Osprey Carbine Piston on a 607 retro
First would it fit under the triangular hand guard ? Second would it insure a more reliable platform ? Third would I have have a larger gas hole on the barrel for it to run flawlessly ? Please if anyone is experienced with this platform chime in.
Are you having reliability problems?
There is nothing wrong with direct gas impingement.
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Originally Posted By EdgecrusherXES_45:
Are you having reliability problems?
Actually haven't built it yet, was inquiring because between the cost of a slick side bolt carrier and some other stuff would it would cost a little bit more for an Osprey Carbine Piston set up and was wondering if it was even worth doing.

If you actually have a 607 I would NOT destroy it's value by altering it.
Get a piston if you really want a piston. You won't be improving reliability or function.
Outside of a a very small minority (SBR and supressors) the DI gas is all you need (its been around for 50 years now). I've dabbled with the gas pistons and am unconvinced that anyone really needs it.
If the idea is that "I'll get a gas piston to make my rifle failure-proof.." then this is a mistaken concept. Bad ammo, magazines and other parts will fail your rifle whether
piston or DI.
As for ease of maintenance I have found a love for plated bolt carrier group like nickel boron or MP3. Being able to simply wipe off carbon is like...a god-send!
Agreed...all good points.
I got a couple of piston ARs just to try them out...they are nice to clean (or not have to) but I wouldn't say they are any more reliable than good old DI.
Google "Filthy 14"; she has an impressive performance record that any piston would be hard pressed to match/surpass.
Originally Posted By SandWMandP15Tee:
Second would it insure a more reliable platform?
no, unless f/a +sbr
please don't dick w/ the 607
Topic Moved
The Osprey system won't fit under M16A2 handguards so I doubt it will fit under A1 triangular handguards.
The Osprey system does not modify the rifle in any permanent way so installation is not "dicking" with it. Watch their video, it's that simple.
–– Chuck
Originally Posted By Stan08:
Outside of a a very small minority (SBR and supressors) the DI gas is all you need (its been around for 50 years now). I've dabbled with the gas pistons and am unconvinced that anyone really needs it.
If the idea is that "I'll get a gas piston to make my rifle failure-proof.." then this is a mistaken concept. Bad ammo, magazines and other parts will fail your rifle whether
piston or DI.
As for ease of maintenance I have found a love for plated bolt carrier group like nickel boron or MP3. Being able to simply wipe off carbon is like...a god-send!
Stan, in the interest of fairness I currently have a complete FailZero nickel boron BCG as well as having had chrome bolts/BCG's in the past. While they
do make cleaning easier that baked on carbon doesn't just "simply wipe off". There
is a little elbow grease required, albeit less than parked ones. Something about those high firing temps bakes that shit to *nearly* impervious to just about any solvent, US cleaner, or plating technology. I have long been in search of the ultimate cleaning tool/solvent/plating and haven't found it yet. Some do indeed make for less work but
nothing just makes it "wipe off" completely.
One thing I'll say about chrome or nickel boron BCG's is that you can
see the carbon and where you need to get to. Kinda like those little red pills you chewed as a kid to show up the spots you missed while brushing your teeth!
Originally Posted By Chuck:
The Osprey system won't fit under M16A2 handguards so I doubt it will fit under A1 triangular handguards.
The Osprey system does not modify the rifle in any permanent way so installation is not "dicking" with it. Watch their video, it's that simple.
–– Chuck
Actually, Chuck, there is a way to modify triangular A1 handguards. The guy at Osprey explained it over the phone to me some time ago when I was contemplating it (never did). Unfortunately I don't remember exactly what had to be done. A quick call to Osprey should answer it though.
Let me begin by STATING THIS IS A RETRO BUILD. That is all.
Originally Posted By SandWMandP15Tee:
Let me begin by STATING THIS IS A RETRO BUILD. That is all.
No, it's not.
Originally Posted By 103:
Originally Posted By SandWMandP15Tee:
Let me begin by STATING THIS IS A RETRO BUILD. That is all.
No, it's not.
I'm thinking WHY NOT, CAUSE YOU WON'T SEE THE PISTON UNDER THE HANDGUARD. GUESS I CAN't BUILD IT.