Archived Posts » 59,672,804
Ron Paul And Rick Perry Should have a baby
1/4/2012 9:20:28 AM
Yeah I said it! First don't jump down my throat about how thats physically impossible cause I saw the movie Twins so I know its possible.
This would allow us to have Ron Paul's stong state side policies which would bring a more balanced budget, end the Fed, and bring us back to a more constitutionally strong country.
We would also have Rick Perry's stong Foreign poliy, close the boarder, and strengthen, and contain the problems in the middle east.
Little Ron Perry could pull us out of the Defect and repeal Obamacare. Who's with me?
(This is written as Satire; I did pass High School health class (not that means much) and I know two men can't have a baby nor should they try)
This would allow us to have Ron Paul's stong state side policies which would bring a more balanced budget, end the Fed, and bring us back to a more constitutionally strong country.
We would also have Rick Perry's stong Foreign poliy, close the boarder, and strengthen, and contain the problems in the middle east.
Little Ron Perry could pull us out of the Defect and repeal Obamacare. Who's with me?
(This is written as Satire; I did pass High School health class (not that means much) and I know two men can't have a baby nor should they try)
1/4/2012 10:07:16 AM
Even if this were possible. Rick Santorum would never allow it... 
1/4/2012 12:57:40 PM
Small domestic government and big government overseas are diametrically opposed philosophies. What you are saying is that you want a hypocrite for a candidate, so take heart you have a plethora of choices other than Ron Paul.
1/4/2012 1:17:09 PM
Since when does Rick Perry want to close the border? He's always been very soft on illegals from what I've seen. Maybe it's not apparent to you out in NYC, but it sure as hell is here in Arizona.
And RP talks a good story, but you do realize that most of his reforms he can't do without congressional approval and he's not going to get it.
The POTUS isn't King, something which a lot of you seem to forget. Without their party in power in Congress there's not much they can do. And even with their party in power in Congress they're still going to be blocked if they start doing stupid shit.
1/5/2012 8:47:40 AM
Originally Posted By Andrew120806:
(This is written as Satire; I did pass High School health class (not that means much) and I know two men can't have a baby nor should they try)
(This is written as Satire; I did pass High School health class (not that means much) and I know two men can't have a baby nor should they try)
No, they definitely shouldn't.
But Ron Paul could attempt to have a baby on his own, if he'd just go fuck himself.
And that's not satire, I mean that literally.
1/7/2012 7:13:18 PM
Originally Posted By SWATH:
Small domestic government and big government overseas are diametrically opposed philosophies. What you are saying is that you want a hypocrite for a candidate, so take heart you have a plethora of choices other than Ron Paul.
Small domestic government and big government overseas are diametrically opposed philosophies. What you are saying is that you want a hypocrite for a candidate, so take heart you have a plethora of choices other than Ron Paul.
Yeah, but at least the other candidates would know who wrote their newsletters for 10 years.
1/7/2012 9:17:31 PM
Originally Posted By ProCCW:
Yeah, but at least the other candidates would know who wrote their newsletters for 10 years.
Originally Posted By SWATH:
Small domestic government and big government overseas are diametrically opposed philosophies. What you are saying is that you want a hypocrite for a candidate, so take heart you have a plethora of choices other than Ron Paul.
Small domestic government and big government overseas are diametrically opposed philosophies. What you are saying is that you want a hypocrite for a candidate, so take heart you have a plethora of choices other than Ron Paul.
Yeah, but at least the other candidates would know who wrote their newsletters for 10 years.
Objection, irrelevant.
1/7/2012 9:20:59 PM
Originally Posted By SWATH:
Objection, irrelevant.
Originally Posted By ProCCW:
Yeah, but at least the other candidates would know who wrote their newsletters for 10 years.
Originally Posted By SWATH:
Small domestic government and big government overseas are diametrically opposed philosophies. What you are saying is that you want a hypocrite for a candidate, so take heart you have a plethora of choices other than Ron Paul.
Small domestic government and big government overseas are diametrically opposed philosophies. What you are saying is that you want a hypocrite for a candidate, so take heart you have a plethora of choices other than Ron Paul.
Yeah, but at least the other candidates would know who wrote their newsletters for 10 years.
Objection, irrelevant.
I think the voters will determine that, don't you?
Or maybe we're too dumb to see Dr. Paul's greatness.
1/8/2012 10:18:49 AM
IM VOTING RICK PERREY CAUSE EVEN THOUGH HE WASNT BORN IN US SO WAS OBAMA AND I THINK THAT MAKES BETTER PRESIDINTS AND TROOPS IN IRAQ IS GOOD WE NEED TO STOP PEOPLE WHO ATTACKED NEW YORK
1/8/2012 11:00:50 AM
Originally Posted By ProCCW:
I think the voters will determine that, don't you?
Or maybe we're too dumb to see Dr. Paul's greatness.
I think the voters will determine that, don't you?
Or maybe we're too dumb to see Dr. Paul's greatness.
The voters might determine it. They might not.
If the public didn't have a distorted view of the stances that Ron Paul has, things would be drastically different.
1/8/2012 11:32:05 AM
Originally Posted By MaverickH1:
The voters might determine it. They might not.
If the public didn't have a distorted view of the stances that Ron Paul has, things would be drastically different.
Originally Posted By ProCCW:
I think the voters will determine that, don't you?
Or maybe we're too dumb to see Dr. Paul's greatness.
I think the voters will determine that, don't you?
Or maybe we're too dumb to see Dr. Paul's greatness.
The voters might determine it. They might not.
If the public didn't have a distorted view of the stances that Ron Paul has, things would be drastically different.
You mean distorted like Dr. Paul's newsletters that he collected monetary gain from which he has no recollection of participating in.
Would you like me post some of it for you to defend?
1/8/2012 11:35:53 AM
Originally Posted By ProCCW:
You mean distorted like Dr. Paul's newsletters that he collected monetary gain from which he has no recollection of participating in.
Would you like me post some of it for you to defend?
You mean distorted like Dr. Paul's newsletters that he collected monetary gain from which he has no recollection of participating in.
Would you like me post some of it for you to defend?
Precisely. Exactly like that. Thanks for the example.
1/8/2012 12:32:13 PM
This post is a classic example of how conservatives are intellectually schizophrenic. You fail to see the enormous connection between massive military spending and massive domestic spending. You do not understand that war has historically lead to increases in the power and size of government.
1/8/2012 12:39:59 PM
Originally Posted By Xanatos903:
IM VOTING RICK PERREY CAUSE EVEN THOUGH HE WASNT BORN IN US SO WAS OBAMA AND I THINK THAT MAKES BETTER PRESIDINTS AND TROOPS IN IRAQ IS GOOD WE NEED TO STOP PEOPLE WHO ATTACKED NEW YORK
IM VOTING RICK PERREY CAUSE EVEN THOUGH HE WASNT BORN IN US SO WAS OBAMA AND I THINK THAT MAKES BETTER PRESIDINTS AND TROOPS IN IRAQ IS GOOD WE NEED TO STOP PEOPLE WHO ATTACKED NEW YORK
