I liked the article, at least the text, by Pat Rogers. The two pictures of the HK16 however, were distracting and out of place. They were presumably put there to support the article as good/wise choice examples but horribly fail in that regard. Come on guys, no rear sight? A scope he drops the dime on? At least the caption of the M16A4 picture matches up with the article. As I came to the end of the last page the final picture was so out of place with what I was reading that I burst out laughing. Whoever added that picture obviously didnít read the article or was making fun of it.