AR15.Com Archives
 Nics denied me today?.
SoMiss1  [Member]
1/3/2012 9:25:42 PM
NY resident but Mississippi native home for holidays. Had a spikes lower shipped in in to Mississippi todayat a local shop. They called in and I was denied transfer because I am out of state and lower was classified as other and "could" be built into pistol.
Wtf?
What a pain.
I thought that at lower was classifies as long gun. Shop says other / receiver. Any feedback?
mak0  [Team Member]
1/3/2012 9:28:39 PM
Receiver is "other" on the 4473, you can only buy them from dealers in your state of residence.
KV  [Team Member]
1/3/2012 9:29:10 PM
A stripped lower is classified as "other".
This can only be purchased in your state of residence.
SoMiss1  [Member]
1/3/2012 9:34:07 PM
Thanks.
I'll have it shipped to my dealer in ny. That blows as I had all other parts here to assemble.
Casper507  [Member]
1/3/2012 11:31:27 PM
It does seem a little unreasonable since according to my local dealer you have to declare when picking it up what it is going to be made into.......
JAD  [Team Member]
1/4/2012 12:07:40 AM
Originally Posted By Casper507:
It does seem a little unreasonable since according to my local dealer you have to declare when picking it up what it is going to be made into.......


Not in about 4 years. For a long time, ATF policy was that the 4473 should reflect the intended use of the virgin receiver. However, the interpretation was corrected in 2008 to reflect the reality that a receiver (and a wide array of other firearms) are neither handguns nor rifles/ shotguns as defined- hence the inclusion of the 'other' catagory on the 4473.

Even if the receiver could only be made into a rifle- either because of practice realities (e.g. parts availability) or legal encumbrances (e.g. it is from a parted out rifle, that was not originally a pistol) it is still an other.

They called in and I was denied transfer because I am out of state and lower was classified as other and "could" be built into pistol.
Wtf?
What a pain.


They shouldn't have wasted their time calling it in- they should have known you would be denied as a non-resident.
Bubbles  [Team Member]
1/4/2012 10:30:52 AM
Originally Posted By JAD:
They shouldn't have wasted their time calling it in- they should have known you would be denied as a non-resident.

This. FFL's should be very well aware by now that 'Other' firearms are not transferable to non-residents.

The way the 1968 Gun Control Act reads, a firearm can not be transferred at all from a dealer to a non-resident, and then the law makes the sole exemption for long guns. A lower receiver is not a long gun or a handgun, it is an Other firearm.
amaixner  [Member]
1/4/2012 6:00:55 PM
Would attaching a stock make the issue go away, since it would then be a rifle?
DogtownTom  [Team Member]
1/4/2012 6:11:09 PM
Originally Posted By amaixner:
Would attaching a stock make the issue go away, since it would then be a rifle?


No.
A rifle has both a barrel and a buttstock..........attaching a buttstock to a lower makes it a lower with a buttstock, not a rifle.
Bubbles  [Team Member]
1/5/2012 9:04:04 AM
Originally Posted By DogtownTom:
Originally Posted By amaixner:
Would attaching a stock make the issue go away, since it would then be a rifle?

No.
A rifle has both a barrel and a buttstock..........attaching a buttstock to a lower makes it a lower with a buttstock, not a rifle.

The FFL also needs to be licensed as a manufacturer and not a dealer, as the gun would have come into his books as a receiver and then go out as a rifle.
amaixner  [Member]
1/5/2012 10:19:29 AM
Originally Posted By DogtownTom:
Originally Posted By amaixner:
Would attaching a stock make the issue go away, since it would then be a rifle?


No.
A rifle has both a barrel and a buttstock..........attaching a buttstock to a lower makes it a lower with a buttstock, not a rifle.


OK. So if someone buys a complete lower, with stock, it would be categorized as a title 1 firearm, and they could then remove the stock and build a handgun? Or are there even more convoluted ATF policies that screw that up also?
bodybagger  [Member]
1/5/2012 1:23:13 PM
Originally Posted By amaixner:
Originally Posted By DogtownTom:
Originally Posted By amaixner:
Would attaching a stock make the issue go away, since it would then be a rifle?


No.
A rifle has both a barrel and a buttstock..........attaching a buttstock to a lower makes it a lower with a buttstock, not a rifle.


OK. So if someone buys a complete lower, with stock, it would be categorized as a title 1 firearm, and they could then remove the stock and build a handgun? Or are there even more convoluted ATF policies that screw that up also?


Once a rifle, always a rifle but you can get an AR pistol, put(in this exact order)a rifle upper on it. Then put a stock on it and you are legal. to go back to a pistol, Remove the stock first, then the rifle upper. Perfect sense isn't it
AASG  [Member]
1/14/2012 12:08:32 AM
Can't you also only buy a long gun in neighboring states?
mak0  [Team Member]
1/14/2012 12:50:53 PM
Originally Posted By AASG:
Can't you also only buy a long gun in neighboring states?


State laws may vary, but under federal law you can buy a long gun in any state.
spqrzilla  [Member]
1/14/2012 6:19:26 PM
Originally Posted By AASG:
Can't you also only buy a long gun in neighboring states?


That was the original law post '68 GCA, but it was amended some time ago. Now you can buy a long gun from an FFL in any state so long as both state laws permit it.

SoMiss1  [Team Member]
1/14/2012 6:28:54 PM
Picked up the lower in Home State yesterday. built it last night! All is well.
Glad they saved me from buying in it Mississippi and taking it to NY.. HAHA