Put a 92A1 on layaway...did I do the right thing?

I like the pistol all, but got to looking. I did not realize it is a 96 slide/frame? Also some of the internals are 90-TWO based, such as the recoil assembly. (Which the lifespan is how long I dunno but they are $60 from Beretta.)

Given the outlook on parts/compatibility of the 92 series, did I pick the right one, or should I go with an M9A1?

Just did not think that there would be a huge difference in parts/internals, and there seems to be some differences.

More or less just worried about getting the parts stockpiled in case of breakage.

Any Beretta users have some insight?

I have a 92A1, would have preferred the M9A1 but it was more of an impulse purchase.

My M9 has a squared off trigger guard, versus the 92A1's rounded one. I assumed that was a difference between M9 and 92 models.

I would be interested in what others have to say, since I havent really researched it much myself.

You don't need to worry for awhile about replacement parts.

The recoil spring assy. can be replaced with a standard rod and spring. What needs to be retained is the metal ring on the end of the assy. from the stock unit. That ring must stay inside the frame recoil rod hole. This way, standard 92 recoil springs and rods will work.

All the parts inside are standard 92 parts. The difference is the take down lever automatically pops back up when the slide is put back on.

The 92A1 has a recoil buffer inside which will increase it's life above the standard 92. Beretta stopped making the 96FS because of breakage but reintroduced it in the A1 series which should tell you something as far as strength goes.

It takes any 92 magazines.

The sights for the 90-Two fit on the 92A1.

The disassembly lever automatically pops back up when you put the slide on.

Stop worrying, it's a great firearm.

Watch this video: [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLMK-E5p8ZQ[/youtube]

I have a standard 92 rod/spring, Trijicon night sights, 92 all metal trigger, D spring, INS trigger spring and older panel type Crimson Trace grips. This is my current HD pistol with a TLR-1 attached.



As far as M9A1 and 92A1 differences go, the M9 has front and back strap checkering vs. the 92 serrations. The 92 has a recoil buffer, the M9 does not. The M9 has one slot on the rail, the 92 has two. The M9 has a flat trigger guard on the front, the 92's is round. 92 has removable front sight, M9 does not. There may be more differences I'm forgetting but these are off the top of my head.

Bottom line, the 92A1 has more going for it.

You should replace the recoil spring every 3-5k rounds. However, you CAN use a regular 92FS guide rod if you buy the washer piece separately that must be put on the end of it to make it fit the 92A1... The piece is like $4 at Brownells...

And, there is a place that makes an all metal, captive 92A1 guiderod. You can take that apart and change the spring whenever you want. It is only $25.

I am on my iPod, but you can find it on a goggle search...

I have two 92A1s. Great gun!

Here we are:

http://guiderod.com/specialorders.html

Its actually $40 + shipping. But after that, you can just use the $3-$4 factory springs

You did the right thing! The 92A1 is an incredible pistol. It is, in my opinion, an improvement upon the 92FS. It's my favorite pistol they make.

After reading all of this, I am not too worried then. I thought the 92A1 was based off the 96 frame/slide with only minimal compatibility with the M9.

Since that is NOT the case, I am good to go. I am thinking about buying a second one whe nI pick this one up in a few weeks.

2 is 1 and all that.

Sho nuff :)

M9 on top and 92A1 on bottom right?

No, those are both A1's Id say.

I bought one when they first came out and love it. Its by far my favorite full sized pistol. Ive never had an issue or malfunction with it. Im using a D spring, extended mag release, and a Brigidier rear sight. Other than that, ive left it alone. I guess i should also mention that its my favorite host for my suppressor too.

yes, they are BOTh 92A1s...

Here is my pair of M9A1s...

Based on the above pictures, it appears that there is a negliable difference between the 92A1 and the M9A1. All I noticed was the shape of the trigger guard and perhaps the markings distinguishing the two. Am I missing something?

Edit: Nevermind....differences are detailed above.

Copyright © 1996 - 2013 :: AR15.Com LLC :: All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.