User Panel
Excelent info. Thanks for taking the time to post all this.
|
|
www.floridashootersnetwork.com
|
Originally Posted By echo6:
Excelent info. Thanks for taking the time to post all this. If I'm lucky, I'll get a chance tomorrow to do some pics of an actual install. |
|
"Look wise, say nothing, and grunt. Speech was given to conceal thought."
- Sir William Osler - |
|
|
ARFCOM.....Time well wasted.
Originally Posted By red65: Ask youself: What organization do libtards hate the most? Answer: The NRA |
Originally Posted By TheGrayMan:
Originally Posted By echo6:
Excelent info. Thanks for taking the time to post all this. If I'm lucky, I'll get a chance tomorrow to do some pics of an actual install. Looking forward to it. I've been wanting to install a camera system on the exterior of the house for going on 2 years. Now the Crazy lady next door has bumped it to the top of my list and I'm hoping to get what I need to get the starts of a good system up within a week. edit to add While I'd much rather put together a custom PC based system, I really want to get something up quick as I have a feeling that things with the next door neighbor unfortunatly may escalate rather quickly. Care to offer an opinion on this system from super circuts? HD are not included, so I can add my own (up to 1TB) and the DVR has the ability to burn to DVD. Any input would be appreciated |
|
www.floridashootersnetwork.com
|
Originally Posted By echo6:
Originally Posted By TheGrayMan:
Originally Posted By echo6:
Excelent info. Thanks for taking the time to post all this. If I'm lucky, I'll get a chance tomorrow to do some pics of an actual install. Looking forward to it. I've been wanting to install a camera system on the exterior of the house for going on 2 years. Now the Crazy lady next door has bumped it to the top of my list and I'm hoping to get what I need to get the starts of a good system up within a week. edit to add While I'd much rather put together a custom PC based system, I really want to get something up quick as I have a feeling that things with the next door neighbor unfortunatly may escalate rather quickly. Care to offer an opinion on this system from super circuts? HD are not included, so I can add my own (up to 1TB) and the DVR has the ability to burn to DVD. Any input would be appreciated I'm not sure that system will give you exactly what you want. Having gone the embedded route myself once, I'm now a proponent of building your own PC-based DVR. Embedded DVRs aren't upgradable (except perhaps the drives, but some manufacturers don't even allow THAT), their performance is limited, and you can't really do much with the hardware (at least not without voiding your warranty). Those cameras are also pretty low-res. I don't see anything that says they're day/night, and their lux rating (low-light performance) could be better too. |
|
"Look wise, say nothing, and grunt. Speech was given to conceal thought."
- Sir William Osler - |
Originally Posted By TheGrayMan:
I'm not sure that system will give you exactly what you want. Having gone the embedded route myself once, I'm now a proponent of building your own PC-based DVR. Embedded DVRs aren't upgradable (except perhaps the drives, but some manufacturers don't even allow THAT), their performance is limited, and you can't really do much with the hardware (at least not without voiding your warranty). Those cameras are also pretty low-res. I don't see anything that says they're day/night, and their lux rating (low-light performance) could be better too. OK I'm convinced. I've got most of what I need to put another PC together already. Pretty sure all I need is a case, HD, and video card. I see you are a strong proponent of the Luxriot DVR software, but with the luxriot SW, what type of card do I use to input the feeds from the cameras? I went back over the thread this morning looking for that info, but I don't have much caffeine in me yet and might have missed it. If its here, just call me stupid and tell me to look again |
|
www.floridashootersnetwork.com
|
Originally Posted By echo6:
Originally Posted By TheGrayMan:
I'm not sure that system will give you exactly what you want. Having gone the embedded route myself once, I'm now a proponent of building your own PC-based DVR. Embedded DVRs aren't upgradable (except perhaps the drives, but some manufacturers don't even allow THAT), their performance is limited, and you can't really do much with the hardware (at least not without voiding your warranty). Those cameras are also pretty low-res. I don't see anything that says they're day/night, and their lux rating (low-light performance) could be better too. OK I'm convinced. I've got most of what I need to put another PC together already. Pretty sure all I need is a case, HD, and video card. I see you are a strong proponent of the Luxriot DVR software, but with the luxriot SW, what type of card do I use to input the feeds from the cameras? I went back over the thread this morning looking for that info, but I don't have much caffeine in me yet and might have missed it. If its here, just call me stupid and tell me to look again I'm not using any card-based encoders in my current setup. It's all-network, mostly Acti, Axis, and panasonic (cameras and video servers). With regards to card-based encoders, I think that's probably the weakest area for Luxriot. On Luxriot's webpage, there's a "supported" tab at the top, and under that tab is a "supported devices" field, which leads to a "video capture boards" field... a bit short IMO. Let me do a little research and get back to you. ETA: Comart seems to be the most economical solution for capture boards... but it looks like a lot of BT8x8 Conexant-based boards might work. You wouldn't know until you tried it, however. |
|
"Look wise, say nothing, and grunt. Speech was given to conceal thought."
- Sir William Osler - |
Let me do a little research and get back to you. No need I mistakenly assumed that was how you were getting the video into the PC system. I've been looking at the ACTi and Axis video servers online, but I'm having a hard time finding a reseller that lists their prices. Instead of researching the (inferior) card based systems, do you have a suggested reseller that lists prices on their websites? edit to add I've found some resellers with prices listed. I understand that if I am using analog cameras I need the server to convert the analog signal to digital, but what if I am using all digital / IP cameras in the system? All the ACTi and Axis video servers I'm finding seem to be set up to input an analog signal and output a digital signal to feed into a DVR. Am I missing a step in the process? How do Digital / IP cameras hook into the PC DVR box? Is it as simple as hooking them up to a router with cat 5 cable? |
|
www.floridashootersnetwork.com
|
Originally Posted By echo6:
Let me do a little research and get back to you. No need I mistakenly assumed that was how you were getting the video into the PC system. I've been looking at the ACTi and Axis video servers online, but I'm having a hard time finding a reseller that lists their prices. Instead of researching the (inferior) card based systems, do you have a suggested reseller that lists prices on their websites? edit to add I've found some resellers with prices listed. I understand that if I am using analog cameras I need the server to convert the analog signal to digital, but what if I am using all digital / IP cameras in the system? All the ACTi and Axis video servers I'm finding seem to be set up to input an analog signal and output a digital signal to feed into a DVR. Am I missing a step in the process? How do Digital / IP cameras hook into the PC DVR box? Is it as simple as hooking them up to a router with cat 5 cable? Yes. That's the beauty of IP cameras. The encoding is done "at the edge," and you simply hook them up to your network. Going with network cameras or video servers also gives you another option if your DVR/NVR craps out (or you decide not to use one). You can directly or remotely access the cameras or servers over the network and see the video via your browser (the Acti servers only support IE via an ActiveX plug-in, while the Axis servers support Firefox as well as IE... don't know if that's a big deal for you, but as a Linux user, I place some value on cross-platform compatibility). You don't have recording capability without the DVR/NVR, but you still have live video as long as the network is up. |
|
"Look wise, say nothing, and grunt. Speech was given to conceal thought."
- Sir William Osler - |
I'm currently trying to educate myself on Linux ( the last time writing code was familiar to me was in the late 80s using a Commodore 64C and writing in BASIC) so working with just windows is GTG.
Thanks again for the writeup, and for answering all my stupid questions |
|
www.floridashootersnetwork.com
|
Originally Posted By echo6:
I'm currently trying to educate myself on Linux ( the last time writing code was familiar to me was in the late 80s using a Commodore 64C and writing in BASIC) so working with just windos is GTG. Thanks again for the writeup, and for answering all my stupid questions Not a problem... and if you can set up an ethernet network (gigabit would be required for larger systems), you can do IP cameras. |
|
"Look wise, say nothing, and grunt. Speech was given to conceal thought."
- Sir William Osler - |
And for whatever it's worth, the camera servers have their own strengths and weaknesses too.
Take the Axis versus the Acti. Axis runs four analog cameras on the same server (they also make single-camera servers, but those aren't worth it IMHO)... and it does 720x480 (IIRC) at 30fps (MJPEG)... but that's 30 FPS split among the four cameras... so basically each camera gets 6-7FPS each. Now that's plenty for any application that I'd be doing, but may not be enough if you need 30FPS on each channel. It also runs as a java applet, quicktime, OR an ActiveX plug-in, so almost any browser can see the video stream. Acti is a single-camera server... but it does that single camera at 30FPS (and to be fair the Axis would too if you only had one camera attached). I'm pretty sure the Acti is also MPEG4 instead of MJPEG (slightly lower picture quality, but much smaller files). It's also ActiveX only... so you're locked in to IE. It's all a matter of what you really want. |
|
"Look wise, say nothing, and grunt. Speech was given to conceal thought."
- Sir William Osler - |
So would this Gigabit switch work, or would I need a managed switch?
|
|
www.floridashootersnetwork.com
|
A note on those troublesome IR emitter lamps.
A few days ago I hooked one up again and checked to see what effect the photocell in its side had. It turns them on and off with no delay. Also, I think putting a 2 watt resistor of a few ohms in series with the LED will reduce the heat it generates and extend its life -greatly. Plenty of room inside to do it. |
|
|
Ouch. I want to start of with at least four cameras, with the ability to add more over time. I was piecing together a system, then realized the cameras I was looking at were analog. Started pricing the IP cams and realized, well just ouch. Especially since the wife is suggesting we go get the package system at BrandsMart for $150
I'm back to looking at the video servers and going with analog cams. As the system grows ( I have a feeling this may end up being worse than BRD ) I can always upgrade as the prices come down and the system grows up |
|
www.floridashootersnetwork.com
|
I went with a managed gig-over-copper switch for the main network switch in my home, but you don't necessarily need to do that. That might change if you're running a bunch of megapixel cams. A single megapixel camera running at max resolution and 30FPS can eat up 8-10 megabits/sec of bandwidth on your switch. You could probably hang a half-dozen of those on a standard 100-megabit switch and not get drop-outs... but more than that would be pushing it. A switch like this would be a decent start, because you could attach 4 PoE (power-over-ethernet) cameras to the powered ports on that switch, then uplink that switch to a standard 100-megabit backbone. If you tried uplink 3-4 of those to the same 100-megabit backbone, youd saturate it, and you'd get drop-outs in your video. At that point, you'd want a gigabit switch as the backbone. |
|
"Look wise, say nothing, and grunt. Speech was given to conceal thought."
- Sir William Osler - |
Just hooked up a Panasonic bl-c131a - will be using this one as a baby monitor.
Doesn't like my WAP (when in wireless mode)... locks up after a few minutes if stations are logged in. Will test a few other types of WAPs I have to hopefully find one it plays nice with. Runs rock solid when wired though. Was very happy to discover it works on my iphone, the pan/tilt even works with a screen tap on the image. Thanks again for this thread TGM... tons of good info in here. |
|
|
Originally Posted By kallnojoy:
Just hooked up a Panasonic bl-c131a - will be using this one as a baby monitor. Doesn't like my WAP (when in wireless mode)... locks up after a few minutes if stations are logged in. Will test a few other types of WAPs I have to hopefully find one it plays nice with. Runs rock solid when wired though. Was very happy to discover it works on my iphone, the pan/tilt even works with a screen tap on the image. Thanks again for this thread TGM... tons of good info in here. I use some wireless too... it's hard not to love wireless, because it's so easy... but it just can't handle the throughput that cameras put out. Wireless is notoriously tempermental... it loses connection, gets knocked off-line, has to renew the IP... I have a love/hate relationship with wireless. |
|
"Look wise, say nothing, and grunt. Speech was given to conceal thought."
- Sir William Osler - |
Originally Posted By TheGrayMan:
And for whatever it's worth, the camera servers have their own strengths and weaknesses too. Take the Axis versus the Acti. Axis runs four analog cameras on the same server (they also make single-camera servers, but those aren't worth it IMHO)... and it does 720x480 (IIRC) at 30fps (MJPEG)... but that's 30 FPS split among the four cameras... so basically each camera gets 6-7FPS each. Now that's plenty for any application that I'd be doing, but may not be enough if you need 30FPS on each channel. It also runs as a java applet, quicktime, OR an ActiveX plug-in, so almost any browser can see the video stream. Acti is a single-camera server... but it does that single camera at 30FPS (and to be fair the Axis would too if you only had one camera attached). I'm pretty sure the Acti is also MPEG4 instead of MJPEG (slightly lower picture quality, but much smaller files). It's also ActiveX only... so you're locked in to IE. It's all a matter of what you really want. Axis video servers are the worst..... We have over 2000 of them in use and are working to replace them all as fast as we can. If you must have Axis go ahead and invest in atleast an iBoot from Dataprobe. |
|
|
Nice install. Crimp BNC connectors are alot easier to use than twist on. Just takes alittle practice. Also, you will get cleaner video with 24v AC cameras.
|
|
|
Nice install. Crimp BNC connectors are alot easier to use than twist on. Just takes alittle practice. Also, you will get cleaner video with 24v AC cameras.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By radio_jumper:
Originally Posted By TheGrayMan:
And for whatever it's worth, the camera servers have their own strengths and weaknesses too. Take the Axis versus the Acti. Axis runs four analog cameras on the same server (they also make single-camera servers, but those aren't worth it IMHO)... and it does 720x480 (IIRC) at 30fps (MJPEG)... but that's 30 FPS split among the four cameras... so basically each camera gets 6-7FPS each. Now that's plenty for any application that I'd be doing, but may not be enough if you need 30FPS on each channel. It also runs as a java applet, quicktime, OR an ActiveX plug-in, so almost any browser can see the video stream. Acti is a single-camera server... but it does that single camera at 30FPS (and to be fair the Axis would too if you only had one camera attached). I'm pretty sure the Acti is also MPEG4 instead of MJPEG (slightly lower picture quality, but much smaller files). It's also ActiveX only... so you're locked in to IE. It's all a matter of what you really want. Axis video servers are the worst..... We have over 2000 of them in use and are working to replace them all as fast as we can. If you must have Axis go ahead and invest in atleast an iBoot from Dataprobe. Never had a problem with them myself... certainly nothing that's ever required regular reboots (with the exception of updating the firmware). ETA: maybe when you've got 2000 of them deployed, you eventually run across a few problems. |
|
"Look wise, say nothing, and grunt. Speech was given to conceal thought."
- Sir William Osler - |
Any review on the Logitech one?
Logitech Cam I'm on low budget and would like something wireless, IR, and that also have the option to be recorded on PC by installing software and/or capture card. Thanks! |
|
|
Lots of great info here. Thanks to everyone for it.
|
|
Revenge is a dish best served cold!
|
Originally Posted By Eth01:
Any review on the Logitech one? Logitech Cam I'm on low budget and would like something wireless, IR, and that also have the option to be recorded on PC by installing software and/or capture card. Thanks! Hmm. They want almost 400 bones for that camera? Looks big/obvious, fixed lens, resolution is only VGA or QVGA (low), not wireless (you still have to run power to it), flimsy-looking mount, easy to redirect/vandalize, not day/night (only goes down to 2lux), and I'll bet you're restricted to using their software. I wouldn't do it. For about 5-600$ you could get an actual enterprise-grade megapixel dome camera, much more robust, with a vari-focal lens, better low-light (and actual day/night with an IR-cut filter), more vandal-resistant, and a choice of software (it comes with its own, but you can use others), and uses 1/3 the electricity (via PoE). Once you go megapixel, you'll never go back. ETA: Remember... you're comparing 640x480 to 1280x1024... it's roughly the difference between these two pictures: You have to pick what's right for you, and your budget... but I doubt that your night images with the Logitech will even be as good as the first of those two images. ETA: incidentally, that second image is taken from an ACTi-1231, which is the twin of the dome I linked above (same camera in a bullet-form-factor, rather than a dome). As far as budget megapixel cameras, ACTi ranks high on the value meter (you can easily spend a grand or more for higher-end multi-megapixel cams) |
|
"Look wise, say nothing, and grunt. Speech was given to conceal thought."
- Sir William Osler - |
Thanks for the reply!
Much appreciated! |
|
|
Reading the data sheet I see that frame rate at that high a resolution is reduced to 8fps.
Is this very noticeable? I realize we are not trying to make home movies here, but is it jerking like watching time lapse? |
|
"I heard that Stickman likes to walk through a fat camp while eating a double whopper....." Danielisright
|
Originally Posted By SandHillsHillbilly:
Reading the data sheet I see that frame rate at that high a resolution is reduced to 8fps. Is this very noticeable? I realize we are not trying to make home movies here, but is it jerking like watching time lapse? Not much. That's about as fast as I've got any of my cameras recording. Casinos and places like that use higher frame-rates, but that's for different reasons. Most people can't distinguish the difference between 15FPS and 30 FPS. |
|
"Look wise, say nothing, and grunt. Speech was given to conceal thought."
- Sir William Osler - |
interesting as always!
|
|
كافر
|
Nice update!!! Glad to see you including installation.
Those Paladin tools are some of the best you can get without being way over priced. It may or may not be within the scope of this thread, but since you are networking and doing the wiring, maybe include a pinout for those guys that do not know. They may get confused with the wiring standards used in networking. |
|
"I heard that Stickman likes to walk through a fat camp while eating a double whopper....." Danielisright
|
Originally Posted By crzywlf: Me too I keep a cheat sheet in my tool bag. I can go 4 months without needing it then all of sudden I am doing wiring jobs.Originally Posted By SandHillsHillbilly: Nice update!!! Glad to see you including installation. Those Paladin tools are some of the best you can get without being way over priced. It may or may not be within the scope of this thread, but since you are networking and doing the wiring, maybe include a pinout for those guys that do not know. They may get confused with the wiring standards used in networking. Hope this helps. I've done countless but never remember. http://www.mikestechblog.com/joomla/images/stories/CAT5_cable/cat5_straight_eia568a_cable.jpg Mind goes blank without use. |
|
"I heard that Stickman likes to walk through a fat camp while eating a double whopper....." Danielisright
|
More excellent information. I suppose the odds of you living in Minnesota are slim to none.... I got lots of ammo for bribery!
|
|
Proud Member of Ranstad's Militia
|
Originally Posted By SandHillsHillbilly:
Originally Posted By crzywlf:
Me too I keep a cheat sheet in my tool bag. I can go 4 months without needing it then all of sudden I am doing wiring jobs.
Originally Posted By SandHillsHillbilly:
Nice update!!! Glad to see you including installation. Those Paladin tools are some of the best you can get without being way over priced. It may or may not be within the scope of this thread, but since you are networking and doing the wiring, maybe include a pinout for those guys that do not know. They may get confused with the wiring standards used in networking. Hope this helps. I've done countless but never remember. http://www.mikestechblog.com/joomla/images/stories/CAT5_cable/cat5_straight_eia568a_cable.jpg Mind goes blank without use. Heh... That's OK. I can't pretend to be the Lord-of-the-Geeks on this one; I had to look it up too. Maybe subnet or one of those guys knows a mnemonic. |
|
"Look wise, say nothing, and grunt. Speech was given to conceal thought."
- Sir William Osler - |
Originally Posted By crzywlf:
Originally Posted By SandHillsHillbilly:
Nice update!!! Glad to see you including installation. Those Paladin tools are some of the best you can get without being way over priced. It may or may not be within the scope of this thread, but since you are networking and doing the wiring, maybe include a pinout for those guys that do not know. They may get confused with the wiring standards used in networking. Hope this helps. I've done countless but never remember. http://www.mikestechblog.com/joomla/images/stories/CAT5_cable/cat5_straight_eia568a_cable.jpg that is t568a most common in the US is t568b eta: and yes, it matters |
|
|
Originally Posted By _Matt_:
Originally Posted By crzywlf:
Originally Posted By SandHillsHillbilly:
Nice update!!! Glad to see you including installation. Those Paladin tools are some of the best you can get without being way over priced. It may or may not be within the scope of this thread, but since you are networking and doing the wiring, maybe include a pinout for those guys that do not know. They may get confused with the wiring standards used in networking. Hope this helps. I've done countless but never remember. http://www.mikestechblog.com/joomla/images/stories/CAT5_cable/cat5_straight_eia568a_cable.jpg that is t568a most common in the US is t568b eta: and yes, it matters sometimes Fixed it for you. I have wired it various ways and yes it matters in certain situations but not always. |
|
Germans know these things...
Cars, guns and beer. And every 50 years or so they can be expected to invade your country. Probably caused by a combination of cars, guns and beer. Sooner or later somebody is gonna call 'road trip' - Steyr Aug |
Originally Posted By crzywlf:
Originally Posted By _Matt_:
Originally Posted By crzywlf:
Originally Posted By SandHillsHillbilly:
Nice update!!! Glad to see you including installation. Those Paladin tools are some of the best you can get without being way over priced. It may or may not be within the scope of this thread, but since you are networking and doing the wiring, maybe include a pinout for those guys that do not know. They may get confused with the wiring standards used in networking. Hope this helps. I've done countless but never remember. http://www.mikestechblog.com/joomla/images/stories/CAT5_cable/cat5_straight_eia568a_cable.jpg that is t568a most common in the US is t568b eta: and yes, it matters sometimes Fixed it for you. I have wired it various ways and yes it matters in certain situations but not always. well, I was speaking more about what TheGrayMan did above with jumping into the middle of a network, but more correctly, if you want you are going from a switch to a computer, use the same on both ends. If you are going computer to computer, then use one end of each and yes, it doesnt matter which you choose, but just use t568b, the rest of the US does oh, and he used t568b |
|
|
Originally Posted By crzywlf:
Originally Posted By _Matt_:
Originally Posted By crzywlf:
Originally Posted By SandHillsHillbilly:
Nice update!!! Glad to see you including installation. Those Paladin tools are some of the best you can get without being way over priced. It may or may not be within the scope of this thread, but since you are networking and doing the wiring, maybe include a pinout for those guys that do not know. They may get confused with the wiring standards used in networking. Hope this helps. I've done countless but never remember. http://www.mikestechblog.com/joomla/images/stories/CAT5_cable/cat5_straight_eia568a_cable.jpg that is t568a most common in the US is t568b eta: and yes, it matters sometimes Fixed it for you. I have wired it various ways and yes it matters in certain situations but not always. There is a lot of info out there but I found this article pretty good: http://www.lanshack.com/make-cat5E.aspx There are also different ends for solid and stranded wire, and lots of minor details like that can bite you. Use the wrong ones and you can chase intermittent problems forever. |
|
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. - Albert Einstein
|
Originally Posted By _Matt_:
Originally Posted By crzywlf:
Originally Posted By _Matt_:
Originally Posted By crzywlf:
Originally Posted By SandHillsHillbilly:
Nice update!!! Glad to see you including installation. Those Paladin tools are some of the best you can get without being way over priced. It may or may not be within the scope of this thread, but since you are networking and doing the wiring, maybe include a pinout for those guys that do not know. They may get confused with the wiring standards used in networking. Hope this helps. I've done countless but never remember. http://www.mikestechblog.com/joomla/images/stories/CAT5_cable/cat5_straight_eia568a_cable.jpg that is t568a most common in the US is t568b eta: and yes, it matters sometimes Fixed it for you. I have wired it various ways and yes it matters in certain situations but not always. well, I was speaking more about what TheGrayMan did above with jumping into the middle of a network, but more correctly, if you want you are going from a switch to a computer, use the same on both ends. If you are going computer to computer, then use one end of each and yes, it doesnt matter which you choose, but just use t568b, the rest of the US does Yes because he is probably running gigabit. That is definitely an instance it matters. I've been doing this about 12 years and normally would use B I just grabbed that pic as an example. You should also test every cable you make but I doubt we always do that It's really the only way to guarantee you can support the speeds you want. |
|
Germans know these things...
Cars, guns and beer. And every 50 years or so they can be expected to invade your country. Probably caused by a combination of cars, guns and beer. Sooner or later somebody is gonna call 'road trip' - Steyr Aug |
Originally Posted By crzywlf:
Originally Posted By _Matt_:
Originally Posted By crzywlf:
Originally Posted By _Matt_:
Originally Posted By crzywlf:
Originally Posted By SandHillsHillbilly:
Nice update!!! Glad to see you including installation. Those Paladin tools are some of the best you can get without being way over priced. It may or may not be within the scope of this thread, but since you are networking and doing the wiring, maybe include a pinout for those guys that do not know. They may get confused with the wiring standards used in networking. Hope this helps. I've done countless but never remember. http://www.mikestechblog.com/joomla/images/stories/CAT5_cable/cat5_straight_eia568a_cable.jpg that is t568a most common in the US is t568b eta: and yes, it matters sometimes Fixed it for you. I have wired it various ways and yes it matters in certain situations but not always. well, I was speaking more about what TheGrayMan did above with jumping into the middle of a network, but more correctly, if you want you are going from a switch to a computer, use the same on both ends. If you are going computer to computer, then use one end of each and yes, it doesnt matter which you choose, but just use t568b, the rest of the US does Yes because he is probably running gigabit. That is definitely an instance it matters. I've been doing this about 12 years and normally would use B I just grabbed that pic as an example. You should also test every cable you make but I doubt we always do that It's really the only way to guarantee you can support the speeds you want. well, we are getting a little off topic, but you certainly can use t568a for gigabit- the only difference with gigabit (1000t) vs 10/100 is that gigabit uses all pairs to communicate, so a crossover cable is t568a(or b) with the other end all pairs switched, not just the orange and green pairs t568 is just colors, you can simply mix it down to what pins they go to |
|
|
That's actually a 100-megabit network. We're only putting in a handful of cameras, and maybe two of them are megapixel (and 1.3MP at that, not multi-megapixel). The existing 100M network should support it easily.
|
|
"Look wise, say nothing, and grunt. Speech was given to conceal thought."
- Sir William Osler - |
Originally Posted By TheGrayMan:
That's actually a 100-megabit network. We're only putting in a handful of cameras, and maybe two of them are megapixel (and 1.3MP at that, not multi-megapixel). The existing 100M network should support it easily. yeah, you should be fine, most offices are fine on 100, but gigabit is nice (for non camera stuff) hope you wired in cat5e at least (doesnt look like cat6) |
|
|
Originally Posted By _Matt_:
Originally Posted By TheGrayMan:
That's actually a 100-megabit network. We're only putting in a handful of cameras, and maybe two of them are megapixel (and 1.3MP at that, not multi-megapixel). The existing 100M network should support it easily. yeah, you should be fine, most offices are fine on 100, but gigabit is nice (for non camera stuff) hope you wired in cat5e at least (doesnt look like cat6) Yep. It's that bulk grey Belkin Cat5e that comes in the box. |
|
"Look wise, say nothing, and grunt. Speech was given to conceal thought."
- Sir William Osler - |
Originally Posted By _Matt_:
Originally Posted By TheGrayMan:
That's actually a 100-megabit network. We're only putting in a handful of cameras, and maybe two of them are megapixel (and 1.3MP at that, not multi-megapixel). The existing 100M network should support it easily. yeah, you should be fine, most offices are fine on 100, but gigabit is nice (for non camera stuff) hope you wired in cat5e at least (doesnt look like cat6) Yes it is. I went rack-mount and gigabit for my home... makes sending backup images to the main network storage array much faster, and allows my network cameras to communicate with the NVR and local/remote clients without breaking a sweat. Upgrade room is your friend. ETA: if I'm lucky, I'll be able to finish the install this weekend or early next week, and get the rest of the pictures up. |
|
"Look wise, say nothing, and grunt. Speech was given to conceal thought."
- Sir William Osler - |
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.