Archived Posts » 59,789,155
Geez guys, I know times are tough but.......
2/6/2009 2:51:49 PM
2/6/2009 3:05:34 PM
LOL!!! Gotta love it 
2/6/2009 3:07:51 PM
Recent postal increase probably .... but I do have to say .... I hope that's yall's discrete mailer!
2/6/2009 3:10:06 PM
lol- gotta love the post office not knowing their own rate guidelines.
Give me your address and I'll get a check out to you.
Or you can explain to your mail carrier that the envelope you received only requires a $.42 stamp since it's less than an ounce and is less than .25" thick.
ETA: I'm confused- there isn't even a $.62 option listed for ANY first class mail: http://www.usps.com/prices/first-class-mail-prices.htm
Ask them to contact me and explain where they came up with their $.20 deficit. Is it part of the new administration's plan to tax envelopes with images of firearms on them?
Give me your address and I'll get a check out to you.
Or you can explain to your mail carrier that the envelope you received only requires a $.42 stamp since it's less than an ounce and is less than .25" thick.
ETA: I'm confused- there isn't even a $.62 option listed for ANY first class mail: http://www.usps.com/prices/first-class-mail-prices.htm
Ask them to contact me and explain where they came up with their $.20 deficit. Is it part of the new administration's plan to tax envelopes with images of firearms on them?
2/6/2009 3:25:42 PM
It's the "Rochester hates everyone" surcharge.
2/6/2009 3:26:20 PM
They could afford the postage if you stopped mailing in box tops and Green Stamps Grandpa!
2/6/2009 5:56:30 PM
Originally Posted By Aimless:
They could afford the postage if you stopped mailing in box tops and Green Stamps Grandpa!
They could afford the postage if you stopped mailing in box tops and Green Stamps Grandpa!
Get off my lawn.
2/9/2009 4:39:09 PM
Originally Posted By JLA:
lol- gotta love the post office not knowing their own rate guidelines.
Give me your address and I'll get a check out to you.
Or you can explain to your mail carrier that the envelope you received only requires a $.42 stamp since it's less than an ounce and is less than .25" thick.
ETA: I'm confused- there isn't even a $.62 option listed for ANY first class mail: http://www.usps.com/prices/first-class-mail-prices.htm
Ask them to contact me and explain where they came up with their $.20 deficit. Is it part of the new administration's plan to tax envelopes with images of firearms on them?
lol- gotta love the post office not knowing their own rate guidelines.
Give me your address and I'll get a check out to you.
Or you can explain to your mail carrier that the envelope you received only requires a $.42 stamp since it's less than an ounce and is less than .25" thick.
ETA: I'm confused- there isn't even a $.62 option listed for ANY first class mail: http://www.usps.com/prices/first-class-mail-prices.htm
Ask them to contact me and explain where they came up with their $.20 deficit. Is it part of the new administration's plan to tax envelopes with images of firearms on them?
I quizzed the carrier today and she said (and I quote) - "was not a machinable piece of mail"...
life goes on
