifle range", then you would have a hard time justifying why you didn't just run to safety.


This is not necessarily true. A deadly threat is a deadly threat. If someone has means, opportunity, and intent to kill you what range he is at doesn't matter so it isn't impossible to be in a situation where it would be legal to engage a threat at extended range. You will have to explain why it was necessary to engage a target at long range, and it will be rare in a self defense shooting, but it is certainly not impossible. Also, free states do not require you to run and hide if attacked. If you live in one of the states that says you have to retreat you have my simpathy.


Let me start- As I type this I can envision a scenario where a crazy is shooting up the neighborhood, so you run and grab your AR to take him out from a range. I also think of the fallout of Hurricane Katrina where looting went beyond wild and several people were shot. Even then, a man walking around with an assault rifle is more likely to endanger himself by presenting himself as a threat to law enforcement.


Both of the examples you gave are legit. Whether someone walking around with a rifle will be percieved as a threat to LE will depend alot on circumstances. Obviously in a post Katrina type event it may be hard for LE to determine at a glance who is a person defending their property and who is a looter. Demeanor, and the type of LE agency you are dealing with, will play heavily into this. That said, if you are keeping watch at your house you don't have to be "walking around with an assault rifle" to accomplish that.


What can you guys come up with? Help me understand. Have you ever thought of the overpenetration of the 22 caliber bullet propelled at 3000fps through your walls, your neighbor's walls, etc? Honestly, every time I see "SHTF" on this forum my first thought is that the member is using it as an excuse to spend oogles of money on stuff you can "depend your life one." Are U.S. civilians really depending their life on their ARs? We are lucky enough to live in a country where our civilians can lay their heads down at night and go about daily business without wondering if they will survive to see the next day. Much of the world's population is not afforded this luxury.

Let the S H T F....


I have pondered, researched, and even tested what is highlighted in red above. Many people have gross misconceptions about how projectiles behave which is evident in your comment. Comparing quality defensive ammo (not military ball) 5.56 rounds are typically less lethal after passing through an intermediate barrier (like drywall) than handgun rounds. Any round capable of stopping an attacker will penetrate walls and kill on the other side, so it is all a matter of degree, but you aren't taking a greater risk with an AR than you are with a Glock but you gain a weapon that is easier to hit with under stress, holds more ammunition without having to reload, is more likely to stop your attacker in a given number of hits than a handgun, and has the ability to be used at longer ranges. There is a reason LE has trended away from pistol caliber carbines and moved to AR rifles. They are more effective and if you have to defend yourself or your loved ones from a deadly threat you should take every advantage you can get.
Advanced techniques are the basics mastered.

Excellence is an art won by training and habit. We are what we repeatedly do. -- Aristotle

Pistol/Shotgun/Rifle Instructor
Sig/Remington/RRA/Sabre Armorer
Will
Member
Offline
Posts: 11837
Feedback: 100% (37)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/20/2012 8:49:35 PM
[Last Edit: 8/20/2012 8:50:52 PM by Will]
See below.
" Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God"- From the personal seal of Thomas Jefferson
Will
Member
Offline
Posts: 11838
Feedback: 100% (37)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/20/2012 8:50:33 PM
Two things- handguns are a poor fight stopper. I can think of no situation other than maybe tunnel rat type work where I would prefer a handgun over a rifle.


Secondly SHTF is one of the most abused and misused terms in the world as far as I'm concerned. To me, it means that things are just one step shy of TEOTWAWKI- in other words about like MADD MAX.....Here though it means that your kid got a D, your wife is making you sleep on the couch, the transmission went out on your car or your dog got "the ghey"......

To me, SHTF means there aren't going to be many questions about whether you used a pistol or a howitzer to defend yourself- it's a self solving problem.
" Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God"- From the personal seal of Thomas Jefferson
Chrazy-Chris
Offline
Posts: 49
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/23/2012 12:24:52 AM
Originally Posted By Sixtigers:
Originally Posted By Chrazy-Chris:
Hey guys,

I'm a bit taken back by the number of people on here referring to their rifles as "SHTF" setups. I fully understand and support the use of firearms for self defense, but what is SHTF? Can anyone give an example of a "SHTF" scenario in our modern day and in our blessed country where the use of a high powered rifle with a range of hundreds of yards would be warranted?

If you are a civilian faced with a situation which justifies your use of deadly force to defend yourself, it is safe to say the bad guy is pretty close to you. If he is out of the range of handguns and enters "rifle range", then you would have a hard time justifying why you didn't just run to safety.

Let me start- As I type this I can envision a scenario where a crazy is shooting up the neighborhood, so you run and grab your AR to take him out from a range. I also think of the fallout of Hurricane Katrina where looting went beyond wild and several people were shot. Even then, a man walking around with an assault rifle is more likely to endanger himself by presenting himself as a threat to law enforcement.

What can you guys come up with? Help me understand. Have you ever thought of the overpenetration of the 22 caliber bullet propelled at 3000fps through your walls, your neighbor's walls, etc? Honestly, every time I see "SHTF" on this forum my first thought is that the member is using it as an excuse to spend oogles of money on stuff you can "depend your life one." Are U.S. civilians really depending their life on their ARs? We are lucky enough to live in a country where our civilians can lay their heads down at night and go about daily business without wondering if they will survive to see the next day. Much of the world's population is not afforded this luxury.

Let the S H T F....




Originally Posted By Chrazy-Chris:
Hey all, OP here-

Thanks for all the responses- even the less than friendly ones. When I initially read SHTF I was thinking more along the lines of smaller scale self-defense situations. Now I understand that SHTF can vary between mass-scale rioting, zombie apocalypse, WWIII, etc.

There have been several assumptions made about me and my "liberal" view. Here are a few facts that you may or may not care about that may surprise you:
-I am not a troll. I am not a liberal blogger trying to make a gun nut make a ridiculous quote. I have been wandering these forums for months as I build my first AR. I never signed up due to the email requirement because I didn't want to use my official email (but I gave in because I really like this forum).
-I am active duty military currently serving in Afghanistan. I didn't get the deployment I volunteered for so instead of spending my tour outside the wire where the action is, I'm stuck at a desk. I've spent my down-time ordering parts here and there to put together a "clone" of my issued M4 to train with on my own time for my next deployment, hopefully a real one. (Now that I'll have it, it probably would be my go-to weapon in the case of SHTF, but I'm not calling it that).
-I HAVE read One Second After and seen "Red Dawn."
-CO is my current duty station, not where I was born and raised- dear old NE. Go Big Red! My last station was in CA, so I know what liberal means and trust me, this is not it.

Now a couple observations:
-There is some saying out there about "perspective being reality." I'm not trying to brag or claim that I'm a hardened vet or anything like that, but when you've spent time in a real war zone where people are constantly trying to kill the f*ck out of you, it affects your perspective. When I'm stateside, I'm sheltered from these people because of U.S. service members much braver than myself. Perhaps that's why I don't particularly feel like I need to have an M4 ready to rock and/or roll in my home. I do feel uncomfortable in public without my CW, though.
-Before ever even seeing "SHTF" I HAVE considered SHTF scenarios (especially after reading One Second After, good book- you guys would love it) and thought about what I would do. The first thing that came to my mind was opening up the gun safe. I have an assortment of firearms, all which serve a purpose from trapsooting to hunting to daily self defense, but never considered one specifically for SHTF. I always just thought I would grab whatever fit the circumstances. I have an "emergency bag" which includes an extra box of 9mm. Now that I (will) have an AR, I'll probably throw a few loaded mags in there for it, too. Will I keep my M4 loaded with one in the chamber under the bed? No. You guys can have it when the zombies get me (after you drill my safe). Sorry, no Red Ryder in there, though

There are a ton of awesome responses in this thread and some really funny ones, too. I don't have a good internet connection here so I haven't had a chance to watch some of the videos posted, but I definitely look forward to it.

Time for me to get back to work... thanks for the distraction and keep on rockin in the free world.



Sir, you smell of troll.

Your first post addresses the AR15, and begs askance. "Why does a CIVILIAN need such a dangerous, high-powered rifle?" You list many anti-gun talking points. You did realize that this was AR15.com, did you not? That this is a firearms enthusiast website, and this forum dedicated to survival-related topics? To post anything disparaging towards civilian ownership of what is arguably the most common rifle in America is going to engender lots of responses. That is the definition of trolling.

You quoted me as asking "Why does a CIVILIAN need such a dangerous, high-powered rifle?" Sir, quotes are to be used when you are repeating what somebody else said word for word. That is not what I said, so I encourage you to go back and read my OP. Here are some actual quotes I think you were trying to refer to: "Can anyone give an example of a "SHTF" scenario in our modern day and in our blessed country where the use of a high powered rifle with a range of hundreds of yards would be warranted?" "a man walking around with an assault rifle is more likely to endanger himself by presenting himself as a threat to law enforcement." See how that works? Quotes are taken directly from what someone said, not twisted to make me look like an idiot. Next time you quote somebody, do it right.

Then, in your second post, you claim you are building one. Why? To coin a phrase: "Why does a CIVILIAN need such a dangerous, high-powered rifle?"

Once again, if you'd used an ounce of critical reading skills, you'd see in my second post that I'm building an M4 clone as a training tool. FYI, I'm also building an 18" HBAR upper to use for prairie dog hunting, plinking, and possible 3-gun.... mostly for just plain fun and because I got hooked on this AR stuff.

You also claim to be military. You claim to be military, and stationed in Afghanistan, and still cling to the notion that you do not understand how SHTF relates to civilians. How is that possible?

You then make a statement describing how wonderfully safe America is, and how her citizens don't need things like M4s to be secure...then without missing a beat, talk about carrying a concealed weapon in order to feel secure.

Your original question seemed to be "What is this SHTF you speak of, and why do I need an M4 to be ready for it?" while proclaiming that you've read One Second After. I answer that you needn't worry about it––you're not going to understand it. It's not something you'll "get".

You say you're serving in a war zone, where people are "constantly trying to kill the fuck out of you", and that such affects your perspective. How, exactly, did this affect your perspective?
Explain to me how being in a war zone where your life is threatened daily has affected your outlook on the human race, your place in it, and how it has caused you to believe that having a loaded weapon under your bed for your immediate defense is a bad thing.

I think I can address all these questions at once. Yes, I "claim" to be military. I don't have shit to prove to you, so I'm just going to say yes, I am military. Perspective is reality. When you've been in a real warzone where people are actually trying to kill you, then you go back to the U.S. where the chances of that happening are much, much, MUCH less, you tend to feel very safe. That's my perspective. It's like if you were a race car driver, out there pedal to the metal around every corner... you'd probably wear your seat belt on the track. Then, you get off the track and are driving the residential streets home.... you'd probably feel pretty safe without your seat belt, and that's because of your perspective. Some here have expressed the perspective that a SHTF scenario could occur at any moment. That is their perspective, and more power to them. This thread has helped me understand and respect that perspective. What's wrong with having a loaded AR under the bed? Well, what if you leave the house and forget to lock it up and a gangbanger breaks in, steals it, then kills with it. What if there are curious children that find it and put a bullet through their best bud's head? What if you or your wife have friends over that get a little too much to drink and do something stupid with it? It's a liability.

You don't sound true. Perhaps it's my old, out-of-touch, slightly cynical outlook on other people, but something about these two posts––which are the only things I have to associate with you––don't ring true for a military man stationed in a combat zone overseas.

As someone else pointed out, I spend all my time on this thread in the AR15-specific portion because I use it to browse through info I may use for my build(s). It was in that section I saw people discussing something along the lines of: "well, that is an ok red dot sight but I wouldn't rely on it for SHTF" and "this is just my SHTF rifle," etc. I only come in here to reply to this thread, which I subscribed to after they moved it.

They smell of troll.

Gentlemen, I apologize. I know this isn't what we do in the Survival Forums. I apologize for my temporary lack of manners when dealing with a new poster in this forum. I know this is not how we do business here.

What I meant to say was "Chris, welcome to the Forum. There's good people here––I hope you find information you can use."

Thank you.




HomeSlice
'cause wrong's what I do best
NRA
Offline
Posts: 3179
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/23/2012 2:14:25 AM

Originally Posted By Chrazy-Chris:
Originally Posted By Sixtigers:
Originally Posted By Chrazy-Chris:
I'm a bit taken back by the number of people on here referring to their rifles as "SHTF" setups.

Originally Posted By Chrazy-Chris:
There have been several assumptions made about me and my "liberal" view.


Sir, you smell of troll.

Your first post addresses the AR15, and begs askance. "Why does a CIVILIAN need such a dangerous, high-powered rifle?"

Thank you.





Ya know what OP, I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt here. If you're a troll, then you're better than most.

The next time you find yourself asking why a "civilian" needs a "dangerous, high-powered rifle", you should also ask yourself why these things are important:
#1
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

#3
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
#4
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
#5
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
#6
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
#7
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
#8
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
#9
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
#10
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

These other 9 "high-powered" rules obviously have no justifiable use in civilian hands either, do they?

The way you've asked the original question is what generated the "troll" comments, because you call out the common criteria of the leftist elite. However, we must all understand that you were probably educated to believe this, and just don't know any better because you haven't done your own homework to understand the history of the great country where you currently reside. I can't blame you for this lack of education because it is all too common in today's world. However, with that said, you owe it to yourself to not drink the kool-aid.

If any of the things on the quotes above are important to you, then you owe it to yourself and your family to understand the one that's missing in the context of the people who made that rule too. What could possibly be the motivation to remove this one, when #3 remains on the books?

As for "SHTF", or whatever you want to call it, you must understand the context of the forum where your search has landed you. This is the SF. We're worried about all things which could lead to a reduced quality of life, and the remediation process to keep that from happening. Learning about this is why we're here. It has much less to do with the tool (rifle) questioned in your specific case. You should stick around and see the convrsations we have about generators and food!

The folks here are suspicious of you because you use the words of the people who are the enemy of individual freedom. And I can't blame them for that. You are merely uneducated and vulnerable in my eyes, but perhaps salvageable. If I'm naive and you run back to DU exclaiming your victory I can't control that, nor can I control your ability to defend your family from the aggressors who will surely be at your doorstep in times of crisis. You're on your own...

</rant>
-Slice

Lord, keep me from being the one the wolves pull out.. -GB
"Yes, I know they stink -well, they eat rancid cow bungholes, what do you expect? " -FordGuy
Sixtigers
Uneducated Poor White Trash
NRAMilitary
Offline
Posts: 6128
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/23/2012 2:40:04 AM
[Last Edit: 8/23/2012 3:01:50 AM by Sixtigers]

You quoted me as asking "Why does a CIVILIAN need such a dangerous, high-powered rifle?" Sir, quotes are to be used when you are repeating what somebody else said word for word. That is not what I said, so I encourage you to go back and read my OP. Here are some actual quotes I think you were trying to refer to: "Can anyone give an example of a "SHTF" scenario in our modern day and in our blessed country where the use of a high powered rifle with a range of hundreds of yards would be warranted?" "a man walking around with an assault rifle is more likely to endanger himself by presenting himself as a threat to law enforcement." See how that works? Quotes are taken directly from what someone said, not twisted to make me look like an idiot. Next time you quote somebody, do it right.

I thank you for your instruction in quoting, Chrazy-Chris. In the future, I shall endeavor to be more manifest in my summations, to whit: In your misguided original post, you seem to ask "Etc...etc.."as opposed to leaving it for the viewer to automatically deduce that––given that I quoted both of your posts directly above mine––I was paraphrasing.

Once again, if you'd used an ounce of critical reading skills, you'd see in my second post that I'm building an M4 clone as a training tool. FYI, I'm also building an 18" HBAR upper to use for prairie dog hunting, plinking, and possible 3-gun.... mostly for just plain fun and because I got hooked on this AR stuff.

OK...so you're saying you DO see a need for a civilian to own an AR-pattern rifle: Just not for self-defense, SHTF, or anything requiring use against another human being. They should be for civilian recreation only, or for the military to "train" with in their off-hours. I paraphrase you here: Their use as a legitimate self-defense rifle is negated by their lethality, and potential risk to the user. Please, correct me if I am wrong in that summation.

I think I can address all these questions at once. Yes, I "claim" to be military. I don't have shit to prove to you, so I'm just going to say yes, I am military. Perspective is reality. When you've been in a real warzone where people are actually trying to kill you, then you go back to the U.S. where the chances of that happening are much, much, MUCH less, you tend to feel very safe. That's my perspective. It's like if you were a race car driver, out there pedal to the metal around every corner... you'd probably wear your seat belt on the track. Then, you get off the track and are driving the residential streets home.... you'd probably feel pretty safe without your seat belt, and that's because of your perspective. Some here have expressed the perspective that a SHTF scenario could occur at any moment. That is their perspective, and more power to them. This thread has helped me understand and respect that perspective. What's wrong with having a loaded AR under the bed? Well, what if you leave the house and forget to lock it up and a gangbanger breaks in, steals it, then kills with it. What if there are curious children that find it and put a bullet through their best bud's head? What if you or your wife have friends over that get a little too much to drink and do something stupid with it? It's a liability.

I want to make sure that I understand you correctly: None of those terrible circumstances could ever occur with a weapon that you would approve of for self-defense, correct? An AR under the bed is more dangerous than a .45 in the nightstand, or a shotgun in the corner. Do I have that right?

As someone else pointed out, I spend all my time on this thread in the AR15-specific portion because I use it to browse through info I may use for my build(s). It was in that section I saw people discussing something along the lines of: "well, that is an ok red dot sight but I wouldn't rely on it for SHTF" and "this is just my SHTF rifle," etc. I only come in here to reply to this thread, which I subscribed to after they moved it.

Okay. Given that you feel as you do, I'm assuming you're going to sell your M4 clone as soon as you're finished with the military, since you'll have no more need for a training weapon. Correct?
Originally Posted By NorCal_LEO:
"Panache is when you pop your collar and rock the douchebag beard while looking for something to kill with an RPG."
Taxed2Death
Offline
Posts: 497
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/23/2012 11:28:24 AM
Too many responses to this to read through them all, so forgive me if I repeat someone.

The answer is simple.....the best defense is a strong potential offense. Having weapons such as an AR, AK, or other, does not necessarily imply any intent or desire to use them in a SHTF situation. It does, however, afford a strong message to potential attackers or oppressors that we have no intent on becoming an easy victim. Why does the US (at least pre-O'assclown) have a superior nuclear weapons arsenal...one that can destroy mankind many times over? The same reason we law-abiding citizens have ARs or similiar...to make the price of attacking us too high for any sane person to take us on, and to allow us a formidable reponse against the rest.
MyName1sMud
Res ipsa loquitur
Online
Posts: 1377
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/23/2012 11:37:36 AM
ZE ZOMBIESSSSSSSS ARE COMINGGGGGG!

"I ain't gonna worry wrinkles in my brow, cuz nothin's never gonna be alright nohow. No matter how I struggle and strive, I'll never get out of this world alive."
— Hank Williams
darkpaladin1
Former USAF 1N1X1A
Military
Offline
Posts: 633
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/23/2012 5:01:19 PM
Originally Posted By Taxed2Death:
Too many responses to this to read through them all, so forgive me if I repeat someone.

The answer is simple.....the best defense is a strong potential offense. Having weapons such as an AR, AK, or other, does not necessarily imply any intent or desire to use them in a SHTF situation. It does, however, afford a strong message to potential attackers or oppressors that we have no intent on becoming an easy victim. Why does the US (at least pre-O'assclown) have a superior nuclear weapons arsenal...one that can destroy mankind many times over? The same reason we law-abiding citizens have ARs or similiar...to make the price of attacking us too high for any sane person to take us on, and to allow us a formidable reponse against the rest.


I think this response covers it pretty well.

Everyone needs to take a step back.

OP came in looking a little like a troll. People jump on possible troll. Cool.
OP clarified his statement, and his clarification from where I stand sounds fairly legit. Cool.
Continued dog-piling and beating of chests just makes bth sides look childish.
Page:  / 4
Next Page  
[ARCHIVED THREAD] - SHTF?   (Page 4 of 4)
ARCHIVED ARCHIVED