School me on Rick Santorum
What do I need to know about him????
I'm a member of the TEA Party here in upstate NY,
How does his politics mesh with the ideals of the TEA Party?
PS I've been to his website, watched some of the debates, but I want to know how the people who h represents feel about him.
He's got extremely solid conservative credentials.
The left would call him a member of the "religious right" and such.
––Fargo007
I'm not from the left and I'd call him a religious nutbag.
If you're cool with people who sleep with dead babies, he's your guy.
Originally Posted By SDMF_Rebel:
I'm not from the left and I'd call him a religious nutbag.
If you're cool with people who sleep with dead babies, he's your guy.
Would you clarify what you're talking about????
WTF is "sleeping with dead babies?"
EDIT just researched what your comment is all about...
What he does to say goodbye to his DEAD CHILD has nothing to do with how he would go about being president!
That was a CHEAP SHOT on someone in a darkest hour of their lives....WTF!
I agree that it was a cheap shot and classless; and I apologize if it offends anyone, but do a little research on this guy. He has said some baffling things regarding everything from child molestation, polygamy, to slavery. It's honestly very difficult to have any respect for the guy.
A man's religious views have a huge impact on what kind of president they would make, in my opinion.
Originally Posted By SDMF_Rebel:
I agree that it was a cheap shot and classless; and I apologize if it offends anyone, but do a little research on this guy. He has said some baffling things regarding everything from child molestation, polygamy, to slavery. It's honestly very difficult to have any respect for the guy.
A man's religious views have a huge impact on what kind of president they would make, in my opinion.
His actual record in congress is far more important than his personal views. The communists simply didn't want a conservative republican senator, so his religion was attacked.
While in office he was the go to guy for every lobbiest who wanted to buy influence. He ran "K" street for the Republican party in D. C. He also took PA state money to home school his kids while he had them enrolled in a local school near Washinton D. C. Very typical politicain.
just google "santorum."
it's not an accident that the first site is what it is.
IMHO...He is a solid conservative who did a good job while in office. He is was/is solidly 2A. Too bad he got caught up in the anti - GW wave and lost his seat when the sheeple voted in that wave of " Hope and Change" . By the way how is all that hope and change working for all you sheeple out there?
Now if you really want to see a bag of frothy feces that is the leftovers from anal sex take a look at his replacement Sen. casey. He votes solidly with nobama and despite what he says he is anti 2A. If the demoncratic party would tell him to step over his dead mother to fornicate with his sister he would set a new land speed record doing it. Santorum can`t win the nomination and certainly will not beat the illegal alien muslim socilist that is, unfortunately for us, presently living off the public dole in DC but Santorum`s record can stand for itself regardless of what kind of half truths and or lies that his detractors may accuse him of. Have a nice day and a Merry Christmas naz
Voted for the Patriot Act, in favor of the WOD, voted for medicare part D, more money for Amtrack, retroactive immunity for the telecoms who knowingly violated customer contracts...
Another big government statist douchebag.
Originally Posted By nazratt:
IMHO...He is a solid conservative who did a good job while in office. He is was/is solidly 2A. Too bad he got caught up in the anti - GW wave and lost his seat when the sheeple voted in that wave of " Hope and Change" . By the way how is all that hope and change working for all you sheeple out there?
Now if you really want to see a bag of frothy feces that is the leftovers from anal sex take a look at his replacement Sen. casey. He votes solidly with nobama and despite what he says he is anti 2A. If the demoncratic party would tell him to step over his dead mother to fornicate with his sister he would set a new land speed record doing it. Santorum can`t win the nomination and certainly will not beat the illegal alien muslim socilist that is, unfortunately for us, presently living off the public dole in DC but Santorum`s record can stand for itself regardless of what kind of half truths and or lies that his detractors may accuse him of. Have a nice day and a Merry Christmas naz
casey sucking doesn't mean that santorum didn't/doesn't also suck.
Originally Posted By whenheavenfell:
just google "santorum."
it's not an accident that the first site is what it is.
Fanatical gay activist Dan Savage and his mindless democrat party minions make sure it stays at the top of Google.
look at the rest of the links on the first page of results.
you give way too much credit to some writer.
Originally Posted By whenheavenfell:
look at the rest of the links on the first page of results.
you give way too much credit to some writer.
You went from the first link to the first few?

If you've got something to say, stop sending people on Google errands and say it yourself.
Wait, there are people that actually support Santorum? Huh, there is a surprise. :)
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
Originally Posted By whenheavenfell:
look at the rest of the links on the first page of results.
you give way too much credit to some writer.
You went from the first link to the first few?

If you've got something to say, stop sending people on Google errands and say it yourself.
wow. i can't tell if you're incredibly lazy, incredibly obtuse, or incredibly vapid.
i mean... what reason could i have possibly had for saying what i did? oh, aside from the SUPER OBVIOUS REASON.
would you like me to add red circles around the relevant material, too?
I would like you to think for yourself and not rely on the Gay Mafia to do your thinking for you.
I really don't know what message you're trying to convey as the only thing you've done is tell people to look at offensive web sites and make cryptic comments.
I find someone with the exact same moniker (and apparently banned there) posted about gay bars, and other "gay issues."
http://www.pazrt.com/forum/thread-gay-day-of-silence-a-waste-of-tax-dollars-critics-say?pid=7170#pid7170
Could this be the same person?
If so, it might background his position.
––Fargo007
yup, that's me.
ha. i must have been banned on pazrt after i left, anyway... which was right after andrew deleted half of the forum and claimed the site's about free speech.
don't know what you're talking about, regarding gay bars, though.
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
I would like you to think for yourself and not rely on the Gay Mafia to do your thinking for you.
...and you based either part on what, exactly? (think for self and gay mafia)
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
I really don't know what message you're trying to convey as the only thing you've done is tell people to look at offensive web sites and make cryptic comments. [/div][/div]
wow. i thought it was ridiculously obvious... the message was that santorum sucks so bad that his reputation is beyond wrecked, due to his own actions/big mouth. it's no accident that searching his name pulls up that shit.
edit: i guess you really did need me to highlight the relevant material in red, before posting the images.
and you criticized me for not thinking for myself? holy hypocrisy. need me to draw you a map?
Originally Posted By whenheavenfell:
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
I would like you to think for yourself and not rely on the Gay Mafia to do your thinking for you.
...and you based either part on what, exactly? (think for self and gay mafia)
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
I really don't know what message you're trying to convey as the only thing you've done is tell people to look at offensive web sites and make cryptic comments. [/div][/div]
wow. i thought it was ridiculously obvious... the message was that santorum sucks so bad that his reputation is beyond wrecked, due to his own actions/big mouth. it's no accident that searching his name pulls up that shit.
edit: i guess you really did need me to highlight the relevant material in red, before posting the images.
and you criticized me for not thinking for myself? holy hypocrisy. need me to draw you a map?
[div]
[/div]You're not thinking for yourself. You're pointing to agenda driven extreme left websites as some sort of "proof" that Santorum is unfit for office. Try looking at his actual record in congress. That takes work! It's much easier to insult people and act like a sarcastic SOB.
[div]
[/div]
[div]Now run along and see what Dan Savage wants you to say next
[div]
[/div][/div]
wow, you're as proficient with tags as you are with logic.
yup, i only hate santorum because of what some writer i know nothing about said, not because of his voting record and bigoted views/big mouth.
totally.
Originally Posted By whenheavenfell:
wow, you're as proficient with tags as you are with logic.
yup, i only hate santorum because of what some writer i know nothing about said, not because of his voting record and bigoted views/big mouth.
totally.
Is there a reason for your hostility?
"Logic" is listing Santorums voting record as proof of his suitability to hold the office he is seeking. You are not doing this.
"Not" "Logic" is pointing to vulgar web sites run by fanatical agenda-driven communists. This is what you are doing.
If I can further assist you in "how to act like an adult in public", just ask.
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
Is there a reason for your hostility?
...what hostility?
is there a reason why you keep attempting to put words in my mouth?
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
"Logic" is listing Santorums voting record as proof of his suitability to hold the office he is seeking. You are not doing this.
logic is knowing that he's a bigot, and another big govt neocon... based ON his voting record AND the bigoted crap he spewed.
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:"Not" "Logic" is pointing to vulgar web sites run by fanatical agenda-driven communists. This is what you are doing.
there you go, AGAIN.
i pointed to GOOGLE, genius. GOOGLE. DERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR. and communists? WTFLOLZ!
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:If I can further assist you in "how to act like an adult in public", just ask.
does it involve missing the obvious over and over, making baseless accusations, and other ways of cramming your feet into your mouth?
Originally Posted By whenheavenfell:
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
Is there a reason for your hostility?
...what hostility?
is there a reason why you keep attempting to put words in my mouth?
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
"Logic" is listing Santorums voting record as proof of his suitability to hold the office he is seeking. You are not doing this.
logic is knowing that he's a bigot, and another big govt neocon... based ON his voting record AND the bigoted crap he spewed.
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:"Not" "Logic" is pointing to vulgar web sites run by fanatical agenda-driven communists. This is what you are doing.
there you go, AGAIN.
i pointed to GOOGLE, genius. GOOGLE. DERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR. and communists? WTFLOLZ!
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:If I can further assist you in "how to act like an adult in public", just ask.
does it involve missing the obvious over and over, making baseless accusations, and other ways of cramming your feet into your mouth?
Please keep showing the world how immature you are.
Instead of doing a remarkably accurate imitation of an ass braying in a field, can you actually make a contribution by pointing to legislation that supports your position on Rick Santorum? You know, what he actually did. Can you show us that your not just another leftist who is incapable of thinking for himself and needs to rely on other people to tell him what to think? Can you do it?
holy irony/hypocrisy.
you made a bunch of stupid, baseless accusations... and i asked you to back up one thing you claimed. you failed to answer... and now hypocritically ask me to prove i'm not a leftist? umm...
genius, a few awesome things about his voting record WERE ALREADY MENTIONED IN THIS THREAD. perhaps you should *gasp* READ the thread?
you said i'm "pointing" to "offensive" sites, when all i said was to use google. how offensive.
you made commie accusations - with nothing to base it on.
you accused me of being immature, after you missed such an obvious point repeatedly, and then made an array of baseless and stupid accusations. how mature.
i mentioned his (shitty) voting record AND his bigotry - and you seem to think that i simply dislike santorum for no reason. USE YOUR BRAIN.
Originally Posted By whenheavenfell:
holy irony/hypocrisy.
you made a bunch of stupid, baseless accusations... and i asked you to back up one thing you claimed. you failed to answer... and now hypocritically ask me to prove i'm not a leftist? umm...
genius, a few awesome things about his voting record WERE ALREADY MENTIONED IN THIS THREAD. perhaps you should *gasp* READ the thread?
you said i'm "pointing" to "offensive" sites, when all i said was to use google. how offensive.
you made commie accusations - with nothing to base it on.
you accused me of being immature, after you missed such an obvious point repeatedly, and then made an array of baseless and stupid accusations. how mature.
i mentioned his (shitty) voting record AND his bigotry - and you seem to think that i simply dislike santorum for no reason. USE YOUR BRAIN.
Does your diaper need changing?
Without relying on Dan Savage to tell you what to think, list Rick Santorums fucking legislative history that backs up your hysterical screeching childish claims.
You can keep trying to evade the question by hurling insults and turning your own miserable failure as an adult toward me, but I'm going to keep asking you to provide evidence to support your claim.
I'm not going away, so put up or shut up.
congrats on your incredible hypocrisy.
i like how you failed to ever mention ONE positive thing about santorum, while making silly demands for negatives. in a thread where numerous negatives were already mentioned. including terrible things he voted for.
you never backed up your "gay mafia" or communist accusations with... anything. i guess you saying so is the only burden of proof for you...
you spoke of maturity, and then had the audacity to say "I'm not going away, so put up or shut up." ...just... wow.
Originally Posted By whenheavenfell:
congrats on your incredible hypocrisy.
i like how you failed to ever mention ONE positive thing about santorum, while making silly demands for negatives. in a thread where numerous negatives were already mentioned. including terrible things he voted for.
Are you up for some sort of dumbest post of the day award? You're the smartest guy in whatever room you enter, YOU list the legislative failures that condemn Rick Santorum. I told you I would keep asking.
you never backed up your "gay mafia" or communist accusations with... anything. i guess you saying so is the only burden of proof for you...
Are you claiming that the "gay" community, individuals and groups have NOT conspired to destroy Rick Santorum? That's "gay mafia".
you spoke of maturity, and then had the audacity to say "I'm not going away, so put up or shut up." ...just... wow.
What part of that confused you? You do this little insult routine to chase off anyone who questions you. It's a typical pattern for leftists. You rely on the fact that the people you are insulting are too polite to fire back at you so you "win" the argument. Are you claiming a mature person would allow you to shout them down?
So one more time. Using his actual voting record, list the reasons to not support Rick Santorum.
at least your hypocrisy is consistent.
zero backing of "gay mafia." zero evidence of any commie bs. zero positive reasons for santorum. as you demand FAR more evidence than you've ever provided... and evidence that's already on page one.
and now i'm a leftist? yet another baseless accusation. golly, you're smart. i'm in awe of your intellect.
"Using his actual voting record, list the reasons to not support Rick Santorum." - have you seriously not even read page ONE yet?
also, that's a fallacy. there's no reason to limit like/dislike solely on voting record, anyway (ie: you keep harping on his voting record. as if that wasn't covered... and as if it's the ONLY thing that matters. it's not). not that it matters, as his wasn't exactly good...
yay for big govt, police statist bigots!
Originally Posted By whenheavenfell:
at least your hypocrisy is consistent.
zero backing of "gay mafia." zero evidence of any commie bs. zero positive reasons for santorum. as you demand FAR more evidence than you've ever provided... and evidence that's already on page one.
Your singular contribution was telling people to go to a website whose idea was initiated and encouraged by those with a fanatical pro-homo agenda, and you're denying that there is a concerted effort in the gay community and their supporters to destroy Rick Santorum?
You haven't said a single thing that wasn't either an insult or a directive to go read someone elses thoughts

Are you not capable of forming an opinion based on facts and thinking for yourself?
and now i'm a leftist? yet another baseless accusation. golly, you're smart. i'm in awe of your intellect.
Your immediate use of insults, lack of any facts, and your hysterical rantings fit the typical leftist pattern.
"Using his actual voting record, list the reasons to not support Rick Santorum." - have you seriously not even read page ONE yet?
Yeah, we're back to "someone elses thoughts" again. That's another tactic trolls use- try to drag in a third party to take the heat off of you.
also, that's a fallacy. there's no reason to limit like/dislike solely on voting record,
What a silly remark. He's applying for a job. His resume is his performance at his previous jobs.
anyway (ie: you keep harping on his voting record.
I apologize for not allowing you to evade the subject.
as if that wasn't covered...
You have yet to cover it.
and as if it's the ONLY thing that matters. it's not).
We can move on to other reasons to like or dislike Rick Santorum after we cover the most important part- his legislative history.
not that it matters, as his wasn't exactly good...
You can't cite a single piece of legislation he authored or voted on, yet he " wasn't exactly good". Do you not see how incredibly asinine that sounds?
yay for big govt, police statist bigots!
Why do you believe Rick Santorum is a "bigot"? Has he authored or voted on any legislation that would support that claim?
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
Your singular contribution was telling people to go to a website whose idea was initiated and encouraged by those with a fanatical pro-homo agenda, and you're denying that there is a concerted effort in the gay community and their supporters to destroy Rick Santorum?
you idiot, i told people to go to GOOGLE. GOOGLE. THAT'S IT. JUST GOOGLE. show me where i said to go elsewhere. you can't. not a surprise, since you haven't backed up a single claim your big mouth made, so far. and gay community? you seriously think that shit was limited to gays?
the asshat doesn't believe in a right to privacy, because it's not explicitly stated in the constitution (9th amendment, much?). he seriously mentioned trying to make all sorts of consensual sex acts outlawed - regardless if the people are gay OR straight.
genius, READ PAGE ONE. there were 5 specific, TERRIBLE things mentioned that he voted for.
also, lolz @ you being such a hupocrite. you STILL never made ONE positive argument for the uberbigot.
Why do you believe Rick Santorum is a "bigot"?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAA.
i know, it's crazy, right? someone makes allllllllll sorts of fearmongering/hatemongering comments about gays and muslims, and people *gasp* get all crazy and think he's a bigot. it's ridiculous, right? why should he be held accountable for the things that his mouth did? this whole logic thing is mind-blowing. i blame wizards.
Originally Posted By whenheavenfell:
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
Your singular contribution was telling people to go to a website whose idea was initiated and encouraged by those with a fanatical pro-homo agenda, and you're denying that there is a concerted effort in the gay community and their supporters to destroy Rick Santorum?
you idiot,
Typical liberal.
i told people to go to GOOGLE. GOOGLE. THAT'S IT. JUST GOOGLE. show me where i said to go elsewhere. you can't.
Your first post directed people to look at the first site on Google which was a Dan Savage inspired ranting screed by Pro-gay fanatics.
not a surprise, since you haven't backed up a single claim your big mouth made, so far.
You're talking about your own failings, once again. You have yet to provide any evidence that Rick Santorum is unsuitable for higher office.
and gay community? you seriously think that shit was limited to gays?
I specifically included "and their supporters". Do you need assistance in the definitions of simple words?
the asshat doesn't believe in a right to privacy, because it's not explicitly stated in the constitution (9th amendment, much?). he seriously mentioned trying to make all sorts of consensual sex acts outlawed - regardless if the people are gay OR straight.
Can you cite Rick Santorm's legislative history supporting that claim?
genius, READ PAGE ONE. there were 5 specific, TERRIBLE things mentioned that he voted for.
You didn't cite any legislation that Rick Santorum either introduced or voted on. will you please stop allowing others to do your thinking for you?
also, lolz @ you being such a hupocrite. you STILL never made ONE positive argument for the uberbigot.
I asked you first.
Why do you believe Rick Santorum is a "bigot"?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAA.
i know, it's crazy, right? someone makes allllllllll sorts of fearmongering/hatemongering comments about gays and muslims,
What did Rick Santorum say? Can you cite examples?
and people *gasp* get all crazy and think he's a bigot.
The gay community and their leghumpers are certainly acting crazy over Rick Santorum. Your posts are a perfect example of loony toons.
it's ridiculous, right? .
Your behavior is certainly ridiculous
why should he be held accountable for the things that his mouth did? this whole logic thing is mind-blowing. i blame wizards.
Once again, let;s focus on his history in congress, and we can move on to his comments that were taken out of context by leftist fanatics.
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
Typical liberal.
typical idiot. way to run with baseless accusations.
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:Your first post directed people to look at the first site on Google which was a Dan Savage inspired ranting screed by Pro-gay fanatics.
for the 5th time, no. i only EVER directed people to google. hence, the screenshots... OF GOOGLE. DERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR. nothing else. ever.
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
You're talking about your own failings, once again. You have yet to provide any evidence that Rick Santorum is unsuitable for higher office.
lolz. i like how you hold yourself to zero burden of proof, while you hold others to a ridiculous burden of proof... that was established at the start of this thread. that you seem to keep pretending never happened.
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
I specifically included "and their supporters". Do you need assistance in the definitions of simple words?
so now "gay mafia" = anyone who believes in equality? yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah, ok. good luck proving that one. oh, wait... you don't try to prove anything.
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:Can you cite Rick Santorm's legislative history supporting that claim?
i like how you ask this over and over, instead of taking the 3 seconds to either look it up, yourself... or following through with your own standards and backing your claims. hint: i'd post what you asked if you ever answered a single question/backed up ONE accusation you made. you haven't. at all. still waiting to hear about the "gay mafia" and "communists."
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
You didn't cite any legislation that Rick Santorum either introduced or voted on. will you please stop allowing others to do your thinking for you?
so because someone else typed it, means that it either didn't happen or does not matter? so C/Ping the post would somehow make it relevant? no.
plus, i DID mention a few things. you just weren't competent enough to comprehend them, i guess.
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
I asked you first.
there's that maturity you spoke of, so much! what are you... 6?
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
What did Rick Santorum say? Can you cite examples?
in short, he said what you just responded to. crazy, right?! and yes, i can cite examples.
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
The gay community and their leghumpers are certainly acting crazy over Rick Santorum. Your posts are a perfect example of loony toons.
irony overload.
yes, your posts are the model of competency, sanity, and logic. baseless accusations followed by evasion, more baseless accusations, and demanding others to spoonfeed you - while you repeatedly run from your claims.
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
Your behavior is certainly ridiculous
i'm glad you're here to act as the hypocritical judge of behavior.
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
Once again, let;s focus on his history in congress, and we can move on to his comments that were taken out of context by leftist fanatics.
now they're out of context? hahahahahahaha.
as for his congressional history - what part of BIG GOVT POLICE STATIST did you not understand?
Originally Posted By whenheavenfell:
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
Typical liberal.
typical idiot. way to run with baseless accusations.
Did somone else tell you to say that or did you mange to think it up all on your lonesome?
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:Your first post directed people to look at the first site on Google which was a Dan Savage inspired ranting screed by Pro-gay fanatics.
for the 5th time, no. i only EVER directed people to google. hence, the screenshots... OF GOOGLE. DERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR. nothing else. ever..
"just google "santorum."
it's not an accident that the first site is what it is."
You wrote it. You own it.
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
You're talking about your own failings, once again. You have yet to provide any evidence that Rick Santorum is unsuitable for higher office.
lolz. i like how you hold yourself to zero burden of proof, while you hold others to a ridiculous burden of proof..
Asking for facts instead of third hand rantings from pro-gay websites is a "ridiculous burden of proof"? How fucking absurd you are.
... that was established at the start of this thread. that you seem to keep pretending never happened...
You never presented any evidence that Rick Santorum is good, bad, or whatever. You can keep telling yourself magical fairy tales but that doesn't change the fact that all you've done is tell people to look at gay web sites and insult me.
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
I specifically included "and their supporters". Do you need assistance in the definitions of simple words?
so now "gay mafia" = anyone who believes in equality? yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah, ok. good luck proving that one. oh, wait... you don't try to prove anything.
Question. Have you been drinking heavily for the past several days? There must be some excuse for your incoherant ramblings.
...
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:Can you cite Rick Santorm's legislative history supporting that claim?
i like how you ask this over and over, instead of taking the 3 seconds to either look it up, yourself...
I'm simply asking you to think for yourself and you're getting hysterical. What kind of pampered life have you led where you not only are incapable of thinking for yourself, but start screaming like a child throwing a tantrum at the very thought of it?
...
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
You didn't cite any legislation that Rick Santorum either introduced or voted on. will you please stop allowing others to do your thinking for you?
so because someone else typed it, means that it either didn't happen or does not matter? so C/Ping the post would somehow make it relevant? no?
I've already told you that I want you to think for yourself and not depend on others to think for you. That extends to other posters in addition to your lord and savior- Dan Szvage. who you directed people to in your first post. Write it yourself. Actual legislation. Stuff that actually happened. Facts. Those things you insult people for demanding.
... plus, i DID mention a few things. you just weren't competent enough to comprehend them, i guess.
You didn't. You scream nonsensical garbage. In your circle of Pabst Blue Ribbon- sister's pants wearing stooges that probably passes for deep thinking.
...
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
I asked you first.
there's that maturity you spoke of, so much! what are you... 6?
...
You insulted me for absolutely no reason. You do not get to dictate terms. You do not get change directions. I will continue to ask you to provide facts. Once that is done I will choose whether or not to indulge your nonsense. Do you understand?
...
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
What did Rick Santorum say? Can you cite examples?
in short, he said what you just responded to. crazy, right?! and yes, i can cite examples.
...
But, you're not citing examples. Which is the entire point to this exercise.
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
The gay community and their leghumpers are certainly acting crazy over Rick Santorum. Your posts are a perfect example of loony toons.
irony overload.
yes, your posts are the model of competency, sanity, and logic. baseless accusations followed by evasion, more baseless accusations, and demanding others to spoonfeed you - while you repeatedly run from your claims.
Does that whole "accuse others of doing exactly what you're doing" schtick actually work on anyone? Instead of these simple minded games you're playing, wouldn't it be easier to just start talking about legislation that Rick Santorum introduced, cosposored or voted on that proves your case?
Originally Posted By Joe_Pennsy:
Once again, let;s focus on his history in congress, and we can move on to his comments that were taken out of context by leftist fanatics.
now they're out of context? hahahahahahaha.
Oh yes, they will be. But first we're going to focus like a laser on Rick Santorums actual history in congress. Which you're evading.
as for his congressional history - what part of BIG GOVT POLICE STATIST did you not understand?
I have no idea what it means in regards to Rick Santorums history in congress as those four words tell me nothing about Rick Santorums history in congress. They're usually uttered by leftists masquerading as Paulistinians.
Did somone else tell you to say that or did you mange to think it up all on your lonesome?
did you pull that from your ass, or do you get your random accusations elsewhere?
"just google "santorum."
it's not an accident that the first site is what it is."
You wrote it. You own it.
exactly, you idiot. nothing in there says to go TO that site. it simply states that it's no accident. DERRRRRRRR. again, hence my OTHER comments about it. AND the screenshots. seriously, the screenshots OF GOOGLE, not the other sites, weren't making it clear enough? some of the top hits specifically mentioned his "google problem." it's not like i pasted them, or anything... OH, WAIT. I DID.
FACT: i said to google "santorum."
FACT: i said to visit google. no other sites. i never said to go to any of the sites that come up with that - and why would i? the headlines for them do more than enough.
FACT: you STILL never backed up a single accusation you've made.
FACT: you were dead wrong in this, yet you keep posting bullshit about it... that clearly refutes your stupid claims.
Asking for facts instead of third hand rantings from pro-gay websites is a "ridiculous burden of proof"? How fucking absurd you are.
...what pro-gay websites? WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? THE ONE AND ONLY WEBSITE I EVER MENTIONED HERE WAS GOOGLE.
You insulted me for absolutely no reason.
no, i insulted you WITH reason. with a logical, factually supported reason... that was even specifically mentioned, in the same line. way to add insult to IRONY.
You do not get to dictate terms.
learn logic. again, you seem to think that you have no burden of proof, whatsoever, while everyone else does. you are wrong.
You do not get change directions
...when have i ever done so? you're the one that's been evading the hell out of your own bullshit. you've been running from the "gay mafia" communists since you mentioned them.
I will continue to ask you to provide facts. Once that is done I will choose whether or not to indulge your nonsense. Do you understand?
i understand that you are an ignorant hypocrite of extraordinary magnitude.
But, you're not citing examples. Which is the entire point to this exercise.
you asked if i COULD cite examples. i CAN cite examples. yes, i' haven't. because they're obvious and you've failed to ever back up anything you said, so why should i? i already told you that i'd happily cite them if you simply backed up your claims. you haven't backed up one.
as for the rest, it's just more blah, blah, blah. hypocrisy, evasion, strawman.
still waiting for you to back ONE of the many stupid accusations you've made.
you won't. you can't. you're just an ignorant hypocrite.
the patriot act is awesome!
Originally Posted By whenheavenfell:
exactly, you idiot.
My god, what a weasel! You can't even take ownership of your own words! It's no wonder you cower in fear of actually posting an original thought that wasn't told to you by fanatical leftist Dan Savage. After this nonsense do you think a single person reading this will ever take you seriously? Your one and only reason for being here is to insult people. That is all you've done.
I've asked you repeatedly to post Rick Santorums history in congress to support your position. It' not difficult. Somewhere, Dan Savage has to have a list you can cut and paste.
You can't do it because nothing Rick Santorum has actually done as a congressman backs the ludicrous claims by the fanatical left.
whenheavendell clearly answered the OP's question: there is nothing wrong with Rick Santorum, the fanatical left just hates him because he's a conservative.
i can't take ownership of my words? wtf are you talking about? my words said to GOOGLE SANTORUM.
but i'm just a leftist gay mafia commie, right?
You stated:
just google "santorum."
it's not an accident that the first site is what it is.
It's crystal clear you were directing people to the first site, or at the very least implying that the first site holds some importance. Now, you're claiming you were just telling people to "use Google"

. You've pulled a lot of scumbag moves in this thread but this one takes the cake. There's simply no point is trying to discuss anything with you because you will just deny making statements, or claim the meaning is ludicrously different.
you have the reading comprehension of a drunken turtle.
i only ever said to google santorum. FACT. guess what that means? it means i encouraged people to type "santorum" into google's search bar and skim the first page of results. that's it. nothing more, nothing less. i even posted screenshots of said results - that was the point, genius! the screenshots said/did it all. notice, screenshots. not links. screenshots. not clickable. because the links didn't matter. it was the RESULT that mattered.
if i wanted to direct people to other sites, i would have linked the sites, you idiot. hence, why i posted the screenshots.
i can't believe i even needed to explain such amazingly obvious shit to someone. let alone, some logically-devoid ignoramus that's literally done nothing but make a laundry list of unfounded accusations.
better watch out, the gay mafia commies are gonna get you and make you gay or whatever it is that you're closet fearing!
Originally Posted By whenheavenfell:
you have the reading comprehension of a drunken turtle.
i only ever said to google santorum. FACT. guess what that means? it means i encouraged people to type "santorum" into google's search bar and skim the first page of results. that's it. nothing more, nothing less. i even posted screenshots of said results - that was the point, genius! the screenshots said/did it all. notice, screenshots. not links. screenshots. not clickable. because the links didn't matter. it was the RESULT that mattered.
if i wanted to direct people to other sites, i would have linked the sites, you idiot. hence, why i posted the screenshots.
i can't believe i even needed to explain such amazingly obvious shit to someone. let alone, some logically-devoid ignoramus that's literally done nothing but make a laundry list of unfounded accusations.
better watch out, the gay mafia commies are gonna get you and make you gay or whatever it is that you're closet fearing!
At least the drunken turtle didn't earn a week off,
whenheavenfell. There's absolutely
no excuse for this level of rudeness.
Email
WILSON@AR15.com with any questions.
Erik (WILSON)
Site staff
AR15.com LLC